DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3868

Will Home Schooling Takeover in Nigeria?

0

Nigeria has experienced several economic downturns over the past few months of 2023. The rise in cost of commodities, the depletion of the national foreign reserve, inflation, decline in the purchasing power of citizens, rise in cost of petroleum amongst others. Likewise has this downturn affected every sector of the economy. One of these is the educational sector.

Nigeria used to be a country where education was cheap and affordable for the common man. I remember when my father told me before he passed on, the highest money he ever paid in school was N150, today you could barely obtain a loaf of bread for that same amount in the country.

Despite the deteriorating conditions of our economy, the education sector has not been hit with a tsunami such as this. Due to some factions between the government and public schools, sponsorship and support for public schools have been a hurdle yet to overcome hence the schools need a means to finance all the bills required to keep the system running. Cost of tuition fee in some universities have doubled, others tripled to unexpected levels, beyond the average margin affordable by a middle earning family.

Worsening the case, the price of petrol has also tripled its pump price which was between N198 to N210 as of April 2023. Now a litre sells for an average of N620. As the price of petrol skyrockets, so do other commodities. Transportation, the cost of running generators for businesses (as the country has no reliable power supply), factories all depend heavily on petrol to keep their businesses running.

As conditions keep degrading, students have began dropping out of school. Earlier this year, I noted some students which I regularly see in school no longer cross my path. So as I made a little inquiry into their condition. I got to discover they dropped out of school due to lack of finance to sponsor their education. It is no strange that things have taken turns this way. As parents become unable to sponsor their children to school, we will continue to see more students drop out of school. This behavior will have a devastating ripple effect on our economy. But is this the way forward?

Western countries have adapted several ways of schooling their children. One of such ways is homeschooling. Home schooling is a type of education where students get to take their classes at home either guided by their parents or a dedicated tutor. This in some jurisdictions usually has a laid down curriculum to follow. This method of schooling has been quite effective in the west as so many people have come out to testify how they found out they were far better than their mates who schooled in public schools when they moved to college. This method of schooling reduces the expenses which parents are mandated to pay when they enroll their children into public schools; reduced tuition fees, bus levy and other miscellaneous required to keep the school running.

Considering this approach of schooling, it will be economical to pursue in order to adapt to the current economic conditions of our country. Though home lessons have been here for over a decade, home schooling has not. If the current system is to be adjusted to accommodate home schooling in the education sector for the development of the economy, then it is wise to consider.

Luno halting some of its Services ahead of new FCA Rules in UK

0

Luno, a cryptocurrency exchange platform, has announced that it will temporarily suspend some of its trading services for UK clients starting from October 6, 2023. The decision comes as a response to the new regulations imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on crypto asset firms operating in the UK. According to a blog post published by Luno on December 31, 2023, the exchange will stop offering the following services to UK clients:

  • Depositing or withdrawing GBP via Faster Payments.
  • Buying or selling crypto using GBP.
  • Sending or receiving crypto to or from other Luno wallets.
  • Creating new crypto wallets.

The FCA’s new rules for the marketing and promotion of cryptocurrencies will take effect on October 8, two days after Luno is scheduled to suspend some services. An email to a Luno client from the UK, seen by Coindesk, said the client would not be able to purchase or trade cryptocurrency as of October 6.

Luno stated that the suspension is expected to last for a few weeks, and that it will notify its customers when the services are resumed. The exchange also assured its clients that their existing GBP and crypto balances are safe and secure, and that they can still access their Luno accounts and wallets at any time.

The reason behind the suspension is that Luno has applied for registration with the FCA as a crypto asset firm but has not yet received approval. The FCA introduced a new regime for crypto asset businesses in January 2020, requiring them to comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing rules, and to register with the regulator by January 10, 2021. However, due to the high number of applications and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FCA has extended the deadline and has allowed firms that have already applied to continue operating under a temporary registration regime until then.

Luno is one of the many crypto firms that have applied for registration with the FCA but have not yet been approved. According to CoinDesk, other platforms that have announced similar suspensions include Wirex, Crypto.com, and Ziglu. The FCA has also warned consumers that investing in crypto assets involves high risks, and that they should be prepared to lose all their money.

The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority’s new promotion rules will treat crypto like “restricted mass market investments” and require any advertisements or promotions to contain clear warnings and ban incentives. Though the new rules were set to take effect on Oct. 8, firms can now apply for an extra three months to apply the rules. Luno is not the only one pausing parts of its U.K. business temporarily. In response to these rules, PayPal also said it would halt crypto purchases in October till 2024.

The FCA Handbook is a comprehensive and consolidated source of FCA Legal Instruments, which are made by the FCA Board and reflect the changes in the regulatory landscape. The Handbook covers various topics, such as conduct of business, prudential standards, supervision, enforcement, redress, markets and listing.

The FCA Handbook is constantly updated to reflect the developments in the financial sector, such as new products, services, risks and opportunities. The FCA also responds to changes in the UK and EU legislation, as well as international standards and best practices.

Some of the recent changes to the FCA Handbook include:

The implementation of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020. The FCA has made several amendments to the Handbook to ensure that it continues to operate effectively after Brexit, such as removing references to EU law and institutions, transferring functions from EU authorities to UK authorities, and applying temporary transitional powers to smooth the transition.

The introduction of new reporting requirements for firms to demonstrate their financial resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic. The FCA has issued a new instrument (FCA 2023/30) that requires firms to submit information on their financial resources, liquidity, capital adequacy and business continuity plans on a regular basis.

The adoption of new technical standards for electronic reporting formats for certain regulatory disclosures. The FCA has issued a new instrument (FCA 2023/31) that implements the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) for annual financial reports of issuers admitted to trading on regulated markets. The ESEF aims to improve the accessibility, comparability and usability of financial information across Europe.

The update of the disclosure guidance and transparency rules sourcebook (DTR) to reflect changes in the UK’s listing regime. The FCA has issued a new instrument (FCA 2023/32) that amends the DTR to align with the recommendations of the UK Listing Review, which aims to enhance the attractiveness of the UK as a listing venue. The changes include reducing free float requirements, allowing dual class share structures, and simplifying prospectus requirements.

Luno, which was founded in 2013 and has over 5 million customers worldwide, said that it is committed to complying with the FCA’s regulations and standards, and that it is working closely with the regulator to complete the registration process as soon as possible. The exchange also expressed its gratitude to its UK clients for their patience and support during this transition period.

DeFi Education Fund files Petition over Patent Troll Lawsuits

0
Fund, money cash dollar

In recent years, the software industry has been plagued by a phenomenon known as patent trolling. Patent trolls are entities that acquire patents, often of dubious quality or relevance, and use them to sue or threaten to sue other companies for infringement. Their goal is not to innovate or compete, but to extract money from the defendants, who often prefer to settle rather than engage in costly and lengthy litigation.

The DeFi Education Fund (DEF), a non-profit organization that aims to promote education and advocacy for decentralized finance, has filed a petition with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to challenge the validity of several patents held by a company called Uniloc. Uniloc is a notorious “patent troll” that has sued hundreds of companies, including Microsoft, Sony, and Netflix, Electronic Arts, and Mojang for allegedly infringing on its patents, many of which are vague or overly broad. Many of these lawsuits have been dismissed or invalidated by the courts, but Uniloc continues to file new ones, hoping to find a willing target.

According to the petition, Uniloc claims to own patents that cover various aspects of blockchain technology, such as smart contracts, tokenization, and decentralized exchanges. Uniloc has filed lawsuits against several DeFi projects, including MakerDAO, Compound, and Uniswap, demanding royalties and threatening to block their access to the U.S. market. DEF argues that these lawsuits are baseless and harmful to the innovation and growth of the DeFi sector.

DEF is seeking to invalidate Uniloc’s patents under the inter partes review (IPR) process, which allows third parties to challenge the patentability of existing patents based on prior art. Prior art is any evidence that shows that the invention claimed by the patent was already known or obvious before the patent was filed. DEF claims that Uniloc’s patents are invalid because they are either anticipated or rendered obvious by prior art in the field of blockchain and cryptography.

However, some of Uniloc’s victims are fighting back. A group of software developers and companies, led by Cloudflare, have launched a series of ‘patent troll’ lawsuits to challenge the validity of several patents held by Uniloc. These lawsuits are based on a legal doctrine called inter partes review (IPR), which allows anyone to petition the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to reexamine a patent and determine if it meets the criteria of novelty and non-obviousness. If the USPTO finds that the patent is invalid, it can cancel it and prevent further litigation.

The IPR lawsuits are intended to expose the weakness of Uniloc’s patent portfolio and deter it from pursuing further litigation. They are also meant to send a message to other patent trolls that they will face resistance and scrutiny if they try to abuse the patent system. The IPR lawsuits are supported by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a digital rights advocacy group that has been campaigning against patent trolling for years.

The IPR lawsuits are an example of how software developers and companies can use the legal system to defend themselves against patent trolling. They are also a way of promoting innovation and competition in the software industry, which benefits consumers and society as a whole. By challenging Uniloc’s patents, the IPR lawsuits aim to protect the software industry from predatory and frivolous litigation.

DEF hopes that its petition will deter Uniloc from pursuing further litigation against DeFi projects and encourage other patent trolls to reconsider their strategy of exploiting the patent system for profit. DEF also hopes that its petition will raise awareness and educate the public about the importance and potential of DeFi and the need to protect it from predatory practices.

Binance US CEO Resigns citing Differences Over Strategic Direction

0

Binance US announced today that its CEO, Brian Brooks, has resigned from his position after less than four months on the job. Brooks, a former acting head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) under the Trump administration, joined Binance US in May 2021 with the goal of leading the company’s regulatory strategy and compliance efforts.

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, is undergoing a major transformation as it faces regulatory scrutiny from various countries. The company’s co-founder and current CEO, Changpeng Zhao, commonly known as CZ, has announced that he is looking for a successor who has a strong compliance background and can lead Binance as a regulated financial institution.

In recent weeks, several top executives have announced their departure from Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume. The reasons behind these resignations are not clear, but some speculate that they are related to the regulatory challenges that Binance is facing in multiple jurisdictions.

However, Brooks cited “differences over strategic direction” as the reason for his departure, without providing further details. He said in a tweet that he wished his former colleagues “all the best”. Binance US is the US arm of Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, which has been facing increasing scrutiny and pressure from regulators around the globe.

Binance US said in a statement that it will continue to operate normally and serve its customers under its current leadership team. It also thanked Brooks for his contributions and expressed its commitment to “earning the trust and confidence” of its users and regulators. Binance US did not name a successor for Brooks but said it will announce one “in due course”.

Brooks’ resignation comes at a time when Binance is facing multiple challenges and investigations from authorities in several countries, including the UK, Japan, Germany, Singapore, Canada, and the US. The exchange has been accused of facilitating money laundering, tax evasion, market manipulation, and offering unlicensed services to customers. Binance has denied any wrongdoing and said it is cooperating with regulators.

Binance’s founder and CEO, Changpeng Zhao, also known as CZ, has recently expressed his willingness to step down from his role and hand over the reins to a more experienced leader who can navigate the complex regulatory landscape. CZ said he is looking for someone with a “strong regulatory background” who can be “very constructive” in working with regulators.

Some of the Executives who have left Binance include:

Brian Brooks, the former head of Binance US, who resigned after less than four months on the job, citing “differences over strategic direction”.

Richard Teng, the former CEO of Binance Singapore, who stepped down after less than five months, saying that he wanted to “pursue other opportunities”.

Jonathan Farnell, the former director of compliance at Binance Europe, who left after three months, without giving any reason.

Helen Hai, the former head of Binance Charity Foundation, who resigned after two years, stating that she wanted to focus on her own philanthropic projects.

These departures raise questions about the future of Binance and its ability to navigate the complex and evolving regulatory landscape of the crypto industry. Some analysts suggest that Binance may need to restructure its business model and governance to comply with local laws and regulations, while others argue that Binance may have an advantage over its competitors due to its global reach and innovation.

Binance US, which operates as a separate entity from binance global, has been trying to distance itself from the legal troubles of its parent company and establish itself as a reputable and trustworthy platform for US customers. It has obtained licenses in several states and partnered with leading banks and payment providers to offer fiat-to-crypto services.

However, it is unclear how Brooks’ resignation will affect binance US’s plans and prospects, especially as it faces stiff competition from other US-based crypto exchanges such as Coinbase, Kraken and Gemini. Binance US has not yet announced who will replace Brooks as the interim or permanent CEO, or whether it will change its strategy or direction in light of his departure.

The crypto industry is undergoing a major shift as regulators around the world are tightening their oversight and enforcement of the sector. Many crypto companies are seeking to comply with the rules and obtain licenses to operate legally and securely. However, some experts argue that excessive regulation could stifle innovation and hamper the growth of the industry.

Bank of International Settlements calls for Blockchain-based sustainable Finance Solutions

0

The Bank of International Settlements (BIS), an organization that serves as a bank for central banks, has published a report on how blockchain technology can support sustainable finance. The report, titled “Blockchain and sustainability: A green role for distributed ledger technology?”, explores the potential of blockchain to address environmental, social and governance (ESG) challenges in the financial sector.

According to the report, blockchain can enable more transparent and efficient ESG reporting, verification and monitoring, as well as facilitate green bond issuance and trading, carbon credit management and climate risk assessment. The report also identifies some of the challenges and trade-offs that need to be addressed, such as the environmental impact of blockchain’s energy consumption, the regulatory and legal frameworks for blockchain-based ESG solutions, and the interoperability and scalability of different platforms.

The report concludes that blockchain can play a key role in advancing sustainable finance, but it also calls for more collaboration and coordination among stakeholders, including regulators, standard-setters, financial institutions and technology providers. The report states: “Blockchain is not a silver bullet for sustainability, but it can be a powerful tool to enhance ESG practices in the financial sector and beyond. To unlock its full potential, however, concerted efforts are needed to ensure that blockchain solutions are aligned with sustainability objectives, principles and standards.”

The BIS has been actively researching and exploring the potential and challenges of blockchain technology, which underlies cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. Blockchain is a distributed ledger technology that allows multiple parties to record and verify transactions without the need for a central authority or intermediary. Blockchain promises to enhance transparency, efficiency and security in various domains of finance, such as payments, trade finance, securities settlement and identity verification.

However, blockchain also faces significant technical, economic and regulatory hurdles that limit its scalability, interoperability and adoption. For instance, the proof-of-work consensus algorithm used by Bitcoin and Ethereum consumes enormous amounts of energy and is vulnerable to attacks by malicious actors. Moreover, the legal status and regulation of blockchain-based assets and activities vary across jurisdictions and are often unclear or inconsistent.

The BIS has been advocating for a balanced and prudent approach to blockchain innovation that harnesses its benefits while mitigating its risks. The BIS has also been collaborating with central banks and other stakeholders to develop and test blockchain-based solutions for sustainable finance, cross-border payments and central bank digital currencies.

In September 2023, the BIS launched an initiative called COP28 UAE TechSprint, in partnership with the Central Bank of the UAE and the Emirates Institute of Finance. The TechSprint challenges developer teams to find solutions that address data verification gaps in sustainable finance using blockchain, artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things. The initiative is spearheaded by the United Arab Emirates’ COP28 presidency and aims to support the global efforts to combat climate change and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

In January 2019, the BIS published a working paper titled “Beyond the doomsday economics of “proof-of-work” in cryptocurrencies”, by Raphael Auer. The paper discusses the economics of how Bitcoin achieves data immutability and payment finality via costly computations, i.e., proof-of-work. The paper argues that proof-of-work is inherently inefficient and insecure, and that it will become unsustainable once the block rewards that incentivize miners are phased out. The paper suggests that alternative consensus mechanisms, such as proof-of-stake, or second-layer solutions, such as the Lightning Network, might help improve the scalability and finality of blockchain-based payments.

In March 2018, the BIS published a working paper titled “Central bank cryptocurrencies”, by Morten Bech and Rodney Garratt. The paper defines and categorizes different types of digital currencies, such as private or public, wholesale or retail, and account-based or token-based. The paper focuses on the potential role and design of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which are digital liabilities of the central bank that can be used as a medium of exchange and a store of value. The paper analyzes the benefits and costs of CBDCs from various perspectives, such as monetary policy, financial stability, payment efficiency and financial inclusion.

These are just some examples of how the BIS is contributing to the global dialogue and experimentation on blockchain technology. The BIS recognizes that blockchain is a dynamic and evolving field that requires continuous monitoring, assessment and collaboration among different actors. The BIS is committed to fostering innovation in finance that serves the public interest.