DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog

BOJ’s Recent Rate Policy is an Ongoing Normalization Away from Decades of Ultra-Loose Monetary Framework

0

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) raise its key short-term policy interest rate yesterday by 25 basis points, from 0.5% to 0.75%. This marks the highest level for Japan’s benchmark rate in 30 years since September 1995, as part of its ongoing normalization away from decades of ultra-loose monetary policy.

The decision was unanimous and widely anticipated by markets. It reflects the BOJ’s increased confidence that wage growth will sustain moderate inflation around its 2% target.

Governor Kazuo Ueda signaled potential for further hikes if economic and price trends align with forecasts, though he provided limited guidance on timing or pace. The yen initially weakened, USD/JPY rose above 157 due to the lack of stronger forward guidance.

Japanese government bond yields surged, with the 10-year JGB yield exceeding 2% for the first time in over two decades. This continues the BOJ’s gradual tightening path, contrasting with rate cuts by many other major central banks.

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) has pursued a 2% inflation target as its core price stability objective since January 2013. This target measures the year-on-year change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), typically excluding fresh food for core readings.

Japan endured prolonged deflation and low inflation from the late 1990s through the early 2010s, with average inflation often negative or near zero. The BOJ formally adopted the 2% target in January 2013 under the “Abenomics” framework, alongside a joint statement with the government to overcome deflation.

To achieve this, the BOJ launched aggressive measures: Quantitative and Qualitative Easing (QQE) in 2013. Negative interest rates in 2016. Yield Curve Control (YCC) in 2016.

An “inflation-overshooting commitment” in 2016, pledging to expand the monetary base until CPI inflation exceeded 2% and stabilized above it, a form of “makeup strategy” to compensate for past shortfalls.

These unconventional tools aimed to lift inflation expectations, which had been anchored near zero due to adaptive backward-looking behavior in Japan. Inflation has exceeded 2% for over 44 consecutive months as of November 2025, driven initially by import costs, supply shocks, and later by domestic wage growth and a positive output gap.

The BOJ assesses that sustainable 2% inflation—supported by a “virtuous cycle” of rising wages and prices—is now in sight or generally achieved. In March 2024, the BOJ ended negative rates, YCC, and QQE, judging the overshooting commitment fulfilled and returning to a conventional framework centered on short-term policy rate adjustments.

The focus remains on achieving the 2% target sustainably and stably, accompanied by moderate wage increases and anchored medium- to long-term inflation expectations. The BOJ conducts policy gradually and data-dependently, raising rates when confidence in the outlook grows.

Projections indicate core CPI may dip below 2% temporarily in early FY2026 due to fading food price pressures and government subsidies but rise thereafter as wage hikes persist and expectations firm.

Unlike strict inflation targeting in some economies, the BOJ emphasizes patience and accommodation to nurture domestic demand-driven inflation, avoiding premature tightening that could revert to deflation. Further rate hikes are signaled if economic and price trends align with forecasts, aiming toward a neutral rate estimated around 1–2.5%.

The hike signals the BOJ’s continued gradual normalization, with potential for further increases in 2026 if wage growth and inflation align with forecasts. Key trading considerations: Higher rates reflect confidence in Japan’s escape from deflation, supporting domestic demand and a “virtuous cycle” of wages/prices.

Stocks reliant on Japanese sales like financials, industrials, consumer sectors have led gains. Banks benefit from wider net interest margins as borrowing costs rise. Well-telegraphed policy removes an “uncertainty premium,” aiding bullish trends in the Nikkei.

Unlike surprise hikes in prior years, gradual tightening is unlikely to trigger sharp corrections, especially with domestic exposure dominating performance. A stronger yen expected over time which erodes competitiveness for companies like Toyota, Sony, and tech/auto firms with heavy overseas sales. However, immediate yen weakness mitigated this.

Japan has been a cheap funding source for global leveraged trades. Further hikes could unwind positions, potentially causing volatility in risk assets like U.S. tech and emerging markets if accelerated.

Precious Metals Are Experiencing Heavy Liquidity Movements Culminating to Surge in Price

0

Precious metals are on a strong bull run as of December 2025. Gold is trading around $4,340–$4,350 per ounce, very close to its all-time high of approximately $4,379–$4,530 set earlier in 2025 primarily in October.

It has surged over 60% year-to-date, driven by geopolitical tensions, central bank buying, and expectations of further Fed rate cuts.

Silver has smashed through to new all-time highs, recently hitting $66–$67 per ounce with peaks around $67.45–$67.65 in mid-December. It’s more than doubled from the start of the year ~$30/oz, fueled by massive industrial demand in solar, EVs, AI/data centers alongside supply deficits and safe-haven flows.

Platinum has reached levels around $1,970–$2,000 per ounce, marking its highest since 2008—a 14–17 year high. Supply constraints from South Africa and recovering industrial/automotive demand have propelled gains of over 100% YTD.

This synchronized rally reflects broader themes: escalating geopolitical risks, a weaker US dollar, persistent inflation concerns, strong central bank and ETF inflows, and structural industrial shortages especially for silver and platinum.

Precious metals are acting as key safe-haven and diversification assets amid global uncertainty. The momentum remains bullish into year-end, though volatility is high.

Silver’s industrial demand has been the primary driver behind its explosive price rally in 2025, accounting for roughly 59-65% of total global silver consumption record ~680-700 million ounces in recent years.

Unlike gold, which is mostly monetary/jewelry-driven, silver’s superior electrical and thermal conductivity makes it irreplaceable in many high-growth technologies, leading to persistent structural deficits.

The largest and fastest-growing segment, consuming ~200-230+ million ounces annually 15-20%+ of total demand. Silver paste is essential for conductive layers in solar cells.

Global renewable energy push like the massive installations in China, policy support like US Inflation Reduction Act has driven record highs, with advanced technologies sometimes requiring even more silver despite thrifting efforts.

EVs use 2-3x more silver than traditional vehicles around 25-50 grams per vehicle for wiring, batteries, sensors, inverters, and charging infrastructure. Demand projected at ~90 million ounces in 2025, growing at ~3-4% CAGR through 2030 as EV adoption accelerates globally.

Broad category including semiconductors, printed circuit boards, connectors, switches, and consumer devices like phones, tablets, wearables. Silver’s unmatched conductivity is critical here, with demand boosted by 5G networks, flexible electronics, and general digitalization. This sector has seen ~50% growth since 2016.

AI, Data Centers, and Power Infrastructure

Surging electricity needs from AI computing and cloud services require high-performance electronics and grid upgrades, heavily reliant on silver for efficient power transmission and components.

Other Notable Uses Brazing Alloys and Soldering — For strong joints in HVAC, aerospace, plumbing, and manufacturing. Industrial offtake hit records in 2024 (680.5 Moz) and is expected to remain near peak levels in 2025 (677-700 Moz), even with some thrifting in solar.

Combined with constrained mine supply mostly byproduct of base metals and multi-year deficits around 100-150+ Moz annually, this has fueled silver’s doubling+ in price this year. Demand is relatively price-inelastic—industries can’t easily substitute silver without performance loss—supporting sustained bullish momentum amid green tech and tech booms.

While precious metals have surged on classic safe-haven drivers; geopolitical risks, central bank buying, inflation hedges, industrial demand for silver/platinum, and a weaker dollar, crypto has largely diverged and underperformed in the second half of 2025.

Bitcoin and broader crypto have increasingly behaved like risk-on assets correlated with tech stocks and equities, rather than pure safe-havens like gold. During periods of market stress or uncertainty in late 2025, flows rotated into traditional hard assets while crypto faced sell-offs or stagnation.

Precious metals benefited from defensive buying amid escalating global tensions, supply constraints, and monetary easing expectations. Crypto suffered from profit-taking after early-year gains, regulatory delays, liquidity resets, and competition from yield-bearing alternatives.

Some analysts note occasional spillovers like crypto sell-offs indirectly supporting metals rallies via capital rotation, but overall, the two markets have decoupled—gold/silver leading as “flight-to-safety” plays, while crypto lags.

Potential Impact of Trump’s Fed Chair Nominee on Interest Rates

0

President Donald Trump told reporters he plans to announce his nominee to succeed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell “over the next couple of weeks,” though he added it might not happen before the end of the year but “pretty soon.”

He also mentioned interviewing three or four candidates and indicated the pick could spill into early 2026. This aligns with his earlier comments in early December suggesting an announcement in early 2026, but the timeline appears to have shifted slightly forward.

Powell’s term as Fed Chair ends on May 15, 2026. Leading Candidates include: Kevin Hassett (National Economic Council Director and longtime Trump adviser). Kevin Warsh (former Fed Governor). Christopher Waller (current Fed Governor, whom Trump recently praised as “great” after a strong interview). Michelle Bowman (current Fed Governor). Possibly Rick Rieder (BlackRock executive, scheduled for an interview soon).

Trump has emphasized the nominee will support significantly lower interest rates.No official nomination has been made as of December 20, 2025, so the announcement is still pending in the coming weeks. Markets are watching closely due to implications for monetary policy and Fed independence.

Trump has explicitly stated that his pick will be someone who “believes in lower interest rates by a lot,” making support for aggressive rate cuts a key criterion. This signals a potential shift toward more dovish (rate-cutting) monetary policy compared to the current cautious approach under Powell.

The Federal Reserve has cut its benchmark rate three times in late 2025, bringing it to 3.50%-3.75%. The latest December projections indicate only one additional cut in 2026, reflecting concerns over persistent inflation around 2.7%-3% and potential upward pressure from tariffs.

Officials emphasize a “wait-and-see” stance, with no rush for deeper cuts unless the labor market weakens significantly. A Trump-aligned chair could push for: Faster and deeper rate cuts in 2026-2027 to stimulate growth, lower borrowing costs like mortgages, car loans, and support Trump’s economic agenda.

Greater emphasis on maximum employment over strict inflation control, potentially accepting slightly higher inflation for lower unemployment. The chair shapes consensus, appoints vice chairs, and sets the agenda—though decisions require majority support from the 12 voting members.

However, limitations exist:The chair cannot unilaterally set rates; dissent from other governors or regional presidents could block aggressive easing. Economic data (inflation, jobs) ultimately drives decisions—Trump’s tariffs could keep inflation elevated, making deep cuts riskier.

Fed independence remains a core principle, though Trump’s pressure raises concerns about political influence. Recently supports lower rates; proposes balance sheet reduction to enable cuts. Historically hawkish on inflation. Moderate dovish shift; cuts possible but tied to reforms; less aggressive than Trump wants.

Kevin Hassett, strong dove: Favors aggressive cuts, accommodative policy to boost growth. Most aligned with Trump; likely pushes for multiple/deep cuts, risking inflation rebound.

Christopher Waller supports steady cuts 50-100 bps more to neutral ~3%; concerned about softening jobs market. Gradual easing; data-dependent, balanced approach—not as aggressive as Trump demands.

Bowman: More cautious on cuts. Rieder: Market-oriented, potentially dovish. Varied; less clear alignment with rapid cuts. Markets have reacted positively to dovish signals e.g., rallies in stocks/crypto on Trump’s “lower by a lot” comments, pricing in more cuts post-nomination.

However, if cuts are too aggressive, it could reignite inflation or erode Fed credibility. The nomination raises the probability of lower rates longer-term than the current Fed path suggests, but outcomes depend on the pick, Senate confirmation, and evolving economic data. No announcement yet, so uncertainty persists.

Why Gaining More YouTube Subscribers Matters for Success

0
Why Gaining More YouTube Subscribers Matters for Succes

YouTube’s evolved into something massive. We’re talking one of the biggest platforms out there for creators, businesses, anyone trying to build something online. Every day, the platform gets flooded with millions of new videos. The competition? Absolutely brutal.

Most creators get stuck focusing on views. They check their analytics obsessively, watching those view counts. But here’s what actually matters for long-term success subscribers. That’s the real game.

A subscriber isn’t just another person who happened to watch a video. Think about it these are people who watched something, enjoyed it enough, and then made the decision to follow the channel. They want more. These people become an actual audience, a real community that pushes growth forward.

Why More Subscribers Is Essential

More subscribers bring consistent views, get better treatment from the algorithm, increase how much people watch, build credibility, open up ways to make money, and provide stability that actually lasts.

Subscribers are what everything else builds on. When a creator uploads something new, subscribers see it first. How they react determines everything. Do they watch it? Like it? Comment? Or do they skip it completely? YouTube watches all of that before deciding whether to show the video to more people. Growing without subscribers is slower and way harder to predict. Sometimes it feels impossible. Basically, subscribers transform individual videos into a system that actually scales.

When Growing Subscribers Needs a Boost

Gaining YouTube subscribers organically is important, but it can also be slow and competitive, especially for newer or growing channels. Even quality content may struggle to stand out without enough early traction. That’s why some creators choose to buy YouTube subscribers from a trusted provider like Media Mister.

A stronger subscriber count helps improve social proof, encourages new visitors to subscribe, and supports better performance when new videos go live. Used alongside consistent content creation, this approach can accelerate growth naturally. If you’re not ready to invest, Media Mister also offers free YouTube subscriber options, allowing creators to start building momentum without any upfront cost.

10 Key Reasons More Subscribers Lead to YouTube Success

1. Subscribers Drive Immediate Views on New Videos

Right after uploading a video, subscribers are the first ones who see it pop up in their feed or get a notification about it. That early traffic those first few hours can make or break a video’s success.

It signals to YouTube that people actually care about this content. Click-through rates go up. The video starts building momentum. Without subscribers giving that initial boost, most videos just sit there struggling. They barely get any traction during those critical first hours, and then it’s too late.

2. Subscribers Strengthen Algorithm Signals

YouTube’s algorithm promotes videos that get engagement fast. Subscribers are way more likely to click, watch the whole thing, and leave likes or comments compared to random people who just stumbled onto the video. All those actions tell YouTube’s system that the content is valuable and worth showing to more people.

The stronger those signals are, the more YouTube pushes the video out to new audiences. It’s like a snowball effect.

3. Higher Subscriber Counts Increase Watch Time

People who subscribe to channels watch more of the content. It’s pretty straightforward—they’re already into the niche and they trust what the creator makes. So they stick around longer.

This means longer view durations on individual videos, more total hours watched across the channel, and better performance in both search results and suggested video feeds. Watch time is still one of the biggest factors YouTube looks at when determining success.

4. Subscribers Build Channel Authority and Trust

When a channel has a solid subscriber count, it just looks more legit right away. New people visiting the channel see that number and think, “Okay, other people are watching this. Must be good.” That social proof matters.

It establishes the channel as an authority in whatever niche it covers. First-time viewers feel more confident about the content. They’re more likely to subscribe themselves. Trust builds channels faster than going viral ever could—viral moments fade, but trust sticks around.

5. Subscribers Create Consistent Traffic

This might be one of the biggest advantages subscribers provide. Consistency. Even when a video doesn’t go viral, doesn’t blow up, doesn’t become the next big thing—subscribers still watch it.

That steadies everything. Overall channel performance becomes more stable. Creators don’t have to constantly chase trending topics or pray for algorithm luck. Growth becomes something you can actually predict instead of just hoping for the best. Building something long-term requires that consistency.

6. Subscribers Unlock Better Monetization Opportunities

More subscribers make it way easier to monetize in multiple ways. Sure, views generate ad revenue. Everyone knows that. But subscribers? They improve earning potential across the board.

They help channels hit YouTube Partner Program requirements faster. They convert better for affiliate marketing. They attract brands looking for partnerships—and those brands pay better when they see engaged audiences, not just random viral spikes. Subscribers also drive merchandise sales because they actually care about the creator’s brand.

Brands almost always prefer working with channels that have loyal, engaged subscriber bases rather than channels that just got lucky with one viral video.

7. Subscribers Increase Engagement Across Channels

Engagement is huge for how YouTube ranks content. Subscribers like videos more frequently, leave comments more often, share stuff with their friends, and actually participate in community posts and polls. Random viewers? Not so much.

All that engagement tells YouTube the content is working. It improves visibility. It strengthens how the platform’s algorithm views the channel overall.

8. Subscribers Support Long-Term Stability

Here’s the thing about YouTube it changes constantly. The algorithm gets updated. Trends come and go in weeks or even days. Content formats that worked last year might not work this year. Through all of that chaos, subscribers provide something stable.

When there’s a loyal subscriber base, traffic doesn’t just disappear overnight because YouTube changed something. Engagement stays relatively steady even when other channels are panicking about algorithm updates. Growth continues. Subscribers basically protect channels from those sudden drops that kill smaller channels.

9. Subscribers Help Build Communities

YouTube success isn’t really about piling up views anymore. Maybe it was years ago, but not now. Now it’s about community. And subscribers? They’re the core of any creator’s community.

A strong subscriber base means consistent feedback. It helps creators figure out what’s working and what isn’t. It lets them improve content quality based on real input. They can create videos their audience actually wants instead of just guessing. Communities drive sustainable growth way more effectively than random one-time viewers who watch something once and never come back.

10. Subscribers Multiply Future Growth Opportunities

Every single new subscriber expands how many people might see future videos. This creates something called a compounding effect. Each video performs a bit better than the last one. Growth speeds up. New opportunities start appearing—sponsorship offers, partnership deals, chances to launch products.

Subscribers turn YouTube from just another side project or hobby into something that could actually become a real long-term asset. Something that generates income for years.

Conclusion

Gaining YouTube subscribers is absolutely critical for building real success on the platform that actually lasts. They fuel engagement when new videos go live. They strengthen all the signals YouTube’s algorithm watches for. They boost watch time metrics. They create a foundation for growth that doesn’t collapse when trends change.

Subscribers make channels look more credible. They unlock different ways to monetize content. They help creators build actual communities instead of just accumulating random viewers who disappear. On YouTube, subscribers represent more than just numbers to brag about or show off. They’re literally what makes lasting success possible.

MSCI Is Considering Removing Companies With High Crypto Holdings From Its Major Indexes

0

MSCI is considering excluding companies with heavy Bitcoin/cryptocurrency holdings from its major indexes, primarily those where digital assets exceed 50% of total assets.

This targets “digital asset treasury” (DAT) firms that increasingly resemble investment funds rather than traditional operating companies. The primary company at risk is Strategy formerly MicroStrategy, ticker MSTR, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder.

Led by Michael Saylor, it has amassed hundreds of thousands of BTC as a core treasury strategy, making its balance sheet heavily crypto-dominant. MSCI launched a consultation in October 2025 to reclassify or exclude such firms from its Global Investable Market Indexes like MSCI World, MSCI USA.

MSCI plans to announce its final decision by January 15, 2026, with potential implementation in February 2026.

Analysts warn of significant passive outflows, as index-tracking ETFs and funds would be forced to sell holdings:~$2.8 billion from MSCI indexes alone for Strategy. Up to $9 billion total if other providers like Nasdaq 100, Russell indexes follow suit.

Broader sector impact could affect 38–39 companies with ~$46–113 billion in combined market cap. Strategy and others via BitcoinForCorporations coalition have submitted letters arguing the rule is arbitrary, discriminatory against crypto as an asset class, and ignores operational businesses.

They claim it stifles innovation and violates index neutrality principles. Michael Saylor has downplayed the risk, stating it wouldn’t fundamentally alter Strategy’s long-term Bitcoin strategy.

The consultation is ongoing with feedback closing December 31, and no final exclusion has occurred. Strategy retained its Nasdaq 100 spot in recent rebalancing but remains under scrutiny. This reflects growing tension between traditional index methodologies and crypto-integrated corporate treasuries, especially amid Bitcoin’s volatility.

The “$9B in passive flows” figure aligns with analyst warnings of maximum potential outflows across multiple indexes if exclusions broaden.

The Nasdaq 100 Index underwent its annual reconstitution, announced on December 12, 2025, with changes effective prior to market open on Monday, December 22, 2025.

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Ferrovial, Insmed, Monolithic Power Systems, Seagate Technology, and Western Digital. Removals (6 companies): Biogen Inc. (BIIB), CDW Corporation (CDW), GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS), Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON), and The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD).

Strategy retained its spot in the Nasdaq 100, despite pre-announcement speculation and analyst concerns about its Bitcoin-heavy balance sheet over 50% of assets in digital assets potentially leading to reclassification or removal.

There was no forced exclusion, unlike the ongoing risks with MSCI indexes. Retention avoids potential outflows estimated at ~$1.6–2.1 billion from index-tracking funds, Invesco QQQ ETF. Instead, it maintains steady demand from passive investors, supporting liquidity and indirect Bitcoin exposure via the index which underpins >$600 billion in AUM across products.

Minor weight adjustments occurred as part of the standard quarterly rebalancing coinciding with the annual event, but no major forced selling/buying for MSTR specifically. This rebalancing reflects Nasdaq’s rules-based approach focused on market cap, liquidity, and non-financial classification—Strategy qualified despite its treasury strategy.

The broader market impact includes shifts in sector exposure, more hardware/storage via new additions and typical trading volume spikes around the effective date from ETF rebalancing.

The outcome contrasts with MSCI’s pending decision expected January 15, 2026, where exclusion risks remain higher due to their consultation on “digital asset treasury” firms.