Institutional investors primarily investment advisors and hedge funds sold Bitcoin ETF shares equivalent to approximately 25,000 BTC during Q4 2025 (October–December 2025).
This data comes from 13F filings analyzed by Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart, who highlighted it in posts and commentary around February 24–25, 2026. The sales represented a net reduction in exposure, valued at roughly $1.6 billion at early 2026 prices around $65,000 per BTC.
Brevan Howard was the largest single seller, offloading over 17,000 BTC-equivalent in ETF holdings. Despite the selling, institutions still held a substantial amount—around 311,700 BTC in ETF exposure post-Q4. This occurred amid a significant Bitcoin price drop in late 2025 from peaks above $120,000 to lower levels, suggesting de-risking or profit-taking rather than full capitulation.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
Reports note hedge funds reduced exposure by up to 28% in certain funds, while broader institutional holdings including non-hedge fund categories saw a smaller relative decline of about 3.5%. This selling contributed to broader market pressure but was described as “trimming” positions.
Meanwhile, recent spot Bitcoin ETF flows showed rebounds with inflows like $258 million in a single day, partially offsetting earlier weakness. It reflects tactical adjustments in a volatile period rather than a wholesale exit from Bitcoin by institutions, many of whom continue to view it as a maturing asset class.
The sales, valued at roughly $1.6 billion at prevailing prices, added tangible selling pressure during an already volatile period. Hedge funds reduced exposure significantly up to 28% in some cases, with Brevan Howard alone offloading >17,000 BTC-equivalent, amplifying the Q4 2025 drawdown of ~23–50% from highs.
This aligned with broader risk-off behavior tied to macro economic factors; Bitcoin became more reactive to headlines and macro data as a “rates-and-risk” asset. ETF outflows intensified into early 2026, with streaks like $3.8 billion over five weeks (longest since early 2025), signaling institutional hesitation post-October 2025 crash.
Many spot Bitcoin ETF holders ~40% remained underwater, needing ~50% recovery to break even, which prolonged cautious positioning. Despite the headline number, institutional holdings only declined ~3.5% overall from ~532,000 BTC to ~513,000 BTC by quarter-end, with ~311,700 BTC still held post-Q4.
This suggests much of the selling was “trimming” or rebalancing rather than full exits—many institutions viewed it as tactical amid the dip, not abandonment of Bitcoin as a maturing asset class. The selling contributed to rotation away from speculative and high-growth assets toward defensives like metals, certain stocks.
However, recent rebounds; $258 million single-day inflows in late February 2026, led by Fidelity and BlackRock indicate flows can reverse quickly, with cumulative ETF inflows still >$54 billion historically. Increased institutional involvement via ETFs has reduced overall Bitcoin volatility ~55% lower than pre-ETF eras and shifted trading toward U.S. hours, but it also ties BTC closer to traditional finance flows—making it vulnerable to macro shocks or custodian risks.
Some analysts see Q4 divergences; bearish sentiment vs. rising stablecoin and on-chain fundamentals as classic bear-market bottom signals. Unlike forced liquidations in leveraged markets, this was mostly voluntary de-risking. Long-term holders including some corporates and governments accumulating quietly absorbed much of the pressure.
Institutions continue holding substantial exposure ~22% of ETF AUM in some estimates, supporting Bitcoin’s legitimacy despite short-term churn. The Q4 selling exacerbated near-term weakness and contributed to a “crypto winter” feel into 2026, but it appears more as portfolio adjustment in a maturing market than a rejection of Bitcoin.
Recent inflow rebounds and persistent holdings suggest potential for stabilization or recovery if macro conditions improve.