Meta’s foray into the metaverse is proving to be an increasingly expensive gamble. In its first-quarter earnings report released Wednesday, the company revealed that Reality Labs, the unit spearheading CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s vision of immersive digital worlds, posted an operating loss of $4.2 billion.
That’s a staggering burn rate for a business division that brought in just $412 million in revenue during the same period.
The numbers, while slightly better than Wall Street’s forecasts – analysts had anticipated a loss of $4.6 billion on revenue of $492.7 million — still underscore the long and costly road ahead for Meta as it tries to pioneer a new frontier in computing through virtual and augmented reality.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
Reality Labs is the division behind the Quest VR headsets and the Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses, key pieces of Zuckerberg’s blueprint for a mixed-reality future where people work, play, and interact through immersive digital platforms. But so far, investors have seen little beyond losses. Since the company pivoted heavily toward the metaverse in late 2020, even rebranding from Facebook to Meta in 2021, Reality Labs has hemorrhaged more than $60 billion.
A Skeptical Wall Street Watches Closely
That sustained spending has raised eyebrows across Wall Street. While Meta’s core advertising business continues to perform well, buoyed by a rebound in digital ad markets and growing traction with AI tools that help drive engagement, its heavy investment in the metaverse remains a sore spot.
Zuckerberg has insisted that building the next computing platform will take time, patience, and billions in upfront capital. But as Reality Labs racks up quarterly losses north of $4 billion, the runway for such a vision appears increasingly narrow, especially in a macroeconomic environment where costs are rising and regulatory threats are mounting.
Trump Tariffs Add Fresh Headwinds
Those costs are set to rise further. President Donald Trump’s recent imposition of sweeping tariffs on Chinese-made electronics, including components used in VR and AR devices, is expected to pressure Meta’s already stretched hardware margins. While the company hasn’t disclosed exactly how much of its supply chain is China-dependent, analysts warn the tariffs could result in significantly higher production costs for the Quest headset line and the Ray-Ban smart glasses.
That added burden may force Meta to either absorb the cost increases, deepening its losses or pass them on to consumers — a move that could dampen demand in a market already struggling to go mainstream.
Layoffs Hit Oculus Studios
Meta is also quietly trimming its metaverse ambitions in other ways. Last week, the company confirmed layoffs within its Oculus Studios unit — the team tasked with creating first-party content and games for its VR platforms. While the number of affected employees remains undisclosed, the move adds to a growing list of cost-cutting measures inside Reality Labs.
“Some teams within Oculus Studios are undergoing shifts in structure and roles that have impacted team size,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. “These changes are meant to help Studios work more efficiently on future mixed reality experiences for our growing audience, while still delivering great content for people today.”
The cuts follow a broader trend of tech companies scaling back moonshot projects and headcount as they confront tighter capital markets and investor pressure for profitability. For Meta, which has laid off tens of thousands of workers over the past two years in a bid to “flatten” its structure, Reality Labs remains the largest and most conspicuous money sink.
Still Betting Big on a Future Few Can See
Despite the financial and political headwinds, Zuckerberg appears unwavering. In internal memos and public remarks, he continues to describe the metaverse as a long-term investment that could rival the smartphone era in its eventual impact. Yet many remain unconvinced that Meta’s version of the metaverse – centered on headsets, avatars, and virtual workspaces — will ever achieve the kind of mass adoption needed to justify the colossal expenditure.
Even within the tech community, there’s growing competition and philosophical divergence over what the future of digital interaction should look like. Apple has taken a more premium and restrained approach with its Vision Pro headset. Meanwhile, OpenAI and other AI developers are steering the narrative in a different direction entirely, toward seamless, intelligent interfaces that don’t require users to strap devices to their heads.
As AI reshapes how people interact with technology — and how companies envision the future of work, communication, and play — the question is whether Meta’s metaverse model will still fit that world, or be left behind by a more practical, less immersive paradigm.