How do we make our careers multinational in scope? What are the ingredients in the 21st century knowledge economy? How do you begin in the village and land in the trading halls of New York City? How can we go international in this age?

Yes, you like to give speeches which pay $$ per hour. How can you expand that business, from Lagos, Nairobi, etc to Tokyo, London, etc. You sing in the community. Any aspiration to sing for the world? The world pays the bills!

How can you run that blog from that small room in Jos, Aba, Bamako, etc – and reach the diasporas and bigger markets in Berlin, Toronto, Beijing and Atlanta? Simply, what is a multinational career in this internet age?

Join me at 7pm WAT tomorrow for Tekedia Mini-MBA Personal Economy class, focusing on Planning a Multinational Career, as we begin on how you can build your own economy, not just your company’s, Nigeria’s, or Africa’s economy. Zoom link in the board.

This is Tekedia Institute >> improving your personal economy via knowledge is part of our mission.

Nigeria’s latest Treasury Bills (T-Bills) auction has brought to light a deepening policy rift between the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Debt Management Office (DMO). The divergence stems from contrasting approaches to managing interest rates and the broader economic strategy, with the CBN pushing for higher yields to attract foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) and stabilize the naira, while the DMO warns that elevated yields could severely inflate the nation’s debt servicing costs.

The latest T-Bills auction conducted by the CBN witnessed robust demand across all maturities, particularly the 364-day bill, which dominated investor interest. The government initially aimed to raise N650 billion but ended up allotting N830.44 billion, reflecting significant market appetite.

• 91-Day T-Bill: The CBN offered N70 billion, received N62.57 billion in subscriptions, and allotted N61.52 billion at a stop rate of 17.00%.
• 182-Day T-Bill: Offered at N80 billion, this bill attracted N60.05 billion in subscriptions, with N50.95 billion allotted at a stop rate of 17.75%.
• 364-Day T-Bill: This long-tenured bill was the most sought-after instrument. With N500 billion on offer, it attracted an overwhelming N1.80 trillion in bids. The government allotted N717.97 billion, with the stop rate closing at 17.82%, a decline from the 18.50% recorded in February.

The auction not only overshot the government’s original offer by nearly N200 billion but also highlighted investors’ preference for longer-term securities amid a volatile economic environment.

Divergent Strategies: Attracting FPIs vs. Managing Debt Costs

A financial expert who preferred anonymity explained that the declining stop rate on the 364-day bill underscores the brewing policy battle between the CBN and the DMO over the appropriate pricing of government debt.

The CBN is advocating for higher rates, arguing that attractive yields are necessary to lure FPIs back into Nigeria’s fixed-income market. The apex bank sees foreign inflows as a crucial mechanism to stabilize the naira, which has remained under pressure despite several policy reforms, including the unification of exchange rates and the removal of fuel subsidies.

However, the DMO, tasked with managing Nigeria’s debt portfolio, is concerned that higher yields will translate to increased borrowing costs. With Nigeria’s public debt already exceeding N90 trillion, the agency is prioritizing debt sustainability and is wary of further exacerbating the federal government’s debt servicing obligations.

The DMO’s stance reflects broader concerns about fiscal space. Nigeria’s debt service-to-revenue ratio has consistently exceeded 80%, raising alarm about the federal government’s capacity to meet its financial obligations without sacrificing critical public services.

High Demand Driven by Refund Strategy

One significant factor contributing to the high subscription levels in the recent auction is the DMO’s strategy of issuing refunds instead of refinancing maturing debts. Typically, the government would roll over maturing T-Bills by issuing new ones of the same value.

By opting for refunds, the DMO has created a situation where investors are reinvesting their capital into new auctions, inflating subscription volumes. Analysts note that this approach, while helping manage the debt profile, also underlines the government’s liquidity management strategy amid fiscal constraints.

Compounded by the Rebasing of Nigeria’s CPI

Complicating the economic outlook further is the rebasing of Nigeria’s Consumer Price Index (CPI). The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) recently changed the CPI base year to 2024, altering the methodology for calculating inflation.

Under the new framework, inflation for January 2025 was reported at 24.48%, a sharp decline from the 34.80% recorded in December 2024 under the old methodology. This sudden drop in inflation has introduced a new variable into the interest rate debate.

Some analysts argue that the revised CPI could justify a less aggressive monetary tightening stance from the CBN. However, others caution that the methodological change does not necessarily indicate a real decline in price pressures, particularly with persistent structural challenges such as high energy costs and supply chain disruptions.

CBN’s Monetary Policy Approach

At its Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting in February 2025, the CBN decided to hold the benchmark interest rate steady at 27.50%, citing the need to assess the impact of the rebased CPI before making further policy moves.

Despite the pause, the MPC acknowledged that inflationary pressures remain a concern, highlighting the complex trade-offs facing policymakers. The committee noted that while stabilizing the naira is a priority, sustaining manageable debt servicing costs is equally critical to maintaining fiscal stability.

The CBN’s push for higher yields aligns with its broader strategy to attract FPIs and improve forex liquidity. However, the DMO’s cautionary approach indicates a pragmatic view of Nigeria’s fiscal realities, where every percentage increase in yield translates to billions in additional debt service costs.

The conflicting objectives of these institutions create uncertainty for investors, who must navigate a market where the outlook for T-Bill yields remains unclear. The rebased inflation figures add to this uncertainty, as they could influence future CBN decisions on interest rates and liquidity management.

Balancing Naira Stability and Debt Management

With the CBN maintaining a pause on rate hikes, financial experts believe the future trajectory of T-Bill yields depends on how this institutional tug-of-war plays out. If the CBN prevails, higher yields could attract foreign inflows, potentially stabilizing the naira but at the cost of higher debt service burdens.

Conversely, if the DMO’s stance gains traction, yields may remain capped, easing the debt service load but possibly limiting Nigeria’s appeal to foreign investors. This delicate balancing act will likely define Nigeria’s economic policy environment in the coming months.

The outcome of this policy debate could also impact broader market sentiment and influence decisions across financial markets, including equity, bond, and forex markets. Investors are expected to closely monitor upcoming T-Bill auctions, MPC meetings, and fiscal policy announcements to gauge the direction of Nigeria’s economic strategy and its implications for returns on government securities.

On March 6, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, a move that converts approximately 200,000 Bitcoin (BTC)—seized by the federal government through criminal and civil forfeiture proceedings—into a national reserve asset. This action, detailed by White House Crypto and AI Czar David Sacks, positions the U.S. as a leader in digital asset strategy and fulfills Trump’s campaign promise to make America the “crypto capital of the world.” 

The reserve begins with an estimated 200,000 BTC, valued at roughly $17.5 billion at current prices (around $87,000 per BTC, per CoinMarketCap data). This figure aligns with estimates from Sacks and blockchain analytics like Arkham, which track U.S. government wallets holding seized crypto. The Bitcoin comes entirely from assets confiscated by agencies like the Department of Justice (e.g., from Silk Road, Bitfinex hacks) over the past decade, ensuring no direct taxpayer cost.

No Sales Policy: The order prohibits selling BTC from the reserve, treating it as a long-term store of value—termed a “digital Fort Knox” by Sacks—reversing prior practices where the U.S. Marshals Service auctioned off about 195,000 BTC for $366 million, missing out on $17 billion in potential value at today’s prices.

The Treasury and Commerce Departments, led by Secretaries Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, are authorized to develop “budget-neutral” strategies to acquire additional Bitcoin, though no immediate purchases are planned beyond seized assets. A full accounting of federal crypto holdings is required, addressing the lack of prior comprehensive audits.

U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile: Alongside the Bitcoin Reserve, the order creates a separate stockpile for other seized cryptocurrencies (e.g., ETH, XRP, Solana, Cardano), though these are not part of the BTC-focused reserve. Trump had earlier floated including these assets in a broader “Crypto Strategic Reserve,” spiking their prices on March 2, but the final order prioritizes Bitcoin alone for the strategic reserve.

Bitcoin dipped nearly 5% to $85,000 shortly after the announcement—possibly due to disappointment over no new purchases—before stabilizing at $88,000 by late March 6, per posts on X and CoinGecko data. Other crypto prices (ETH, XRP, SOL, ADA) also fell 4-8%, reflecting tempered expectations. This marks a departure from the Biden administration’s enforcement-driven crypto stance, aligning with Trump’s pro-crypto pivot since his 2024 campaign, where he received significant industry backing (e.g., $25 million from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and others).

Unlike New York’s Bill A06515 (criminalizing crypto fraud) or Coinbase’s SEC hurdles with tokenized COIN, this order avoids securities classification debates by treating seized BTC as a reserve asset, not an investment vehicle. Wyoming’s crypto-friendly laws (e.g., BioNexus’s Ethereum treasury) set a state-level precedent, but this is a federal leap.

Proponents like Senator Cynthia Lummis argue a Bitcoin reserve could bolster the dollar and counter inflation, akin to gold reserves (the U.S. holds 8,133 tons worth ~$650 billion). Critics, including some X users, call it “a pig in lipstick”—a rebrand of existing holdings with no immediate buying power.

Holding 200,000 BTC (1% of the 21 million cap) signals institutional acceptance, potentially spurring adoption, though volatility risks remain (BTC hit $109,071 in January 2025 before cooling). The White House Crypto Summit on March 7, 2025, may clarify custody logistics (e.g., multisig wallets, audits) and future acquisition plans, watched closely by markets. As of now, the U.S. has repositioned its 200,000 seized Bitcoin into a strategic reserve under Trump’s directive, a historic step in crypto policy, though its full impact hinges on execution and broader regulatory evolution.