The National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) has announced that Nigerians will now be required to pay for the newly introduced multipurpose national identity card.

According to Peter Iwegbu, NIMC’s head of card management services, this decision stems from the federal government’s limited revenue, which makes it challenging to fund the production of the cards.

The announcement was made during a two-day press conference in Lagos. Iwegbu explained that charging for the cards aims to ensure that only individuals who truly need them will request them, thereby reducing waste.

“Before we stopped due to funding, we produced more than two million cards, but a lot of them are still in our office because people didn’t need them,” he said.

This move also seeks to address inefficiencies observed in previous attempts to distribute free identity cards, where many remained uncollected.

To make the process more convenient, NIMC is collaborating with banks across the country. Nigerians can visit any participating bank to request and pick up their cards. Additionally, special provisions have been made for less privileged individuals who cannot afford the card but require it for essential government services.

Lanre Yusuf, director of information technology at NIMC, highlighted this effort, stating, “The government has implemented programmes to make the card accessible to less privileged Nigerians who cannot afford it but require it to access government support.”

Features and Expected Launch

The new ID card, described as a “post-paid identity card,” will serve multiple purposes, including identity verification, payments, and access to government services. The card is powered by AfriGO in partnership with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Nigeria Inter-bank Settlement System. Yusuf confirmed that sample test cards had already been received, suggesting the card’s readiness for rollout.

The initiative is part of a broader federal government strategy to digitize identification and streamline access to services across ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs).

Concerns Over Potential Apathy

However, there is growing concern that the decision to charge for the cards could lead to public apathy. Some argue that requiring payment could deter many Nigerians, especially those already facing economic hardship, from obtaining the card. This could undermine the government’s goal of broadening access to identification services.

Experts also warn that apathy could mirror the challenges of past distribution efforts, where over two million cards produced for free remained uncollected. Charging for the cards, they say, risks exacerbating this trend, particularly in rural areas where disposable income is limited, and the perceived need for the card may be low.

While NIMC has justified the fees as a necessary response to limited government funding, the policy raises questions about its alignment with inclusivity goals.

To combat potential apathy, experts suggest increasing public awareness of the card’s multipurpose functionality and its benefits, such as facilitating payments and access to government services. These features, they note, could incentivize more people to view the card as an essential tool rather than an optional expense.

While the initiative aims to reduce waste and improve efficiency, the government has been urged to address public skepticism and economic barriers to ensure widespread adoption. How this policy is received will likely set the tone for future reforms in national identification and other public service programs.

Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu has presented an unprecedented budget of N3 trillion for the 2025 fiscal year, underlining the state’s unchallenged position as the economic hub of Nigeria.

This financial plan, aptly titled The Budget of Sustainability, was unveiled to the Lagos State House of Assembly on Thursday. The proposal underscores Lagos’ role as the lifeline of Nigeria’s economy, with no other state in the federation having crossed the N2 trillion budget threshold.

The scale of this budget reflects Lagos’ unique capacity to mobilize resources, driven by its dynamic economy and expansive tax base.

The N3 trillion budget is structured with a projected total revenue of N2.6 trillion and a financing deficit of N408 billion. Governor Sanwo-Olu outlined that N1.77 trillion is earmarked for capital expenditure, while N1.24 trillion is designated for recurrent expenses, including personnel costs, overheads, and debt servicing. Capital-intensive projects such as road infrastructure, environmental initiatives, healthcare, and education dominate the financial blueprint, with economic affairs receiving the highest allocation of N908.7 billion.

The scale of this budget points to Lagos’ ambition to sustain its infrastructure development and improve the lives of its over 20 million residents. Sanwo-Olu emphasized the durability and adaptability of these investments, aiming to cater to the state’s rapidly growing population and urban demands.

However, the budget’s enormity has raised concerns about potential inefficiencies and the inclusion of phantom projects and inflated expenditures. Many have expressed skepticism about the transparency and accountability of such a massive financial plan, warning of the risks associated with unchecked allocations. Claims of padded expenditures have further fueled doubts, with some stakeholders calling for greater scrutiny to ensure the budget serves its intended purposes.

This concern stems from a review of past budgets. For example, Funso Doherty, a Lagos-based chartered accountant and politician, recently spotlighted several significant allocations in the Lagos State Government’s 2023 budget.

Among the highlighted expenditures were N440 million allocated for new Lexus LX 600 bulletproof SUVs for the Chief of Staff’s office and N7.48 million for liquid fragrance replacement in the Governor’s office. Additionally, the budget earmarked N400 million for ad-hoc charter plane expenses.

Doherty also expressed concern over a N69.9 billion allocation for the repair and upgrade of a section of the Eti Osa/Lekki Expressway, questioning the scale of the investment in the road rehabilitation project.

Further scrutiny was directed at the Lagos Rail Mass Transit (LRMT) project, particularly the N218 billion allocation for phase 2 construction. Doherty called on the government to ensure transparency and guard against potential cost overruns or inefficiencies in the project.

This development follows a steady increase in Lagos’ budget over the years. The state’s financial plan grew from N1.77 trillion in 2023 to N2.27 trillion in 2024, culminating in this record-breaking proposal for 2025. The consistent expansion of Lagos’ budget underscores its economic strength, buoyed by robust internally generated revenue (IGR) and a diverse economic base.

Despite its promise, economists have highlighted the challenges of the proposed budget. They note that Lagos must sustain its impressive revenue-generation capacity while ensuring that expenditures translate into tangible benefits for residents. In addition, the rising debt servicing costs pegged at N125 billion in 2025, and the need to curb leakages and corruption were cited as critical issues that need to be addressed.

Assembly Speaker Mudashiru Obasa assured the governor of the legislature’s commitment to a thorough review of the budget, signaling the need for checks and balances as the state pursues its ambitious agenda.

Our best product is our blog because via tekedia. com we are able to convert readers to sign up for Tekedia Mini-MBA and other services we offer. As I explained in a Harvard Business Review post, it is critical for companies to have a one oasis, and anchoring on that, execute a double play strategy, where one thing can bring in the customers, and value capture is done via another way, if frontal positioning is not possible.

Companies typically make blogs their side service or at best a sub-domain feature, but I decided to make our blog our top domain, understanding that to win, you need to influence Demand (users), and not necessarily bring more Supply since there is nothing you can provide that is not somewhere on the web. In other words, the grand competition is about who can influence the users, and not who is bringing more stuff in a sea of the internet, for the products and services we offer.

When you take that to a higher level, owning a browser at the highest league becomes strategic. A few days ago, I argued that taking Chrome out of Google, by the government, will make Google blind since the eyes of Google to the web will always come from the browser. OpenAI understands that and wants to have its own eye:

 “OpenAI is reportedly exploring the development of its own web browser, a move that aligns with its recently announced plans to launch a dedicated search engine. These steps mark a significant shift for the company, signaling its intent to challenge Google’s dominance in the search and browser markets. The potential browser, which could incorporate OpenAI’s ChatGPT, is said to have been shown in prototype or design form to companies such as Conde Nast, Redfin, Eventbrite, and Priceline, according to The Information.”

The apps and websites of the near-future will evolve, and new browsers will be needed to make the integration of AI agents more optimal. So OpenAI going for this is the right call. Fortunately for Google, this announcement becomes a weapon to argue in its expected appeal that the government should not take Chrome from it.