DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 3

How China Is Using AI to Rewire Its Energy System as Power Becomes the Biggest Constraint on Artificial Intelligence

0

In the city of Chifeng, in northern China’s Inner Mongolia region, Reuters reports an ultra-modern factory humming to life not on coal or gas, but on wind, solar power, and algorithms.

Owned by green-energy company Envision, the facility produces hydrogen and ammonia using renewable electricity, guided by an artificial intelligence system designed to solve one of the hardest problems in the global energy transition: how to run energy-hungry industrial processes on power sources that are inherently unstable.

The plant operates on a standalone grid that feeds electricity directly from Envision’s wind and solar farms into its production lines. That electricity supply can swing sharply depending on weather conditions, a problem for chemical manufacturing, which traditionally depends on steady, uninterrupted power. To manage this, Envision built an AI-driven operating system that continuously adjusts production levels to match real-time renewable output.

Zhang Jian, Envision’s chief engineer for hydrogen energy, described the system as “a conductor” that synchronizes electricity use with nature. When wind speeds rise, the AI automatically ramps up production to absorb as much green power as possible. When output drops, the system scales back electricity demand almost instantly, Zhang told China Energy News, a state-run publication.

The Chifeng facility is Envision’s blueprint for large-scale renewable hydrogen and ammonia production, fuels that could play a critical role in decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors such as steelmaking, chemicals, and shipping. It is also a glimpse into how China is deploying AI not just as a digital tool, but as infrastructure — a way to make its sprawling renewable energy system work at scale.

“AI can play a hugely important role in China’s climate action and energy transition,” said Zheng Saina, an associate professor specializing in low-carbon transition at Southeast University in Nanjing. Beyond industrial optimization, she noted, AI can help calculate and project carbon emissions, forecast electricity supply and demand, and manage increasingly complex power systems.

This push comes at a critical moment. Energy has become one of the biggest bottlenecks in the evolution of artificial intelligence globally. As AI models grow larger and data centers proliferate, electricity demand is surging at a pace that is straining grids from the United States to Europe. In China, AI data centers alone are projected to consume more than 1,000 terawatt-hours of electricity annually by 2030 — roughly equivalent to Japan’s total yearly power consumption.

That looming demand surge presents a paradox. AI is being positioned as a key enabler of China’s green transition, yet its own energy appetite risks undermining climate goals.

“AI data centers are expected to cause explosive growth in electricity demand,” Zheng warned. “This is a problem that urgently needs addressing.”

Where China believes it has an edge over the United States is in energy diversity and scale. China leads the world in installed wind and solar capacity, and continues to add renewable power at a pace unmatched elsewhere. While the U.S. has focused much of its AI investment on building advanced large-language models and cloud infrastructure, China has placed parallel emphasis on integrating AI into physical systems, particularly energy.

President Donald Trump is opposed to green energy initiatives and has recently ordered the halt of wind energy programs.

“China is developing very specific, tailored AI solutions that support the grid and individual energy sectors like wind, solar and even nuclear,” said Cory Combs, associate director at Beijing-based research firm Trivium China. “That’s different from the U.S. approach, which has largely centered on model performance rather than system-level integration.”

As renewable energy expands, grid flexibility has become essential. Wind and solar power are intermittent, and without smart coordination, excess electricity is often wasted. AI is increasingly seen as the missing link. In September, Beijing launched an “AI+ energy” strategy aimed at deeply integrating artificial intelligence across the power system.

By 2027, the plan calls for more than five large AI models dedicated to energy applications, at least 10 replicable pilot projects, and over 100 real-world use cases. Within three more years, China wants to reach what it describes as a “world-leading level” in combining specialized AI technologies with the energy sector.

One of AI’s most critical roles is demand forecasting. Power grids must balance supply and demand second by second to avoid blackouts. Fang Lurui, an assistant professor of power-system planning at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University in Suzhou, said accurate AI-driven forecasts allow grid operators to plan ahead, deciding how much electricity to store in batteries or when to call on backup generation.

“If AI models can accurately predict renewable output and electricity demand throughout the day, the grid can operate more efficiently and safely,” Fang said.

Better forecasting also reduces reliance on coal-fired backup plants and allows more renewable power to be absorbed rather than curtailed.

Some Chinese cities are already experimenting at scale. Shanghai has launched a citywide virtual power plant backed by a digital platform developed by State Grid. The system aggregates electricity generation and load-reduction capacity from 47 operators, including data centers, building heating and cooling systems, and electric vehicle charging networks, allowing them to function as a single flexible resource.

During a trial run in August, the platform successfully flattened a demand spike by shedding 162.7 megawatts of load — roughly the output of a small coal-fired power plant.

Beyond grid management, China is also exploring how AI can strengthen its national carbon market, which covers more than 3,000 companies across power, steel, cement, and aluminum smelting. These sectors account for over 60% of the country’s total carbon emissions. AI could help regulators verify emissions data, improve allocation of free allowances, and allow companies to calculate compliance costs more precisely, according to Chen Zhibin, a senior manager for carbon markets at think tank Adelphi.

Yet challenges remain formidable. Studies suggest the lifecycle carbon emissions of China’s AI industry could double between 2030 and 2038, peaking at nearly 700 million tons — higher than Germany’s total emissions in 2024. China’s grid still relies heavily on coal, complicating efforts to green AI at speed.

To address this, Beijing has mandated that data centers improve energy efficiency and raise renewable power usage by 10% annually. It is also encouraging new data centers to be built in western regions rich in wind and solar resources. On the East Coast, operators are experimenting with unconventional solutions. Near Shanghai, a data center is being built underwater, using cold seawater for cooling and drawing more than 95% of its electricity from a nearby offshore wind farm, according to its developer, Hailanyun.

While AI’s energy footprint is now a central concern, many researchers argue that the technology remains indispensable. Xiong Qiyang, a PhD candidate at Renmin University of China who co-authored one study on AI emissions, said the trade-off is unavoidable but manageable.

“AI’s energy use is a real concern,” he said. “But it does much more good than harm in helping key sectors reduce emissions. That makes AI an essential tool in China’s green transition.”

China’s bet amid intensifying competition in artificial intelligence is that by pairing AI with a vast and diversified renewable energy system, it can stay ahead in both the AI race and the energy transition, even as other economies struggle to keep the lights on.

China Imposes Up to 42.7% Provisional Tariffs on EU Dairy Products, Escalating Tit-for-Tat Trade Dispute

0

China has escalated its trade confrontation with the European Union by announcing provisional anti-subsidy tariffs of up to 42.7% on select dairy imports from the bloc, effective from December 23, following a preliminary investigation that concluded EU subsidies have inflicted “substantial damage” on its domestic dairy sector.

The move, detailed in a statement from the Ministry of Commerce, targets a range of products including fresh and processed cheeses, blue-veined varieties such as France’s renowned Roquefort—aged in the caves of Roquefort-sur-Soulzon—curd, and certain milk and cream with fat content exceeding 10%.

Notably, infant formula, a high-value export category, has been spared, providing some relief to major players like Danone and Nestlé.

Tariff rates are tiered based on cooperation during the probe: around 60 participating companies, including Denmark’s Arla Foods (known for brands like Lurpak and Castello) and Ireland’s Kerry Group, will face duties between 21.9% and 29.7%, while non-cooperators are slapped with the maximum 42.7%.

Most firms are expected to pay around 30%, according to industry estimates.

The investigation, initiated in August 2024, scrutinized subsidies under the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and national schemes, which Beijing claims have enabled unfair pricing amid China’s domestic challenges, like a milk oversupply, declining prices, and shifting consumer demand driven by an aging population and economic slowdown.

This action fits into a broader pattern of retaliatory measures, sparked by the EU’s October 2024 imposition of up to 45.3% tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) after a year-long anti-subsidy probe that found state aid distorted competition.

Beijing has since targeted other EU exports, including brandy (with provisional duties up to 34.9% in July 2025, later challenged by the EU at the World Trade Organization) and pork.

Just last week, China finalized pork tariffs at 4.9% to 19.8% for five years—significantly lower than September’s provisional 62.4%—potentially signaling room for negotiation amid ongoing talks.

Analysts view the dairy tariffs as calibrated pressure, exempting sensitive items while hitting symbolic EU strengths like French cheeses and Irish milk powders.

Economically, the tariffs could disrupt $589 million in annual EU dairy exports to China (stable from 2023), representing about 5% of the bloc’s total dairy shipments but a larger share for specific nations.

Ireland, a top supplier of milk powders and cheeses, stands to lose the most, with exports valued at over €200 million annually; France follows with its premium cheeses like Roquefort and Camembert, potentially facing €150 million in hits.

Denmark and the Netherlands, key players via Arla and FrieslandCampina, could see combined losses exceeding €100 million.

For China, the measures bolster domestic giants like Mengniu and Yili, which have invested billions in modernizing farms but struggle with overcapacity—producing 45 million tons of milk annually amid stagnating consumption.

Shares in Mengniu briefly climbed before closing flat, reflecting optimism for local market share gains.

Stakeholder reactions have been swift and critical. The European Commission labeled the tariffs “unjustified and unwarranted,” based on “questionable allegations and insufficient evidence,” and vowed to submit detailed comments while pursuing dialogue.

Industry voices echoed dismay: Conor Mulvihill of Dairy Industry Ireland called dairy a “political pawn” in the EV spat, while Henrik Damholt Jorgensen of the Danish Dairy Board urged negotiations to avert long-term harm.

French producers, already reeling from domestic challenges like labor shortages, fear rerouting to less lucrative markets like New Zealand or the U.S.

Broader implications highlight deepening EU-China trade fissures. China’s trade surplus with the EU has ballooned to a record $300 billion in 2025, more than double imports, fueling accusations of dumping and overcapacity.

French President Emmanuel Macron, in recent interviews, has warned of Europe’s “life or death” industrial moment, labeling China’s surplus “untenable” and urging investments in the EU to avoid further barriers.

Dutch officials have echoed concerns over Beijing’s retaliatory tactics, such as export restrictions on chips.

As provisional measures, these tariffs could be adjusted in a final ruling expected by mid-2026, similar to the pork case, but analysts warn of potential escalation into luxury goods or autos if EV talks stall.

Michael Saylor Predicts Bitcoin to Reach $1 Million in 10 Years as Strategy Eyes Supply Cap

0

Strategy CEO Michael Saylor has projected a dramatic long-term rise in Bitcoin’s value, linking future price levels to how much of the cryptocurrency’s total supply his company, Strategy, ultimately controls.

Speaking on The Breakdown with David Gokhshtein, the Strategy executive chairman said the firm plans to continue accumulating Bitcoin until it holds between 5% and 7.5% of the asset’s total supply.

According to Saylor, Strategy would only slow its purchases once it approaches that threshold, which he described as a natural ceiling driven by Bitcoin’s scarcity rather than a change in corporate strategy.

Saylor noted that reaching such ownership levels would likely coincide with significantly higher Bitcoin prices. He suggested that if Strategy were to control around 5% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, the cost of a single coin could rise to approximately $1 million in 10 years.

He attributed these potential price increases to Bitcoin’s fixed supply and structural constraints, arguing that long-term valuation growth would be fueled by scarcity dynamics rather than short-term speculative demand.

In a recent post on X, he shared a chart of Strategy’s recent Bitcoin accumulation, with the caption, “Green Dots Beget Orange Dots.”

The post features a chart tracking the company’s 90 Bitcoin purchases since 2020, with orange dots marking buy events, a green line showing average cost at $74,972, and current holdings of 671,268 BTC valued at $59 billion as of December 21, 2025.

The caption “Green Dots Beget Orange Dots” metaphorically links profitable unrealized gains (green line below price) to triggering additional buys (orange dots), reflecting a strategy of accumulating during dips for long-term appreciation.

Recent data confirms this approach, as Strategy added 10,645 BTC for $980 million on December 16 2025, at $92,098 per coin, achieving 24.9% year-to-date BTC yield amid market volatility, as echoed in community replies praising conviction over short-term timing.

As Strategy chairman, Saylor’s optimism often precedes corporate buys, aligning with the firm’s debt-financed accumulation strategy amid the 2025 average price of $102,112. He described Bitcoin buying as a process of deploying ever-larger amounts of capital against a fixed and diminishing supply, naturally slowing accumulation over time.

Amidst Saylor’s prediction of BTC to reach $1 million per coin in 10 years, the crypto asset according to analysts underperformed in 2025. At the time of writing this report, Bitcoin was trading at $89,530, beneath its peak. Recall that the crypto asset had traded as high as $94,461 this year, before it retraced. Overall in 2025, Bitcoin is down nearly 5%. This performance has increased pressure on long-term holders, with profits continuing to decline.

Notably, the underperformance of Bitcoin relative to gold has sparked concerns among analysts that speculative assets may be entering a prolonged downturn. Gold continued its upward rally today, reaching a fresh all-time high of $4,409 during the early Asian trading session.

A market watcher explained that gold’s move to fresh all-time highs heading into year-end suggests that investors continue to prioritize capital protection while rotating into risk assets selectively.

Bitcoin critic and Gold advocate Peter Schiff has stated that Bitcoin hype is what is preventing people from buying Gold.

He said,

“Bitcoin is what’s preventing so many people from buying gold or silver. It’s so unfortunate that they will lose most of their money in Bitcoin instead of making even more money in precious metals”.

In an earlier post on X, he criticised CNBC for focusing on BTC, while ignoring much bigger rallies in precious metals like Gold and silver.

He wrote,

“Now CNBC is focusing on today’s meaningless Bitcoin rally as reflecting an increased appetite for risk assets in general. But they are ignoring much bigger rallies in precious metals and mining stocks, which indicate that investors are rotating into assets seen as safe havens.”

The post underscores Schiff’s longstanding preference for precious metals over cryptocurrencies during economic volatility, positioning gold and mining stocks as indicators of investor caution rather than speculation.

Nevertheless, some market participants hold a more optimistic view on Bitcoin’s outlook, arguing that long-term fundamentals outweigh short-term volatility.

Cathie Wood, CEO of ARK Invest, has expressed confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term potential, citing its expanding use cases, rising institutional allocation, and the maturation of market infrastructure such as spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). According to Wood, these developments could unlock fresh capital inflows and reduce barriers to entry for traditional investors.

Large financial institutions have also contributed to the optimistic sentiment. Analysts at firms such as Fidelity Digital Assets have noted that Bitcoin’s network fundamentals including hash rate growth and wallet adoption continue to strengthen, even during periods of market correction. This resilience, they argue, suggests that Bitcoin is evolving beyond a speculative asset into a more established component of global financial markets.

While risks remain and price fluctuations are expected, these optimistic voices maintain that Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory remains intact. For them, periods of market uncertainty represent not a signal to exit, but an opportunity to accumulate ahead of what they believe could be another phase of sustained growth.

OpenAI’s Stargate Seals Memory Deals with Samsung and SK Hynix for DRAM, Sparking Global Supply Chain Concerns

0

OpenAI’s ambitious Stargate project, a cornerstone of the AI infrastructure race, has secured preliminary agreements with South Korean semiconductor powerhouses Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix to supply massive volumes of DRAM wafers, potentially devouring up to 40% of global production by 2029.

The deals, formalized as letters of intent in October 2025 following high-stakes meetings involving OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, and executives from both firms, underscore the project’s unprecedented scale and its ripple effects on global tech supply chains.

The partnerships go beyond mere supply: Samsung and SK Hynix, which together command about 70% of the global DRAM market and 80% of high-bandwidth memory (HBM), have committed to ramping production to meet OpenAI’s projected demand of 900,000 DRAM wafer starts per month.

This volume encompasses commodity DDR5, low-power LPDDR4/LPDDR5, premium HBM for AI accelerators, and specialty DRAM types. Notably, initial deliveries will consist of undiced wafers—raw silicon before cutting into individual chips—granting Stargate flexibility in customization and processing. But questions linger on who will handle dicing, packaging into DRAM chips, HBM stacks, or modules, with speculation pointing to potential in-house or third-party fabs.

To contextualize the scale, global 300mm fab capacity is forecasted to hit 10 million wafer starts per month (WSPM) in 2025, per TechInsights. DRAM’s share stood at 22% (about 2.07 million WSPM) in 2024, with analysts like those at TrendForce projecting an 8.7% growth to roughly 2.25 million WSPM in 2025—meaning Stargate could claim around 40% of that capacity at peak. Broader market forecasts from Yole Group predict DRAM revenues surging to $129 billion in 2025, up from prior years, driven by AI demand, with total memory market revenues nearing $190 billion, including NAND.

However, this concentration has fueled warnings of shortages: Counterpoint Research notes 50% price hikes in 2025, with further increases into 2026, impacting consumer electronics like PCs, smartphones, and GPUs.

Deloitte’s 2025 Semiconductor Outlook highlights AI and data centers as key drivers for chip sales growth, even as PC and mobile demand lags.

Stargate, a $500 billion collaboration controlled by OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, aims to deploy multiple gigawatt-scale AI data centers globally to train next-generation models. Launched in January 2025 with a request for proposals from partners, the project has accelerated rapidly.

The flagship site in Abilene, Texas, went operational early, providing 1 gigawatt of capacity. By mid-2025, Oracle pledged an additional 4.5 gigawatts, pushing totals over 5 gigawatts. September brought announcements of five new U.S. sites, escalating investments to $400 billion, and capacity toward 7 gigawatts. In October, Michigan joined with a multi-billion-dollar campus developed by Related Digital, set for construction in early 2026. December saw ground broken on a $15 billion, four-building complex in Wisconsin by Vantage Data Centers, offering nearly 1 gigawatt, and Michigan regulators approving 1.4 gigawatts of power from DTE Energy—despite local opposition over energy costs and grid strain.

These facilities demand enormous resources: thousands of servers per site, each packed with Nvidia Blackwell GPUs and ancillary gear like cooling systems and power delivery—potentially necessitating dedicated power plants, as Altman has toured Asia-Pacific to secure. The Samsung ecosystem’s involvement deepens the alliance. Samsung SDS will co-design and operate Stargate sites in Korea, provide consulting for integrating OpenAI models into enterprise systems, and act as a reseller for services like ChatGPT Enterprise in South Korea.

Samsung C&T and Samsung Heavy Industries are pioneering floating data centers—offshore platforms leveraging maritime tech for superior cooling efficiency and lower emissions, though engineering hurdles remain. Plans include two Korean “Stargate-style” facilities starting at 20 megawatts, positioning South Korea as an AI hub amid high local adoption of OpenAI tools.

Altman lauded Korea’s “incredible tech talent, world-class infrastructure, strong government support, and thriving AI ecosystem” during his visit.

AI Drove Over 50,000 Job Cuts in U.S. in 2025 – Report

0

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer just reshaping how work is done, it is now reshaping who gets to keep their jobs.

In 2025, the rapid adoption of AI across U.S. industries was responsible for almost 50,000 layoffs, according to data from consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

These figures highlight a growing shift as companies automate roles, streamline operations, and replace human labor with AI-driven systems in a bid to cut costs and boost efficiency. Per Challenger, overall job cuts topped 1 million in 2025, the highest level since the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020.

Major firms such as Meta, Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM, amongst others, announced significant job cuts this year, citing AI as a factor. Amazon in October, announced the largest ever round of layoffs in its history, slashing 14,000 corporate roles, as it looks to invest in its biggest bets which include AI.

CEO Andy Jassy warned of the cuts earlier this year, telling employees that AI will shrink the company’s workforce and that the tech giant will need “fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs.”

Also, Tech giant Microsoft has cut a total of around 15,000 jobs through 2025, and its most recent announcement in July saw 9,000 roles on the chopping block.

CEO Satya Nadella wrote in a memo to employees that the company needed to “reimagine” its “mission for a new era,” and went on to tout the significance of AI to the company.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff confirmed in September that 4,000 customer support workers had been cut at the firm with the help of AI.

He said on a podcast, “I’ve reduced it from 9,000 heads to about 5,000, because I need less heads”.

Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant disruption in the U.S. labor market, it is already reshaping how people work and what skills are valued. As AI systems become more capable of automating routine, repetitive, and rules-based tasks, U.S. citizens are increasingly being pushed to upskill and adapt in order to remain relevant in a fast-changing economy.

According to a recent report from the McKinsey Global Institute, AI and AI-powered robots are now capable of performing more than half of all work hours in the United States. The report found that although the vast majority of human skills will remain relevant in an era of large-scale automation, the way people use those skills is expected to change dramatically.

At current levels of capability, AI agents could perform tasks that occupy 44 percent of U.S. work hours today, and robots could account for 13 percent, the report said. Recent U.S. government projections underline this shift. Employment growth is expected to remain flat or even decline in several tech-exposed fields, particularly administrative support roles, paralegals and legal assistants, and computer programmers.

These occupations have traditionally relied on structured tasks such as data entry, document preparation, basic legal research, and writing or debugging standard code areas where AI tools now perform faster and at lower cost.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has explicitly pointed to technology, including AI, as a major factor behind these projections. In administrative roles, for example, AI-powered software can now schedule meetings, manage emails, generate reports, and process invoices with minimal human input. This reduces demand for entry-level and mid-level clerical workers while increasing demand for professionals who can supervise systems, interpret outputs, or manage more complex workflows.

Even in programming once seen as a future-proof career AI is changing the landscape. Tools that can generate code, fix bugs, or translate natural language into software instructions are reducing demand for basic coding tasks.

The BLS suggests that while advanced software engineering, systems design, and AI-related roles will grow, traditional programming jobs focused on routine development may stagnate or decline. This is forcing programmers to upskill into areas like AI engineering, cybersecurity, cloud architecture, and product-focused development.

Overall, AI is not just replacing jobs, it is redefining them. Workers who rely solely on routine technical or administrative skills face higher risk, while those who invest in continuous learning especially in analytical thinking, creativity, system oversight, and human-centered skill are better positioned to thrive.

As AI adoption accelerates across industries, the U.S. workforce is being nudged toward higher-value roles that complement machines rather than compete with them. The future of work, as the BLS projections suggest, will belong to those who can adapt alongside AI, not those who ignore its impact.