DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 337

Crypto Markets Downtime Has Triggered FUD on Wintermute and Crypto.com

0

The cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp downturn, triggered by U.S. President Trump’s announcement of 100% tariffs on Chinese imports. This led to over $10 billion in liquidations across the sector within 24 hours, with Bitcoin dropping from around $122,000 to below $110,000 and the total market cap shedding hundreds of billions.

Amid this volatility, unverified rumors began circulating on Telegram channels and X (formerly Twitter) claiming that major market maker Wintermute and exchange Crypto.com had suffered catastrophic losses—often phrased as “blowing up” or facing insolvency/liquidation.

These claims speculated that the firms were dumping assets on exchanges like Binance to cover positions, exacerbating the sell-off. The rumors gained traction quickly on social media, with posts warning users to withdraw funds and speculating on broader contagion.

However, no official downtime, withdrawal halts, or announcements from the firms supported these claims—users reported normal operations throughout.

Official Statements Denying the Rumors

Both companies swiftly addressed the speculation on October 11, 2025, via X posts and statements, emphasizing operational stability and dismissing the rumors as “baseless FUD” fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

The system is operating perfectly and the FUD is unfounded.” Confirmed no disruptions to withdrawals or transactions. “I’m sorry to disappoint you, but Wintermute is perfectly fine, everything is as usual.” Stressed no collapse during the downturn and normal business operations., Kris noted.

BD/Partnerships Exec Arnaud Arn_Wintermute Responded to liquidation rumors with: “I heard Wintermute got liquidated” – followed by clarification that it’s “unfounded FUD” and false. Expressed confusion over the claims.

These responses were echoed across crypto news outlets, with no evidence emerging to substantiate the rumors. Binance founder CZ also weighed in separately, denying any involvement in “hunting Wintermute” and calling related speculation false.

The sell-off was part of a larger $19B+ liquidation wave, but the rumors appear to have amplified panic without basis. Wintermute’s recent OTC volume growth 313% in 2024 and institutional ties suggest resilience, not vulnerability.

The Binance FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) episode in late 2022, triggered by the FTX collapse, exemplifies how rumors of exchange insolvency can cascade through crypto markets.

Sparked on November 6 when Binance CEO CZ announced liquidation of $529M in FTT tokens citing risk management post-Terra/LUNA fallout, it escalated with Binance’s brief takeover intent, abandonment on November 8 after due diligence revealed FTX’s $8B shortfall, and subsequent proof-of-reserves scrutiny on Binance.

Largest since FTX; BUSD bled ~9B tokens. Comparable % outflows hit Crypto.com/OKX, but Binance scrutiny was outsized. -32% from Nov; shorts piled in $118M open interest, but no FTT-like crash—BNB’s utility (e.g., fee discounts) buffered it.

Bank run” narrative, with $300M daily outflows and warnings to “get off exchanges.” Reserves fell just 6% vs. FTX’s 90%, but perception ruled—BNB dipped amid shorts, and BTC tested 2-year lows (~$15,650). Temporary USDC withdrawal halts fueled more doubt; Silvergate bank ties rumored severed.

By Jan 2023, inflows resumed; BTC rallied 50%+ into 2023 bull run. Accelerated CEX transparency (e.g., PoR standards) and DeFi migration; Binance consolidated dominance but faced SEC scrutiny (fined $4B in 2023).

FUD exploits sentiment in speculative markets, causing outsized volatility like 10-15% BTC/ETH drops on rumors alone. Yet, facts (e.g., reserves) prevail; it often signals bottoms for HODLers. Parallels recent Wintermute/Crypto.com rumors—verify via on-chain data/official channels to mitigate.

While the statements calmed immediate nerves, crypto’s history via past Wintermute manipulation allegations in early 2025 means skepticism lingers. No further issues have been reported as of October 12, 2025.

The rumors were unfounded FUD amid a volatile market day, and both firms are operating normally.

Gold Hits New All-Time High Above $4,200 per Ounce

0

Gold futures surged to a fresh all-time high (ATH) of $4,218.17 per troy ounce, marking a significant milestone in the precious metal’s price history. This eclipses the previous record of around $4,014.60 set just a week earlier on October 7.

The current spot price as of midday trading stands at approximately $4,184.22, up about 1.4% from the prior close and reflecting a 13.8% gain over the past month alone. This extends a blistering rally that’s seen the precious metal up over 54% year-to-date, outpacing most major assets amid a perfect storm of economic and geopolitical pressures.

Silver, often riding gold’s coattails, also notched a fresh record at $49.57 per ounce earlier this week before pulling back slightly to around $52.38 today.

Why Is Gold Rallying Now?

This latest ATH comes amid heightened global uncertainty, positioning gold as a classic safe-haven asset: Escalating US-China Trade Tensions: Renewed threats from President Trump over tariffs on soybeans, rare earth minerals, and shipbuilding have spooked markets.

China, a major buyer of US agricultural goods, has halted 2025 fall harvest purchases due to retaliatory measures, boosting demand for gold as a hedge. The dollar’s decline—coupled with the Federal Reserve’s recent rate cuts—has made gold more attractive to international buyers.

Gold has now held above $4,000 for three straight days, up 56.3% year-over-year from $2,661.40 in October 2024. Ongoing sanctions on Russia, diversification by central banks like the China’s record purchases, and persistent inflation fears are driving inflows.

Analysts note gold’s role in portfolios during volatility, with retail and institutional investors piling in. Gold’s path to $4,200 is remarkable: Previous ATH: $4,014.60 on October 7, 2025—surpassing the inflation-adjusted 1980 peak of ~$2,500–$3,000 nominal $850 then.

Persistent inflation hedging, coupled with central banks especially in emerging markets diversifying away from the dollar, has fueled massive ETF inflows—$64 billion YTD, including a record $17.3 billion in September alone.

Gold’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) is at 87, signaling “overbought” territory, but the rally shows no signs of fatigue yet. It’s broken key resistance levels like $4,000 hit on October 7-8 with conviction.

Analysts are overwhelmingly bullish, with many eyeing $4,500+ by year-end and $5,000 in 2026. UBS projects gold ETF holdings to top 3,900 metric tons by December, nearing 2020 records. Deutsche Bank sees a full-year return exceeding 50%, potentially making gold 2025’s top performer.

From 2011’s nominal high of ~$2,000, gold endured a decade of consolidation before exploding higher post-2020 amid COVID-19 stimulus and geopolitical shocks. Year-to-date 2025 gains exceed 50%.

The surge is dominating conversations on X (formerly Twitter), with users celebrating (or speculating) in real-time, with a chart showing the spike. “Gold Hit New ATH $4200 … $5000 this year possible?”, pondering further upside.

“People don’t like tariff uncertainty -> Gold hit another ATH at $4200” – @TradfiBaby, linking it to policy risks. @TradfiBaby. Multiple live Spaces and posts from @modernmarket_ and team, drawing hundreds of views: “Gold hits new ATH at $4200.”

Forecasts are bullish but cautious—analysts see potential for $4,500–$5,000 by year-end if tensions persist, though some warn of pullbacks if rates stabilize. Bank of America advises measured exposure near these levels.

A stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs report or de-escalating trade talks could cap gains short-term. If you’re eyeing exposure, consider physical bullion, ETFs like GLD, or mining stocks—but as always, diversify and DYOR. Gold’s not just shining; it’s a spotlight on deeper market cracks.

Brookfield to Take Full Control of Oaktree Capital in $3bn Deal, Strengthening Its Credit Powerhouse

0

Brookfield announced on Monday that it will acquire the remaining 26% stake in U.S.-based Oaktree Capital Management for about $3 billion, cementing full ownership of one of the world’s leading credit and distressed debt investors.

The deal marks a major step in Brookfield’s ongoing effort to expand its footprint in private credit and alternative investments — a space increasingly dominated by global heavyweights like Blackstone and Apollo Global Management.

Under the terms of the agreement, New York-based Brookfield Asset Management (BAM.TO) and its parent company, Brookfield Corporation, will fund roughly $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion of the purchase price, respectively. Once completed, Brookfield will own 100% of Oaktree, which it first acquired a majority stake in for $5 billion in 2019.

The move will make the United States Brookfield Asset Management’s largest market, with $550 billion in assets under management (AUM), employing more than half of its global workforce and generating about 50% of its total revenue. The deal, expected to close in the first quarter of 2026, positions Brookfield as one of the most diversified alternative asset managers in the world — with deep reach across credit, infrastructure, real estate, renewables, and private equity.

Founded in 1995 by Howard Marks and Bruce Karsh, Oaktree Capital has built a global reputation for expertise in distressed debt and opportunistic credit investing. The Los Angeles-based firm manages about $209 billion in assets as of June 30, 2025, making it one of the largest credit managers in the world.

Brookfield’s decision to acquire Oaktree outright is part of its strategic bet on the private credit market, which has surged in popularity as rising interest rates push companies to seek flexible financing outside traditional banks. The acquisition also strengthens Brookfield’s wealth and asset management capabilities, enabling it to offer investors more comprehensive access to public and private credit strategies.

“Oaktree will remain central to Brookfield’s credit strategy, and we see significant opportunities to grow the franchise and expand what we can offer our clients together,” said Oaktree’s co-chairman, Howard Marks, in a statement.

Marks, who is one of the most respected figures in global investing, will continue to serve on Brookfield’s board following the transaction.

Oaktree’s chief investment officer, Bruce Karsh, will also join the board of Brookfield Asset Management, while Oaktree’s co-CEOs, Robert O’Leary and Armen Panossian, will become co-CEOs of Brookfield’s entire credit business.

By consolidating Oaktree’s operations, Brookfield aims to streamline its credit investment platform, which has already been a major profit driver. Including Oaktree’s contribution, Brookfield Asset Management generated about $2.8 billion in fee-related earnings over the last twelve months, the firm said.

When Brookfield first acquired its majority stake in Oaktree in 2019, the deal was seen as a landmark combination between two giants in alternative asset management — marrying Brookfield’s strength in real assets with Oaktree’s expertise in credit and distressed opportunities. Since then, the partnership has allowed both firms to scale their product offerings globally, targeting institutional and high-net-worth investors seeking stable returns amid volatile equity markets.

Brookfield CEO Bruce Flatt has long emphasized the firm’s ambitions to rival Blackstone and Apollo in the alternatives space. With full control of Oaktree, Brookfield is now better positioned to compete directly with those firms in the fast-growing $1.7 trillion private credit market — an area that has become one of Wall Street’s most lucrative profit engines.

For Oaktree, the full buyout by Brookfield is also the culmination of a long-running partnership that has steadily integrated its teams, platforms, and client networks. The firm is expected to retain its brand identity and continue to operate independently under the Brookfield umbrella, much as it has since 2019.

It is believed that the timing of the deal aligns with a broader trend of consolidation among alternative asset managers, as firms seek scale and diversification in an increasingly competitive environment. The combination of Brookfield’s global infrastructure and Oaktree’s credit expertise gives the merged entity an advantage in capturing institutional capital flows at a time when investors are searching for higher yields and downside protection.

With this deal, Brookfield’s credit platform — already one of the largest globally — will gain even greater scope and influence. The company now expects its credit operations to become one of its biggest growth engines over the next decade, helping it attract institutional mandates and further entrench its position among the world’s top-tier asset managers.

The acquisition marks another major consolidation milestone in the financial industry, uniting two of the most respected names in asset management and reshaping the competitive dynamics of the global alternatives market.

BYD Eyes Spain for Third European Factory, Intensifying Competition with Tesla and Volkswagen

0

China’s largest automaker, BYD, is considering Spain as the leading candidate for its third European factory — a move that could reshape competition in Europe’s electric vehicle market.

The planned assembly plant, which would join facilities in Hungary and Turkey, marks the latest phase in BYD’s rapid global expansion and its effort to outpace Tesla and Volkswagen on European soil.

According to people familiar with the matter who spoke to Reuters, BYD favors Spain because of its low manufacturing costs and clean energy network. The automaker has been scouting several sites across Europe, including Germany, but sources said the country’s high labor and energy costs have raised concerns internally. A final decision on the factory, expected before the end of the year, will need approval from Chinese regulators.

BYD’s country manager for Spain and Portugal, Alberto De Aza, told Reuters last month that Spain would be an “ideal location for further expansion” because of its strong industrial infrastructure and access to cheap electricity.

His remarks reflect how diplomatic and business ties between Spain and China have warmed considerably in recent years. Spain, Europe’s second-largest car-producing nation, has also become increasingly attractive to foreign automakers after it announced a €5 billion plan in 2020 to draw EV and battery investments using EU pandemic relief funds. The plan has already brought in major investments from Volkswagen, China’s Chery, and battery giant CATL.

BYD’s interest in Spain signals its intent to deepen its footprint in Europe and avoid tariffs on Chinese-made vehicles. Reuters previously reported that BYD aims to produce all-electric vehicles for sale in Europe locally within three years — a move that will help it sidestep the European Union’s proposed tariffs on Chinese EV imports.

The Chinese automaker has enjoyed a meteoric rise in Europe. Sales jumped 280 percent in the first eight months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, as BYD expanded its offerings to include both plug-in hybrids and fully electric cars. Reuters noted that BYD recently overhauled its European operations, hiring more managers and expanding its dealership network to boost sales. Its Hungarian factory, which is still under construction, has seen its production timeline pushed to next year, while its Turkish plant is expected to open in 2026.

Spain’s emergence as the frontrunner for BYD’s next facility also carries broader geopolitical significance. Last year, Spain abstained from a European Union vote on tariffs targeting Chinese EVs — a decision that helped improve ties with Beijing. By contrast, Germany voted against the tariffs. According to Reuters, China’s government privately urged automakers to halt investments in countries that supported the tariffs, which has further strengthened Spain’s position as a preferred investment destination.

Analysts say BYD’s deepening presence in Europe could intensify competition for both Tesla and Volkswagen, the two dominant forces in the continent’s EV market. Tesla has struggled in Europe this year as its small, aging model lineup has faced growing competition from EVs launched by European and Chinese rivals.

Despite modest year-on-year gains in some countries — including a 2.7 percent increase in France and 20.5 percent in Denmark — Tesla’s European performance has been overshadowed by the influx of newer, cheaper models from Chinese automakers like BYD.

Volkswagen, on the other hand, has managed to maintain its foothold but faces its own challenges. The automaker recently reported a 1 percent increase in global deliveries, driven in part by European sales, though Reuters quoted Volkswagen executives warning that “the cost of producing both EVs and combustion engine cars and constructing battery cell plants weighed on earnings.” The German automaker expects only a “slight increase” in operating profit margins for 2025, underscoring the financial strain of adapting to an all-electric future while defending market share against lower-cost competitors.

For BYD, the European expansion is a calculated move to lock in supply chains, lower export costs, and cement itself as a local player rather than an external challenger. The automaker has publicly stated that it intends to make Europe one of its largest overseas markets within the next decade. If the Spain plant is approved, it would not only strengthen BYD’s production capacity but also give it strategic access to key European markets through Spain’s robust logistics network.

The broader implications are significant. As BYD’s presence grows, the competition for Europe’s electric vehicle market — already fierce — is set to intensify. Tesla, which once dominated Europe’s EV sales, now faces pressure from both ends: traditional automakers like Volkswagen are accelerating their EV transition, and new entrants like BYD are offering affordable alternatives. Volkswagen, meanwhile, must defend its home turf while balancing profitability and innovation costs.

Reuters’ factual reporting captures this shifting balance: “BYD’s sales in Europe jumped 280%… Tesla has struggled in Europe this year… Volkswagen reported a 1% increase in third-quarter global deliveries.” Those lines together reflect a quiet but powerful transition — one where China’s most valuable automaker is no longer content to export cars to Europe, but to build them there, right next to its competitors.

OpenAI launches mental health council to guide ChatGPT and Sora on emotional well-being amid growing scrutiny

0

OpenAI has formed a new Expert Council on Well-Being and AI, a group of eight specialists who will advise the company on how its artificial intelligence tools, including ChatGPT and the short-form video app Sora, affect users’ mental health, emotions, and motivation.

The council will help OpenAI define what healthy interactions with AI should look like, as the company moves deeper into integrating emotionally aware technologies across its platforms. According to OpenAI, the group will meet regularly and conduct ongoing evaluations to ensure that future product developments align with mental health safety standards.

The formation of the council comes at a critical time for OpenAI, which has faced increasing scrutiny over the psychological and social implications of generative AI systems. Regulators, child safety advocates, and mental health professionals have raised concerns that chatbots could exacerbate anxiety, loneliness, or depressive behaviors—especially among young users who spend long hours engaging with conversational AI.

In September, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) opened an inquiry into several technology firms, including OpenAI, Google, and Meta, over the potential mental health risks posed by AI chatbots. The investigation is examining how these systems collect user data, influence emotions, and potentially manipulate behavior through tailored responses.

OpenAI is also facing a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of a teenager who died by suicide. The lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT generated harmful content and failed to identify or mitigate signs of distress during the user’s interaction. Legal experts have said the case could set an important precedent for AI accountability and content moderation standards in emotionally sensitive contexts.

In response to such concerns, OpenAI has ramped up its AI safety and well-being initiatives. The company has introduced an age prediction system that automatically activates teen-appropriate settings for users under 18 years old. These settings restrict access to certain features and moderate chatbot tone to reduce the risk of emotionally triggering responses.

OpenAI has also implemented new parental control features, allowing parents to monitor AI interactions and receive alerts if their child exhibits signs of emotional distress or unsafe behavior. These tools, introduced in September, were developed with early input from members who now sit on the Expert Council.

OpenAI emphasized that the council will play a key role in establishing measurable standards for AI safety and emotional intelligence in human-machine interactions.

The company said it will also collaborate with the Global Physician Network, a consortium of mental health clinicians and behavioral researchers who will test ChatGPT for signs of emotional bias, manipulation, or mental health risks. Their findings will inform internal policy frameworks and guide updates to AI behavior models.

The Expert Council’s first in-person meeting took place last week, during which members began discussions on what constitutes “healthy AI engagement.” Early priorities reportedly include the development of emotional safeguards for AI responses, prevention of dependency behavior, and guidelines for the responsible use of AI in educational and therapeutic settings.

The eight members of OpenAI’s Expert Council on Well-Being and AI include leading figures in psychiatry, psychology, and digital interaction research:

  • Andrew Przybylski, Professor of Human Behavior and Technology at the University of Oxford, is known for his research on the psychological impact of digital technologies.
  • David Bickham, Research Scientist at Boston Children’s Hospital’s Digital Wellness Lab, who studies the influence of media and technology on youth mental health.
  • David Mohr, Director of the Center for Behavioral Intervention Technologies at Northwestern University, specializing in digital mental health solutions.
  • Mathilde Cerioli, Chief Scientist at Everyone.AI, a nonprofit exploring how AI impacts child development.
  • Munmun De Choudhury, Professor at Georgia Tech’s School of Interactive Computing, who has published extensively on mental health analytics and online behavior.
  • Dr. Robert Ross, pediatrician and former CEO of The California Endowment, a nonprofit focused on health equity.
  • Dr. Sara Johansen, Clinical Assistant Professor at Stanford University and founder of the Digital Mental Health Clinic, which researches technology’s role in therapy.
  • Tracy Dennis-Tiwary, Professor of Psychology at Hunter College and author of “Future Tense,” which explores how anxiety can be reframed as a positive force.

The council’s formation underlines OpenAI’s intent to position itself as a leader in responsible AI development, particularly as the use of emotionally intelligent chatbots continues to expand globally.

ChatGPT currently has more than 700 million active users, according to independent analytics, and serves as a daily companion for many students and professionals. Meanwhile, Sora, OpenAI’s experimental video-generation platform, is being tested for educational and storytelling use cases that could deeply engage users’ emotions.

By establishing this council, OpenAI is signaling that the next phase of AI innovation will focus on empathy, ethics, and emotional intelligence, balancing rapid growth with the responsibility to safeguard human well-being.