DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 4

Crypto Thefts Surge to $247M in July 2026, Second-Worst Month of The Year

1

A new report has revealed that hackers stole $247.4 million in cryptocurrency in July 2026, making it the second-worst month of the year for crypto thefts, behind April’s $644 million total, according to DefiLlama data.

The figure more than tripled the $75 million lost in June and the $60 million recorded in May.

The primary driver was a major exploit targeting Coldcard hardware wallets. Confirmed losses exceed $38 million, though Galaxy Research estimates the total impact could reach $110 million as attacks continue.

The attacker systematically swept 500 distinct victim wallets over the course of 25 minutes, prioritizing the largest holdings first. Cumulative value stolen skyrocketed to roughly $30 million within the first 10 minutes, and three of the 10 largest victim wallets each held over $636K (10 BTC).

The early targeting of high-value wallets, including a single $1.8 million victim, suggests that the attacker studied the victim wallet population in advance, rather than sweeping indiscriminately.

Also, Galaxy Digital reported that attackers drained at least $100 million in Bitcoin from roughly 7,300 wallets across three confirmed attack waves.

A suspected fourth wave could push total losses from the incident toward $130 million, while DefiLlama’s tracker places the figure at approximately $115 million.

The vulnerability stemmed from a firmware issue affecting seed generation on certain Coldcard models, which reduced the effective randomness of recovery phrases and allowed private keys to be reconstructed offline without physical access to the devices. Many of the affected wallets had remained dormant for years.

The episode has drawn attention because Coldcard devices are designed for cold storage, keeping private keys offline and away from internet-connected systems.

Research platform CryptoRank noted that the month demonstrated how technological risks can still place thousands of wallets at risk simultaneously, even when assets are held in hardware wallets intended for maximum security.

July also saw several other significant incidents. These included a $24 million theft from the Arbitrum-based perpetual exchange AFX involving a bridge exploit, a $9 million oracle-related attack on the DeFi protocol Bonzo Lend, $7.5 million stolen via the Verus Ethereum Bridge, and $2.6 million taken from the Cardano-based wallet SecondFi due to a wallet flaw.

The concentration of losses in a single hardware wallet vulnerability has prompted renewed discussion within the industry about the limits of self-custody assumptions and the importance of rigorous firmware auditing.

Coinkite, the maker of Coldcard, has issued guidance urging affected users to generate new seeds and migrate funds where necessary.

Notably, with more than $30 million already stolen through mid-2026, this year is on pace to surpass 2025’s record $58 million total. Chainalysis noted that home invasions have climbed from 26% of documented incidents in 2023 to 37% in 2026, allowing criminals to compel immediate transfers in controlled environments.

Attacks targeting family members have grown from near zero in 2021 to 25-30% of cases.

Amidst the numerous attacks last month, Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has filed a civil lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), its Reconnaissance General Bureau (RGB) intelligence agency, the Lazarus Group, and 20 unidentified “John Doe” defendants.

The suit stems from the February 21, 2025, cyberattack that drained approximately $1.5 billion in Ethereum and staked Ether over 400,000 ETH and stETH from the Dubai-based platform, marking the largest cryptocurrency theft on record.

Bybit announced the action on August 7–8, 2026, stating that it has also secured a preliminary injunction freezing identified stolen assets held by the John Doe defendants. The court order prohibits the transfer, sale, or dissipation of those assets while the litigation proceeds.

As of early August, the broader July totals underscore that sophisticated attackers continue to identify and exploit weaknesses across both on-chain protocols and offline storage solutions.

Outlook

The July figures point to a worsening security environment for the cryptocurrency industry, with attackers increasingly exploiting vulnerabilities across both decentralized protocols and hardware-based self-custody solutions.

The scale of the Coldcard incident is particularly significant because it challenges the assumption that keeping assets offline automatically eliminates major cybersecurity risks.

Looking ahead, the industry is likely to place greater emphasis on firmware security, independent code audits, vulnerability disclosure, and faster migration procedures when flaws are discovered.

Hardware-wallet providers may also face growing pressure to strengthen seed-generation processes and improve mechanisms for identifying potentially compromised wallets.

US Student Loan Payment Errors and Delays: Federal Report Proposes Solutions for Borrowers

0

Student-loan borrowers are facing a difficult combination of payment errors, confusing account information and long waits for customer-service assistance.

For millions of Americans already struggling to manage education debt, administrative failures can turn an ordinary payment into a financial crisis.

A new federal report, points toward a practical solution: stronger oversight, better technology and clearer accountability across the student-loan servicing system.

The problems are not simply inconvenient. Student-loan servicers are responsible for processing payments, maintaining borrower accounts, communicating repayment options and helping people navigate complicated federal programs.

When those functions fail, borrowers can experience incorrect balances, missing payments, unexpected charges or difficulties accessing programs designed to provide relief. Even a temporary error can have serious consequences when borrowers are living paycheck to paycheck.

Customer service has become another major source of frustration. Borrowers may spend long periods waiting for assistance, only to receive inconsistent information or be transferred between departments. The complexity of federal repayment programs makes effective communication particularly important.

A borrower who receives unclear instructions may make the wrong payment, miss an important deadline or fail to complete paperwork needed to protect their account. The federal report’s proposed solution reflects a broader recognition that student-loan servicing needs structural improvement rather than temporary fixes.

Better data systems could help prevent payment-processing errors before they reach borrowers. Servicers could also be required to maintain more accurate records and provide clearer explanations when account balances or payment requirements change.

Technology could play a central role in that transformation. Modernized platforms can automatically identify unusual transactions, flag discrepancies and give borrowers real-time access to account information.

Instead of forcing borrowers to depend entirely on telephone representatives, improved digital systems could allow them to track payments, verify balances and receive important notifications online. However, technology alone will not solve the problem.

Federal agencies must strengthen oversight of the companies responsible for servicing loans. Clear performance standards, regular audits and meaningful consequences for repeated errors could encourage servicers to prioritize accuracy and responsiveness.

Borrowers should not have to carry the financial consequences of mistakes they did not make. Transparency is equally important.

Borrowers need straightforward information about how much they owe, when payments are due and how their payments are being applied. When policies change, communication should be timely and understandable rather than buried in complicated notices or technical language.

The report therefore raises a larger question about how the government manages one of the country’s most important consumer-finance systems. Student loans affect household budgets, home purchases, entrepreneurship and long-term financial planning.

Administrative failures can therefore have consequences far beyond an individual account. The immediate priority is accuracy. Every payment should be properly recorded, every account should reflect the correct balance and every request for assistance should receive a timely response.

The challenge is creating a system capable of delivering those basic standards consistently. The federal report offers an opportunity to rethink student-loan servicing around accountability rather than bureaucracy. If agencies implement stronger oversight, modern technology and borrower-focused customer service, payment errors and delays could become less common.

The ultimate measure of reform, however, will be simple: whether borrowers can manage their loans without fighting the system designed to help them.

Berkshire Hathaway Puts Record Cash Pile To Work With $20 Billion Stock Spree, Alphabet Bet

0

Conglomerate ends 14-quarter streak of net stock sales as Greg Abel accelerates buybacks and deploys billions under Berkshire’s new leadership

Berkshire Hathaway began putting its enormous cash reserves to work in the second quarter, investing nearly $20 billion more in stocks than it sold and repurchasing billions of dollars of its own shares as new Chief Executive Greg Abel moves to reshape the conglomerate’s capital-allocation strategy.

The Omaha, Nebraska-based company said Saturday that it repurchased $4.5 billion of its own shares during the second quarter and another $3.3 billion in July. The purchases mark an acceleration from the buybacks that resumed in March after a nearly two-year pause.

Berkshire also bought nearly $20 billion more stocks than it sold between April and June, ending a 14-quarter streak in which the conglomerate had been a net seller of equities.

The shift is significant because Berkshire had accumulated one of the world’s largest corporate cash piles as Warren Buffett struggled to find investments large enough to absorb the company’s growing liquidity.

Berkshire’s cash, cash equivalents and short-term Treasury bills stood at $364.7 billion at the end of June, down from a record $380.2 billion three months earlier. Even after the latest spending, the conglomerate retains an enormous financial cushion.

The biggest new equity bet was Alphabet, parent of Google and YouTube. Berkshire invested about $10 billion in the company during the quarter, making Alphabet one of its largest stock holdings. The purchase gives Berkshire substantial exposure to artificial intelligence and digital advertising while adding a major technology company to a portfolio historically dominated by financial, consumer and industrial businesses.

The move also signals that Berkshire is willing to deploy a meaningful portion of its cash when management sees attractive valuations, rather than allowing liquidity to accumulate indefinitely.

Abel Begins to Put His Stamp on Berkshire

The second-quarter results provide one of the clearest early indications of how Abel intends to manage Berkshire’s vast balance sheet after succeeding Buffett as chief executive.

Abel became CEO early this year, while Buffett remains chairman. Investors have been closely watching whether Abel will adopt a more aggressive approach to acquisitions, equities and share repurchases than Buffett did during the final years of his tenure.

The pace of Berkshire’s buybacks is already comparable with some of Buffett’s most active periods. Berkshire’s biggest annual share-repurchase programme came in 2021, when it bought back $27 billion of its own stock.

The latest purchases suggest that Berkshire’s capital allocation may be entering a more active phase. The company has the financial capacity to pursue large acquisitions, invest in public companies and repurchase shares simultaneously, although Abel’s willingness to deploy capital will ultimately depend on valuations and available opportunities.

The Alphabet investment is notable because it represents a large commitment to a company at the center of the AI investment cycle. Berkshire had previously been cautious about technology valuations even as AI enthusiasm drove major U.S. technology stocks sharply higher.

Operating Businesses Deliver Stronger Profit

Berkshire’s operating performance also improved during the quarter. Second-quarter operating profit rose 16% to $12.98 billion, or about $9,068 per Class A share, from $11.16 billion a year earlier.

Higher earnings at BNSF railroad and stronger results from Berkshire’s manufacturing, service and retail operations contributed to the increase. Foreign-currency movements also provided a benefit.

Net income more than doubled to $25.67 billion, or about $17,928 per Class A share, from $12.37 billion a year earlier.

The comparison was helped by a $3.76 billion writedown Berkshire recorded a year earlier on its stake in packaged-food company Kraft Heinz. That accounting charge had weighed heavily on the prior year’s net income.

The operating-profit figure is generally more closely watched as a measure of Berkshire’s underlying business performance because net income can fluctuate significantly with changes in the market value of its equity investments.

Cash Mountain Begins to Shrink

The reduction in Berkshire’s cash pile is modest relative to its overall size, but the direction is important.

The company entered the quarter with more than $380 billion in cash and Treasury bills, reflecting years of accumulated liquidity. Buffett repeatedly argued that Berkshire needed to maintain substantial financial strength while waiting for opportunities that offered attractive risk-adjusted returns.

Now, with Abel at the helm, Berkshire appears to be moving toward greater capital deployment.

The nearly $20 billion net stock purchases, combined with $4.5 billion in second-quarter buybacks and more than $3.3 billion in July repurchases, show that the company is no longer simply allowing its cash reserves to accumulate.

The shift could become more consequential if Berkshire finds additional companies trading at prices that meet its investment criteria.

At the same time, Berkshire’s cash balance remains large enough to preserve its ability to make a transformative acquisition or provide liquidity during a market downturn. That combination of a huge cash reserve and renewed willingness to invest gives Abel considerable flexibility as he establishes his own record as Berkshire’s capital allocator.

Berkshire’s roughly $10 billion investment in Alphabet may be the most closely watched element of the quarter.

Alphabet has become one of the largest beneficiaries of the global AI investment cycle, but it also faces substantial costs as it expands data-center capacity and develops AI models and services.

For Berkshire, the investment provides exposure to a business with several established revenue streams, including search, advertising, cloud computing and YouTube, while giving the conglomerate a larger position in the technology sector.

The move also indicates that the AI boom is reshaping the opportunity set for large institutional investors. Berkshire can participate in the theme without taking on the early-stage risks associated with unprofitable AI startups or infrastructure companies. Its decision to deploy $10 billion into Alphabet suggests management sees sufficient long-term value in the company’s earnings and competitive position to justify a significant allocation.

The broader message from Berkshire’s results is therefore less about a single stock purchase than about a change in the use of its balance sheet.

Switch Files Confidentially for U.S. IPO at Potential $50bn Valuation as AI Data Center Demand Surges

0

Switch Inc., a data center operator majority-owned by DigitalBridge Group Inc., has confidentially filed for a U.S. initial public offering as investors continue to pour capital into infrastructure supporting the artificial intelligence boom, according to Bloomberg News, citing people familiar with the matter.

The Las Vegas-based company is targeting a public listing that could come as early as November, the people said. The IPO plans remain preliminary, and the timing, size and other terms of the offering could change.

Switch is working with Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley on the potential offering, one of the people said.

The planned IPO would position Switch among a growing group of data center companies seeking access to public equity markets as surging demand for AI computing drives investment in power, servers and large-scale data center capacity.

The company operates facilities in Nevada, Michigan, Georgia and Texas, according to its website. Its infrastructure is designed to serve large technology customers whose computing requirements have expanded rapidly with the development of generative AI and other data-intensive applications.

A16z Co-Founder Joins Switch Board

Separately, Ben Horowitz, co-founder of venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, is joining Switch’s board, according to people familiar with the matter.

Switch has also been working on a funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz, which could value the company at close to $50 billion including debt, Bloomberg News reported in July.

That potential valuation would represent a major increase from the $11 billion enterprise value at which Switch was acquired in 2022 by a group including DigitalBridge and Australian infrastructure investor IFM Investors. The valuation would also highlight how dramatically investor expectations for data center infrastructure have changed as AI companies and cloud providers commit enormous amounts of capital to expand computing capacity.

Data Center IPO Market Gains Momentum

Switch’s confidential filing comes during an increasingly active period for U.S. data center listings and fundraising.

Data center owners, infrastructure investors and companies supplying equipment and services to the industry have been seeking new capital as AI-related demand accelerates the need for additional computing facilities.

Blackstone Digital Infrastructure Trust raised $2 billion through an IPO in May, while Csquare, backed by Brookfield, raised $1.21 billion in an IPO last month.

The activity reflects a broader shift in how investors view data centers. Once primarily considered a specialized real estate and infrastructure business, the sector has increasingly become a key part of the AI investment chain.

The rapid expansion of AI workloads has created demand for facilities with access to large amounts of electricity, advanced cooling systems and high-density computing infrastructure. That has increased the strategic value of data center operators capable of securing power and bringing new capacity online.

For Switch, an IPO could provide capital to expand its footprint while giving existing shareholders a liquid market for their stakes.

DigitalBridge is Switch’s majority owner and has positioned itself as a major investor in digital infrastructure, including data centers.

DigitalBridge and IFM Investors acquired Switch in 2022 in a transaction valued at about $11 billion including debt. DigitalBridge itself agreed last year to be acquired by SoftBank Group, further connecting Switch to one of the world’s largest technology-focused investment groups.

The potential IPO therefore comes at an important point for Switch’s ownership structure and financing strategy.

A public listing would also give investors a clearer market valuation for a company whose assets have benefited from the sharp repricing of data center infrastructure since the AI boom accelerated.

The biggest question for prospective investors will be whether Switch can convert the extraordinary demand for AI infrastructure into sustainable long-term returns. Building data centers requires substantial upfront capital, while securing electricity, land and grid connections can constrain how quickly operators add capacity.

If Switch proceeds with a November listing, analysts expect its valuation and market reception could provide another important test of investor appetite for AI infrastructure after a period in which capital has increasingly flowed toward the physical assets required to power the technology.

Delaware Judge Revives Verisk’s $2.35bn AccuLynx Deal After Finding Termination Invalid

0

A Delaware judge has ordered data analytics company Verisk to pursue the completion of its $2.35 billion acquisition of roofing software provider AccuLynx, more than seven months after Verisk sought to terminate the transaction, in a ruling that could force the company back into a deal it had attempted to abandon.

Delaware Chancery Court Judge Bonnie David ruled that Verisk’s termination of the agreement was invalid because the company’s own “willful conduct caused the failure of a condition to closing.” The court also awarded AccuLynx damages for direct costs, plus interest.

The ruling means a major setback for Verisk, which had argued that it was entitled to walk away from the transaction after the U.S. Federal Trade Commission failed to complete its regulatory review by the agreed termination date of December 26.

Verisk announced the planned acquisition in July 2025, initially targeting completion by the third quarter of that year. The transaction was intended to strengthen Verisk’s position in software and data services serving the property insurance and roofing industries.

The deal encountered regulatory obstacles in October 2025, when the FTC requested additional information from Verisk and AccuLynx. The request extended the agency’s review and pushed the transaction beyond its original timetable.

By late December, Verisk said the FTC had notified the companies that its review had not been completed by the December 26 deadline. Verisk subsequently terminated the agreement.

AccuLynx rejected that decision and notified Verisk that it believed the termination was invalid. Verisk strongly disagreed and said it would vigorously defend its position.

Judge David’s ruling now puts the transaction back in play.

The central issue was not simply whether the FTC had completed its review by the contractual deadline. The court found that Verisk’s own conduct had contributed to the failure of a condition required for closing, undermining its attempt to use that failure as a basis for terminating the agreement.

That finding weighs heavily because it limits a buyer’s ability to rely on a closing condition when the buyer’s conduct has helped prevent that condition from being satisfied. For AccuLynx, the ruling preserves the possibility of completing a transaction that had appeared to collapse months ago.

The deal, however, is not guaranteed to close.

The FTC must still approve the acquisition, meaning the regulatory question that contributed to the dispute remains unresolved. The agency’s request for additional information last year indicated that the transaction was receiving a more extensive review than initially anticipated.

That regulatory scrutiny could prove decisive. A Delaware court can determine the contractual rights of the parties, but it cannot compel the FTC to approve a transaction that raises competition concerns.

The ruling also creates a more complicated strategic position for Verisk. The company must now attempt to complete an acquisition that it previously determined it could terminate, while potentially absorbing additional legal and transaction costs and remaining exposed to regulatory uncertainty.

The court’s award of direct costs and interest adds another financial consequence for Verisk, although the ruling does not indicate that AccuLynx is entitled to the full $2.35 billion transaction value as damages.

The dispute also underlines the impact of regulatory oversight on acquisitions. Deals can remain vulnerable for months when antitrust reviews extend beyond expected closing dates, particularly when agreements contain deadlines that allow either party to exit under specified circumstances.

The next major hurdle is therefore the FTC. Until the agency completes its review and grants approval, Verisk’s obligation to pursue the acquisition does not guarantee that the transaction will ultimately close.

However, with this judgment, what began as a $2.35 billion software acquisition announced in 2025 has now become a closely watched test of how far a buyer can go in terminating a transaction when regulatory conditions remain unresolved.