DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5155

X-Raying Atiku’s Stand On The Female Student Lynched In Sokoto

0

The former Vice President of Nigeria and presidential aspirant on the platform of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), Abubakar Atiku, on Friday 13th May 2022, stated that every tweet on his official social media handles must get his approval before publication.

This came in response of his reaction towards the 200-Level student, Deborah Samuel gruesomely murdered in Sokoto State on Thursday 12th May 2022, by a mob over alleged blasphemy.

It could be recalled that Atiku had earlier condemned the barbaric killing on his Twitter handle but later deleted the post, having published a disclaimer, saying he never approved the message, hence knew nothing about it. He consequently sacked his media aide who was purportedly behind the publication.

It’s noteworthy that the U-turn made by Atiku, which has been condemned by several Nigerians in various quarters, came as a result of the threats he received on the Twitter platform. Some seeming Sokoto indigenes had threatened failure over his presidential ambition, saying he had lost millions of votes in the said state for condemning Deborah’s killing.

Atiku, during his consultative visit to Governor Godwin Obaseki of Edo State on Friday at the Government House, Benin, on Friday, same day he took the actions, disclosed that every tweet on his official social media pages must be approved by him prior to publication.

According to the erstwhile Vice-President, “Every tweet has to get my expressed approval but this one didn’t, so I asked them to take it down.

“I took a stand about Sharia law and was abused, thrown stones at, but how long did it last? Despite that, I didn’t change my position on it. I am not afraid to take a stand on critical issues.” he said.

Speaking further as regards his presidential race, he stated that investment in education was key. He said, “If you can recall what the PDP government did then while in power, we created the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND).

“We also set up the Primary School Education Fund and Education Tax Fund to enable us (PDP Federal Government) provide sufficient money to both state and local governments to enable them to have sufficient money to invest in primary and secondary education.

“We also passed the law to make education compulsory for every Nigerian child, from primary to secondary schools”. he said.

Responding to the issue of zoning for the PDP presidential ticket, Atiku said that zoning was not jettisoned by the party.

On the issue of getting a running mate, he responded that he would sit down with the party to agree on a running mate for the 2023 presidential election.

By this singular display, Atiku has shown and proven that he is a religious bigot. Even if the post wasn’t approved by his person, as claimed, did it call for deletion?

For the fact that the killing of Deborah by the mob was indeed condemnable, judging it from all angles, should have been enough reason to allow the post to fly as much as it could. Had it been the statement made in the post wasn’t justifiable or reasonable, then Atiku’s reaction would have been commendable.

He can scold the media aide, if truly the post never sought his approval, not to delete it outrightly, simply because he received a myriad of threats over his presidential ambition.

This action of Atiku has made Nigerians understand that many who are currently clamouring to emerge as the president of a heterogeneous country like Nigeria come 2023, do not actually deserve the honour being sought.

Deborah Yakubu killers are to be sentenced to death

1

“….The Islamic religion is not a primitive religion that allows its adherents to take the law into their own hands and to commit jungle justice. Instead, there is a judicial system in Islamic law that hears and determines cases including the trial of criminal offenses and anybody accused of committing an offense against the religion or against a fellow Muslim brother should be taken to the court (either a Sharia or a secular/common law court) for adjudication. It is only when a person is convicted and sentenced by a court of law that he will be liable to a punishment which will be carried out by an appropriate authority (i.e. the prison)”

~His Lordship I. T. Muhammad JSC (now CJN) in the case of SHALLA VS STATE (2007) LPELR-3034(SC).

In July 1999, in the Kardi village of Kebbi State, one Abdullah was accused of blasphemy; insulting the prophet Muhammad, he was reported to some Muslim faithful who formed a mob and decided to attack the accused, they dealt him blows with sticks, bottles and even machete, till they hacked him to death. 

The mobsters (about five of them) were later arrested and charged to court for the offense of murder and culpable homicide of Abdullah in the Kebbi State High Court. 

Their defense was that they have justification for the killing of Abdullah (religious justification), pointing to the sections of the Quran that demand that anybody who insults the prophet MUHAMMED should be killed. 

They were convicted of murder and sentenced to die by hanging in the trial court. They appealed to the Appellate court and the appeal court upheld the judgment of the trial court and they further appealed to the Supreme Court. 

The case went on from the lower courts till it got to the supreme in 2007 and the Supreme Court upheld the judgments of the lower courts. In one of the dictums of one of the justices, Justice Ibrahim Tanko Muhammad, (who is now the Chief Justice of Nigeria); he states thus; 

“In my view, it is the appellants rather than the deceased who committed an offense against Islamic or Sharia by their unjustified action which represents to the public that Sharia is an uncivilized and primitive system that allows or permits the killing of people without complying with the due process of law, the Islamic religion is not a primitive religion that allows its adherents to take the law into their own hands and to commit jungle justice. Instead, there is a judicial system in Islamic law that hears and determines cases including the trial of criminal offenses and anybody accused of committing an offense against the religion or against a fellow Muslim brother should be taken to the court (either a Sharia or a secular/common law court) for adjudication. It is only when a person is convicted and sentenced by a court of law that he will be liable to a punishment which will be carried out by an appropriate authority (i.e. the prison)”.

The Justices of the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the judgments of the lower courts stating that the accused persons committed the offense of murder and culpable homicide which carries the capital punishment of death sentence. They were all; every one of them that partook in the killing of Abdullah were sentenced to death. 

On this note, those that are justifying the killing of Deborah Yakubu on the ground that the killers are carrying out what their religion requires them to do should educate themselves that everyone that is involved in the death of Deborah Yakubu has committed the offense of murder and culpable homicide and stating categorically from the judicial precedent in the case of SHALLA V State, they will all be sentenced to death and their religion will not come to their rescue. 

Speaking Up or Staying Silent on Blasphemy and the Need for Quantum Strategy in Nigeria

0

Religion and ethnicity are without a doubt the two most important topics that have polarized and continue to divide Nigerians. They have played and continue to play important roles in ensuring that people and organizations pick sides when victims of various injustices demand socioeconomic and political justice. These concerns have remained vultures eating any serious projects and intentions from the social and political spheres over the years, especially since the country’s return to democratic administration in 1999.

As people and organizations across the country express mixed feelings about the execution of Deborah Samuel Yakubu, who was accused of making disparaging words about Prophet Muhammad (SAW), our expert observes that it is unlikely to be the last. Our analyst’s position was founded on the fact that over the years, concerned stakeholders in the governmental, familial, and religious institutions have ignored the remote causes.

Our analyst has been monitoring conversations on the virtual sphere and in physical settings since Deborah’s death became a national tragedy. According to the analysis, the platforms have well-divided viewpoints. There are various schools of thought on whether or not the killers have the right to take the lives of fellow citizens as a result of her action. Discord has emerged among friends and followers on Facebook and Twitter as a result of the conversations surrounding her death. According to our analysis, a case of a journalist who wrote rhetorically about the occurrence resulted in the unfriending of a Muslim who posted a message (on Facebook) that the journalist deemed bad.

From a political standpoint, former Vice President Alhaji Atiku Abubakar’s earlier post on Facebook and Twitter drew harsh criticism from northerners and southerners of various stripes. Northerners believed Alhaji Atiku has committed a crime by protesting the killings in his post. As a result, he should disregard their support. People in the south and northern states who are Christians believe that the former Vice President cannot manage the country fairly if given the chance. Alhaji Atiku erased the message, claiming that he did not authorise it, which appears to be in line with the northerners’ position.

Beyond the virtual platform, our observational analysis clearly shows that people in physical settings are similarly hesitant to say anything about the occurrence. Looking at the two platforms as a whole, our analyst concludes that, as with previous religious and ethnicity issues in the country’s history, people and organizations are either speaking up and ready to defend their positions constructively using strong evidence or remaining silent for fear of being labeled hypocrites, preventing true national cohesion or paving the way for a “long overdue separation” from the northern region.

As indicated in one of our previous assessments on injustice in the country, our analyst believes that religious and ethnic concerns require strategic discourse between leaders and followers. Based on previous religious violence across the country, it is apparent that existing political, family, social, security, and educational systems have failed to handle religious and ethnic extremism.

For instance, there are constitutional provisions that make any sort of wrongful killing illegal. However, existing criminal and judicial institutions have made it nearly hard for victims to receive the justice they deserve. Where it matters most, educational and religious institutions have failed to improve critical thinking among learners and followers. Due to personal interests, political leaders are also making fair justice impossible. Followers are taking advantage of existing legal provisions to engage in behaviors that are at odds with the existence of a group or people, without obtaining a proper interpretation of where protection begins and stops.

Overall, our analyst advocates for a holistic approach to resolving the increasing concerns of religious and ethnic crises. For the preparation of a Quantum National Strategic Plan, national participatory action research is required. Our analyst believes that doing the study will assist concerned stakeholders at the meso, micro, and macro levels in identifying important concerns, planning, executing, observing, and reflecting on particular measures that will address the problems in a long-term manner.

A Testimonial From Singapore On Tekedia Institute

0

Congratulations Gerald, Jun Hao Goh for joining us at Tekedia Institute. I just read the amazing comments in the Board: “Lecturers provided many insights and touch based on Industry 4.0 topics. It is indeed relevant and insightful.”  Thank you and thank you to #Singapore, one of our fastest growing markets, outside West Africa.

Let me also thank our Industry 4.0 Faculty for the world-class program we have in Tekedia Institute: SAP Aderinola Oloruntoye, Microsoft Olanrewaju Oyinbooke, Mastercard Stanley Jacob,  Northern Sky Research Joseph U. Ibeh, Dr Edward Hudgins, Gennady Stolyarov II, Dr. Chogwu Abdul, Brent Ellman, ….

Microsoft Wale Olokodana, Nvidia Emeka Obiodu, Oxford’s Dr Olayinka Oduwole, WWF Olu Teniola,  Dr. Francis Nwebonyi, Deloitte Bola Adesope, Franklin Peters (FIMC) and many other eminent faculty members.

These faculty members have made it possible for Tekedia Institute to welcome learners from 44 countries with 5 star rating in our community. We are transforming the future of the workforce.

Experience world-class education at Tekedia Institute. We’re really great in what we do. Go here 

Source

INEC Contemplates Moving Materials from CBN, Laments Double Registration by Voters

0
Election cycle

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has disclosed that it may consider moving sensitive electoral materials away from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), where they are statutorily kept for safety.

The Commission’s Chairman, Prof Mahmood Yakubu made this known on Thursday, 12th May 2022 while fielding questions from newsmen at a Consultative meeting with media outfits in Abuja, the nation’s capital territory.

His comment was tied to the question on the partisanship of the incumbent CBN Governor, Godwin Emefiele who is reportedly eyeing the presidential seat.

While the CBN Governor has not officially declared his intention to run for the topmost seat in the country, there have been campaigns and branded vehicles from faceless groups, urging him to contest. His body language thus far also suggests he is interested in the race.

In the rush for the position under the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Farmers’ Association of Nigeria purportedly paid a whopping sum of N100 million to obtain the expression of interest forms and nomination forms for Mr Emefiele.

He had also filed a suit seeking to secure his right to run for the presidency in 2023, without resigning from his current position.

In response to newsmen’s question on the CBN Governor’s partisanship activity in recent times, Prof Yakubu stated that the INEC had started talking on alternative places to store its sensitive materials.

“I understand the context in which the question is asked. But you should also understand the context in which events are unfolding.

“As we speak, our Director, Litigation and Prosecution is in court. There is a case in court. We have been invited to state our own side of the story. We usually refrain from talking about such issues because there is essentially subjudice.

“But we have already started talking about what alternatives are available to us in case we need to change the arrangement for the handling of sensitive materials.” the INEC boss replied.

Prof Yakubu equally vowed not to tolerate any form of jeopardy to the conduct of the election by creating a misconception around the situation in the process.

It’s noteworthy that Mr Emefiele has continued to shun President Muhammadu Buhari’s call for the resignation of all appointees vying for political offices in the impending general elections come 2023.

He met with the president on Thursday, 12th May 2022 at Aso Rock. After the visit, the CBN Governor, who appeared not to be bothered about calls for his resignation, bluntly told newsmen that he was “having fun” with the whole melodrama.

He said, “I am having fun at the scenario. Let them have heart attack. It’s good to have heart attack. I am having a lot of fun.”

Since President Buhari has refused to sack Mr Emefiele in spite of the numerous calls by various Nigerians, both home and abroad, it’s very clear and understandable that the CBN is no longer safe to keep the sensitive electoral materials.

In view of this fact, the INEC needn’t be notified or reminded that it’s compelling for the commission to seek alternative venues. Hence, the expected arrangement regarding the required action ought to be made in earnest. Think about it!

INEC Lamentation Over Voters’ Double Registration, Sundry Issues

Ahead of Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is currently worried over multiple registrations of voters across the country.

The Head of Voter Education and Publicity in Yobe State, Rifkatu Duku, in an exclusive interview with newsmen on the update of voters’ registration in Yobe State, disclosed that one of the biggest challenges the commission was faced with had been voters engaging in multiple registrations.

She said the commission is not embarking on new registration and therefore did not encourage people who already had voter cards to register again.

According to the Yobe State spokesperson, such an action would amount to double registration and could lead to the disenfranchisement of those involved in the uncalled act.

Mrs Duku, who could not immediately disclose the exact number of unclaimed Permanent Voters Cards (PVCs) within their jurisdiction,  equally frowned over the situation where many PVCs were yet to be collected by the owners. She said, “a huge number of cards are yet to be collected.

“This is another big problem for us to handle alone. We are going to engage the media and civil society organizations to sensitize the people on the need to claim their cards.” She, therefore, stated that the commission was working hard to curb voters’ apathy.

“INEC usually does their budget based on the projection of voters. In Yobe State for instance, in the last election, we had about 1.3 million voters and that is the figure we have to consider first for the projection of our materials.

“Now in the event where such projection is based on voter’s cards or the number of registered voters, which is always the case, you can imagine the loss the commission will incur if the cards are not collected.” Mrs Duku said.

She further added that the commission would be closing her portal for registration for new members on 30th June this year, while calling on people to make the best use of the remaining time.

Nigerians shouldn’t be informed on the need to ensure they aren’t disenfranchised during the forthcoming general elections. I wonder why they could be clamouring for positive change or transformation in the country, yet not willing to cast their votes at the polls.

For crying out loud, any sane and discerning mind within the shores of Nigeria isn’t meant to be reminded of this lawful task required of him or her as we vigorously await the national ritual.