DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5266

Is It Really Disruptive Innovation?

1

The term ‘disruptive innovation’ is fast becoming commonplace in the startup space. Many founders would conveniently describe their innovation as disruptive even when it does not exactly fit the description. I get the impression that they do this because of some perceived reputation that they think disruptive innovations should have. However, not every innovation in space is disruptive, and your business does not have to be a disruptor to survive.

Disruptive innovation is a product or service, usually more simplified and affordable, that is introduced into the market to cater to the part of the market that has been largely ignored by other players. Often, such products are introduced by new and smaller players, and it gives them a foothold to enter the market. Large market players sometimes introduce disruptive innovations to cater to a market segment they may have ignored over time. It may involve tweaking or transforming an existing product (maybe expensive or highly sophisticated), into a simpler, cheaper, and more accessible product that can cater to that segment of the market that was ignored.

Why does this happen? Most times, market players would prefer to focus on satisfying the needs and desires of their most profitable customer base, largely ignoring some market segment that is perceived as less profitable and less desirable. This now creates room for entrepreneurs seeking to get a foothold into the same market, and they take advantage of the lack of attention, target the ignored market segment with affordable solutions. This unattended market segment, though little in the beginning, grows over time and gives the innovator a foothold in the market, long before other players start venturing into the same space to compete.

Creating new products and solutions to serve a market segment that was already being serviced is not disruptive innovation. It is more like sustaining innovation. (topic for another day).

A solid example of disruptive innovation is Amazon. The internet community was growing at the time, with an emerging niche market of online shopping, book enthusiasts. However, the traditional brick and mortar bookstores did not see a market large enough to deserve their attention, and so focused on selling their books out of the shelves. Jeff Bezos came in with his innovation to attend to this market, and this became a disruptor in the bookselling industry. With time, the physical book shoppers got interested in online shopping and started making the shift, gradually increasing the small market share Amazon catered to in the beginning. Now, Amazon has gone way beyond selling books, to everyday items like groceries. From disrupting bookselling, Amazon ended up disrupting selling as a whole.

What you can see from this is that to be a disruptive innovator, you must have done some research, and have solid evidence to believe there are potentials in the market segment you want to service. It may be cool to serve a small segment in the beginning, but how quickly this segment grows will determine how long you remain in business.

What Amazon saw and predicted was that the power of the internet (on which it was building its business model) would grow in leaps, increasing their customer base and keeping them in business for a way longer time than the then-big-players thought.

Most entrepreneurs now are taking the route of sustaining innovation, which means finding easier, cheaper, and faster ways to service the existing market. This is also a good option, and there are several successful businesses now that started along this path.

You will need solid market research and accurate projections to start and scale a disruptive innovation business – much more than you would need for sustaining innovation where the market need has already been established. In the end, it is really up to you to decide.

Is Africa Ready for NFT? Join the conversation tomorrow

0

As we welcome Franklin Peters Odoemenam – the blockchain oracle – tomorrow to discuss decentralized finance (defi) and NFT marketplaces, please read this piece by Tekedia Mini-MBA alum, John Mc Keown. John looks beyond cryptocurrency, fintech and defi and then asks if Africa is ready for Web 3.0

At Tekedia Mini-MBA, our members influence some components of our programs. John captured it when he quoted this line, possibly from the community: ‘That NFT stuff is not for people who are occupied with food and clean water. Not sure it will be durable in Africa’.

That is how I see it. How can NFT help the GREAT Ovim people of Abia State and how can it make Oriendu Market better? I have been waiting for Auntie Ngozi Okonji-Iweala’s policies in the World Trade Organization to change how people buy garri, yam and plantain in Ovim. Yes, trade happens in Ovim – big time. And WTO must pay attention. Lol.

Good People, we expect to have a great session with Franklin. Read John’s piece to get ideas on the jargons which Franklin will blow on Thur (7pm WAT).

Sharing of kegs of fuel as party souvenirs: update

0

Recall the viral event that took place some days back whereby the party organizers and celebrant due to the fuel scarcity rampaging the Lagos state and  the entire country decided to be creative with their gifts and shared gallons of petrol to the party attendees.

The police and other law enforcement agencies of the state immediately swung into action and subsequently shut down the event Centre and ordered the arrest of one Ms Pearl Chidinma Ogbulu the prime suspect; the celebrant and the Chief host of the party that engaged in the distribution of kegs of petroleum to guests and attendees at her party as souvenirs and “thank you for coming”  gifts at the party held on Havilah event Centre, Victoria Island, Lagos state  on the 4th of Match 2022. 

The suspect was arrested and charged to court. She was arraigned and brought before the court for the offence she had allegedly committed on Monday, the 14th March at the special court offences (mobile) court of Lagos state of the Ikeja Magisterial Division, Holden at Oshodi. 

She was arraigned on a four-count charge offence which include;

Count one: Engaging in an act and conduct which is likely to cause the breach of (public) peace.

Count two: Carrying out acts that are capable of endangering human life by distributing combustible and flammable products in a public gathering. 

Count three: Forming the intent to do harm to another and 

Count four: The act of unlawfully carrying on the business of storage and containerization of petroleum products without necessary permits.

All these offence counts bother on criminal matters hence the reason for the  criminal charges which is in consonance with Nigeria’s criminal code (as applicable in the southern Nigeria) and the administration of the criminal justice act (AcJA) of 2015 and the Administration of the Criminal Justice Law (ACJL)  of Lagos state. 

An official statement released by the state Commissioner of Information Mr. Gbenga Omotoso, he reiterated that the matter won’t be taken lightly by the state and the law enforcement agency are in full action conducting investigation to make sure all those involved in these dastard acts are made to dance to the tune of the music of the law.

The Commissioner of Police on the other hand also emphasized the Command’s statutory duty and commitment to protecting lives and property in the state and further warned that citizens should stay away from  acts that are capable of causing havoc, endangering human lives and properties.

Russia Invasion of Ukraine Gives Rise To Russophobia Around The World

0

Amid the ongoing Russian-Ukraine war that saw Russia forcefully invade Ukraine, their action has however inflamed Russophobia around the world. It has gotten so extreme that Russian movies are now being pulled out from Film festivals, Russian-owned restaurants are being vandalized and given negative reviews, Russian vodkas are being evacuated from shops and poured out on the streets. People who chose to show their solidarity with the people of Ukraine have been unleashing their anger at innocent Russian citizens.

While sanctions are being pelted at Russia, States of the west are seizing the properties of Russian oligarchs, prominent Russian citizens are banned from music and sporting activities which have seen FIFA and UEFA ban Russia from world football. As if that is not enough, a Russian pianist Alexander Malofeev was dropped from a concert because of his nationality, and out of the pain he tweeted, “the truth is that every Russian citizen will feel guilty for decades because of the terrible and bloody decision that none of us could influence and predict”. 

Major brands and businesses in several European countries are boycotting Russian-made products and are reportedly discriminating against Russian-origin customers. Russian citizens have been receiving harsh treatment around the world ever since the inception of the war, especially those in the United States where two congressmen, Eric Swalwell and Ruben Gallego publicly called for kicking every Russian student out of the United States because they believe that these students are the sons and daughters of Russian oligarchs.

It’s disheartening that innocent Russian citizens get to face this unjust treatment, which makes it seem like a lot of people have for a long time harbored hatred against Russians but have been looking for an event or incident to let it out. A professor of political science, Idlir Lika, had warned that such unbridled racism might end up playing well into Putin’s hands by confirming his antagonistic worldview of the west.

With ordinary Russians being treated harshly, Putin might feel justified in thinking that the dissolution of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the twentieth century and that Russia’s aim should be to restore the USSR to save itself from annihilation from the hands of the West. Personally, the unfair treatment innocent Russian citizens are receiving from the West, and other parts of the world have been taken over the board. Never in history has two wrongs made a right.

Despite the fact that Russian citizens protested against their leader for his illegal invasion of Ukraine, which sent a message across to the world that they were never in support of his act. It still seems a lot of people got so overwhelmed with their emotions and chose to ignore the innocent Russian citizens by still going ahead to treat them unfairly. Russophobia is aimless and serves no purpose, it is rather a form of injustice that creates the conditions for long-term animosity and hate that will complicate future social and political relationships.

The whole scenario now looks like it is the world against Russians and not Putin. Does the West feel that their actions towards innocent Russian citizens will push them to the wall where they will be left with no option but to rebel against their leader Putin and as well overthrow him? I do not see a possibility in that.  The actions being pelted out on innocent Russian citizens is appalling because attacking a person or an institution simply because they are Russian without regard for their position in the war is not in any way a show of solidarity but rather an act of hypocrisy and jingoism.

U.S. sanctions against Russia are “not designed to be permanent” – US Government

2

Good People, as you can see I am not writing about Ukraine and Russia. I figured out that, innocently, one could be accelerating the “accepted” talking point. After doing my own independent analysis, and found out that most of the things we’re reading on this war, from the big media houses,  are fake, I switched off. 

The biggest problem in this world is when the big media decide on the narratives they want to pursue. If you do not follow along, you become old-fashioned. Like I always say, if most things we read or hear about Africa are true, the global investors will not be pouring the $millions into our startups.

So, Good People, let us focus on what we can control. They now delete posts they do not like. They hide posts they do not like. Yet, they claim that China censors. This world is full of propaganda but the real difference is where you belong.

U.S. sanctions against Russia are “not designed to be permanent” and could “go away” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said, should Russia change its behavior. Simply, if there is a ceasefire tomorrow, in days, the sanctions could be lifted. What does that mean? There is a strong mutual respect between the world powers and we the people must not miss that point.