DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 5769

The Nigeria’s Telecom Grand Debate: GSM-Led or Satellite-Led As Elon Musk’s SpaceX Starlink Arrives

4

The generation’s finest innovator is coming to Nigeria with his product. Yes, Elon Musk and SpaceX are already in Abuja working with the industry regulator, Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), for permits to pipe broadband via satellite, bringing a new domain in the ICT space in the country. I have called that an “asymmetric disruption” because it offers a new order to what the terrestrial players like MTN, Glo and Airtel offer. In 2017, I wrote an article titled “2022 – Africa’s Year Of Affordable Broadband Internet And Immersive Connectivity”. That seems to be on the money!

In today’s videocast, I make a case that Africa will enter the era of affordable broadband internet in 2022. That will be the year we will begin a new dawn of immersive connectivity where you can eat and surf all you can. Industry players will take off the Internet meter and then focus on service, experience and quality. From satellite broadband vendors to the MNCs with balloons and drones, the sector will become very competitive and service will drive growth. This has happened in the past – every decade, Africa experiences a major industrial transformation. We saw that in banking and voice telephony. 2020s, starting at 2022, will be the decade of immersive connectivity.

People, the game is changing and customers have a promise ahead – better quality at lower price. As that happens,  we will see how the telco industry body lobbies: expect a new dimension of bank-led and telco-led mobile money debate to resurface, but now GSM-led and satellite-led broadband connectivity in Nigeria. Yes, would telcos expect SpaceX Starlink to come into the open party just as they have expected the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to allow them to join the mobile money redesign in Nigeria. The argument was that telcos would improve the mobile money customer experience, better than banks, due to their better distribution outlets. 

But here, since Starlink is coming from satellite, I do think it has a huge chance to also improve the experiences of customers on broadband connectivity, unbounded and unconstrained by the usual terrestrial challenges.

People, everything will be tested and it all depends on what the regulator does with SpaceX, because if you allow Starlink carelessly, these telcos will fade. The telcos which have made a case for mobile money, that the government should allow the best to win, have an opportunity to tell Nigerians if they truly believe in a totally free market system in our telecommunication sector.

SpaceX team in Nigeria

But this is what I expect the telcos to say: the Nigerian telecom sector should be GSM-led, and not Satellite-led, and by that, even if SpaceX Starlink comes, it must be mandated to pipe its data through partnerships with GSM-based broadband providers. The telco lobby will argue for protecting jobs and investments. It would be a fierce one.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX Starlink Arrives Nigeria, Meets NCC for Permit

#EndSARS – Insurers Have Paid N4 billion As Claims

0

Of course, #ENDSARS affected the lives of many young people who were attacked by law enforcement. We also just learning that the insurance industry will see lesser profits as a result of the violence many brought to a largely peaceful civil protest: “The Nigerian Insurers Association (NIA) said Thursday that insurance companies have paid N4 billion as claims as a result of last year’s #EndSARS-related violence.”

Addressing journalists in Lagos, Ganiyu Musa, Chairman, NIA, said about 2,000 insured businesses were affected by the violence.

Mr Musa also assured customers that all genuine claims resulting from the protests would be paid.

He said insurance operators were still collating claims stressing that every genuine claim would be settled.

“The number of insured businesses that were affected at the last count was about 2,000 and the industry has settled N4 billion claims out of N4.5 billion in respect of the #EndSARS protests.

“Once they are documented and completed, we have the commitment of our members that the claims will be paid timely,” he said.

Mr Musa said the association was on top of the developments and would continue to encourage its members to pay all genuine claims in line with the expand policies.

Is Nigeria’s Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) for Investors or Against Them?

0

Nigeria’s oil and gas industry is plagued by various challenges, ranging from insecurity to the cost of production, policies, and regulatory issues. But among all the challenges confronting the industry, the inability of the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) to regulate it in line with global best practices is the biggest of all.

 

By the law that established it, DPR  is the regulator of  Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. The Department has a vision “To be a leading regulator in oil and gas sector” and a mission “to ensure the sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil and gas resources across the value chain for our stakeholders through effective regulation while entrenching world-class professionalism, accountability, and transparency.”

Effective regulation of any industry does not only build the confidence of investors, it engenders growth. Crude oil accounts for about 90 percent of Nigeria’s foreign exchange earnings and 70 percent of its revenue. This shows how important the sustainability of the industry is to the country. But with what transpired in the industry in recent months, many investors must be asking if the DPR is for or against them.

In what many see as a lack of commitment to the rule of law, fairness, and nonchalant attitude towards a stable business climate for investment, the DPR revoked four oil mining licences of Addax Petroleum in April, citing the inability of the company to develop the assets.

After the revocation of the licences, the  DPR  inaugurated a team of experts to assess the revoked licences from Addax Petroleum to a new operator – Kaztech/Slavic Consortium. It, however, took the intervention of President Muhammadu Buhari, who doubles as the Minister of Petroleum Resources, for the licences to be restored to Addax.

“President Muhammadu Buhari has approved the restoration of the leases on OMLs 123, 124, 126, and 137 to the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC which is in production sharing contract with Addax Petroleum, a company wholly owned by Government of the People’s Republic of China on the blocks. The leases belonging to the Federation were revoked on March 30, 2021.

“This development reaffirms the commitment of President Buhari to the rule of law and sanctity of contracts.

“While directing the Department of Petroleum Resources, DPR to retract the letter of revocation of the leases, the President also directed NNPC to utilize contractual provisions to resolve issues in line with the extant provisions of the Production Sharing Contract arrangement between NNPC and Addax.

“The restoration of the blocks to NNPC will boost the organisation’s portfolio, thereby making the Corporation to, in the long run, boost its crude oil production and in turn increase the revenue it generates to the Federation Account,” a statement issued by the Senior Special Assistant to the President (Media & Publicity, Garba Shehu, on April 23, 2021, read partly.

Similarly, the Department on April 6, 2021, also issued letters revoking 11 Marginal Oil Fields licences. According to the operators of the assets in a Letter to Buhari, they have invested over $400 million in these assets.

GMD Kyari mele nnpc

They explained that they were not contacted by the DPR or, giving any opportunity to make representation before the regulator issued the letters revoking their licences.

The operators noted that the revocation puts the investment of several State Governments, Nigerian entrepreneurs, and their foreign technical partners in jeopardy, and will add to the problem of  Non-Performing Loans (NPLs)  for the local banks. As of last year, the oil and gas industry accounted for about $8 billion in debt owed to Nigerian banks.

“Not only are the actions of the DPR at complete variance with the Marginal Field bid guidelines and the duly executed Farm-out Agreements, we are extremely concerned that the DPR has chosen to pursue such a course of action in the midst of a global economic crisis with its resultant impact on the Nigerian economy at large, and in particular the primary economic contributor thereto, being the oil and gas sector.

“The revocation of the licenses will certainly lead to litigation against the Marginal Field Operators by foreign partners and banks who have financed the development of the Marginal Fields, in addition to sending the wrong signal to both Foreign and local investors” the operators stated.

“We have conservatively invested over US$ 400 million in developing the affected fields, with a number of them in production, whilst others are in various advanced stages of development including testing of oil wells, drilling of new wells, construction of production facilities, etc.

“These investments were made despite low crude oil prices, militancy, and insecurity in the Niger Delta region, resulting in frequent shut down/ vandalization of crude export pipelines,” they added.

The Marginal Fields affected and their operators include Atala operated by Bayelsa Oil/CEPL; Dawes Island operated by Eurafric; Ofa operated by Independent Energy; Ke operated by Del-Sigma/Xenoil; Ororo operated by Guarantee/Owena; and Ekeh operated by Movido.

Others are Akjepo operated by Sogenal;, Tsekelewu operated by Sahara/Africa Oil; Tom Shot Bank operated by Associated/Dansaki; Oriri operated by Goland, and Ogedeh operated by Bicta.

In June 2019, DPR also revoked the licences of Pan Ocean Oil Corporation (OML 98); Allied Energy Resources Nigeria, (OML 120 and 121); Express Petroleum and Gas Company (OML 108); Cavendish Petroleum Nigeria (OML 110), and Summit Oil International (OPL 206), for non-payment of royalties.

Oil and gas is the mainstay of Nigeria’s economy, and for that reason, the Federal Government, and the DPR in particular, must ensure that the regulation of the industry is in line with the global best practices. Before licences are revoked, the DPR should ensure that affected companies are contacted and given a fair hearing. Also, the oil and gas industry is a peculiar industry, which means that revocation of licence should not be the immediate punishment for non-payment of royalties, or inability to develop assets.

Revocation of licences does not only lead to loss of jobs, but it also makes investment unattractive. Marginal Fields are exclusively allocated to Nigerian exploration and production companies, and the fact that these companies are indigenous should be enough reason for the DPR not to revoke their licences without giving room for dialogue, to understand their predicament or why they are unable to develop their assets or pay royalties.

Investment in the oil and gas industry is dollar-driven, and access to credit facilities in dollars is usually a big challenge for indigenous oil and gas companies. This is the reason why the DPR needs to be more judicious in carrying out its regulatory roles. The Department needs to work on how it can carry out both administrative penalties and criminal penalties without undermining investors’ confidence. This will be critical in deepening local content in the country as the world pushes towards energy transition.

The recent actions of the DPR do not give investors confidence and show a harsh business environment, which does not speak well on the ease of doing business in the country, especially in the oil and gas industry.

As we look forward to the response of Buhari to the letter written to him by the affected 11 Marginal Field operators, I hope he will do the right thing by directing the DPR to restore the licences to these companies, to save hundreds of jobs that will be lost as a result, and spare the country of facing litigation both home and abroad.

Trump’s 2024 Presidential Ambition and the Burden of His Social Media Ban

0

Five months after Donald Trump’s ouster from social media, following the January 6 deadly Capitol insurrection attributed to his false election claims, he is yet to find a viable means to reach his millions of followers even though he is nursing 2024 presidential ambition.

Twitter, one of the social media platforms used by Trump said in January that his ban is permanent and could not be reversed. Twitter founder and CEO Jack Dorsey said the ban was the right decision as Trump’s tweets point to the failure of Twitter to promote healthy conversation.

Trump has been reeling at the mercy of the social media platforms since then, as they had served as his megaphone. His helpless situation has been amplified by his dispute with the mainstream media. However, Facebook offered some hope to his return to social media with the promise of reviewing his ban, but the promise took long and unfortunately didn’t yield the result the former president expected.

On Wednesday, Facebook independent Oversight Board upheld the decision to keep Trump away from social media, at least for now.

“The Board has upheld Facebook’s decision on January 7 to suspend then-President Trump from Facebook and Instagram. Trump’s posts during the Capitol riot severely violated Facebook’s rules and encouraged and legitimized violence,” the Oversight Board said in a tweet. But it added that it was “not appropriate” for the company to “impose the indeterminate and standardless penalty of indefinite suspension.”

“Facebook’s normal penalties include removing the violating content, imposing a time-bound period of suspension, or permanently disabling the page and account,” the board said, adding that it “insists Facebook review this matter to determine and justify a proportionate response that is consistent with the rules that are applied to other users of its platform.”

Although the board, dubbed “Supreme Court” said Facebook must complete its review of this matter within six months of the date of its decision, it only heightens Trump’s predicament.

Getting worn off by his lingering inability to communicate like before, which has limited his ability to challenge the present administration and curse his enemies at will, Trump’s attempts to get around the ban has only backfired.

Although Trump claims he doesn’t miss Twitter, describing the social media app as “very boring”, he was caught on Wednesday trying to bypass his ban by creating a new account. The bio of the new account said: “Posts copied from Save America on behalf of the 45th POTUS; Originally composed via https://DonaldJTrump.com/Desk. *Note: Not Donald J. Trump Tweeting.”

Twitter immediately shut the new account down as it goes against its policy. The social media’s spokesperson said in response to Trump’s attempt to create a new account: “As stated in our ban evasion policy, we’ll take enforcement action on accounts whose apparent intent is to replace or promote content affiliated with a suspended account.”

In the wake of his ban from social media, Trump had hinted on starting his own social media platform, an idea which seems viable given that he has over 70 million supporters who wouldn’t hesitate to sign up if there is a social media to Trump’s name. On Tuesday, Trump did launch a website, From the Desk of Donald J. Trump, but it’s everything short of a social media platform. It’s just a blog where his followers can share his tweetlike statements on social media.

Since his social media ban in early January, Trump has resorted to mailing press statements to a few media outlets he doesn’t consider as “fake news” as a way of getting his voice heard, but it has sounded far below the range of his social media megaphone.

Losing the presidential election and the events that came with it were realities Trump has struggled to shrug off. But he has defiantly moved on with sight on 2024, when he hopes to have another chance to work from the Oval Office. He has the crowd, a mammoth throng of disciples loyally following his lead no matter where he is heading. His problem is how to tell them where he is going now that he is partially muzzled.

An anonymous source close to Trump told Axios that getting this account back is not only essential for his future political viability, “it would also be an undoing of an unjust act by a social-media company that made an ad hoc ruling to deplatform a sitting president.”

With all other platforms including YouTube and Instagram firm in their decision to part ways with the controversial ex president, Trump’s 2024 presidential ambition depends pretty much on what Facebook decides to do to his account in six months.