Poor Mark Zuckerberg! He wanted commoners to make decisions reserved for $billionaires – and expectedly the Facebook Oversight Board did not fall for his antics. As they do in American football, they punted his problem back to him.

Yes, the Facebook Oversight Board which Mark created to oversee the most difficult decisions within the social media network has ruled that it would not help it decide if former US President, Donald Trump, could continue to be part of Facebook planet or not: “Facebook was justified in its decision to suspend then-President Donald Trump after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, the company’s Oversight Board said on Wednesday. That means the company does not have to reinstate Trump’s access to Facebook and Instagram immediately. But the panel said the company was wrong to impose an indefinite ban and said Facebook has six months to either restore Trump’s account, make his suspension permanent, or suspend him for a specific period of time.” Simply, Mark, this is your decision, we cannot make it for you.

The Facebook Oversight Board was designed to make some of Facebook’s most difficult decisions for the company. But on Wednesday the board put one of the biggest dilemmas facing the platform back on Facebook and company CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

The board said Facebook was right to suspend Trump in the immediate aftermath of the January 6th insurrection, but said Facebook couldn’t just make the suspension “indefinite” with no actual rule on its books allowing for that. The board said Facebook must review the decision and figure out if Trump should be banned from the platform forever.

The board could have made that decision itself, but by choosing to hand the decision back to Facebook it once again puts Zuckerberg’s powerful role in overseeing public discourse in the United States in the spotlight, along with the arbitrary nature of how Facebook moderates it platform.

Facebook has six months from today to decide Trump’s fate.

My piece on the Igbo Apprenticeship System will be published in the Harvard Business Review this month. Oxford University has also reached out that it is looking to do research in this domain. Last month, I spoke with BBC and the Central China TV on the mechanics of IAS. This is the deal: Nigeria has to explore updating our secondary school economics textbooks with some of Africa’s economic frameworks. 

Last month, I spoke before eminent scholars from northern Nigeria. I passed one message: rebuilding the Northeast, post Boko Haram, must not be driven by the constructs postulated by IMF and World Bank. I told them to send experts to rural communities in the Southeast on how, and what they did, to rebuild after the civil war. I provided data to show that whatever they did has worked – and Nigeria can deploy that framework anywhere in the nation.

The Igalas have their playbooks. Yoruba people have. Igbos have. Hausas have….it is time for Nigeria and Africa to look inwards. I am very happy for my small contribution to deepen this conversation on the Igbo Apprenticeship System. Now, the real experts (I mean economists) must improve and deepen the system, and hopefully fintech will invest based on that mechanics. Simply, if you finish from the apprenticeship, we will invest in that new venture, as your master seeds your business.

Africa, let us look inwards. We have got lessons to help us. Yes, as that happens, our economists must spend more time,  and find how we can integrate these frameworks: get the best from Igalas, Hausas, Igbos, etc and combine them to improve our national operating models.

I have read nearly all articles written by the New York Times between 1966 and 1970 on Nigeria’s civil war.  Of course, it was not everything that the Times got right, based on stories by actual participants in Nigeria’s lowest point. The Times wrote about ingenuity, uncommon tenacity and brilliance of the Southeast people of Nigeria. But watching some videos on what happened immediately after the war tells me that today’s Nigeria is redeemable. Yes, from all angles, Nigeria does not have a big problem, if we can pick lessons post civil-war. 

Do you know that most community development unions in Southeast Nigeria started after the civil war? Do you know that it was communal? Yes, people came together to build schools, maternity centers, clinics, shops, factories, etc. That is what they teach in business school: attain economies of scale and do great things in markets. Here, community development unions were vehicles for people to pool funds and do big projects.

It does seem that across Nigeria, from north to south, east and west, and beyond, we have tons of knowledge which we do not value. The template deployed across Southeast Nigeria was not developed by IMF, World Bank or African Development Bank, but by the communities. And the thing worked since we have enough time to evaluate.

First, they have economically rebuilt the region. On education, Imo State at 96.43% literacy rate leads the nation. Abia and Anambra hover over 90%; Enugu is above 85% but Ebonyi is below 80%. Across most metrics, the outcome would be better than anything the World Bank and IMF could have designed.

So, the question is this:  why is Nigeria not looking for solutions internally instead of hiring  experts who compound issues due to the lack of the nuances of Nigeria? Time to invest in community-centered development?

Good People, the Mhagic team has informed us that it would be doing the public presentation of the $60,000 grand prize cheque for winning the Velocity Mhagic season 1 to Tekedia Institute later this month. The event will happen in Lagos. The scholarships will also follow for students; all information will be in Tekedia Hub – hub.tekedia.com.

Again, Tekedia thanks all our members for supporting the school for this prize. All our winning is donated to fund scholarships for students to attend Tekedia Mini-MBA, Tekedia Advanced Diploma programs, Tekedia Certificates, Tekedia CollegeBoost, etc.

How do you get Northeast Nigeria back on the path of growth? How do you overcome the paralysis which is affecting that region?  Despite Nigeria budgeting and spending about N10.02tn over six years on security ($25 billion using the average exchange rate over the period), according to BudgIT data, we have continued to scale insecurity.

So, what can the nation do as a nation? I personally think the insecurity has no military solution: to win this internal war, a heavy dose of economic war has to be fought. Sure, there are religious components but even those could be adjusted economically.

I have been studying how Southeast Nigeria came out of the ruins of war to the position it is now. There was a plan and every village formed a development union to stimulate models to advance education, healthcare services, etc.  Nigeria needs to examine what happened in Southeast Nigeria during that journey.

That “onye aghala nwanne ya” [do not leave your brethren behind] goes beyond business. What happened was that communities pooled resources to build schools and people came together to build shops, buy equipment, etc, and by following that playbook, they advanced faster.

It is based on this that I continue to say that it is wasteful to give 100,000 women each $100 and expect that money to advance their economic status over time. However, if you use that money, you can provide better community-systems which could improve their lives indirectly. For instance, you can use that money to provide solar-powered 24/7 electricity to help market women extend their perishable goods. For each of those women, that electricity will help them over time than each getting $100.

Nigeria had a framework which worked; I am hoping we revisit it now that we are looking for pathways for growth in the nation.