DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 6867

E-waste: A Topical Issue on Environmental Degradation in Nigeria

0

By Oko Ebuka

The informal recycling of Electronic wastes otherwise referred to as E-waste has been causing environmental haphazard in the country by emitting unwanted chemicals which affects human health and increases high mortality rate.

According to the Ministry of Environment, the concern about E-waste arises from the fact that it contains about 1,000 hazardous substances such as toxins which are released to the environment from prevalent recycling practices where cables are burnt, process to extract copper and other precious like gold, diamond, etc.

These substances in the environment however, interfere with the body functional processes increasing risk of stroke, heart diseases, lung cancer, acute and chronic respiratory diseases including asthma and many other health problems.

Also, high mortality rate have been recorded from the inhalation of this noxious and toxic emission from informal recycling of e-waste.

According to the findings of Basel Action Network, from Basel centre, Nigeria study of 2005, about 500,000 used computers are imported in into the country annually through the Lagos port alone.

And an estimated 25% of the imports were functional while 75% were junks or unserviceable which is eventually burnt or dumped, the ministry said.

Areola affirmed that the project which is now backed up by law will aid in curbing the excessive wrong recycling across the nation and create job opportunities.

“This project is apt considering volumes of waste being generated and the need to use waste as a resource to grow the economy and generate employments along the waste value chain.

“The federal government has programmed a legal framework for curbing this menace through NESREA”, she said.

Disclosing this to journalists during the formal launching and inception meeting of project tagged “Circular Economy Approaches for the Electronics Sector in Nigeria”, organized by National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency, NESREA, in conjunction with United Nations Environment Programme, UNEP, and Global Environment Facility, GEF, recently held in lagos, the permanent secretary who was represented by Mrs. Oluwatoyin Areola, said that the project is mainly focused on life-cycle management to achieve a zero waste environment.

 “This is the underlining dynamism in the implementation of the extended producers’ responsibility (EPR) programme focused on the life cycle management of waste towards achieving a zero waste.

Also in the report, the Federal Ministry of Environment said that about 60,000 tons of used and unused electrical containers are imported in Nigeria per year by only buyers in Lagos ports. This also includes imports to lands from neighboring countries with most imported used electronics and electronic equipment, UEE, partially functional but a fraction still remains non-functional.

From the statistics also, it can be inferred that Nigeria may have imported at least, 15,700 tons of E-wastes most of which are LCD TVs containing mercury, refrigerators, and air conditioners containing HCFCs.

This goes a long way to prove the words of an environmental expert, Professor Oladele Osibanjo, who posited that e-waste is a national issue with global consequences as Nigeria is the only place the world choses to dump e-wastes in Africa.

He hopefully added that Nigeria should embrace the e-waste formal recycling business which has a special attraction and will be resourceful to the economy if properly utilized

Beyond ACFTA, The Real African Challenge

0
AfDB president Akinwumi Adesina
Akinwumi Adesina

ACFTA (African Continental Free Trade Agreement) has been heralded by many as a possible panacea to many trade frictions in Africa. Interestingly, the African Development Bank’s 2019 African Economic Outlook may have a clear insight on what really matters: “trade costs due to poorly functioning logistics markets may be a greater barrier to trade than tariffs and nontariff barriers”.  Yes, logistics paralysis in Africa is more critical than tariffs. So, even if you remove the tariffs among member states without dealing with supply chain infrastructures, nothing catalytic will happen. Those infrastructures will be seaports, airports and trade routes structured for intra-Africa trade, besides the current Africa-Europe which the colonial rulers built to help their missions many decades ago.

When writing the African e-commerce story, I often leap at the chance to explore only the enviable milestones the continent has made. Nevertheless, there still exist formidable challenges especially in logistics, a vital constituent of the industry. The African Development Bank, in its 2019 African Economic Outlook, notes that “trade costs due to poorly functioning logistics markets may be a greater barrier to trade than tariffs and nontariff barriers”. This side of the story must also be told; if we are to find sustainable solutions to what could be the gateway to growing Africa’s e-commerce by leaps and bounds.

Simply, unless ACFTA will fix these infrastructure challenges, the expectation that tariffs will do the magic is an illusion. Yes, I am not hopeful that ACFTA can deliver, since after many years, NEPAD (New Partnership for African Development) has failed to change the destinies of African people despite the workshops and partnerships. Of course, I am not saying we do not need integration, my point is that even after all the papers have been signed, Africa needs to build infrastructures, as I noted in this Harvard article, to power trade if it hopes for those signatures to impact positively the welfare of the citizens.

If logistics accounts for 50-75% of retail price of goods, in Africa, it means that is where the opportunities are to improve trading efficiency. Tariffs remain important but we cannot lose the sights where the real challenge is. I am not sure the reason why Nigeria is not trading more with Gabon is due to tariff; I do think the problem is that poor infrastructures make that intra-Africa trade more challenging. To fly into Gabon from Lagos, you may have to fly into Europe first, and then back to Africa; tariffs will not fix that, only building infrastructures will do.

 

President Buhari Must Consider MAN Position on ACFTA, Fixing “Rule of Origin” Prerequisite for Nigeria

African Diaspora and the Sustainable Development Goals: Making a case for Diaspora Resource Management

By Dr. Nnamdi Madichie & Dr. Chinedu Madichie

In a 2013 Special Issue on “Is the Middle East the land of the future?” a range of papers debated how the region was faring in terms of meeting the millennium development goals, and concluded that the targets had been missed in the most desperate sectors. Indeed, even in the fastest growing economies of the Middle East proved that nothing could be concluded as a given. A similar observation had been made in the case of Africa two years earlier in a journal special issue entitled “Is Africa the land of the future?”

In this article, the focus is on highlighting the role of the African diaspora in actualising the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on the back of the missed targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that elapsed in 2015. The study commences with a re-articulation of migration, the value and constraints of remittances, contribution of the African Diaspora and ultimately, what these all mean for success in achieving the SDGs.

Migration is often viewed negatively by home, transit, and destination countries. While African countries tend to label it a “brain drain,” destination and/ or recipient countries consider it as a burden on available resources. This has resulted in the inadequate attention migration and migrants contribute to sustainable development – especially from the purview of the youth and notably international students. It is for this reason that the African Diaspora Network in Europe (ADNE) advocates for the voice of diaspora to be included in development policy planning both in Africa and in Europe. It is the opinion of ADNE that well managed migration policies would bring about an optimal use of diaspora contribution to development considering the huge demographics of migrants in the world. Examples of such policies include easier access to legal status in destination countries, enabling dual-citizenship, reduced bureaucratic procedures and administrative hurdles, etc.

Indeed, the much-touted SDGs and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development have provided new opportunities for African diaspora involvement in the face of the partly missed targets of the MDGs that preceded these goals. It is our view that the diaspora have the wherewithal to contribute towards the SDGs, particularly on the targets of ensuring safe, orderly, and regular migration; reducing the costs of diaspora remittances; and improving data on the skill sets of these groups.

While target #1 of the SDG on ending poverty, and target #12 on improving data with a view to establishing diaspora networks to facilitate the circulation of knowledge, ideas and technology for capacity building to take off, it is paradoxical that while the diasporas are important actors in economic development, they are still mainly considered shortcuts to leveraging financing – especially remittances – and channelling funds for sustained development in Africa – in a sub-optimal manner. This attitude underscores the need for alternative platforms of innovative contributions of the diaspora for the development of the region.

We posit, therefore, that the impact of diaspora on the 2030 Agenda should not just be multidimensional, but also multifaceted, requiring an in-depth consideration by African governments and other stakeholders in ensuring the actualisation, and effective deployment of three key initiatives – notably (i) leveraging diaspora remittances, trade and investment; (ii) capacity building (transfer of skills, knowledge and technology); and (iii)  advocacy and involvement in development policy making and implementation process.

Unpacking these further, first, as far as Remittances, trade and investment goes, there is a need for Diaspora remittances and financial contributions are well mobilised through various instruments including, but not limited to, bonds, securitised remittances, and special banking arrangements. The World Bank and other development partners have revealed that remittances by African diaspora surged by 3.4% to US$35.2 billion in 2015. However, this amount doesn’t directly translate to development due to many challenges such as the very high costs involved in money transfer, the technical complexity of alternative innovative platforms – going beyond funds for the day-to-day needs of families. A larger, more consolidated option channelled towards productive investments fostering entrepreneurial rather than dependency culture is needed.

Second, in relation to capacity building is another area where technology and skills transfers and modern management practices can contribute. Examples abound where diaspora have galvanised public private partnerships (PPPs) in sectors where such expertise is not locally available. This conduit in knowledge and skills transfers has proved effective especially during the Ebola epidemic when UK-based Sierra Leonean health workers volunteered to provide cultural awareness training for anyone travelling to Sierra Leone. Another example is BethAri Limited, a management consultancy with diaspora expertise working in partnership with West African Health Organisation(WAHO) on capacity building and skills development for pharmaceutical regulatory practices in West Africa. It is envisaged that these examples can be built upon in a more significant manner so as to make the SDG targets a reality by placing the diaspora engagement at the core of the development process.

Third, and finally, Advocacy and development policy engagement, the nation-building process also relies on social and political dialogue, advocacy and awareness, and stability for sustainable development. African governments have recognised the need to engage diaspora by providing an enabling environment for potential contributions of the latter. This includes creating economic and social linkages, accelerating structural reforms and providing incentives. It has also been established that country ownership of diaspora strategies and strong ties with the diaspora, underlined by a shared vision, helps commit the diaspora and government to act synergistically.

A typical example of this exemplary vision of diaspora engagement by the Nigerian government was the establishment of Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation (NIDO) worldwide, where office space is provided at embassies to facilitate such initiatives. Other African countries Rwanda, Kenya, Ethiopia, to name a few, have all launched initiatives to engage with the diaspora. We, therefore, advocate for the Diaspora to be viewed and treated as development partners – i.e. to be considered, not just as sources of finance for development, but also as development partners. As one study points out “for Africa’s economies to successfully transition from their current state of commodity-dominated production to high value-added production, governments in the continent must design and implement strategies to harness their grossly underutilized diaspora in developed countries.”

African diaspora may have the capacity and patriotic mind-set to contribute to national development, but require concerted efforts by all stakeholders to develop policy objectives that could facilitate diaspora mobilisation. However, poor policy choices, lack of clearly defined objectives, poor implementation plans, as well as weak and inaccurate data on the diaspora remain stumbling blocks.

There is an urgent need for national diaspora engagement strategy to build an African Diaspora Skills Database in order to fully understand the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the diaspora, their attitudes, and possible areas of interest for collaboration, and most importantly, avenues for promoting the optimal use of diaspora expertise in their home countries. We hope to see more concerted efforts in this regard and institutional support that would enable these efforts come to fruition.

That in our view would open up a new world of Diaspora Resource Management (DRM)– arguably an offshoot of International Human Resource Management.


About the Authors

Dr Nnamdi Madichie is Director of the Centre for Research and Enterprise at the Bloomsbury Institute, London. He is a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy and former Editor in Chief of the African Journal of Business and Economic Research.  In addition to being a member and key participant of the Association of Commonwealth Universities, Dr Madichie has also worked on industry projects with the London Development Agency, as well as having contributed to the United Nations Conference on Trade & Development (UNCTAD), World Investment Forum Round Table, which culminated in the launch of the Business Schools for Impact project. He is also co-author of recently published book on Digital Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa Challenges, Opportunities and Prospects as part of the Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship in Africa series, highlighting the intersections of entrepreneurship and the world of digital in the African context.

Dr Chinedu Madichie is former Chairperson of the Nigerians in Diaspora Organisation Europe (NIDOE), Belgium-Luxembourg Chapter and former Senior Adviser (Entrepreneurship & Private Sector) and Board Member of African Diaspora Network Europe (ADNE) based in Brussels. Dr. Madichie is a life-sciences graduate with almost 20 years professional experience in the pharmaceutical industry.  He is the Founder/CEO of BethAri limited, a general consultancy organisation whose clients include the Nigerian National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), the West African Health Organisation (WAHO) a Specialized Institution of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) responsible for health issues and numerous pharmaceutical companies in Africa & Europe.

Central Bank of Nigeria Hints on Recapitalization of Banks

0
President and CBN boss

The Central Bank of Nigeria plans to recapitalize banks:“Banks will therefore be required to maintain higher levels of capital, as well as liquid assets in order to reduce the impact of an economic crisis on the financial system,” he said.”  That is the right thing to do especially since the stock market has simply refused to make amends after the ocean-bottom of 2008.

To achieve Financial System Stability, Mr Emefiele said a resilient and stable financial system was imperative for continued growth of the country’s economy given the intermediation role of a financial institutions, to support the needs of individuals and businesses.

“In the next five years, we intend to pursue a programme of recapitalising the banking Industry to position Nigerian banks among the top 500 in the world.

“Banks will therefore be required to maintain higher levels of capital, as well as liquid assets in order to reduce the impact of an economic crisis on the financial system,” he said.

Recapitalization/redesigning happened about ten years ago and we lost some brands. This time around, depending on the amount CBN is pegging the new capital requirement; we may experience the same thing. Unfortunately, most banks will not do the recapitalization at the position of strength since it will be a double-whammy: fintechs are there practically asset-light while government wants me to hold more capital to compete with them. When you hold more capital, you may look good on paper but actually you are carrying cost, and that means inefficient on the utilization of the factors of production. But banks need to do the needful because they hold other people’s money!

I see about 6 banks departing the scene after this CBN exercise. It will be hard for them to get new capital at good terms because the market is ferociously tough. Remove the amalgam of fees on customers, they will pile losses as their interest-incomes [where you expect banks to make money from] are largely insignificant!