U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has delayed Fidelity’s spot Solana ETF, with a decision now expected by October 10, 2025, as the agency seeks public feedback and revised filings by the end of July. The delay, announced on July 7, 2025, aligns with the SEC’s ongoing development of a new crypto ETF framework, requiring issuers to clarify staking mechanisms, in-kind redemptions, and investor protection measures. This follows a pattern of delays for Solana ETFs, with the SEC opening a 21-day public comment period and a 35-day rebuttal window.
Despite the setback, the SEC’s request for expedited refilings suggests potential approval before the October deadline, spurred by the recent launch of the REX-Osprey SOL and Staking ETF. Solana’s price saw mixed reactions, with some reports noting a 5% rise amid market volatility. Other firms like Grayscale, VanEck, and Bitwise also face similar delays for their Solana ETF applications.
The delay contributes to uncertainty, potentially dampening Solana’s price momentum despite a reported 5% rise in some analyses. Investors may hesitate due to regulatory ambiguity. Approval by October 2025 could boost institutional adoption, increasing Solana’s liquidity and mainstream credibility. The SEC’s expedited refiling request hints at a structured path to approval.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Delays may frustrate retail investors seeking exposure to Solana via regulated products, pushing some toward riskier alternatives like direct crypto purchases or offshore ETFs. The delay reinforces caution among institutions, but the SEC’s framework development signals a maturing regulatory environment, potentially encouraging larger allocations once approved. Fidelity, Grayscale, VanEck, and Bitwise face a race to refine filings.
First-mover advantage could be significant, as seen with the REX-Osprey SOL ETF’s launch. The SEC’s focus on staking, in-kind redemptions, and investor protections could shape future crypto ETF approvals, impacting Ethereum, Cardano, or other altcoins. The SEC’s scrutiny of staking mechanisms may force Solana ETF issuers to limit or exclude staking rewards, potentially reducing yield appeal compared to direct SOL holdings.
ETF approval could drive developer and user growth on Solana’s high-speed blockchain, reinforcing its position against competitors like Ethereum. The SEC prioritizes investor protection and market stability, requiring detailed disclosures on Solana’s staking and redemption processes. This cautious approach clashes with the crypto industry’s push for rapid innovation.
Investors and issuers expect swift approvals, especially after spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF successes. The delay underscores a disconnect between regulatory timelines and market enthusiasm. Fidelity’s ETF targets TradFi investors seeking regulated exposure. Delays frustrate this group, who value compliance over decentralization. Decentralized finance (DeFi) users, accustomed to direct SOL staking or trading, may view ETFs as unnecessary, preferring self-custody despite risks like hacks or volatility.
Stringent SEC oversight delays Solana ETFs, limiting U.S. investors’ access compared to spot Bitcoin ETFs. Countries like Canada and Brazil already offer Solana ETFs, giving international investors a head start. This divide could push U.S. capital to offshore markets or unregulated platforms. Solana faces unique scrutiny due to its staking model and newer market presence compared to Bitcoin or Ethereum.
Bitcoin/Ethereum ETFs faced fewer hurdles, highlighting Solana’s perceived riskier profile despite its technical advantages (e.g., faster transactions). The delay poses short-term challenges but could pave the way for a robust Solana ETF framework, benefiting long-term adoption. The divide between regulatory caution and market demand, TradFi and crypto-native preferences, and U.S. versus global markets underscores the complex evolution of crypto in regulated finance.



