The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has recently moved to retry Roman Storm, co-founder and developer of the Tornado Cash cryptocurrency mixer.
This follows his August 2025 trial in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), where a jury convicted him on one count—conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business—but deadlocked (failed to reach a unanimous verdict) on two more serious charges: conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to violate U.S. sanctions.
Prosecutors filed a motion around March 9-10, 2026, requesting a retrial on those two counts, with a proposed start date in October 2026 potentially October 5 or 12. The retrial is expected to last about three weeks. Storm remains free on bail while also seeking a judgment of acquittal on the convicted count, with arguments scheduled for April 2026.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 20 (June 8 – Sept 5, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
Storm has publicly criticized the decision, noting the significant personal and financial toll of another trial and arguing that a jury already couldn’t unanimously agree on the more severe allegations. This comes amid shifting U.S. regulatory tones on crypto privacy tools, including a recent Treasury Department acknowledgment that mixers can serve legitimate purposes, which some see as contrasting with the DOJ’s persistence here.
If convicted on the remaining counts, Storm could face up to 40 years in prison.Separately, the DOJ is investigating whether Iran used Binance to evade U.S. sanctions. Reports from March 11, 2026 primarily via The Wall Street Journal indicate the probe focuses on transactions allegedly routing over $1 billion through Binance to networks linked to Iran-backed groups, including Yemen’s Houthi militants and entities tied to the IRGC.
It’s unclear if Binance itself is a direct target or if the focus is on users/customers facilitating the flows. This follows earlier internal flags at Binance and comes after the exchange’s 2023 $4.3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities over sanctions violations and other issues including a guilty plea and ongoing oversight. In response to the WSJ reporting, Binance filed a defamation lawsuit against the newspaper on the same day the probe details emerged.
These developments highlight ongoing U.S. scrutiny of crypto platforms and tools in the context of money laundering, sanctions evasion, and national security concerns.
Meanwhile, the ongoing DOJ investigation into Iran’s alleged use of Binance to evade sanctions adds another layer of scrutiny to major crypto platforms. He faces renewed legal pressure and potential severe consequences. If convicted on the retrial counts, he could receive up to 40 years in federal prison (20 years each for money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violations), plus substantial fines.
Storm has described the retrial as personally and financially devastating, with his defense already raising millions including Ethereum Foundation support for legal costs. He remains free on bail, with arguments on his motion for acquittal on the existing conviction (unlicensed money-transmitting business, max ~5 years) set for April 2026. The retrial is slated for October 2026 and could last ~3 weeks.
This case tests the boundaries of developer liability for open-source code misused by others. A conviction could chill innovation in privacy-focused protocols, deterring developers due to fears of criminal exposure even without direct intent or facilitation of crime. It might accelerate capital flight from such tools, with exchanges and custodians imposing stricter compliance filters.
Conversely, an acquittal or another hung jury could affirm that building neutral privacy software isn’t inherently criminal, boosting demand for decentralized privacy solutions amid growing blockchain transparency concerns. The mixed original verdict already highlights uncertainty, potentially making prosecutors more cautious in similar cases lacking strong evidence of intent.
The push for retrial contrasts with recent softer signals from U.S. authorities. The Treasury Department’s March 2026 report to Congress acknowledged that mixers can serve legitimate purposes.
The DOJ has also signaled via memos against “regulation by prosecution” for end-user actions. This apparent tension fuels debates over U.S. crypto policy consistency, potentially influencing future enforcement priorities and encouraging advocacy for clearer rules on privacy tech.
Tornado Cash usage dropped sharply (85% post-2022 OFAC sanctions), but the case keeps privacy tools in the spotlight. Illicit crypto flows remain high overall ($158B in 2025 estimates), so outcomes could shift how privacy protocols are perceived and regulated globally.
The exchange faces renewed U.S. regulatory heat despite its 2023 $4.3B settlement including guilty pleas on sanctions/AML violations and ongoing compliance monitoring. The probe examines whether over $1 billion routed through Binance to networks tied to Iran-backed groups. It’s unclear if Binance itself is targeted or if the focus is solely on users/customers.
Binance denies direct sanctioned transactions, claims it uncovered and acted on suspicious patterns with law enforcement, and has sued the WSJ for defamation over related reporting. Potential outcomes include new fines, enhanced monitoring, operational restrictions, or even charges against executives if systemic failures are found—further pressuring its global dominance.
National security and sanctions enforcement: This underscores crypto’s role in evading traditional sanctions, especially for state actors like Iran funding proxies. It amplifies U.S. efforts to disrupt terror financing via digital assets, with congressional oversight demanding accountability. Broader implications include tighter global scrutiny of exchanges handling high-risk jurisdictions.
Heightened probes reinforce compliance burdens on centralized platforms, potentially driving users toward decentralized alternatives (though those face their own risks, as seen in Tornado Cash). It highlights persistent challenges in balancing innovation with anti-illicit finance goals, possibly spurring more regulatory tools or international coordination.
These cases together illustrate ongoing U.S. tensions between cracking down on crypto-enabled crime/sanctions evasion and adapting to legitimate uses of privacy tech. Outcomes in both could set precedents for years.