JPMorgan Chase is seeking to transfer risk tied to more than $4 billion in loans linked to private equity funds, revealing mounting concern inside major banks over growing strains in the buyout industry as deal exits remain weak and artificial intelligence threatens parts of corporate valuations.

According to people familiar with the matter cited by the Financial Times, the largest U.S. lender is discussing a transaction that would allow it to offload exposure connected to so-called net asset value, or NAV, loans while keeping the loans themselves on its balance sheet.

The proposed structure would shift losses tied to roughly 12.5% of a loan pool exceeding $4 billion to outside investors in exchange for low-teens returns, reflecting the rising premium investors now demand to absorb private-market risk tied to leveraged buyout portfolios.

The discussions highlight how rapidly sentiment is changing around one of private equity’s fastest-growing financing tools.

NAV loans, once marketed as relatively safe because they are backed by diversified fund portfolios rather than a single company, have exploded in popularity as private equity firms searched for liquidity during a prolonged slowdown in dealmaking and IPO activity. The loans allow firms to borrow against the value of existing investments inside a fund, often to return cash to investors, extend the life of struggling portfolio companies, finance acquisitions, or amplify returns in secondary-market transactions.

But what had been viewed as an innovative liquidity solution is increasingly drawing scrutiny from regulators, investors, and banks themselves as the private equity industry grapples with a worsening exit bottleneck.

AI Disruption Fears Deepen Pressure On Private Equity Portfolios

JPMorgan’s move comes at a particularly sensitive moment for the buyout sector. Private equity firms have struggled for nearly three years to sell portfolio companies amid high interest rates, weaker IPO markets, and valuation uncertainty. That pressure has been especially acute in technology and software holdings, historically among private equity’s most lucrative sectors.

Now, the rise of artificial intelligence is introducing a fresh layer of uncertainty. Investors and analysts are expressing fear that AI could rapidly erode the value of certain software businesses by commoditizing products, automating services, or compressing pricing power. Those concerns are beginning to ripple through leveraged private equity portfolios where debt levels were structured around assumptions of stable long-term cash flows.

The risk is notable because software companies represent a major concentration within many private equity funds. Banks that aggressively expanded financing relationships with large buyout firms during the era of cheap money are now reassessing exposures tied to those portfolios.

JPMorgan’s transaction is seen as part of a trend that has seen global lenders increasingly using “significant risk transfer” structures to reduce capital exposure without fully exiting assets. Such deals became more common after post-2008 banking regulations increased pressure on banks to manage concentrated risks more actively.

Under the proposed arrangement, JPMorgan would still hold the NAV loans but transfer a portion of first-loss exposure to investors, effectively insulating itself against early-stage deterioration in portfolio values. The structure also allows the bank to reduce regulatory capital requirements tied to the assets while maintaining client relationships with private equity firms.

Regulators Uneasy Over “Leverage On Leverage”

The growing dependence on NAV financing has become a major focus for regulators in both the United States and Europe. Supervisors have warned that the structures can create what they describe as “leverage over leverage,” since many underlying portfolio companies already carry substantial debt burdens from leveraged buyouts.

Critics believe that NAV borrowing can artificially support fund performance by injecting additional liquidity into aging portfolios rather than forcing firms to realize losses or sell assets at lower valuations. Some market participants also worry that widespread use of NAV loans may obscure stress building within private equity by delaying the recognition of weaker asset values.

The market, however, continues to expand rapidly despite those concerns. According to a May report from AllianceBernstein, the global NAV loan market currently stands near $100 billion and could grow to $350 billion by 2030 as private markets continue expanding.

That growth has attracted banks, private credit funds, and institutional investors seeking higher yields in an environment where traditional lending margins have tightened. Japan’s largest lender, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, has also explored similar risk-transfer transactions tied to private-credit exposures, highlighting how concerns are spreading across global banking institutions.

The broader issue confronting lenders is whether private equity’s long boom period, fueled by cheap borrowing costs and steadily rising asset prices, can withstand a more volatile era shaped by higher rates, slower exits, and technological disruption from AI.

For banks such as JPMorgan, reducing exposure now may represent less a retreat from private equity than an acknowledgment that risks across the sector are becoming harder to model with confidence.