Home Community Insights A Foray Into the STABLE and GENUIS Acts Advancing in the U.S. House/Senate

A Foray Into the STABLE and GENUIS Acts Advancing in the U.S. House/Senate

A Foray Into the STABLE and GENUIS Acts Advancing in the U.S. House/Senate

The STABLE Act, formally known as the Stablecoin Transparency and Accountability for a Better Ledger Economy Act, advanced through the U.S. House Financial Services Committee with a 32-17 vote on April 2, 2025. This bipartisan support included six Democrats voting in favor alongside Republicans. The bill, introduced by Representatives French Hill and Bryan Steil, aims to establish a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, such as those pegged to the U.S. dollar, by mandating transparency in reserves and business operations. It now awaits a full House floor vote, while a related Senate bill, the GENIUS Act, also progresses toward its own floor debate.

The advancement of the STABLE Act through the House Financial Services Committee with a 32-17 vote on April 2, 2025, alongside the parallel progress of the Senate’s GENIUS Act, signals a potential transformation in the stablecoin market. These bills aim to regulate payment stablecoins—digital assets pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar—by enforcing strict reserve requirements, transparency, and oversight. Both acts mandate 1:1 reserve backing with high-quality liquid assets (e.g., cash, U.S. Treasuries), regular audits, and public disclosures. This could bolster confidence among investors and consumers, reducing the risk of de-pegging events like the Terra/Luna collapse in 2022.

Stablecoins such as USDC (issued by Circle) could see enhanced credibility, potentially increasing adoption in mainstream finance. However, issuers like Tether (USDT), which have faced scrutiny over reserve opacity, might need to overhaul operations to comply, affecting their market dominance (currently around 61% of the $230 billion stablecoin market as of early 2025). The dual federal-state framework—federal oversight for issuers with over $10 billion in market cap and state options for smaller players—provides a clear legal pathway. This could attract institutional players, including banks and tech giants, who have hesitated due to regulatory uncertainty.

Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.

Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.

Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.

Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.

For example, firms like Meta or Google might explore stablecoin issuance, leveraging their scale to compete with traditional financial systems. This could drive transaction volumes on public blockchains into the trillions, enhancing efficiency in payments and remittances. Stricter compliance costs (e.g., AML/KYC, audits) may disproportionately burden smaller issuers, potentially consolidating the market around larger, well-capitalized players. The STABLE Act’s two-year ban on algorithmic stablecoins and prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins could further limit innovation in decentralized models, favoring centralized, fiat-backed options. This might reduce diversity in the stablecoin ecosystem, locking in leaders like USDC and USDT while sidelining experimental projects.

Stablecoins are a backbone of decentralized finance (DeFi), facilitating trades and lending. Regulatory clarity could accelerate DeFi growth by integrating stablecoins into traditional systems, but restrictions on yield or algorithmic designs might constrain certain protocols. Crypto exchanges, heavily reliant on stablecoins for liquidity, may need to adjust listings, particularly if non-compliant issuers lose U.S. market access. This could shift trading dynamics, potentially boosting compliant stablecoins’ market share. By reinforcing dollar-backed stablecoins, these acts aim to maintain the U.S. dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency amid competition from digital currencies like China’s e-CNY.

The GENIUS Act’s push for international reciprocity could align U.S. standards with frameworks like the EU’s MiCA, enhancing cross-border interoperability. However, stringent rules might disadvantage U.S.-based issuers against offshore competitors with laxer regulations, unless global coordination mitigates this gap. As the bills await full House and Senate votes, uncertainty could spark volatility. Issuers adjusting reserves or exiting non-compliant models might trigger price fluctuations or redemption pressures. Markets will closely watch implementation timelines and enforcement rigor, especially post-enactment.

The STABLE and GENIUS Acts could legitimize and stabilize the stablecoin market, driving adoption and reinforcing the dollar’s digital dominance. Yet, they risk entrenching large players, stifling innovation, and creating near-term uncertainty—outcomes that will hinge on final legislation details and execution. The $230 billion stablecoin market stands at a pivotal moment, with ripple effects likely across crypto, banking, and global finance.

No posts to display

Post Comment

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here