Apple is increasingly emerging as an unlikely defensive play for investors as concerns over the durability of the artificial intelligence boom and the risk of a global bond-market sell-off push money away from some of the technology sector’s biggest AI beneficiaries.
Shares of Apple rose 2.6% on Tuesday even as technology stocks broadly declined, extending a period of relative strength that has seen the iPhone maker move in the opposite direction from the broader technology market.
The divergence is unusually pronounced. According to CNBC analysis of ThinkOrSwim data, Apple’s 30-day correlation with the Nasdaq-100 has fallen to levels not seen since 2005. The correlation reached negative 0.86 on Thursday and stood at negative 0.82 at the latest reading.
Register for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
A correlation of -1 means two assets move perfectly in opposite directions, making the current reading notable for a company that remains one of the largest constituents of the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100. Apple accounts for about 7.5% of the index.
Apple has historically experienced periods when its shares moved inversely to the Nasdaq-100, including during the first quarter of 2024. But the current divergence is both stronger and more persistent.
In early 2024, Apple was under pressure as investors redirected capital toward companies seen as the primary beneficiaries of the emerging AI boom. Now, the direction of the trade appears to be reversing, with Apple benefiting as investors question whether the enormous valuations attached to AI-related companies can be sustained.
“When the AI trade gets questioned, Apple doesn’t sell off with it, because it was never carrying that risk in the first place,” said Dave Mazza, chief executive of Roundhill Investments, which operates an Apple ETF using swaps to generate weekly income.
“It has become the hedge inside the Nasdaq,” Mazza said.
That shift marks a significant change in Apple’s position within the technology sector. For much of the year, the company lagged the Nasdaq as investors favored chipmakers, cloud providers and other companies directly exposed to AI spending.
Apple has since reversed that pattern. After trailing the Nasdaq-100 during the first six months of the year, Apple is now up about 20%, compared with a roughly 15% gain for the index. The longer-term performance gap remains narrower. Over the past three years, the Nasdaq-100 has gained about 90%, while Apple has advanced roughly 82%.
The renewed demand for Apple is also visible in the derivatives market, where options traders appear to be positioning for continued relative strength.
Nearly 1.5 million Apple call options changed hands during Tuesday’s session, compared with fewer than 700,000 puts. ThinkOrSwim data indicated that about 543,000 calls were likely opened by buyers, versus fewer than 220,000 put positions initiated by buyers.
Barchart’s analysis of options flows likewise showed a strong bullish skew in net delta exposure, a measure of how sensitive option positions are to movements in Apple’s share price. Trading activity was unusually heavy. Apple options were the second-most actively traded contracts on Tuesday, with volume roughly twice the 30-day average, according to SpotGamma and Cboe LiveVol data.
The market positioning suggests investors are not simply using Apple as a defensive alternative to AI stocks. Some are actively betting that the company’s relative strength can continue.
Apple’s appeal in the current environment stems partly from what it does not represent. Unlike Nvidia and several other major AI beneficiaries, Apple has not been valued primarily on expectations of explosive AI infrastructure spending. Its enormous installed base, hardware ecosystem, services business, and recurring consumer demand give investors a different earnings profile from companies whose valuations are more directly tied to the pace of AI investment.
That is becoming more relevant as investors reassess the scale of spending required to build AI infrastructure and question how quickly those investments will translate into profits.
There is also a broader macroeconomic dimension. Rising government bond yields can put pressure on expensive growth stocks by increasing the discount rate applied to their future earnings. If investors become more concerned about inflation, fiscal deficits or a broader global rate sell-off, companies with valuations heavily dependent on distant future cash flows can become particularly vulnerable.
Apple is not immune to those forces. Its shares remain expensive by many traditional measures, and the company still faces questions over iPhone growth, China demand, tariffs, and the pace at which its own AI initiatives can generate meaningful revenue.
But its current market role is changing.
Rather than being treated simply as another mega-cap technology stock, Apple is being used as a relative safe harbor within the Nasdaq. The unusually negative correlation with the index suggests investors are separating the company from the broader AI trade and viewing its earnings and cash-generation characteristics as a source of stability when enthusiasm for AI-related assets weakens.
If that pattern persists, it could mark a meaningful shift in technology-market leadership, where investors may not necessarily be abandoning technology, but reallocating within the sector from the most aggressive AI exposures toward companies perceived to offer stronger and more diversified underlying businesses.