Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro series recorded modest global sales growth during its first three weeks on the market, with stronger demand in China helping offset declines in the United States and Japan as higher prices and limited product improvements weighed on consumers.
Sales of the iPhone 18 Pro models were 3.1% higher than those of the iPhone 17 Pro series over the equivalent period a year earlier, according to Counterpoint Research. The figures point to a mixed start for Apple’s latest premium smartphones, with performance varying considerably across major markets.
China delivered the strongest growth, with sales increasing 29% year on year. Counterpoint attributed the performance partly to greater initial availability of the new models compared with the previous generation and higher prices for rival flagship Android smartphones from Chinese manufacturers, which helped support demand for Apple’s devices.
Register for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
The strength of the Chinese market was particularly important to the overall result. Counterpoint said global sales growth would have been considerably weaker if China were excluded, suggesting that the headline increase masks softer demand in other important markets.
In the United States, sales fell 4% from a year earlier, while Japan recorded a sharper 27% decline. Counterpoint said American consumers saw few meaningful improvements in features or design to justify the higher prices of the new models. In Japan, exchange-rate movements amplified the price increases, putting additional pressure on demand.
The contrasting performances indicate that Apple’s ability to sustain premium pricing is becoming increasingly dependent on local market conditions, including currency movements, competing product prices, and the perceived value of each new generation.
China’s 29% increase gave the iPhone 18 Pro series an important source of growth at a time when demand in other major markets was weaker. The performance also highlights how product availability and competitive pricing can influence early sales, even in a market where domestic smartphone manufacturers have established positions in the premium segment.
Counterpoint said Apple benefited from stronger initial stock availability than it had for the iPhone 17 Pro series a year earlier. Better availability can help a company capture demand immediately after launch, when interest among early adopters is typically strongest and purchasing decisions are concentrated around the newest models.
Higher prices for competing flagship Android phones from Chinese manufacturers also improved Apple’s relative position. When rival products become more expensive, the price difference between premium devices can narrow, making Apple’s offering more competitive for consumers already considering a high-end smartphone.
However, the figures do not establish whether Chinese sales will persist beyond the initial launch period. Early sales can be influenced by inventory levels, promotional activity, and purchases brought forward by consumers seeking the latest model. Thus, sustained growth will depend on whether demand remains strong after the initial wave of buyers has passed.
The results also underline the importance of separating Apple’s performance in China from its global momentum. The company’s overall growth was positive, but its dependence on one market to offset declines elsewhere raises questions about the breadth of demand for the latest models.
Higher Prices Test The Value Proposition
The declines in the United States and Japan point to a different challenge: consumers may be less willing to pay more for incremental improvements when their existing smartphones remain capable of meeting their needs.
In the United States, Counterpoint said the new models offered few significant changes in features or design to justify the higher prices. That assessment suggests the latest devices may not have provided enough additional value to persuade some consumers to upgrade.
This has created a difficult balance for Apple. Higher prices can support revenue per device and help offset rising component and development costs, but they can also lengthen replacement cycles if consumers do not see a compelling reason to purchase a new phone.
Japan’s 27% sales decline illustrates how currency movements can intensify that pressure. When exchange rates increase the local-currency cost of imported electronics, manufacturers may face a choice between passing the additional cost to customers and absorbing part of it through lower margins.
The United States and Japan results also show why a single global sales figure can conceal important differences in consumer behavior. China’s growth was supported by favorable competitive pricing and stronger availability, while higher prices and limited perceived improvements weighed on demand in the other two markets.
The iPhone 18 Pro Max accounted for 56% of sales within the series, down slightly from 57% for the previous generation. The marginal decline suggests that the largest model continued to represent the majority of series sales, although its share edged lower.
Overall, the 3.1% increase provides evidence of continued demand for Apple’s premium smartphones, but it is not a uniform recovery across markets. China supplied much of the momentum, while the declines in the United States and Japan point to greater sensitivity to price and product differentiation.
The next test for Apple will be whether demand broadens beyond China as the launch period progresses. If consumers in mature markets continue to see limited reasons to upgrade, the company may find it harder to sustain growth through premium pricing alone.