Blockchain gaming is a rapidly growing sector in the metaverse, where players can own, trade and create digital assets on decentralized platforms. Blockchain gaming offers a new level of immersion, interactivity and ownership for gamers, who can benefit from the security, transparency and interoperability of blockchain technology.
However, blockchain gaming is not without its challenges and limitations. One of the main issues facing blockchain gaming is scalability, which refers to the ability of a network to handle a large number of transactions and users without compromising performance or security. Blockchain gaming platforms often rely on public blockchains, such as Ethereum or Binance Smart Chain, which have limited throughput and high fees. This can result in slow, expensive and unreliable gaming experiences for players, especially during periods of high demand.
Another issue facing blockchain gaming is accessibility, which refers to the ease of use and adoption of blockchain technology by gamers. Blockchain gaming platforms often require players to have a basic understanding of blockchain concepts, such as wallets, tokens and smart contracts. They also require players to use specialized software and hardware, such as browsers, extensions and devices that support blockchain functionality. This can create a steep learning curve and a high entry barrier for gamers who are not familiar with or interested in blockchain technology.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 14 (June 3 – Sept 2, 2024) begins registrations; get massive discounts with early registration here.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
Blockchain gaming is a promising sector that combines the benefits of decentralized technology with the entertainment value of video games. However, despite the potential, blockchain gaming has not attracted as much venture capital (VC) funding as other segments of the blockchain industry. Why is that?
There are several possible reasons for the low VC inflow on blockchain gaming. One is that the market size and demand for blockchain games are still unclear. Unlike other blockchain applications, such as DeFi or NFTs, which have clear use cases and value propositions, blockchain games are more dependent on user preferences and tastes. It is hard to predict how many gamers will adopt blockchain games and how much they will spend on them.
Another reason is that the development and distribution of blockchain games are challenging and costly. Blockchain games require not only technical skills, but also creative and artistic talents, which are scarce and expensive. Moreover, blockchain games face regulatory and legal uncertainties, as well as platform and network limitations, which can hamper their scalability and accessibility.
A third reason is that the monetization and retention of blockchain gamers are difficult and uncertain. Blockchain games often rely on tokenomics and play-to-earn models, which can create incentives for users to play, but also introduce risks of volatility, manipulation, and exploitation. Furthermore, blockchain games have to compete with traditional games, which have more established brands, communities, and features.
These reasons may explain why VC investors are cautious about investing in blockchain gaming. However, this does not mean that blockchain gaming has no future or potential. On the contrary, blockchain gaming can offer unique advantages and opportunities for both developers and players, such as ownership, interoperability, innovation, and social impact. As the technology matures and the market evolves, blockchain gaming may attract more attention and funding from VC investors.
Blockchain gaming meta is wading off as a result of these issues, which hamper the growth and innovation of the sector. Blockchain gaming platforms need to find ways to overcome these challenges and provide better solutions for gamers who want to enjoy the benefits of blockchain technology without compromising on quality, convenience or affordability.
Some possible solutions include:
Using layer 2 solutions or sidechains that can increase the scalability and efficiency of blockchain gaming platforms by processing transactions off-chain or on parallel chains that are connected to the main chain.
Using cross-chain bridges or interoperability protocols that can enable the transfer and exchange of assets and data across different blockchains, enhancing the diversity and compatibility of blockchain gaming platforms.
Using user-friendly interfaces and tools that can simplify the user experience and lower the technical barriers for blockchain gaming platforms, making them more accessible and appealing to a wider audience of gamers.
Using gamified incentives and rewards that can motivate and educate players about blockchain technology and its benefits, creating a positive feedback loop and a loyal community of blockchain gamers.
Blockchain gaming meta is wading off, but it is not drowning. Blockchain gaming has a lot of potential and promise for the future of gaming and the metaverse, but it also needs to address its current challenges and limitations. By adopting these solutions, blockchain gaming platforms can improve their performance, usability and adoption, and revive the blockchain gaming meta.