“Crypto Will Become the Native Currency of AI Agents” has gained significant traction recently, especially following comments from prominent figures in the crypto space at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
Changpeng Zhao (CZ), former CEO of Binance, stated during a panel: “The native currency of AI agents will be cryptocurrency. Blockchain will become the most natural technical interface for AI agents.”
This view was echoed by others, including industry leaders from Circle who emphasized stablecoins for AI bot payments, former PayPal executives predicting Bitcoin’s role, and Coinbase discussions on agentic commerce.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab (class begins Jan 24 2026).
Why This Narrative Makes Sense
AI agents — autonomous systems that can plan, act, transact, and even earn/spend on behalf of users or themselves — face key challenges with traditional finance: Speed and scale — Human-centric systems like credit cards or bank transfers involve friction.
AI-driven economies could involve billions of micro-transactions per second like machine-to-machine payments for compute, data, or services. Agents need money that can be scripted, escrowed, or conditional— smart contracts handle this natively.
No weekends, no geography limits, no KYC per transaction for pure machine interactions. Agents can’t realistically hold credit cards or fiat bank accounts in traditional systems, but they can control wallets and private keys.
Crypto especially blockchains with low fees, fast settlement, and token standards fits as “digital-native” money. Stablecoins are frequently highlighted as the practical choice for value stability, while volatile assets like Bitcoin could serve as a store-of-value layer or reserve.
Projects and protocols are building exactly this: agent payment standard like x402 for AI-agent commerce, machine-to-machine micropayments on chains like Mintlayer or others, and autonomous agents already earning/spending tokens, examples in gaming, DeFi, or experimental bots.
Predictions date back earlier 2023–2025 forecasts from Bitwise, Animoca Brands, and others, but Davos 2026 amplified it into mainstream finance and crypto discourse. Some estimate this convergence could drive massive value — one report referenced a potential $20tn opportunity as AI transforms crypto use cases beyond speculation into real infrastructure.
Many including some responding to CZ argue stablecoins (USDC, USDT, etc.) will dominate for everyday agent transactions due to predictability, while Bitcoin/ETH serve as higher-level assets. Governments may impose rules on autonomous payments; traditional rails could compete.
Low-cost, high-throughput layers (Solana, Ethereum L2s, specialized chains) are better positioned than high-fee networks for micro-transactions. Not everyone agrees fiat rails will be fully displaced — hybrids might emerge.
The thesis is compelling and increasingly discussed in 2026: as AI agents become economic actors, crypto’s properties position it uniquely as their “native” medium of exchange. Whether it’s Bitcoin specifically, stablecoins, or broader crypto rails remains debated — but the direction feels directionally correct to many builders and investors in the space.
If you’re bullish on this intersection, projects focused on AI agents + payments, verifiable compute, or on-chain automation could be worth watching. Agents become autonomous economic actors with their own wallets, earning/spending independently.
This could democratize value creation but also concentrate power if a few platforms dominate agent orchestration. While CZ said “crypto,” many including Circle’s CEO predicting “billions of AI agents” using stablecoins in 3–5 years argue volatility makes assets like BTC/ETH unsuitable for routine payments.
Stablecoins offer predictability for agents negotiating fees or paying per-token usage, while native tokens e.g., on Solana or Ethereum L2s handle gas and incentives. Agents need permissionless identity (wallets via private keys), instant micropayments, and smart contract escrow/verification.
Projects building agent wallets, launchpads like Virtuals Protocol, or decentralized intelligence markets could see explosive growth. Conversely, high-cost networks risk being sidelined for agent-scale txns.
AI agents could interact with tokenized real-world assets autonomously, blurring lines between digital and physical economies.
Who is responsible if an agent makes a bad trade, spends funds erroneously, or causes harm? Regulatory uncertainty around autonomous payments is already noted — governments may demand oversight, KYC for agent creators, or rules on “machine money.”
Some worry this betrays crypto’s decentralization promise if centralized AI platforms control agents. Crypto’s pseudonymity suits agents, but regulators might push for traceable flows in an AI-driven economy to prevent illicit use.
This narrative reframes crypto beyond speculation: real utility as infrastructure for the next economic layer. It could drive sustained demand for base assets (BTC as reserve), stablecoins (USDC/USDT volume surges), and AI-crypto intersection tokens.
Crypto’s properties (programmability, borderlessness, 24/7 operation) make it uniquely suited, but success hinges on stable, scalable infrastructure, thoughtful regulation, and avoiding centralization pitfalls.