The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has recently shared significant updates on its leadership structure and 2025 roadmap, reflecting a strategic pivot to address community concerns, enhance scalability, and maintain Ethereum’s core values. As of March 17, 2025, Hsiao-Wei Wang, a seven-year EF researcher instrumental in the Beacon Chain and sharding, and Tomasz Sta?czak, founder of Nethermind (a key Ethereum execution client), have been appointed as co-executive directors. This dual-leadership model replaces the traditional single executive director role, aiming for collaborative decision-making and technical focus.
Aya Miyaguchi, executive director since 2018, has moved to the role of president, focusing on strategic initiatives and ecosystem growth. The EF Board, including Vitalik Buterin, Miyaguchi, Wang, and Patrick Storchenegger, sets the long-term vision, emphasizing decentralization, open-source innovation, and censorship resistance. Former EF researcher Danny Ryan has joined Etherealize, a new initiative to bridge Ethereum with institutional investors, co-founded with Vivek Raman.
These changes follow community criticism in 2024 over governance, transparency, and conflicts of interest (e.g., EF researchers’ advisory roles at EigenLayer). Vitalik Buterin initiated the restructuring to enhance technical expertise, community engagement, and ecosystem support while rejecting calls for political lobbying or centralized control.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
2025 Roadmap Updates
The EF outlined its 2025 goals, focusing on scalability, user experience, and ecosystem decentralization, as detailed in a recent blog and tweets. Prioritizing mainnet improvements to reduce transaction costs and congestion, including increasing transaction throughput via “blob” transactions (EIP-4844). Enhancing data availability through blobs to support Layer 2 (L2) solutions, addressing concerns about L2s cannibalizing base-layer revenue.
Streamlining interactions for developers and users, potentially accelerating projects like Verkle Trees and history expiry. Ongoing work includes 3-Slot-Finality, delayed execution (EIP-7886), and quantum-safe SNARKs to simplify the protocol and mitigate centralization risks (e.g., MEV and liquid staking).
Vitalik Buterin has suggested modernizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) by transitioning to RISC-V for better performance and overhauling the execution layer to reduce L2 scaling costs. Refining governance models, public goods funding, and token models to ensure long-term sustainability without fostering dependency.
The EF is also exploring staking its ETH reserves for sustainable revenue and deploying funds (e.g., 50,000 ETH into DeFi protocols) to align with ecosystem participation rather than selling ETH. These updates come amid competitive pressures from blockchains like Solana, declining ETH prices, and community debates over L2 revenue impacts post-Dencun upgrade. The EF aims to balance short-term deliverables with long-term research, leveraging its new leadership to restore momentum and trust.
The Ethereum Foundation’s (EF) leadership changes and 2025 roadmap updates carry significant implications for Ethereum’s ecosystem, market position, and long-term viability. Prioritizing Layer 1 (L1) scaling (e.g., blob transactions, EIP-4844) and user experience improvements (e.g., Verkle Trees, EVM modernization) could reduce transaction costs and congestion, making Ethereum more competitive with high-throughput chains like Solana. However, execution risks remain, as complex upgrades like 3-Slot-Finality or quantum-safe SNARKs require robust testing to avoid network disruptions.
Improved data availability and lower L2 scaling costs could strengthen Ethereum’s rollup-centric roadmap, boosting adoption of L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism. Yet, this risks further diverting revenue from L1, potentially weakening validator incentives unless addressed (e.g., via Vitalik’s execution layer overhaul). Proposals like transitioning to RISC-V and delayed execution aim to streamline Ethereum’s architecture, reducing technical debt and centralization risks (e.g., MEV, liquid staking). Success could enhance developer accessibility and network resilience, but failure to deliver could erode confidence in EF’s technical leadership.
Lower L1 revenue post-Dencun has strained validator profitability. Roadmap efforts to balance L1 and L2 economics (e.g., blob fee adjustments) are critical to maintaining network security. Failure to address this could increase centralization risks via liquid staking dominance (e.g., Lido). Refining funding models for ecosystem projects could sustain Ethereum’s open-source ethos, but over-reliance on EF grants risks creating dependency. A sustainable token model or decentralized funding mechanism could enhance long-term economic resilience.
Appointing Hsiao-Wei Wang and Tomasz Sta?czak as co-executive directors, with their deep technical expertise, signals a commitment to community-driven, transparent governance. This could rebuild trust after 2024’s controversies (e.g., EigenLayer conflicts). However, the dual-leadership model is untested and may face challenges in aligning priorities. Rejecting political lobbying and centralized control aligns with Ethereum’s ethos but limits its ability to counter regulatory pressures compared to competitors with lobbying arms (e.g., Solana Foundation). The EF’s focus on technical governance (e.g., open-source innovation) may strengthen community loyalty but risks slower ecosystem coordination.
Increased transparency (e.g., detailed roadmaps, blog updates) and Buterin’s proactive restructuring address past criticisms. Sustained engagement will be crucial to avoid perceptions of elitism or disconnect, especially as Ethereum scales. Ethereum faces pressure from high-performance L1s (e.g., Solana, Aptos) and modular chains (e.g., Celestia). Successful roadmap execution could solidify Ethereum’s dominance in DeFi and NFTs by improving UX and affordability. Delays, however, could cede ground to rivals capitalizing on Ethereum’s high fees and complexity.
Simplifying the EVM and developer tools could attract more builders, reinforcing Ethereum’s lead in dApp development (e.g., ~60% DeFi TVL). Competitors offering faster onboarding or cheaper deployment may still challenge this edge if Ethereum’s upgrades lag. Danny Ryan’s move to Etherealize signals Ethereum’s growing appeal to institutional investors. However, without clearer regulatory engagement, Ethereum may struggle to match competitors’ institutional traction (e.g., Solana’s ETF progress).
Risks and Opportunities
Successful roadmap delivery could drive a virtuous cycle of lower costs, higher adoption, and stronger network effects, positioning Ethereum as the go-to smart contract platform. Leadership changes and governance reforms could enhance community trust, attracting talent and capital. Technical delays, governance missteps, or failure to balance L1-L2 economics could erode Ethereum’s market share and developer base. External factors like regulatory crackdowns or macroeconomic shifts (e.g., rising interest rates) could amplify these challenges.
The EF’s updates position Ethereum to address critical pain points—scalability, UX, and governance—while reinforcing its decentralized ethos. Success hinges on executing complex technical upgrades and maintaining community trust amid competitive and economic pressures. Short-term price volatility may persist, but long-term, Ethereum’s ecosystem strength and developer loyalty provide a solid foundation for growth.