22
07
2025

PAGES

22
07
2025

spot_img

PAGES

Home Tekedia Forum

Tekedia Forum

Forum Navigation
Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Using ChatGPT May Cause Cognitive Decline, MIT Study Finds

 

Using AI Bots Like ChatGPT May Lead to Cognitive Decline, MIT Study Warns

As artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT become increasingly embedded in everyday life, concerns about their impact on human cognition are growing. A new pre-print study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has added fuel to the fire, suggesting that using ChatGPT could contribute to cognitive decline and hinder long-term learning.

The study, conducted by researchers at the MIT Media Lab, found that people who used ChatGPT to complete writing tasks showed significantly lower brain activity, struggled with memory retention, and were more likely to produce biased or shallow content when later asked to write without assistance.

Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 18 (Sep 15 – Dec 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.

Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.

Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.

Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment.

Inside the Study: How AI Use Affects the Brain

The MIT study divided participants into three groups: one using ChatGPT, another using a search engine, and a control group using no digital tools. Each participant was tasked with writing essays, during which researchers monitored brain activity using electroencephalograms (EEGs) to observe neural engagement.

Afterward, both human and AI evaluators reviewed the quality of the essays. The participants were also asked to recall or quote from their work to assess memory retention and connection to the content.

The results were striking: the ChatGPT-only group exhibited the lowest levels of neural activation, performed worst in recall tests, and produced writing that was “biased and superficial” when asked to write without assistance later.

In contrast, those who relied solely on their own thinking — with no digital aid — showed strong cognitive engagement, better memory retention, and a higher sense of ownership over their work.

What Is “Cognitive Debt”?

One of the study’s most compelling findings is the idea of “cognitive debt.” This term refers to the long-term mental cost of outsourcing thinking tasks to machines. As people become increasingly reliant on AI to generate or structure ideas, they miss out on critical mental processes, such as reasoning, reflection, and deep analysis.

“Repeated GPT use can come with cognitive debt that reduces long-term learning performance in independent thinking,” the researchers noted.

In other words, the convenience of AI tools may come at a hidden cost: diminished creativity, lower critical thinking, and a reduced ability to learn independently. Over time, this could make users more vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation — especially if they accept AI-generated content without question.

Users Feel Less Connected to Their Work

Beyond the neurological data, the study revealed an emotional disconnect between AI users and their own work. Participants in the ChatGPT and search engine groups reported feeling less connected to the content they produced. Many struggled to recall specific points or quotes from their own essays.

In contrast, participants who worked unaided by technology not only remembered their content more clearly but also reported greater satisfaction and engagement during the writing process.

“When participants reproduce suggestions without evaluating their accuracy or relevance,” the study warned, “they not only forfeit ownership of the ideas but also risk internalising shallow or biased perspectives.”

This raises serious questions about how AI is shaping not just what we write, but how we think and remember.

What Does This Mean for the Future of AI and Education?

As AI becomes more deeply integrated into classrooms, workplaces, and creative industries, the findings of this study should serve as a wake-up call. While tools like ChatGPT offer undeniable convenience and support, the MIT researchers urge caution.

They recommend more rigorous, long-term studies to better understand how AI tools influence the brain before large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are embraced uncritically.

For educators, parents, and policymakers, the key takeaway is clear: AI should be used to enhance—not replace—human thought. Overreliance on tools like ChatGPT could not only reduce the quality of thinking but could also lead to broader societal impacts related to knowledge, autonomy, and creativity.

Balancing AI Use with Critical Thinking

This study doesn’t suggest abandoning AI tools altogether. Instead, it calls for a more intentional and balanced approach. Here are a few takeaways for responsible use:

  • Use AI as a brainstorming partner, not a ghostwriter.
  • Always fact-check and review suggestions rather than accepting them at face value.
  • Encourage deep reflection after using AI outputs — ask “Why does this make sense?” or “What’s missing?”
  • Engage in active learning to keep cognitive skills sharp, especially when using AI tools regularly.

Looking Forward

As AI tools like ChatGPT become even more integrated into daily life—from education and journalism to creative writing and business communications—the challenge will be finding a healthy balance between human cognition and machine assistance.

The MIT study doesn’t call for banning AI, but it does underscore the need for responsible use. Future research will likely explore how AI can be redesigned or guided to stimulate learning and creativity, rather than replace them. This could involve more interactive and reflective AI features, or new education models that combine human and artificial intelligence thoughtfully.

Ultimately, the path forward should focus not just on what AI can do, but on what humans should keep doing for themselves—thinking critically, creating deeply, and learning actively. As we enter a new era of human-AI collaboration, protecting our cognitive health must be part of the equation.

Conclusion

The rise of generative AI like ChatGPT has sparked a revolution in how we create, write, and communicate. But this MIT study is a crucial reminder that convenience should never come at the expense of cognition. Outsourcing too much of our mental work to machines can result in shallow thinking, weaker memory, and a diminished capacity to learn and grow independently.

As AI continues to evolve, so must our awareness of its impact—not just on what we produce, but on how we think. The future of human intelligence depends on it.

Meta Description:
A new MIT study shows that relying on AI tools like ChatGPT for writing tasks may lead to decreased brain activity, poor memory retention, and reduced learning skills. Here’s what it means for users and educators.

Uploaded files: