A wave of mergers and acquisitions is sweeping the gold mining industry as elevated bullion prices strengthen miners’ balance sheets and encourage consolidation, but disagreements over valuations and the future direction of gold prices are making it harder to complete transactions, Perseus Mining Chief Executive Craig Jones said.
“There’s a lot of activity, but not necessarily a lot of completion,” Jones told Reuters late Tuesday. “Companies are trying to work out what gold prices will do before making transaction decisions.”
The disconnect between buyers and sellers has become a defining feature of the current M&A cycle. Strong gold prices have increased the value of established producers and made high-quality assets more attractive, but they have also raised the prices that potential targets are demanding.
Register for the next Tekedia Mini-MBA.
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
That development is now creating a difficult calculation for mining companies. Buyers must decide whether current gold prices can be sustained long enough to justify paying elevated valuations, while sellers have little incentive to accept offers based on conservative assumptions when bullion prices are high.
The industry has already seen a series of major transactions as producers seek to increase reserves, extend mine lives and strengthen their positions in a market supported by strong gold prices. Northern Star Resources acquired De Grey Mining, Ramelius Resources agreed to buy Spartan Resources, Equinox Gold purchased Calibre Mining and AngloGold Ashanti completed its takeover of Centamin.
Yet several other transactions have demonstrated how difficult it can be to convert strong M&A interest into completed deals.
Zijin Gold’s planned $4 billion acquisition of Allied Gold collapsed before closing, while Gold Fields’ approach for Northern Star was rejected. Gold Fields last month proposed an A$38.7 billion ($26.99 billion) transaction that it described as transformational and said would create the world’s No. 2 gold miner. Northern Star rejected the proposal, describing it as opportunistic and saying it significantly undervalued the company.
The dispute underpins the valuation problem confronting the sector. At high gold prices, a producer’s earnings and cash flow can increase rapidly, but buyers have to determine how much of that improvement is cyclical and how much can be sustained over the life of a mine.
Jones said different assumptions about future bullion prices were creating significant gaps between buyers and sellers.
“Some companies have more aggressive assumptions and some more conservative assumptions,” he said. “You’ve got to decide whether the risk-reward makes sense.”
That uncertainty is making companies more selective even as the number of potential transactions rises.
The sector’s M&A cycle is also being complicated by competing bidders and regulatory requirements. A company that wants to acquire an attractive asset must not only determine whether the price makes financial sense but also assess whether another bidder is prepared to pay more.
This means for shareholders of potential targets, elevated gold prices can strengthen the argument for holding out for a higher offer. For acquirers, however, paying too much at the top of the commodity cycle can undermine the financial benefits that initially attracted them to the transaction.
Perseus Prioritizes Organic Growth
Perseus itself has experience of the competitive nature of the current market. The company allowed its bid for Australian explorer Predictive Discovery to lapse last year after rival bidder Robex Resources improved its offer.
For now, Perseus is prioritizing organic growth rather than pursuing acquisitions simply to expand its production base. The company operates mines in Ghana and Ivory Coast and is developing a fourth operation in Tanzania. Jones, a former Newcrest executive, said Perseus remains focused on extending mine lives and expanding its existing operations. That approach allows the company to use its existing technical and operational expertise while avoiding the valuation risks associated with buying assets at a time when gold prices are volatile.
Perseus is not, however, restricting itself permanently to Africa.
“We look everywhere,” Jones said, adding that any acquisition outside Africa would need to fit the company’s mine-building and operating expertise.
The qualification is deemed necessary because mining acquisitions can create substantial value only when the buyer can operate the acquired assets effectively. Geographic expansion without the necessary operational capabilities can increase costs and execution risks.
Broker Canaccord Genuity said in August that Perseus was well positioned to pursue acquisitions if suitable opportunities emerged. The broker forecasts EBITDA of about $2.25 billion in fiscal 2027-28 and expects the company to have more than $2 billion in cash by the end of 2028. Those financial resources could give Perseus flexibility if valuations become more attractive or if an asset emerges that fits its operating strategy.
For now, however, the company appears more interested in strengthening the assets it already controls. Jones said higher fiscal costs in Ghana had not materially altered Perseus’ plans. The company is continuing a $140 million cutback at its Edikan operation while carrying out exploration intended to extend the mine’s life.
However, the strategy highlights a broader divide within the gold sector. Companies with strong cash generation can pursue acquisitions, but high valuations mean there is no guarantee that buying another producer will generate better returns than investing in existing mines.
The current M&A environment is likely to remain active without necessarily producing a comparable number of completed transactions. High gold prices are encouraging producers to consolidate, but the same prices are making potential targets more expensive and increasing the uncertainty around future earnings.
For buyers such as Perseus, that raises a concern about the price paid generating an attractive return if gold prices retreat from current levels. Analysts expect that valuation discipline to determine which of the many proposed gold deals ultimately reach completion and which remain part of the sector’s growing pipeline of M&A activity.