The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have concluded their investigations into Polymarket, a blockchain-based prediction market platform, with no charges filed. The probes, initiated during the final months of the Biden administration, examined whether Polymarket violated a 2022 CFTC settlement that required the platform to block U.S.-based users from placing bets, particularly through workarounds like VPNs.
The investigations gained attention after Polymarket’s surge in popularity during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, where it accurately predicted outcomes, drawing scrutiny for allegedly allowing U.S. users to participate despite the ban. Polymarket received formal notices earlier this month confirming the closure of both the civil and criminal probes, signaling a regulatory shift under the Trump administration’s more crypto-friendly stance. This resolution may pave the way for Polymarket to explore reentering the U.S. market, potentially through CFTC registration or partnerships.
The resolution without charges allows Polymarket to operate without the immediate threat of U.S. regulatory penalties. This is a significant win, as the investigations focused on potential violations of a 2022 CFTC settlement that barred Polymarket from offering services to U.S. users. The closure signals a possible path for Polymarket to explore reentering the U.S. market legally, potentially by registering as a designated contract market (DCM) with the CFTC or partnering with compliant entities like Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated prediction market.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
This could expand Polymarket’s user base and trading volume, which reached $2.3 billion in October 2024 alone. The lack of charges enhances Polymarket’s credibility, reinforcing its position as a leading prediction market platform, especially after its accurate forecasting during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The DOJ and CFTC’s decision not to pursue charges may indicate a softening regulatory stance under the Trump administration, which has expressed pro-crypto policies.
This could encourage other prediction markets to push boundaries, testing U.S. regulations while leveraging offshore structures. With Polymarket potentially eyeing U.S. reentry, competitors like Kalshi, which operates legally in the U.S., may face heightened competition. This could drive innovation but also regulatory scrutiny to ensure a level playing field.
The resolution may attract more institutional and retail interest in prediction markets, as regulatory clarity reduces perceived risks. Prediction markets could gain traction for forecasting not just elections but economic indicators, sports, and other events. The closure aligns with a broader shift toward crypto-friendly policies in the U.S., potentially encouraging blockchain-based platforms to innovate without fear of aggressive enforcement.
Polymarket’s offshore operations (based in Panama) highlight the tension between global blockchain platforms and U.S. regulations. The resolution may prompt discussions on harmonizing international and U.S. regulatory frameworks. Polymarket operates legally outside the U.S. but faced scrutiny for allegedly allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPNs, violating the 2022 CFTC settlement.
The closure of the investigation reflects a potential shift from the Biden administration’s stricter enforcement to a more lenient approach under Trump, creating a divide between past and present U.S. regulatory priorities. Prediction markets sit in a gray area between the CFTC (which regulates derivatives and futures) and the SEC (which oversees securities). The CFTC’s jurisdiction over Polymarket’s activities contrasts with potential SEC interest if prediction contracts are deemed securities, creating regulatory uncertainty.
Polymarket has advocated for prediction markets as tools for public good, providing real-time, market-driven insights (e.g., election forecasts). Regulators, however, prioritize consumer protection and compliance, viewing unrestricted access as a risk for fraud or manipulation. The 2022 CFTC settlement barred U.S. users, creating a divide between American bettors, who resorted to VPNs, and international users, who face fewer restrictions. This has fueled debates about fairness and access to decentralized platforms.
Platforms like Kalshi, which comply with U.S. regulations, argue that offshore platforms like Polymarket gain an unfair advantage by sidestepping rules. The investigation’s closure may pressure competitors to innovate or lobby for stricter enforcement. Supporters, including crypto enthusiasts and data analysts, view Polymarket as a valuable tool for aggregating collective wisdom, outperforming traditional polls (e.g., its accurate 2024 election predictions). They argue for lighter regulations to foster innovation.
Critics, including some regulators and traditional financial institutions, see prediction markets as akin to gambling or speculative trading, raising concerns about market manipulation, addiction, or unregulated financial flows.
Polymarket’s use of blockchain (Polygon, a layer-2 Ethereum solution) enables transparency and decentralization but complicates regulatory oversight due to its borderless nature. Traditional platforms like Kalshi operate within regulated frameworks, creating a divide between Web3 and legacy systems.
The DOJ and CFTC’s decision to close their investigations into Polymarket is a pivotal moment for the platform and the prediction market industry. It alleviates immediate regulatory pressure, potentially enabling Polymarket to pursue U.S. market reentry and boosting its legitimacy. However, it also underscores ongoing divides: between U.S. and global regulations, compliant and offshore platforms, and blockchain-based versus traditional systems.
These divides will likely shape future regulatory debates, especially as prediction markets gain prominence and the U.S. navigates its crypto policy under a new administration. If Polymarket leverages this opportunity to align with U.S. regulations, it could bridge some of these divides, fostering a more integrated and innovative prediction market ecosystem.