Elon Musk’s tenure as a special government employee leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ended on May 30, 2025, due to a 130-day statutory limit on his role, which began with President Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2025. Musk announced his departure on X, stating he would step back to focus on his companies, particularly Tesla, which faced a 71% profit drop amid protests and boycotts linked to his DOGE involvement. He expressed gratitude to Trump for the opportunity and claimed DOGE’s mission to reduce wasteful spending would continue.
During his time, Musk led aggressive cost-cutting efforts, with DOGE claiming $160 billion in savings, though transparency issues and a Partnership for Public Service analysis estimated $135 billion in taxpayer costs due to inefficiencies like paid leave and rehiring. His policies sparked lawsuits, protests, and tensions with Cabinet officials like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio over DOGE’s sweeping cuts to agencies like USAID and the Social Security Administration.
Musk’s influence persists through loyalists like Steve Davis and Antonio Gracias, embedded in agencies, ensuring DOGE’s ongoing impact despite his reduced role. Critics argue his cuts harmed essential services, while supporters, including Trump and Vice President JD Vance, praised his efforts. Musk may continue advising Trump informally, but his formal DOGE role has concluded. Elon Musk’s exit from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on May 30, 2025, carries significant implications for government operations, policy direction, and public perception.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
Despite Musk’s departure, his loyalists, such as Steve Davis and Antonio Gracias, remain embedded in key agencies, ensuring DOGE’s cost-cutting agenda persists. This could lead to continued reductions in federal programs, particularly in areas like foreign aid like USAID and social services (e.g., Social Security Administration), which faced heavy cuts under Musk’s tenure. Musk’s aggressive reforms, including layoffs and agency consolidations, have disrupted federal operations. The Partnership for Public Service estimated $135 billion in taxpayer costs due to inefficiencies like paid leave for furloughed workers and rehiring expenses. Ongoing lawsuits and employee resistance may further destabilize agencies.
Musk’s informal advisory role with President Trump suggests he could still shape policy, potentially prioritizing deregulation and privatization aligned with his business interests like Tesla, SpaceX. However, conflicts with Cabinet officials like Scott Bessent and Marco Rubio may temper DOGE’s influence over broader economic or foreign policy. Musk’s return to Tesla comes amid a 71% profit drop, partly attributed to boycotts and protests tied to his DOGE role. His focus on stabilizing Tesla could boost its innovation (e.g., autonomous driving, energy storage) but may face challenges from lingering public backlash.
Musk’s departure could stabilize markets wary of his divisive policies, though his continued influence via proxies may sustain uncertainty in sectors reliant on government contracts or regulations (e.g., defense, healthcare). Musk’s tenure exacerbated divides between supporters of deregulation and those advocating for robust public services. His cuts to programs like education and environmental agencies were praised by fiscal conservatives but criticized by progressives as undermining vulnerable communities.
Musk faced significant protests, including from furloughed federal workers and advocacy groups, who accused him of prioritizing corporate interests. This has fueled anti-Musk sentiment, with boycotts impacting Tesla’s brand. Musk’s clashes with Cabinet members highlight intra-administration rifts. His alignment with Trump and JD Vance contrasts with resistance from moderates like Rubio, potentially complicating Republican unity on fiscal policy.
Trump, Vance, and conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation lauded Musk’s $160 billion in claimed savings, viewing DOGE as a model for lean government. They argue his reforms cut bureaucratic waste and empowered private-sector efficiency. Democrats, federal employee unions, and advocacy groups decry the cuts as reckless, citing harm to essential services such as Social Security, education administration. Transparency issues—DOGE’s lack of detailed spending breakdowns—fueled accusations of cronyism, especially given Musk’s business ties.
Musk’s exit may calm some tensions but risks entrenching distrust in government efficiency efforts. His legacy at DOGE—streamlined in some areas, chaotic in others—will likely shape debates on government size and role through Trump’s term. The divide between pro- and anti-Musk factions mirrors broader U.S. polarization over wealth, power, and public goods, with implications for the 2026 midterms and beyond.
