Moody’s Zandi Warns Elevated Asset Prices Could Reverse as Economic Signals Weaken

Mark Zandi warns that elevated valuations, rising speculative behavior, and fragile Treasury market dynamics could combine to trigger a sell-off severe enough to spill from Wall Street into the broader U.S. economy.

The U.S. stock market has wavered in 2026 as investors juggle tariff uncertainty, artificial intelligence–driven volatility, and persistent inflation pressures. But for Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, the risks extend well beyond routine market swings.

Zandi, whose commentary typically centers on macroeconomic fundamentals rather than equity price action, said recent developments have pushed him to issue an unusually direct warning. In a thread on X, he argued that markets may be entering a destabilizing phase in which asset prices detach from underlying economic performance.

“There are times when I feel markets are overdone and increasingly disconnected from the economy,” Zandi wrote. “Markets risk moving in a big way, causality is reversed, and falling asset prices threaten an already vulnerable economy. This is one of those times.”

Speculation and stretched valuations

Zandi’s concern begins with valuations. By conventional metrics such as price-to-earnings ratios and equity risk premiums, U.S. stocks remain elevated relative to long-term averages. Investors have justified these levels with expectations of productivity gains from artificial intelligence and resilient corporate earnings.

Zandi does not dispute the existence of supportive fundamentals. However, he argues that speculative momentum is increasingly driving price formation.

“Valuations are high,” he wrote. “There are good fundamental reasons for this, but markets appear increasingly tainted by speculation. That is, investors are simply investing on the faith that prices will rise quickly in the future because they have in the recent past.”

Such dynamics can amplify volatility. When prices rise primarily because of price trends — rather than incremental improvements in earnings, productivity, or cash flow — they become more sensitive to negative shocks. A policy surprise, geopolitical escalation, or weaker-than-expected data release can quickly reverse sentiment.

Risk not confined to equities

Zandi’s warning is notable because he does not limit the vulnerability to equities or other traditional risk assets. He also flagged safe-haven assets, including gold and silver, that have rallied amid geopolitical uncertainty and concerns over fiscal sustainability. He included cryptocurrencies in the same broad risk category.

The implication is that asset inflation may be systemic rather than sector-specific. In such an environment, diversification provides less protection if liquidity conditions tighten or investor psychology shifts broadly toward risk aversion.

Mixed macro backdrop

At the core of Zandi’s thesis is what he characterizes as a fragile macroeconomic foundation.

Real gross domestic product is expanding slightly above 2%, according to recent data, below his estimate of the economy’s potential growth rate of roughly 2.5%. Employment growth has slowed, and he noted that the unemployment rate has been edging higher. Inflation, measured by the Federal Reserve’s preferred personal consumption expenditures (PCE) index, remains near 3%, a level he described as “stubbornly and uncomfortably high.”

This combination — modest growth, softening labor markets, and persistent inflation — limits policy flexibility. If growth slows further, the Federal Reserve faces pressure to ease monetary policy. If inflation remains elevated, rate cuts could risk reigniting price pressures.

Treasury market fragility

Zandi also pointed to a less discussed vulnerability: the structure of demand in the U.S. Treasury market.

The Treasury market is widely viewed as the global risk-free benchmark, anchoring mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, and sovereign debt pricing worldwide. However, Zandi expressed concern about the growing role of leveraged institutional investors, including hedge funds, in absorbing supply.

While he praised the appointment of Kevin Warsh to lead the Federal Reserve, he cautioned that concentrated or leveraged participation in Treasurys could amplify volatility if sentiment shifts.

Suppose hedge funds and other nontraditional buyers were to retreat simultaneously — whether due to economic fears, margin calls, or regulatory shifts — Treasury prices could fall sharply. Because yields move inversely to prices, such a move would push interest rates higher across the curve.

The transmission to the real economy would be direct. Higher Treasury yields raise mortgage rates, increase borrowing costs for businesses, and pressure equity valuations by increasing discount rates applied to future earnings. For households, that could translate into weaker housing demand and slower consumption, and could curtail capital investment and hiring for corporations.

Feedback loop risk

Zandi’s most serious warning concerns what economists describe as a negative feedback loop. In normal conditions, asset prices respond to economic fundamentals. In stressed environments, the relationship can invert: falling asset prices weaken economic activity, which then justifies further declines in asset prices.

Such episodes are rare but consequential. They typically require three elements: elevated valuations, economic vulnerability, and concentrated or leveraged financial positioning. Zandi suggests all three may be present.

The current market environment is not in crisis. GDP continues to grow, inflation is below its 2022 peak, and financial institutions remain well capitalized by regulatory standards. Yet Zandi’s argument is that the margin for error is narrowing.

In his assessment, the greater risk lies not in a gradual slowdown but in a rapid repricing of assets that tightens financial conditions faster than policymakers or markets anticipate. If that occurs, Wall Street volatility could migrate to Main Street through higher borrowing costs, weaker hiring, and slower income growth.