In a fiery ceremony at Capitol One Arena, Donald Trump marked his return to the White House by reversing dozens of Biden-era policies, including critical environmental regulations and federal support for electric vehicles (EVs).
Trump, addressing a cheering crowd, signed a series of executive orders designed to prioritize gas-powered vehicles and reduce federal influence on the auto market. Among the most notable actions was the rescission of a 2021 non-binding order aimed at making half of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. electric by 2030, a move that could have profound implications for the EV industry and its biggest players, including Tesla.
A Boon for Tesla’s Competitors
Although Tesla CEO Elon Musk has shown little public concern over Trump’s reversal of EV-friendly policies, analysts suggest the move could harm Musk’s wealth and Tesla’s market position. The rollbacks may enable Tesla’s competitors, particularly China’s BYD, to gain a stronger foothold in the EV market. BYD, already a formidable rival, benefits from robust support within China’s pro-EV policies and has been rapidly expanding its global market share.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
The EV sector’s growth has been heavily reliant on supportive regulations and incentives. With the U.S. government pulling back on its commitment to green energy, domestic consumers may lean toward cheaper gas-powered vehicles, slowing EV adoption and eroding Tesla’s advantage in the market.
Despite Trump’s well-known stance against green energy initiatives, Musk openly supported his presidential run, raising questions about the Tesla CEO’s motivations. Musk’s alliance with Trump stands in contrast to Tesla’s identity as a leader in the clean energy revolution. Many believe that Musk’s support undermines the credibility of his environmental commitments, suggesting it may have been motivated by broader business interests rather than a genuine alignment of values.
Trump’s decision to rescind the EV adoption target aligns with his broader agenda to reduce regulatory constraints and protect traditional American industries. During his announcement, he framed the move as a defense against what he called unfair competition from China, which has heavily subsidized its own EV sector.
“The United States will not sabotage our own industries while China pollutes with impunity,” Trump declared to a raucous crowd, positioning his actions as a strike against global competitors.
However, analysts have pointed out that the rollbacks could leave the U.S. trailing in the global race for clean energy leadership. While countries like China and members of the European Union continue to expand their EV markets, the U.S. risks falling behind, both in technology and in its commitment to combating climate change.
Environmental groups and climate activists have condemned Trump’s actions, warning of the long-term consequences. The Center for Biological Diversity criticized the decision as a politically motivated rollback that would increase pollution, weaken U.S. competitiveness, and harm public health.
“These clean car rollbacks will burden Americans with a Trumpfecta of higher prices, more pollution, and weaker competitiveness,” said Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign. “Our kids and everyone with lungs will pay the price for these actions.”
Economically, the rollbacks could also hinder investment in EV infrastructure and innovation, areas where the U.S. has been trying to catch up with global leaders like China and the EU.
For Tesla, Trump’s policies present a mixed bag of challenges and opportunities. While fewer regulations might lower production costs for some vehicle models, the loss of federal incentives could slow overall EV adoption in the U.S., shrinking the potential market. This could place even greater pressure on Tesla to innovate and maintain its competitive edge in an increasingly globalized industry.
With federal support for green energy waning, the future of sustainable transportation in the U.S. may hinge on market dynamics and state-level policies.