New Hampshire Governor Kelly Ayotte signed House Bill 302 (HB302) into law, making New Hampshire the first U.S. state to authorize its treasurer to invest public funds in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies with a market capitalization exceeding $500 billion, currently limiting eligibility to Bitcoin. The law allows up to 5% of the state’s general fund and other authorized funds to be allocated to these digital assets, alongside precious metals like gold and silver.
The assets must be held in secure, U.S.-regulated custody solutions, such as state-controlled multisig wallets or qualified custodians. The bill, introduced in January 2025, passed the House with a 192-179 vote and received strong Senate support. Supporters, including Representative Keith Ammon and the Satoshi Action Fund, argue it diversifies state investments and hedges against inflation, while critics like Representative Terry Spahr raised concerns about financial risks.
The law takes effect 60 days after passage, positioning New Hampshire as a leader in state-level crypto adoption, especially after similar bills in Arizona and Florida failed. The move aligns with growing national interest in Bitcoin reserves, including federal proposals by President Trump and Senator Cynthia Lummis.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026): big discounts for early bird.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab: From Technical Design to Deployment (next edition begins Jan 24 2026).
Allowing up to 5% of New Hampshire’s general fund to be invested in Bitcoin and other high-market-cap cryptocurrencies introduces a new asset class to the state’s portfolio. This could hedge against inflation and fiat currency devaluation, given Bitcoin’s fixed supply and historical performance as a store of value.
As the first U.S. state to enact such a law, New Hampshire may attract crypto-related businesses, startups, and investors, boosting its economy and reinforcing its reputation as a blockchain-friendly state. This aligns with its existing pro-crypto policies, like exempting crypto from property taxes. Bitcoin’s volatility (e.g., 50% price swings in past years) poses financial risks. A market crash could impact state funds, though the 5% cap limits exposure. The requirement for secure custody mitigates some operational risks.
Success could inspire other states to follow, potentially normalizing crypto as a public investment vehicle. Failure, however, might deter similar initiatives, highlighting the speculative nature of crypto. The law dovetails with federal proposals, like President Trump’s Bitcoin Strategic Reserve and Senator Lummis’s bill, signaling growing political acceptance of crypto. It may pressure other states and the federal government to clarify crypto regulations.
By mandating U.S.-regulated custodians and high market-cap thresholds, the law sets a cautious yet progressive framework, potentially influencing national standards for institutional crypto adoption. New Hampshire’s move could solidify its status as a crypto innovation hub, building on its “Live Free or Die” ethos and attracting blockchain talent and investment.
The law may normalize crypto among residents, encouraging personal investment and adoption. However, it could also polarize those wary of crypto’s risks or environmental concerns (e.g., Bitcoin mining’s energy use). Implementation will likely require public education on crypto, potentially increasing financial literacy but also exposing divides in tech-savviness.
The law has sparked a clear divide, reflecting broader debates about cryptocurrency’s role in finance and governance. Figures like Representative Keith Ammon, the Satoshi Action Fund, and crypto advocates view the law as a forward-thinking step. They argue: Bitcoin aligns with New Hampshire’s libertarian values, offering an alternative to centralized financial systems.
With U.S. debt at $33 trillion and inflation concerns, Bitcoin’s fixed supply is seen as a safeguard. The law positions New Hampshire as a pioneer, potentially attracting jobs and investment. The bill passed with significant legislative support (192-179 in the House, strong Senate approval), reflecting a coalition of crypto enthusiasts, fiscal conservatives, and innovation advocates.
Critics like representative Terry Spahr and others highlight risks, including: Bitcoin’s price swings (e.g., $69,000 peak in 2021, $16,000 low in 2022) could jeopardize public funds. Critics argue crypto lacks intrinsic value, comparing it to speculative bubbles. Bitcoin mining’s energy consumption (e.g., 127 TWh annually, per some estimates) raises sustainability questions, though New Hampshire’s law focuses on investment, not mining.
Older or less tech-savvy residents, fiscal traditionalists, and environmental advocates may oppose the move, fearing instability or misalignment with public priorities. The debate mirrors national tensions between decentralization advocates (favoring crypto’s anti-establishment ethos) and traditionalists (favoring fiat stability and regulation).
While crypto has bipartisan appeal (e.g., Trump’s and Lummis’s support), opposition often comes from progressive or risk-averse lawmakers, creating a complex political landscape. Younger, tech-savvy individuals tend to support crypto, while older generations may view it as risky or incomprehensible.
New Hampshire’s law is a landmark experiment with significant implications for state finance, national policy, and crypto adoption. It could catalyze economic growth and innovation but carries risks that fuel skepticism. The divide—between those embracing crypto’s potential and those wary of its volatility—reflects broader societal tensions over technology, finance, and governance. The law’s success or failure will likely shape the future of public crypto investment in the U.S.