The House of Representatives has taken a significant stride towards the overhaul of Nigeria’s governmental structure, as a group of 60 lawmakers push for a transition from the current presidential system to a parliamentary one, reminiscent of Nigeria’s First Republic.
Led by the Parliamentary Group, the lawmakers introduced three constitution alteration bills during Wednesday’s plenary session. These bills, titled ‘Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (Alteration) Bill, 2024’ (HB.1115, HB.1116, and HB.1117), mark a pivotal moment in Nigerian political discourse, setting the stage for a potential shift to a parliamentary system by 2031.
Briefing journalists on the bill sponsored by the Minority Leader, Kingsley Chinda (PDP, Rivers), Abdulsamad Dasuki, the spokesperson for the Parliamentary Group, elucidated the rationale behind the proposed transition, citing concerns over the exorbitant costs associated with the presidential system and the concentration of power in the hands of the executive.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 14 (June 3 – Sept 2, 2024) begins registrations; get massive discounts with early registration here.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
“No wonder the Nigerian President appears to be one of the most powerful Presidents in the world,” Dasuki said.
“Over the years, the imperfections of the Presidential System of Government have become glaring to all, despite several alterations to the constitution to address the shortcomings of a system that has denied the nation the opportunity to attain its full potential.
“Among these imperfections are the high cost of governance, leaving fewer resources for crucial areas like infrastructure, education, and healthcare, and consequently hindering the nation’s development progress, and the excessive powers vested in the members of the executive, who are appointees and not directly accountable to the people,” he said.
The proponents of the parliamentary system argue that its reinstatement would foster accountability, responsibility, and responsiveness in governance, thereby curbing excessive expenditure and enhancing development initiatives in critical sectors such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare.
The proposed parliamentary system bears resemblance to Nigeria’s governance structure during the First Republic, characterized by a prime minister as the head of government. In contrast to the presidential system, where the executive branch operates independently of the legislature, the parliamentary model intertwines the executive and legislative branches, promoting closer collaboration and expeditious decision-making.
Nevertheless, skepticism abounds regarding the feasibility and efficacy of this transition. Critics point to historical precedents, highlighting how the parliamentary system contributed to political polarization during the First Republic, ultimately paving the way for military intervention. The concern persists that without sufficient safeguards, a return to parliamentary governance may reignite divisions within Nigerian society.
Furthermore, the timing of the proposed legislation raises eyebrows, with some viewing it through the lens of political expediency. The proposed transition coincides with the end of President Bola Tinubu’s constitutionally mandated tenure in 2031, prompting speculation about ulterior motives driving the lawmakers’ agenda.
It is noteworthy that the proponents of this transition encompass members from both the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), indicating a cross-party consensus on the need for systemic reform.
As the debate surrounding Nigeria’s governance structure intensifies, it becomes imperative to weigh the potential benefits of transitioning to a parliamentary system against the inherent risks and challenges. While proponents advocate for enhanced accountability and efficiency, detractors caution against repeating past mistakes and exacerbating political divisions.
Ultimately, the efficacy of any governmental system lies not solely in its structure but in the integrity, competence, and commitment of its leaders.
Good leadership advocates said that addressing Nigeria’s leadership deficit necessitates comprehensive reforms beyond mere structural changes, focusing on institutional strengthening, anti-corruption measures, and inclusive governance practices. Only through concerted efforts to cultivate a culture of transparency, meritocracy, and civic engagement can Nigeria realize its full potential and overcome its persistent challenges in governance.
Dasuki said the group is seeking to ignite a conversation about the lack of effectiveness of the current presidential system.
“The bills presented today seek a return to the system of government adopted by our founders, which made governance accountable, responsible, and responsive, and ultimately less expensive,” he said.