Why Nigeria attracted $16.7 billion in capital importation in the first nine months of 2025, more than 97% of inflows came from foreign portfolio investments, raising sustainability concerns.
Nigeria attracted $16.78 billion in capital importation in the first three quarters of 2025, according to newly released data from the National Bureau of Statistics.
The figure includes $11.1 billion recorded in the second and third quarters, reports that had been delayed for nearly six months.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 19 (Feb 9 – May 2, 2026).
Register for Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register for Tekedia AI Lab.
The year-to-date total already exceeds the $12.32 billion recorded in the whole of 2024, signaling a sharp recovery in foreign capital inflows. Quarterly breakdowns show a steady trajectory:
- Q1: $5.64 billion
- Q2: $5.12 billion
- Q3: $6.01 billion
The third quarter marked a 17.5% increase quarter-on-quarter, making it the strongest performance of the year so far.
Yet beneath the headline strength lies a familiar structural pattern: foreign portfolio investment (FPI) dominates overwhelmingly.
Liquidity-Led Inflows, Not Structural Investment
Portfolio flows exceeded $14 billion between Q1 and Q3, representing more than 97% of total capital importation. In Q3 alone, portfolio inflows reached $4.85 billion, accounting for over 80% of total inflows.
Bond investments strengthened markedly in Q3, while money market instruments remained elevated, albeit slightly lower than Q2 levels. This suggests foreign investors are positioning heavily in high-yield fixed-income securities.
By contrast, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) remains subdued. FDI rose gradually from $126 million in Q1 to $143 million in Q2 and $296 million in Q3. Even cumulatively, FDI remains under $600 million for the year, less than 4% of total inflows.
This imbalance is critical as portfolio capital is typically yield-seeking and short-term. It responds quickly to interest rate differentials, currency expectations, and global risk appetite. FDI, on the other hand, reflects long-term commitments to productive capacity, infrastructure, and job creation.
The data indicate that Nigeria’s rebound is largely liquidity-driven rather than anchored in structural investment expansion.
Sectoral Concentration in Financial Services
Sector-level analysis reinforces this conclusion.
Banking attracted more than $3.1 billion in each quarter, consistently accounting for over half of total inflows.
The Financing sector followed, pulling in $2.10 billion in Q1, easing to $873 million in Q2, and rebounding strongly to $1.86 billion in Q3. Together, Banking and Financing absorbed roughly 70–80% of total capital importation across all three quarters.
Outside financial services, inflows were comparatively modest:
- Manufacturing rose to $261 million in Q3.
- Telecommunications increased to $209 million in Q3.
- The Electrical sector saw a one-off spike of $456 million in Q2.
- Agriculture fluctuated between $24 million and $67 million.
Oil and gas — historically a magnet for foreign capital — attracted relatively limited inflows compared to the scale of the sector. Technology, health care, construction, and real estate also recorded small shares.
The heavy concentration in finance suggests that most capital is entering through securities markets rather than through greenfield projects, infrastructure development, or industrial expansion.
Policy Drivers Behind the Surge
The surge in portfolio inflows aligns with Nigeria’s recent monetary tightening cycle and foreign exchange reforms. Higher domestic interest rates increase the attractiveness of naira-denominated assets, particularly treasury bills and bonds.
Improved clarity around exchange rate policy and increased FX market liquidity have also reduced some of the uncertainty that previously deterred foreign investors.
In effect, Nigeria has restored its appeal as a carry-trade destination. Investors borrow in lower-yielding currencies and invest in higher-yielding Nigerian instruments, profiting from the interest differential — provided currency stability is maintained.
However, such inflows are inherently sensitive to external shocks. A shift in global interest rates, a spike in U.S. Treasury yields, or renewed currency volatility could trigger rapid reversals.
Historical Parallels and Risk Signals
The pattern bears resemblance to 2019, when aggressive monetary tightening attracted strong foreign portfolio flows. At the time, inflows supported external reserves and exchange rate stability.
That episode unraveled as policy direction shifted and the COVID-19 shock hit global markets. Capital exited emerging markets, including Nigeria, and exchange rate pressures intensified.
The key lesson is that yield-driven inflows can be transient. Sustained economic transformation requires a stronger base of FDI and diversified sectoral investment.
The delayed publication of Q2 and Q3 data also raises governance considerations. For months, officials referenced aggregate figures of about $21 billion in capital importation for the first ten months of 2025 without releasing detailed breakdowns. The absence of timely quarterly data created uncertainty about composition and durability. Transparent and consistent reporting remains central to investor confidence.
What It Means for Growth and Stability
Nigeria’s external accounts have benefited from the surge. Strong portfolio inflows can bolster foreign reserves, improve balance-of-payments metrics, and support exchange rate stability in the short term.
However, translating liquidity inflows into durable growth requires complementary reforms — infrastructure expansion, industrial policy coherence, regulatory stability, and improvements in the business environment that attract long-term investors.
With FDI under $600 million year-to-date, the gap between financial inflows and productive investment remains wide. Unless capital begins flowing into manufacturing, energy, agriculture, and technology at scale, the economic multiplier effects may remain limited.
However, Nigeria’s 2025 capital importation figures signal renewed investor appetite. The durability of that confidence will depend on macroeconomic consistency, exchange rate stability, and the country’s ability to convert yield-seeking inflows into sustained structural transformation.