Alexandr Wang, the 28-year-old tech prodigy and founder of Scale AI, is making headlines again—not just for his new role leading Meta’s ambitious superintelligence initiatives, but for his unorthodox vision of human evolution and parenting.

Speaking on the Shawn Ryan Show on Thursday, Wang said he’s putting off having children until brain-computer interface technologies like Neuralink are mature enough to become a part of early childhood development.

Wang, who has long been at the frontier of AI infrastructure, is now thinking beyond code—into the human brain itself. As he sees it, the future of intelligence isn’t just artificial; it’s symbiotic.

“In your first like seven years of life, your brain is more neuroplastic than at any other point,” Wang explained. “When we get Neuralink and we get these other technologies, kids who are born with them are gonna learn how to use them in like crazy, crazy ways.”

This philosophy is not rooted in fantasy. Neuralink, the Elon Musk-backed neurotechnology firm, is already conducting clinical trials with brain implants the size of a coin. These implants record and stimulate brain activity and are envisioned as a gateway to enhanced cognition, telepathic communication, and even treating neurological disorders.

The technology has already seen limited success: one trial participant, Brad Smith, who suffers from ALS, reported using the device to edit a video using only his thoughts.

Wang’s comments come as the brain-machine interface field is heating up with players beyond Neuralink. Synchron, which has backing from Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, is collaborating with Apple to help people with disabilities use iPhones via thought. Another entrant, Motif Neurotech, has developed a neurostimulator system akin to a pacemaker for the brain, aimed at treating severe depression.

However, these devices are far from mainstream. Neuralink, for instance, has only implanted chips in three patients so far, and the long-term effects of such technologies are unknown. But for Wang, this isn’t a deterrent—it’s an invitation to prepare for a radical future.

At the core of Wang’s decision is the scientific principle of neuroplasticity—the brain’s ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections. This capacity is strongest in children, particularly in the first seven years of life, when the brain is still wiring itself.

According to a landmark 2009 study in Brain Dev, this period of “under construction” brain development provides a unique window for learning and adaptation. Wang believes that brain-computer interfaces if introduced during this neuroplastic phase, could result in entirely new modes of cognition—children hardwired from birth to integrate and expand the boundaries of human-machine intelligence.

Wang’s perspective also reflects a growing ideological shift in Silicon Valley’s next generation of leaders—one that prioritizes not only advancing technology but reengineering the human experience itself. As he takes the helm at Meta’s superintelligence division, his comments suggest that the push toward human-AI symbiosis may become more than just a research agenda—it could define how the next generation is raised.

While his ideas may sound speculative, Wang’s track record of building foundational AI infrastructure lends weight to his predictions. And as he sees it, delaying parenthood in favor of waiting for brain-enhancing technology isn’t a retreat—it’s an investment in creating the first true generation of augmented minds.

The U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) dropping to levels not seen since March 2022 indicates a significant weakening of the U.S. dollar against a basket of major currencies, including the euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc. Based on available information, here’s a concise analysis of this event:

A DXY level comparable to March 2022 would likely place it around 99–100, as the index was rising during that period after a Flag continuation pattern formed, signaling bullish momentum. Recent reports from 2025 indicate the DXY has been declining, with values like 98.1840 on June 13, 2025, and even lower at 99.01 in April 2025, marking a three-year low. This suggests a sustained bearish trend since early 2025, with an 11% drop year-to-date by May 2025.

President Donald Trump’s tariff announcements, dubbed “Liberation Day,” triggered sharp sell-offs, with the DXY falling 1.81% on April 10, 2025, its worst day since November 2022. These tariffs, contrary to expectations of dollar strength, led to a loss of confidence in the dollar, exacerbated by bond market turmoil and rising Treasury yields. Analysts suggest a breakdown in the traditional correlation between rising U.S. Treasury yields and dollar strength, signaling a potential “silent fracture” in global finance. Major banks like Morgan Stanley and Citi have turned bearish on the dollar, citing soft tariffs and shifting global liquidity.

Increased use of the yuan for cross-border payments and a 10% rise in the euro against the dollar since February 2025 point to a broader move away from dollar hegemony, which may be structurally weakening the DXY. Historically, sharp DXY drops (e.g., November 2022, March 2020) have coincided with Bitcoin cycle lows, often triggering bull markets. X posts emphasize an inverse correlation, suggesting potential Bitcoin rallies if the DXY continues to weaken.

A weaker dollar makes U.S. exports cheaper but increases import costs, potentially benefiting exporters but complicating Trump’s trade war strategy. However, analyst Lyn Alden argues that a weaker dollar may be necessary for rebalancing U.S. trade deficits, though tariffs could disrupt this. The rapid DXY decline has led to speculation about a long-term reconfiguration of the global monetary system, with some X users warning of a collapsing dollar-based system.

While establishment sources like CNBC and Forbes attribute the drop to Trump’s policies, the narrative overlooks deeper structural issues, such as decades of U.S. monetary expansion and reliance on dollar dominance. The DXY’s fall may reflect markets pricing in these vulnerabilities rather than isolated policy shocks. X posts, though speculative, highlight grassroots sentiment about systemic risks, but their claims (e.g., Japan or China dumping bonds) lack verified evidence.

The DXY’s drop to March 2022 levels reflects a confluence of aggressive U.S. trade policies, shifting global financial dynamics, and potential de-dollarization. While short-term volatility is likely, the trend suggests broader implications for currencies, crypto, and global trade. The continued decline of the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY) to March 2022 levels (around 99–100, with recent values like 98.1840 on June 13, 2025) has wide-ranging implications. A weaker dollar increases costs for imported goods (e.g., electronics, oil), potentially driving inflation. With U.S. CPI already sensitive to trade disruptions from Trump’s 2025 tariffs, this could squeeze consumers and challenge the Federal Reserve’s policy stance.

U.S. exports become more competitive, benefiting sectors like manufacturing and agriculture. However, tariff-related trade tensions may offset gains, as seen with the DXY’s 1.81% drop on April 10, 2025, after “Liberation Day” announcements. The euro’s 10% gain against the dollar since February 2025 and rising yuan usage in global trade signal de-dollarization momentum. This reduces demand for dollar-based assets, potentially pressuring U.S. stocks and bonds.

The unusual decoupling of rising U.S. Treasury yields from dollar strength suggests investor concerns about U.S. debt sustainability. This could lead to bond market volatility, as noted by analysts like Lyn Alden and bearish outlooks from banks like Citi. The DXY’s decline historically correlates with Bitcoin cycle lows (e.g., November 2022). X posts as of June 2025 strongly predict a crypto bull market, with Bitcoin potentially benefiting as a hedge against fiat weakness. Investors may shift capital to decentralized assets if dollar confidence erodes further.

Increased reliance on non-dollar currencies (e.g., yuan, euro) for trade could reshape global financial alliances. This aligns with X sentiment about a “silent fracture” in dollar dominance, though claims of abrupt bond dumping by nations like China remain unverified. A weaker dollar eases debt burdens for countries with dollar-denominated loans, potentially stabilizing economies in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Dollar-priced commodities like gold and oil rise in value as the DXY falls. This benefits producers (e.g., OPEC nations) but raises energy and raw material costs globally, impacting industries and consumers. The DXY’s drop may reflect markets pricing in U.S. fiscal vulnerabilities, like high debt and monetary expansion. While mainstream sources focus on tariffs, X users highlight broader distrust in the dollar system, suggesting a gradual reconfiguration of global finance.

The combination of tariff shocks, yield spikes, and currency shifts points to heightened uncertainty. Investors may seek safe-haven assets like gold or crypto, further pressuring traditional markets. The DXY’s decline is not just a policy-driven event (e.g., Trump’s tariffs) but a symptom of structural challenges to U.S. dollar hegemony. While X posts amplify fears of a collapsing dollar, such outcomes are speculative without concrete data.