DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1045

World Bank Slashes Global, U.S. Growth Forecasts to 2.3% as Trump’s Trade War Drags Economy into Turbulence

0

The World Bank has downgraded its economic outlook for the United States and the rest of the world, warning that President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs and unpredictable trade tactics are weighing heavily on global commerce and investor confidence.

In its updated Global Economic Prospects report released Tuesday, the Washington-based institution projected that the U.S. economy will expand by just 1.4% in 2025, a sharp slowdown from the 2.8% growth recorded in 2024. That’s also a steep drop from the 2.3% forecast issued in January, reflecting the fallout from Trump’s escalation of trade tensions with key partners.

While the report avoids mentioning Trump by name, it directly blames a “substantial rise in trade barriers” for the slowdown. Trump’s policy of imposing 10% tariffs on imports from nearly every country, coupled with abrupt policy reversals and retaliatory measures by U.S. trading partners, has triggered price hikes for consumers, disrupted supply chains, and deepened global uncertainty.

“The world economy today is once more running into turbulence,” said Indermit Gill, the World Bank’s chief economist, in the report’s preface. “Without a swift course correction, the harm to living standards could be deep.”

Globally, the World Bank now expects growth to come in at 2.3% in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. The bank cut 0.4 percentage points from its earlier projection, citing a combination of weaker investment, trade friction, and monetary tightening still playing out in several economies.

Fallout Beyond the U.S.

Trump’s trade war is having ripple effects far beyond American borders. Europe, China, and other major economies are all feeling the strain.

In the Eurozone, growth is expected to slow to 0.7% in 2025, down from an already tepid 0.9% last year. European exporters, especially Germany and France, have been hit by Trump’s tariff regime. Worse still, businesses are holding back on investment due to the erratic nature of Trump’s trade measures, which are often announced, postponed, or restructured without warning.

In China, growth is expected to fall from 5% in 2024 to 4.5% this year, and then down to 4% in 2026. The world’s second-largest economy is grappling not only with the trade barriers imposed by the Trump administration but also with a real estate crisis and demographic pressures as its population ages.

India, while still the fastest-growing major economy, is also seeing its momentum taper. Growth is now projected at 6.3% for 2025, down from 6.5% last year and below the 6.7% forecast earlier this year. In Japan, growth is expected to pick up slightly—from 0.2% to 0.7%—but remains well below the 1.2% that had been projected.

Rising Concern Among Global Watchdogs

The gloomy revision from the World Bank echoes warnings from other global institutions. Just last week, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) also trimmed its growth forecasts for the U.S. and global economies, citing similar concerns about escalating trade barriers and policy unpredictability.

The World Bank said the global economy has lost the chance for a “soft landing” after the pandemic, where inflation could be tamed without triggering a sharp downturn. Instead, the world now risks stagnation or worse, as countries struggle to balance growth against financial stability.

“Living standards in many countries could face long-lasting damage,” the report warned, pointing to reduced household incomes, rising food prices, and weakened investor confidence as key risks.

The bank reiterated its core mission to reduce poverty and promote shared prosperity by extending grants and low-interest loans to developing countries—many of which are also facing rising debt burdens and inflationary pressures amid weaker global trade.

Unless there is a coordinated policy response to reverse the course of rising protectionism and restore investor confidence, the World Bank cautions, the global economy may remain stuck in low gear for the foreseeable future.

TAJBank Gets Approval to Launch N20 Billion Second Sukuk Tranche with 20.5% Return

0

TAJBank, Nigeria’s flagship non-interest lender, has secured regulatory clearance for the second tranche of its ambitious N100 billion Mudarabah Sukuk bond programme, announcing a new N20 billion issuance that offers a 20.5% annual return to investors.

The new issuance, officially announced on Tuesday, comes nearly two years after the bank broke new ground with its maiden N10 billion Sukuk bond in 2023. That inaugural offering—Nigeria’s first-ever Sukuk to be listed on the Nigerian Exchange—was oversubscribed by 115%, reflecting strong investor interest in sharia-compliant, profit-sharing investment options.

TAJBank’s second Sukuk tranche is structured under the Mudarabah model, where funds are pooled into profit-generating ventures managed by the bank, with investors entitled to a share of the profits. The bank said the latest issuance aims to broaden financial inclusion and attract ethically driven investors seeking stable returns amid volatile market conditions.

“This second tranche presents another opportunity for individuals and corporate investors to stake their funds in an ethical instrument with a competitive 20.5% per annum return,” the bank said in a statement.

Alhaji Tanko Isiaku Gwamna, Chairman of TAJBank, said the bond aligns with the lender’s core commitment to providing investment alternatives that are grounded in transparency, shared risk, and equitable profit-sharing principles. He noted that the issuance will allow a broader group of investors to benefit from the bank’s business success while adhering to non-interest banking standards.

Reaffirming TAJBank’s performance, Managing Director Hamid Joda recalled his 2023 pledge during the listing of the maiden bond, when he assured stakeholders of strong and consistent returns.

“The board has been fulfilling that promise since then,” he said.

Partnering for Scale and Trust

AVA Capital Ltd., the lead issuing house for the bond, reiterated confidence in TAJBank’s capacity to deliver returns to investors. AVA’s CEO, Mr. Kayode Fadahunsi, described the new N20 billion issuance as a critical step toward completing the broader N100 billion Sukuk programme, calling it a “milestone for ethical finance in Nigeria.”

Fadahunsi also emphasized that TAJBank’s growth in the non-interest banking segment has laid a solid foundation for investor confidence.

“We are optimistic that this Sukuk will not only deepen Islamic finance but also offer compelling returns, especially for investors looking for lower-risk alternatives outside traditional markets,” he said.

Broader Momentum in Nigeria’s Islamic Finance Market

TAJBank’s move comes amid a broader surge in Nigeria’s Islamic finance landscape, which is witnessing renewed momentum after years of slow traction. According to Fitch Ratings, non-interest banks in Nigeria recorded a 110% year-on-year asset growth by the end of 2024—driven by increased deposits and lending, each more than doubling within the year.

Fitch also projects that the Islamic finance industry will expand significantly between the second half of 2025 and 2026, supported by new regulatory incentives, capital requirements, and rising investor demand for Sukuk and other sharia-compliant assets.

The growing appetite was further demonstrated when Nigeria’s Debt Management Office (DMO) announced that the Federal Government had secured over N2.2 trillion in Sukuk subscriptions since its inaugural issuance in 2017—a figure that reflects an oversubscription rate of 735%, despite a two-year pause in sovereign Sukuk offerings.

Analysts suggest that TAJBank’s 20.5% return structure offers a compelling case for conservative investors amid inflationary pressures and volatile returns from equities and other traditional assets.

TAJBank’s successful issuance is expected to serve as a catalyst for further private Sukuk offerings in Nigeria, helping to complement the government’s sovereign Sukuk issuances. With the bank’s overall Sukuk programme still holding N80 billion in unissued potential, more tranches are expected in the coming years, offering even wider access to Nigeria’s expanding ethical investment market.

US SEC Plan On DeFi Exemptions Could Unleash Innovation And Position The U.S. As A DeFi Leader

0

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins has announced that the agency is developing policies to potentially exempt decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms from certain regulatory restrictions. During the SEC’s Crypto Task Force roundtable titled “DeFi and the American Spirit” on June 9, 2025, Atkins outlined plans for an “innovation exemption” to provide conditional relief from regulatory requirements. This initiative aims to foster innovation in blockchain-based systems while maintaining investor protections and market integrity.

Atkins emphasized that software developers building DeFi tools should not be held liable for how their code is used, criticizing the previous administration’s enforcement-heavy approach. He directed SEC staff to explore exemptions or guidance to allow DeFi platforms to operate with fewer barriers, supporting the development of on-chain financial systems. This marks a shift from the prior SEC leadership’s reliance on broad interpretations of securities laws and enforcement actions.

Atkins also stressed the importance of self-custody of digital assets as a foundational American value and advocated for rulemaking through a transparent “notice and comment” process rather than ad hoc enforcement. The SEC’s Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, is expected to release a policy report in the coming months to further clarify the regulatory framework for DeFi and digital assets. Industry experts are awaiting details on how these exemptions will be implemented, as they could significantly shape the future of DeFi in the United States.

The announcement by SEC Chairman Paul Atkins regarding potential exemptions for DeFi platforms from regulatory barriers has significant implications for the decentralized finance sector, the broader crypto industry, and regulatory approaches in the U.S. It also highlights a divide in perspectives on how DeFi should be regulated. Exemptions could reduce regulatory burdens, allowing DeFi developers to innovate without fear of enforcement actions.

This aligns with Atkins’ view that software developers shouldn’t be liable for how their code is used, potentially spurring growth in blockchain-based financial systems. DeFi platforms could scale faster, offering decentralized alternatives to traditional finance, such as lending, trading, and yield farming, with fewer compliance costs. While exemptions may encourage innovation, they could weaken investor protections if not carefully designed.

DeFi’s pseudonymous nature and lack of centralized oversight raise risks like fraud, hacks, or mismanagement, which the SEC aims to address through “conditional relief.” The SEC’s focus on maintaining market integrity suggests exemptions will likely include guardrails, such as transparency requirements or anti-fraud measures. A lighter regulatory touch could make the U.S. a more attractive hub for DeFi development, countering the trend of projects moving offshore to avoid stringent SEC rules under prior leadership.

This could position the U.S. to compete with jurisdictions like Singapore or the EU, which have clearer crypto frameworks. DeFi tokens and platforms could see increased investment and adoption if regulatory clarity reduces uncertainty. Posts on X reflect optimism among crypto enthusiasts, with some predicting a “DeFi boom” if exemptions materialize. However, traditional financial institutions may push back, fearing competition from unregulated DeFi alternatives.

The “innovation exemption” could set a precedent for regulating emerging technologies beyond DeFi, balancing innovation with oversight. The SEC’s Crypto Task Force report, expected soon, will likely provide further clarity, influencing how other agencies approach digital assets. Pro-Innovation Camp (Atkins, Crypto Industry, Commissioner Peirce): Advocates argue that DeFi’s decentralized nature doesn’t fit traditional securities frameworks, and overregulation stifles innovation. Atkins’ critique of past enforcement-heavy approaches reflects this view.

Supporters, including many in the crypto community (evident in X posts), see exemptions as a way to empower developers and users, emphasizing self-custody and financial freedom. They argue that DeFi’s transparency (via public blockchains) and community governance can mitigate risks without heavy-handed regulation.

Pro-Regulation Camp (Traditional Finance, Some Policymakers): Critics, including some regulators and traditional financial institutions, warn that exemptions could enable illicit activities, such as money laundering or tax evasion, due to DeFi’s pseudonymous transactions. They argue that investor protections require strict oversight, citing high-profile DeFi hacks (e.g., $600M+ in losses in 2024 alone, per web data) and scams.

Some Democrats and consumer protection groups may push for robust rules, fearing that exemptions could undermine financial stability or leave retail investors vulnerable. Some stakeholders, including certain industry leaders, advocate for a balanced approach—exemptions with conditions like enhanced disclosures or anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. This aligns with Atkins’ mention of “conditional relief.”

Atkins’ appointment under a crypto-friendly administration (post-2024 election) signals a departure from the previous SEC’s aggressive enforcement, led by Gary Gensler. This shift amplifies the divide between those favoring innovation and those prioritizing oversight. The EU’s MiCA framework and other jurisdictions’ clear rules put pressure on the U.S. to act. Exemptions could bridge the gap, but critics argue they risk regulatory arbitrage.

The SEC’s move toward DeFi exemptions could unleash innovation and position the U.S. as a DeFi leader, but it risks weakening investor protections if not carefully implemented. The divide between pro-innovation and pro-regulation camps reflects broader tensions in balancing financial freedom with oversight. The forthcoming Crypto Task Force report will be critical in shaping how these exemptions balance opportunity and risk.

South Korea’s Stablecoin Legislation Is A Bold Step Toward Integrating Digital Assets Into Its Financial System

0

South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party has introduced the Digital Asset Basic Act, a bill to regulate and enable stablecoin issuance by local companies. The legislation, proposed by lawmaker Min Byeong-deok, requires stablecoin issuers to hold over 500 million Korean won (approximately $367,890) in capital and maintain separate reserves. It aims to establish clear rules for the crypto sector, positioning South Korea as a leader in the global digital economy.

The bill also includes provisions for a self-regulatory body and clearer guidelines for crypto service providers. This move aligns with President Lee Jae-myung’s pro-crypto stance, including plans for a won-backed stablecoin to reduce reliance on foreign stablecoins like USDT and USDC, addressing capital outflows estimated at 56.8 trillion Won. The central bank has expressed concerns about monetary policy implications, advocating for oversight. South Korea’s crypto market, with 18 million users and a Q1 2025 stablecoin volume of 57 trillion won, is one of the world’s most active.

The introduction of the Digital Asset Basic Act in South Korea, allowing stablecoin issuance, has significant implications for the economy, financial system, and global crypto landscape. With 18 million crypto users and a Q1 2025 stablecoin trading volume of 57 trillion won ($41.9 billion), South Korea is a crypto powerhouse. The legislation could further mainstream digital assets by providing regulatory clarity, encouraging institutional participation, and fostering innovation in blockchain-based financial services.

The push for a won-backed stablecoin aims to curb reliance on foreign stablecoins like USDT and USDC, which reportedly caused ?56.8 trillion ($41.7 billion) in capital outflows. A domestic stablecoin could retain economic value within South Korea, strengthening the won and reducing exposure to foreign exchange risks. The Bank of Korea has raised concerns about stablecoins’ impact on monetary policy, as they could bypass traditional banking systems and complicate liquidity control. The requirement for issuers to hold reserves and substantial capital (500 million won, ~$367,890) aims to mitigate risks but may limit smaller players’ ability to enter the market.

By establishing a clear legal framework, South Korea could set a global standard for stablecoin regulation, attracting international crypto firms and positioning itself as a hub for digital finance innovation. A won-backed stablecoin could challenge the dominance of USD-pegged stablecoins, aligning with South Korea’s ambition to lead in the digital economy. However, it may face hurdles in gaining global adoption due to the won’s limited international use compared to the dollar.

The legislation’s focus on reserves, capital requirements, and a self-regulatory body could protect consumers from risks like issuer insolvency or fraud, addressing concerns seen in past crypto failures (e.g., Terra-Luna). The bill aims to foster innovation while imposing strict oversight, potentially creating a safer environment for crypto adoption but also increasing compliance costs for businesses.

President Lee Jae-myung and the Democratic Party’s pro-crypto stance contrasts with the central bank’s cautious approach. The Bank of Korea’s concerns about monetary policy disruptions and financial stability reflect a tension between innovation and control. This could lead to friction in policy implementation, especially if the central bank pushes for stricter oversight than the bill currently proposes. South Korea’s crypto market is heavily urban, with younger, tech-savvy populations driving adoption. Rural areas, with less access to digital infrastructure, may see limited benefits, potentially widening economic disparities.

The high capital requirement (500 million won) favors well-funded corporations, potentially sidelining startups and smaller firms. This could concentrate stablecoin issuance among a few large players, reducing competition and innovation diversity. Crypto adoption is already skewed toward wealthier, urban investors. While the legislation may stabilize the market, it could deepen financial inequality if access to stablecoin-related opportunities (e.g., investment or services) remains limited to those with significant resources.

South Korea’s proactive regulation could give it a first-mover advantage in the global crypto race, but it may also create tensions with countries like the U.S., where stablecoin regulation remains fragmented. A won-backed stablecoin could face challenges in international markets dominated by USD-based assets. South Korea’s advanced infrastructure and crypto user base contrast with developing nations lacking similar regulatory or technological capacity. This could widen the global digital finance gap, as South Korea attracts investment and talent that might otherwise flow to less-regulated markets.

The crypto community often champions decentralization, but the bill’s regulatory framework and potential central bank oversight lean toward centralized control. This could alienate purist crypto advocates who see stablecoins as a tool for financial sovereignty, creating tension between regulators and the crypto community. The legislation balances fostering innovation with preventing risks, but stricter rules may stifle experimental blockchain projects. This could divide the crypto industry between those prioritizing compliance and those pushing for unregulated innovation.

South Korea’s stablecoin legislation is a bold step toward integrating digital assets into its financial system, with potential to boost economic growth, reduce capital outflows, and establish global leadership in crypto regulation. However, it also risks deepening divides—politically between pro-crypto and cautious factions, economically between large and small players, and globally between nations with varying regulatory approaches. The success of the Digital Asset Basic Act will depend on navigating these tensions, ensuring inclusive access, and balancing innovation with stability.

US, China Strike Rare Earth Trade Framework Pending Trump-Xi Approval, Paving Path for Broader Tariff Resolution

0

The United States and China have concluded two days of tense, high-level trade negotiations in London with what both sides describe as a breakthrough framework to restore the flow of rare earth metals and ease certain export controls — a deal now awaiting the approval of President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The talks, held behind closed doors at Lancaster House near Buckingham Palace, include US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while China dispatched Vice Premier He Lifeng and chief trade negotiator Li Chenggang. Over 20 hours of negotiations culminated in a late-night agreement on Tuesday, with officials describing the mood as “intense but productive.”

Lutnick confirmed that the two delegations had agreed on a path forward to implement the Geneva consensus reached last month, which had aimed to scale back tariffs imposed during the prolonged trade war.

“First we had to get sort of the negativity out,” Lutnick told reporters. “Now we can go forward to try to do positive trade, growing trade.”

Rare Earths at the Heart of a Larger Shift

The centerpiece of the agreement is China’s commitment to accelerate shipments of rare earth metals — elements critical for electric vehicles, missile guidance systems, smartphones, and other advanced technologies. In return, Washington will begin unwinding select export controls, particularly those related to industrial software and components needed by Chinese manufacturers.

This mutual compromise on rare earths and strategic goods is being interpreted by insiders as a potential inflection point. It’s believed that by resolving the long-standing deadlock on rare earth exports, both sides may be able to build momentum for addressing broader tariff disputes and other contested areas in trade.

Analysts note that rare earths have emerged as one of the most powerful bargaining chips in the US-China trade standoff. China controls over 70% of the global supply, and disruptions in recent months triggered alarm across major economies, particularly in Europe and Asia, where automakers and defense contractors have warned of production slowdowns.

While negotiators expressed cautious optimism, the agreement is still tentative. “We’ve got a framework, but we still need our principals to sign off,” said China’s Li Chenggang as he addressed reporters outside the historic venue around midnight.

The positive tone offered some relief to investors who feared an escalation in trade tensions. Markets responded with limited enthusiasm — US equity futures edged lower, the offshore yuan remained stable, and China’s CSI 300 Index gained nearly 1%, marking its best day in weeks.

“Markets will likely welcome the shift from confrontation to coordination,” said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo Markets. “We’re not out of the woods yet — it’s up to Trump and Xi to approve and enforce the deal.”

If approved, the rare earth arrangement is expected to act as a springboard for resolving contentious disputes on steel and aluminum tariffs, industrial overcapacity, and digital services taxes — all of which have weighed heavily on bilateral trade since 2018.

The Chips-for-Metals Conundrum

Lutnick hinted at concessions by Washington that would ease controls imposed under national security grounds.

“There were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming,” he said. “You should expect those to come off — sort of, as President Trump said, in a balanced way.”

That “balance,” however, is delicate. Export controls on semiconductor technologies and AI-enabling software remain politically charged in Washington, where hawks argue that loosening restrictions could empower Beijing’s military and surveillance capabilities. But Trump officials now appear willing to leverage some of those restrictions to secure concessions in other areas, especially rare earth access.

Wendy Cutler, a former senior US trade official, called the shift “unprecedented,” warning that the deal’s durability depends on sustained political will.

“It took two days, three US Cabinet members, and a Chinese vice premier just to get back to upholding the Geneva accord,” she wrote on LinkedIn. “That’s a preview for the next 60 days.”

What’s Next: 60 Days to Resolve Broader Issues

The Geneva deal in May established a 90-day pause on retaliatory tariffs, set to expire in early August. The current framework on rare earths buys time, but trade remains volatile. US imports from China dropped sharply in May, marking the worst contraction since early 2020, when China’s economy was shuttered by COVID.

Among the unresolved issues is China’s industrial overcapacity — particularly in steel, solar panels, and electric vehicles — which the US argues has led to global price distortions. In addition, the Trump administration has pressed China for measurable action on fentanyl production, an issue it cited in levying a 20% tariff earlier this year.

“President Trump is watching fentanyl closely,” said Jamieson Greer. “We would expect to see progress from the Chinese on that issue in a major way.”

No further meetings are currently scheduled, but both sides say discussions will continue remotely. “We hope the progress we made will be conducive to building trust,” Li Chenggang added.

Beyond trade data, what’s been most damaged by the years-long standoff is trust. According to Josef Gregory Mahoney, a professor of international relations at East China Normal University, “We’ve heard a lot about agreements on frameworks for talks, but the fundamental issue remains: Chips vs rare earths. Everything else is a peacock dance.”

However, many believe the rare earth deal may mark the beginning of a pragmatic phase. If both leaders endorse the proposal, it could open the door for more substantive discussions — not just on trade, but on global supply chains, climate coordination, and digital governance.