DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 11

“This Will Be the Biggest Cycle Ever” — Tom Lee Says Crypto Has Entered A Historic Bull Market

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Bitmine CEO Tom Lee is taking an unusually bullish view of the crypto market’s current trajectory.

Lee, while speaking at the Korean Blockchain Week, noted that the market is entering a historic bull cycle, driven by broader institutional participation, growing mainstream adoption, and the expanding role of digital assets in the global financial system.

His comment comes as Bitcoin trades at

$83,803, in a significant upsurge despite cooling from its high above $87,000. The Kobeissi letter noted that Bitcoin is up 43.1% so far in Q3 2026, on track for its best quarterly performance since Q4 2024.

Notably, Lee’s forecast comes as Bitcoin heads towards its strongest quarter in nearly two years, though uncertainty over interest rates continues to weigh on crypto markets.

Bitcoin is struggling to make its next move up after its August comeback, though it is still trading at much stronger levels than over the summer, when it stalled in the $60,000 zone.

Lee believes the crypto market bull market has begun, maintaining his $150,000 target for Bitcoin. His outlook is built around several potential catalysts. He expects investors who previously reduced their crypto exposure to return as the current four-year crypto cycle approaches its later stages.

He also pointed to increasing institutional participation and potential progress on U.S. crypto legislation, particularly the CLARITY Act, as factors that could support Bitcoin and Ethereum.

Under Lee’s scenario, Bitcoin reaching his projected price, would represent a substantial recovery from the levels seen during the recent market downturn.

His forecast places particular importance on the fourth quarter, which he expects could bring stronger institutional demand and renewed momentum across the crypto market. His outlook suggests that the current cycle could extend well beyond the patterns seen in previous crypto markets.

This prediction stands in contrast to several analysts who have recently warned that Bitcoin could experience further downside. While some analysts are watching support levels around $80,000 and below, Lee continues to argue that the current weakness could precede another major advance.

Lee is also putting the money where his mouth is. BitMine bought 17,362 ETH last week, pushing its total holdings past 6 million ETH, worth more than $16 billion at current prices.

The firm has bought ETH every week since it launched its treasury strategy in June of last year.

In line with his prediction, Chief Investment Officer Arthur Hayes of Maelstrom says Bitcoin could reach $1 million by 2030 as the bust of the Artificial intelligence investment boom prompts governments to inject trillions of dollars into the financial system.

Hayes says Bitcoin’s limited supply will also support its price as the supply of fiat money grows. He described AI investment as a bubble, saying that expanding debt obligations and falling compute prices could undermine the economics of new infrastructure. Hayes expects the crypto’s strongest gains to come in late 2027 or 2028.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s latest price decline, has prompted a growing number of analysts to warn that the cryptocurrency could face further downside if key support levels fail to hold.

Jeff Anderson, head of U.S. at STS Digital, has identified $82,000 as an important level for Bitcoin. According to his analysis, a sustained break below the level could expose the cryptocurrency to a decline toward the high-$70,000s.

Anderson’s warning comes as broader financial-market conditions create additional pressure on risk assets. Rising U.S. Treasury yields and increased volatility in bond markets have contributed to a more challenging environment for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Lacie Zhang of Bitget Wallet has also highlighted the $81,500-$83,000 region as an important area for Bitcoin. She noted that a sustained move below the zone, combined with weak exchange-traded fund flows and higher Treasury yields, could increase the probability of a deeper correction.

Outlook

Bitcoin’s next move is likely to depend on whether renewed institutional demand can overcome the macroeconomic pressures currently weighing on risk assets.

Tom Lee’s $150,000 target reflects a scenario in which institutional adoption, regulatory progress and renewed capital inflows strengthen during the final months of 2026. His bullish view also suggests that the current cycle could continue beyond the traditional four-year pattern.

However, the near-term outlook remains contested. Bitcoin’s inability to decisively move beyond the $87,000 area, combined with concerns over interest rates, Treasury yields, and weakening market demand, could leave the cryptocurrency vulnerable to another pullback.

OpenAI Plans to Bring Dots AI Agents to Wider Consumer Base as It Tests $500 Premium Tier

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

OpenAI plans to eventually make its new Dots AI agent system available across its consumer base, Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar said, signaling that the company sees autonomous AI agents becoming a mainstream feature rather than remaining a premium product for heavy users and businesses.

Dots will initially be restricted to OpenAI’s higher-priced Pro, Business and Enterprise offerings, Friar said in a CNBC interview Tuesday. The company, however, intends to extend access to its broader consumer audience, which OpenAI says now numbers about 1.2 billion people globally.

“For the business, you’re going to see it show up inside our pro SKUs and then inside of our business enterprise offerings for now,” Friar said. “But absolutely our vision is to bring this to our whole consumer base as well, 1.2 billion people around the world.”

The comments more clearly indicate how OpenAI is approaching the economics of agentic AI. Rather than immediately putting an autonomous system into the hands of its entire user base, the company is starting with customers paying substantially higher subscription fees, where greater usage and computing costs can be absorbed more easily.

CEO Sam Altman made a similar point at OpenAI’s DevDay on Tuesday, describing Dots as a premium product initially but saying the company ultimately expects to offer a mass-market version.

“I think there are very good reasons for that, and I think it will help us understand and help people understand how expensive what AI can do,” Altman said.

“But you should, of course, expect us to do a mass market thing for billions of people,” he added.

Dots represents a shift in how OpenAI wants people to use ChatGPT. Instead of waiting for users to issue prompts, the system is designed to work across the applications people use and take action on their behalf.

Friar described it as “productivity” that can proactively remind users about tasks and interact with services such as email, calendars, and Slack.

“Dots is now productivity,” Friar said. “It’s the agent that can tap you on the shoulder and remind you that you forgot to do that LinkedIn post for tomorrow. So it can go to your email, it can go to your calendar, it can go to your Slack or wherever you work.”

The design is believed to align with OpenAI’s business model. A conventional chatbot largely consumes computing resources when users actively interact with it. An agent that continuously monitors information, reasons about tasks and takes actions can require substantially more compute even when the user is not directly interacting with it.

Starting Dots within premium subscriptions therefore gives OpenAI a controlled environment to measure usage, compute requirements and the willingness of customers to pay for the additional capability.

Neither Friar nor Altman provided a timetable for when Dots will reach the broader consumer market or what it would cost.

$500 Subscription Puts A Price On Intensive AI Use

OpenAI’s premium strategy is already expanding beyond its traditional $20-a-month Plus subscription. The company announced Pro 500, a $500 monthly ChatGPT plan that costs $6,000 annually and provides the highest usage allowance. The plan includes what OpenAI describes as ultrafast computing for GPT-6 Astra in ChatGPT Work and Codex, with speeds up to eight times faster.

OpenAI has also reopened its $200 monthly Pro subscription while reducing its computing allowance. Subscribers now receive 10 times the usage allowance of the $20-a-month Plus plan, compared with 20 times previously.

The pricing structure points to a differentiated ChatGPT market, with OpenAI charging users according to how intensively they consume its computing resources.

Friar argued that there is evidence customers are becoming more comfortable with higher-priced AI subscriptions.

“A year ago, two years ago, when we launched our $200 SKU, people thought we’d lost our minds. No one’s ever going to spend that per month. I heard that over and over again,” Friar said.

“And now, actually, what we see is not only are people willing to spend more, they’re actually moving more towards consumption in consumers.”

The challenge for OpenAI is that the economics of agents could be very different from those of conventional chatbot subscriptions. An agent that searches across multiple applications, continuously processes information, and executes multi-step tasks could generate substantially more inference demand per user.

That makes the current premium-first strategy commercially significant. OpenAI can use its highest-paying customers to establish how much people value autonomous assistance before deciding how much of the capability can be offered at lower prices.

The Mass-Market Ambition Comes With An Infrastructure Question

OpenAI’s stated goal of reaching billions of consumers creates a much larger economic challenge. The company says its consumer audience already stands at 1.2 billion people. Even a relatively small percentage of those users adopting autonomous agents could produce a significant increase in computing demand if each agent performs substantially more work than a conventional chatbot interaction.

The $500 Pro 500 subscription effectively establishes a high-end tier for customers willing to pay for that computing intensity. The company’s eventual mass-market offering will require OpenAI to determine which agent capabilities can be delivered economically at lower prices.

That could result in a tiered system in which simple agent functions become widely available while more computationally intensive tasks remain subject to usage limits or higher subscription fees. It also creates a potentially important distinction between AI as software and AI as an ongoing service. Traditional software can be sold to millions of customers with relatively low marginal costs once it has been developed. Autonomous AI agents require continuing expenditure on computing every time they reason, retrieve information, or execute a task.

OpenAI’s pricing strategy is seen as an indication that it is increasingly trying to make that variable cost visible in the subscription structure. The company is believed to be pursuing two objectives simultaneously: expanding AI agents into everyday consumer workflows and ensuring that the economics of that expansion can support the computing required to operate them.

Dots’ initial restriction to premium and business customers gives OpenAI an opportunity to test that equation before taking the technology to its entire consumer base. The long-term ambition, however, is clear from Altman’s comments. OpenAI does not intend for autonomous agents to remain a niche feature for companies and high-paying users. It wants them to become part of the mainstream ChatGPT experience.

Nvidia-Branded Trailers Stolen With 20,000 Pounds of Sand Inside

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The theft of Nvidia-branded trailers in California has produced one of the strangest stories to emerge from the booming artificial intelligence industry. Thieves reportedly stole trailers displaying Nvidia branding, apparently expecting valuable technology or equipment.

Only to discover that the cargo inside was something considerably less glamorous: thousands of pounds of sand. The incident highlights both the growing value associated with Nvidia’s name and the unusual methods technology companies use to test the next generation of artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicles.

The trailers were associated with PlusAI, an autonomous-trucking company working on self-driving technology. Nvidia’s technology and branding are closely connected with the broader AI infrastructure ecosystem.

Where powerful processors, servers and computing systems have become some of the most valuable components in the technology supply chain. That association may have made the trailers appear particularly attractive to thieves.

Instead of expensive Nvidia GPUs or artificial intelligence servers, the trailers reportedly contained approximately 20,000 pounds of sand. The material was being used as simulated cargo for testing autonomous trucks.

By placing heavy loads inside a trailer, engineers can reproduce the weight and physical characteristics of a commercial shipment while evaluating how an autonomous vehicle responds to different driving conditions.

The stolen trailers were reportedly taken overnight from outside a PlusAI facility in Newark, California. Their Nvidia branding may have created the impression that valuable technology was being transported inside. But the apparent prize turned out to be an industrial testing material.

The trailers were eventually recovered after someone familiar with the company recognized them near another business location. The recovery meant that PlusAI avoided the potentially significant financial damage that could have resulted if expensive autonomous-driving equipment had actually been stolen.

The story points toward a broader security issue surrounding the artificial intelligence boom. As AI companies expand their data centers and autonomous-driving programs, the physical infrastructure supporting these technologies has become increasingly valuable.

Nvidia GPUs, networking equipment, servers and specialized computing systems can cost millions of dollars, creating new incentives for organized theft and supply-chain crime.

Nvidia has become one of the most recognizable companies in the AI economy. Its chips power a significant portion of the computing infrastructure used to train and operate advanced AI models.

As a result, the Nvidia name can itself become a signal of potential value, even when a shipment has little or nothing to do with high-end processors.

The California trailer incident therefore carries an ironic lesson for companies operating in the AI supply chain. Security cannot simply focus on the contents of a shipment. Branding, transportation routes, warehouse locations and publicly visible logistics can also reveal information that criminals may use to identify potential targets.

The incident ended with the trailers recovered and the sand apparently still intact. For the thieves, what may have looked like a valuable Nvidia shipment turned into a remarkably heavy haul of sand.

The episode is funny on the surface, but the underlying trend is serious. AI is creating a new ecosystem of valuable physical assets, from GPUs and data-center hardware to autonomous vehicles and specialized testing equipment.

As that ecosystem grows, companies will increasingly have to protect not only their digital systems but also the physical supply chains that make the AI economy possible.

The Nvidia trailer theft may have involved sand rather than semiconductors, but it reflects a larger reality: in the AI era, even an empty-looking trailer carrying a famous technology company’s logo can become a target.

Solana PAID Token Drops 38% as X Money Blocks Fee Payouts, While BitMine Surpasses 6M ETH Holdings

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Two developments highlight different sides of the crypto market: the fragility of new payment-linked token models on Solana and the growing scale of institutional Ethereum accumulation. They show how quickly liquidity, infrastructure and corporate treasury strategies can reshape digital-asset markets.

UsePaid, a Solana-based protocol that routes creator fees from token launches to X accounts through X Money, has been forced to change its payout system after a sharp increase in activity overwhelmed its payment process.

The platform reported $1.54 million in fees claimed over 24 hours, roughly 26 times the amount processed the previous day. It initially imposed a $750 daily payout cap before suspending X Money payments.

The disruption exposed a key weakness in the model: although the underlying fees are generated on-chain, the original payout mechanism depended on an external payment rail.

UsePaid subsequently introduced a web-based claims portal allowing eligible recipients to withdraw qualifying fees directly to Solana wallets, generally in SOL. Historical X Money balances are being handled separately.

The market reaction was immediate. The PAID token fell sharply, with reports putting the decline at about 38% around the initial disruption, while subsequent market data showed an even larger 47% 24-hour decline at one point.

The move demonstrated how closely the token had become associated with the protocol’s ability to process creator-fee flows. The episode also illustrates the risks of building financial infrastructure across multiple layers.

Solana can settle the underlying transactions rapidly, but converting those revenues into conventional payments introduces another dependency. When transaction activity accelerates faster than the payout infrastructure can absorb it, an on-chain business can still experience an off-chain bottleneck.

At the same time, BitMine Immersion Technologies is pursuing the opposite strategy: concentrating increasingly large amounts of capital into Ethereum. The company purchased another 17,362 ETH during the week ending September 27, taking its holdings to 6,001,302 ETH.

That represents approximately 4.9% of Ethereum’s estimated 122.1 million circulating supply. BitMine’s position was valued at roughly $16.2 billion using its stated ETH reference price of $2,698.

Across crypto, cash, marketable securities and other investments, the company reported approximately $17.2 billion. Its portfolio also included 213 BTC, $672 million in cash and marketable securities, and equity positions in Beast Industries and Eightco Holdings.

More importantly, about 5.07 million of BitMine’s ETH was staked, representing roughly 84% of its Ethereum holdings. The company estimated annualized staking revenue at approximately $358 million, although actual returns can vary with network conditions, validator performance and other factors.

BitMine began its Ethereum treasury strategy in June 2025 and says it has purchased ETH every week since then. Its stated objective is to reach ownership equivalent to 5% of Ethereum’s supply.

Putting the company close to a milestone that would give one public corporation an unusually large economic position in a major blockchain network. The two stories capture an important tension in crypto. Smaller protocols are experimenting with new bridges between social platforms, token launches and payments.

Where infrastructure failures can rapidly translate into token volatility. Meanwhile, larger companies are treating established networks such as Ethereum as strategic treasury assets, accumulating billions of dollars in exposure.

The contrast is about scale and infrastructure. One model is testing how crypto payments can become embedded into internet identities; the other is testing how far corporate balance sheets can integrate blockchain assets.

Both demonstrate that in crypto, technological design and financial structure increasingly move markets together.

Instinct’s $1 Billion Bet Signals a New Phase for Consumer AI Agents

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

The artificial intelligence industry is entering a phase in which the most valuable systems may not simply answer questions but act on behalf of their users.

Instinct, a young AI startup developing a personal agent capable of performing everyday tasks autonomously, has underscored that shift by raising $1 billion in Series C funding at a $10 billion valuation.

The new valuation is four times the $2.5 billion level assigned to the company only about a month earlier. The financing, backed by Sequoia Capital, Benchmark and Coatue, is striking not only because of its size but also because of the speed at which investors have repriced the company.

Instinct launched its invite-only service in August, yet it has already attracted enormous attention from venture capital investors searching for the next major consumer AI platform. At the center of the company’s proposition is a simple change in how people interact with software.

Instead of asking an AI chatbot for information and then completing the work themselves, users can ask Instinct to execute the task. The agent can plan trips, order groceries, make reservations, purchase tickets, pay bills and cancel subscriptions.

It can communicate through text or phone calls while using its own computer and phone systems to complete actions. That distinction is important for the emerging agentic-AI economy. Traditional generative AI largely transformed search, writing, coding and information retrieval.

AI agents attempt to transform execution. The economic opportunity therefore extends beyond software subscriptions toward transactions that currently pass through travel companies, retailers, restaurants, service providers and other intermediaries.

Instinct has introduced a concierge capability designed to handle tasks requiring phone conversations, including appointments with businesses that lack online booking systems. Its trusted-person network allows different Instinct agents to coordinate with one another.

Suggesting a future in which software agents could negotiate and organize activities between people without requiring every participant to interact directly. The enormous valuation comes while the company remains in early access.

Instinct has not publicly disclosed comprehensive user or revenue figures, making the $10 billion valuation less a reflection of established financial performance than an expression of investor expectations about the potential size of personal AI.

Reuters reported that the company is expanding its technology while emphasizing privacy protections such as isolated sandboxes and short-lived credentials. Privacy is particularly important because an agent capable of acting autonomously requires considerably more access than a conventional chatbot.

To book a flight, manage subscriptions or make purchases, an AI may need access to communications, accounts, payment information and personal preferences. Instinct has faced questions around the amount of information users must provide, highlighting the tension between convenience and control.

Competition is also intensifying. Meta’s Muse is pursuing a similar consumer-agent opportunity while benefiting from integration across Meta’s enormous ecosystem. That creates a difficult strategic environment for startups: they must build superior agents while competing against technology companies with vast computing resources, distribution networks and existing consumer relationships.

Instinct’s $1 billion raise therefore represents more than another spectacular AI funding round. It reflects investor conviction that autonomous software could become a new layer of consumer computing. Whether that conviction ultimately translates into sustainable revenue will depend on reliability, privacy, transaction economics and user trust.

For now, Instinct’s rapid rise demonstrates how aggressively capital is moving toward an AI future where software does not merely respond to people—it acts for them.

1...101112...9,425Page 11 of 9,425

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy