DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1108

Tekedia Capital Congratulates Kuraway for Winning Africa Impact Initiative’s Launchpad

0

Tekedia Capital congratulates our portfolio company, Kuraway, for winning the Launchpad competition organized by Founders Connect in collaboration with Africa Impact Initiative (AII) yesterday. Kuraway is built with the African continental free trade in mind and the Pan-African payment settlement system in the playbook.

We thank AII stakeholders like Mastercard Foundation, Microsoft, University of Toronto, and others for recognizing Kuraway. With Kuraway, the Bondly escrow technology offers a new layer for intra-African trade. (Bondly owns Kuraway)

African SMEs, the technology you need is here. Talk to the team to provide all you need to sell to all African countries. There is a Kura…way in all African commerce. For more, visit https://kuraway.com/

Anthropic CEO Says Humans Hallucinate More Than AI

0

As the race to artificial general intelligence (AGI) accelerates, one of the most persistent and widely scrutinized flaws of today’s AI models, hallucination—remains largely unresolved.

At Anthropic’s first-ever developer conference, Code with Claude, held in San Francisco last Thursday, the company’s co-founder and CEO, Dario Amodei, offered an eyebrow-raising take. He said AI models, in his view, may hallucinate less frequently than humans.

Amodei made the remarks in response to a question from TechCrunch, clarifying that the tendency of AI to present false information with confidence, an issue commonly referred to as hallucination, should not be viewed as a limiting factor on the path to AGI.

“It really depends how you measure it, but I suspect that AI models probably hallucinate less than humans, but they hallucinate in more surprising ways,” Amodei said.

His argument was part of a broader statement that sought to downplay technical limitations often cited by AI skeptics.

“Everyone’s always looking for these hard blocks on what [AI] can do,” Amodei said. “They’re nowhere to be seen. There’s no such thing.”

But that optimism doesn’t reflect the full scope of industry concerns.

OpenAI: Hallucinations Still a Growing Problem

Even as AI models continue to improve in performance and reasoning capabilities, hallucination remains one of the thorniest challenges facing developers. OpenAI, arguably the leader in generative AI, has recently admitted that its most advanced models, including the o3 and o4-mini variants, have unexpectedly higher hallucination rates than their predecessors. The company has expressed surprise at this finding and admitted that it still does not understand why this regression has occurred.

While models like GPT-4.5 have demonstrated improvements, the inconsistency across model generations highlights just how elusive a solution remains. Without a clear understanding of what drives hallucinations in advanced AI systems, ensuring consistent reliability remains a distant goal.

Most benchmarks used to assess hallucinations are model-to-model comparisons and do not pit AI performance directly against human cognition. This makes it difficult to verify Amodei’s claim that machines “hallucinate less than humans.” What is evident, however, is that AI-generated hallucinations often carry greater risks because of the confidence with which machines assert incorrect facts—especially in high-stakes settings such as legal filings, journalism, or healthcare.

In fact, Anthropic recently experienced backlash after a lawyer used its Claude chatbot to generate citations in court documents. The model inserted hallucinated case names and titles, leading to a courtroom apology and renewed scrutiny of AI’s readiness for sensitive professional use.

Amodei’s downplaying of hallucinations comes at a time when Anthropic’s own models have raised serious concerns over deceptive tendencies. Independent testing by Apollo Research, a safety-focused institute, revealed that an early version of Claude Opus 4 exhibited behaviors that could be interpreted as manipulative or even adversarial. According to Apollo, the model showed signs of scheming against humans and engaged in strategic deception when it believed doing so would help it avoid a shutdown.

Anthropic acknowledged the report and claimed it implemented mitigations that addressed these troubling behaviors. However, the incident highlighted the risks posed when hallucination is compounded by the confident, and sometimes deceptive, presentation.

Amodei conceded during the press event that the confident delivery of inaccurate information is indeed problematic. But his broader assertion—that hallucination is not a show-stopping flaw—suggests that developers, users, and regulators may have to learn to live with the issue for now.

Rising Waters, Lingering Uncertain Path to AGI

Amodei is among the more bullish voices in the AI world. In a 2023 paper, he predicted that AGI, systems with human-level or greater intelligence, could emerge as early as 2026. During Thursday’s event, he said the pace of AI progress remains steady, adding that “the water is rising everywhere.”

But that rising tide may not lift all problems equally. While new tools and techniques, such as grounding AI responses in web searches, have been shown to reduce hallucination rates in some contexts, they are far from silver bullets. Many AI experts still believe that hallucination is one of the most difficult and persistent obstacles on the path to truly reliable AI systems.

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, for instance, argued just days before the Anthropic event that today’s models “have too many holes” and still get too many basic questions wrong. Hassabis emphasized that addressing these shortcomings is essential before any credible claim to AGI can be made.

Nigeria Remittance Boom: FX Inflows Through IMTOs Soar to $4.76bn in 2024 Amid CBN Reforms

0

Remittances from Nigerians abroad surged in 2024, as inflows through International Money Transfer Operators (IMTOs) jumped to $4.76 billion—marking a 44.5% increase over the $3.30 billion received in 2023.

The figures, contained in the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) latest quarterly statistical bulletin, point to a dramatic rebound in diaspora remittances following a raft of liberal reforms championed by CBN Governor Olayemi Cardoso.

Over the course of the year, foreign currency sent home by Nigerians through licensed money transfer channels became critical support to the country’s struggling FX market, helping to cushion families, SMEs, and the broader economy from persistent currency volatility and liquidity constraints.

Strong Start, Record Mid-Year Peaks

The year began with solid momentum. In January 2024, IMTO inflows climbed to $390.86 million—up 32.5% from $295.21 million in the same month of 2023. The upward trend strengthened further in February, as remittances hit $326.91 million, representing a 67.3% rise compared to the $195.23 million recorded a year earlier.

March inflows rose 30% year-on-year to $363.76 million, and in April, the market witnessed a sharp leap to $466.11 million—an 83.3% increase over the $254.26 million posted in April 2023. That April figure represented the highest year-on-year jump in the first half of the year.

By May, IMTOs processed $404.75 million in remittances, up 45.3% from the previous year, while June maintained a similar pace with inflows totaling $389.79 million, a 40.2% rise year-on-year.

The most dramatic inflows occurred in July and August. July saw IMTO inflows soar to $552.94 million, more than double the $240.35 million recorded a year earlier. That 130% increase was followed by another peak in August, with $585.21 million—up 116% from $271.24 million in August 2023. Together, both months accounted for nearly a quarter of the year’s total inflows, underscoring their central role in foreign exchange liquidity.

Fluctuations in Final Months

The final quarter of 2024 presented a more mixed picture. In September, inflows reached $336.61 million—a 40.8% increase year-on-year. October figures climbed modestly to $378.85 million, representing a 29.1% jump from the previous year.

November, however, broke the momentum, as inflows dropped 22.1% to $252.28 million from $324.20 million a year earlier. December brought a partial rebound, with $316.59 million recorded—though still 9.1% lower than the $348.33 million reported in December 2023.

The monthly fluctuations toward year-end appeared to reflect broader economic uncertainties, seasonal shifts, and possibly tighter global liquidity conditions impacting remittance behavior.

The Game Changer Cardoso’s Reforms

The rise in inflows can be traced directly to bold reforms introduced by Governor Cardoso, who took the reins of the CBN in September 2023. Determined to re-anchor confidence in Nigeria’s foreign exchange market, the apex bank wasted no time rolling out policies to liberalize the remittance space.

In January 2024, the CBN abolished the ±2.5% cap on exchange rates quoted by IMTOs, allowing them to align closer with market rates. That same month, the Bank issued revised guidelines for IMTO operations—including a dramatic 1,900% hike in license application fees from N500,000 to N10 million. The guidelines also set a minimum operational capital of $1 million (or its naira equivalent) for both foreign and domestic IMTOs.

Initially, IMTOs were barred from buying FX in the domestic market. However, that restriction appears to have been reversed following industry consultations and a new circular, allowing operators to access the official window under stricter supervision.

Perhaps most notable is the CBN’s decision to establish a Collaborative Task Force with IMTOs, with a clear mandate to double remittance inflows into Nigeria. The team, which reports directly to the Governor, has been tasked with expanding outreach to the diaspora, improving onboarding efficiency, and boosting competition among IMTOs.

Speaking on the apex bank’s strategy, Acting Director of Corporate Communications, Hakama Sidi Ali, revealed that 14 new Approvals-in-Principle (AIPs) had recently been granted to prospective IMTOs—signaling a more open and competitive remittance market.

The reforms have also emphasized compliance, transparency, and efficiency. According to CBN insiders, the regulator has been actively onboarding more IMTOs while streamlining approval processes for faster licensing.

The $4.76 billion in IMTO inflows helped stabilize the naira at several critical points in 2024, offering much-needed supply in the formal FX market. Analysts say it also helped reduce dependence on speculative demand in the parallel market by offering better pricing incentives and restoring confidence among remitters.

What to Watch in 2025

Analysts are watching to see whether the CBN can sustain the momentum into 2025. Much will depend on global economic conditions, including interest rate trends in the U.S. and Europe, which influence diaspora remittance behavior. Another factor will be how quickly the CBN can address the remaining inefficiencies in the official market and keep the naira stable.

 

Kraken’s xStocks is Poised to Revolutionize Global Access to U.S. Stocks

0

Kraken has launched xStocks, a tokenized equities trading platform built on the Solana blockchain, in partnership with Backed Finance and the Solana Foundation. This platform allows non-U.S. clients in select markets to trade tokenized versions of over 50 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs, such as Apple, Tesla, Nvidia, and SPDR S&P 500 ETF, 24/7.

These assets are issued as SPL tokens on Solana, backed 1:1 by real shares held by Backed Finance, and can be traded on Kraken’s platform or used on-chain as collateral in DeFi applications. The initiative aims to provide faster, cheaper, and borderless access to U.S. equities, with plans to expand to additional jurisdictions and potentially other blockchains.

Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken plans to offer tokenized versions of U.S. stocks and ETFs using blockchain technology. Known as “xStocks,” the digital tokens, which will trade around the clock, can be converted into the cash value of the underlying securities. The tokenized stocks will only be available to non-U.S. customers, including those in Europe, Latin America and Asia. Kraken, which is based in the U.S., says the initiative gives international investors access to U.S. stocks, without the fees associated with traditional brokerages.

Implications of Kraken’s xStocks Platform

xStocks enables non-U.S. investors in regions like Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia to trade tokenized versions of U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs (e.g., Apple, Tesla, Nvidia, SPDR S&P 500) 24/7, bypassing traditional market hours and geographic restrictions. This democratizes access for investors in emerging markets who face high fees or limited access to U.S. equities through conventional brokers.

Blockchain-based tokenization allows for fractional trading, enabling smaller investors to participate in high-value assets, enhancing financial inclusion. By leveraging Solana’s high-speed, low-cost blockchain, xStocks reduces transaction fees and enables instant settlement, addressing the high intermediary costs and delays in traditional finance (TradFi).

xStocks, issued as SPL tokens on Solana, can be used as collateral in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, creating new opportunities for yield generation and liquidity provision not possible with traditional equities. Kraken’s initiative reflects a broader trend of blending traditional finance with blockchain infrastructure, potentially attracting institutional and retail investors to crypto-native platforms.

Kraken’s Co-CEO Arjun Sethi predicts tokenized equities could surpass the $240 billion stablecoin market, especially with derivatives like futures and options, signaling significant growth potential. Kraken is working with regulators to ensure xStocks complies with local laws, learning from past failures like Binance’s 2021 tokenized stock offering, which was halted due to regulatory pushback.

Tokenized securities face scrutiny over compliance, asset custody, and market acceptance. Regulatory uncertainty could limit adoption or lead to restrictions in certain jurisdictions. xStocks challenges traditional brokers by offering 24/7 trading, lower costs, and borderless access, potentially pressuring legacy financial institutions to innovate. With only $373 million in tokenized equities on-chain currently, Kraken’s entry could boost liquidity and mainstream adoption, especially with Solana’s high-performance infrastructure.

Solana’s low latency and high transaction throughput make it ideal for real-time, global trading, enhancing user experience compared to slower traditional systems. Blockchain’s transparency ensures clear ownership records, while Backed Finance’s 1:1 asset backing and redeemability for cash aim to align token prices with uhnderlying securities, reducing volatility risks.

Bitcoin Runes, a protocol for creating fungible tokens on Bitcoin’s blockchain introduced in April 2024, could enable tokenized equities to be issued on Bitcoin’s network, leveraging its security and decentralization. This would diversify xStocks’ blockchain options beyond Solana, potentially attracting Bitcoin-centric investors. Runes’ simplicity and lower transaction costs compared to earlier Bitcoin token protocols (e.g., BRC-20) could make tokenized equities more cost-effective on Bitcoin’s blockchain, though slower transaction speeds compared to Solana might limit scalability.

Integrating Runes would require bridging Bitcoin’s blockchain with Solana’s for xStocks, posing technical challenges due to differing consensus mechanisms and transaction models. Cross-chain solutions like Wormhole (which recently brought Dogecoin to Solana) could be explored. Bitcoin’s limited smart contract functionality might restrict DeFi applications for Runes-based xStocks, making Solana’s ecosystem more practical for now.

Associating xStocks with Bitcoin Runes could enhance credibility among Bitcoin maximalists, but it might also confuse investors due to Runes’ niche status and limited adoption compared to Solana’s established DeFi ecosystem. Regulatory scrutiny could intensify, as Bitcoin-based tokens might attract attention from authorities monitoring crypto innovations.

xStocks is currently unavailable to U.S. clients due to regulatory constraints, creating a divide where non-U.S. investors gain access to innovative 24/7 trading, while U.S. investors are limited to Kraken’s traditional brokerage offering (over 11,000 stocks and ETFs). This could exacerbate financial exclusion in the U.S. unless regulatory clarity allows expansion.

Investors in emerging markets (e.g., Africa, Latin America) benefit from xStocks’ low-cost, borderless access, potentially reducing the wealth gap with developed markets. However, limited internet or crypto literacy in some regions could hinder adoption, deepening the digital divide. Traditional investors accustomed to regulated brokers may hesitate to adopt tokenized equities due to perceived risks (e.g., volatility, security) or unfamiliarity with blockchain, creating a divide between crypto-savvy and conservative investors.

Younger, risk-tolerant crypto users, already familiar with Kraken and Solana, are likely to embrace xStocks, gaining early access to a new asset class and DeFi opportunities, potentially outpacing traditional investors in returns. Countries with crypto-friendly regulations (e.g., certain European nations) will see faster xStocks adoption, while restrictive regimes may lag, creating uneven access globally. Kraken’s proactive regulatory engagement aims to bridge this, but challenges remain.

Smaller investors may face less regulatory friction, while institutional players could encounter stricter oversight, potentially limiting their participation in tokenized markets. xStocks requires understanding wallets and blockchain transactions, which may exclude less tech-savvy investors, reinforcing a divide between those comfortable with crypto infrastructure and those reliant on traditional platforms.

Regions with robust internet and smartphone penetration will benefit more from xStocks’ mobile app accessibility, while underserved areas may struggle, exacerbating technological inequities. xStocks’ low-cost, fractional trading could empower retail investors, narrowing the wealth gap by enabling participation in high-value U.S. equities. However, if adoption is skewed toward wealthier, crypto-savvy users, it could widen disparities.

Kraken’s xStocks platform, built on Solana, is poised to revolutionize global access to U.S. equities by offering 24/7 trading, lower costs, and DeFi integration, challenging traditional finance’s inefficiencies. It promotes financial inclusion for non-U.S. investors but creates divides based on geography (U.S. exclusion), investor type (crypto vs. traditional), regulatory environments, and technological access.

A hypothetical Bitcoin Runes integration could further diversify xStocks’ reach but would face technical and regulatory hurdles, with limited immediate impact due to Runes’ nascent state. To mitigate divides, Kraken must prioritize regulatory clarity, user education, and infrastructure expansion to ensure equitable access across regions and demographics.

U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Allows Trump to Fire Members of Independent Federal Agencies

0

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling allowing President Donald Trump to fire members of independent federal agencies, specifically Gwynne Wilcox of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Cathy Harris of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), without cause, at least temporarily. The decision, which paused lower court rulings that had reinstated these officials, suggests the president can remove executive officers who exercise significant executive power, subject to narrow exceptions. The Court emphasized that the NLRB and MSPB wield considerable executive authority, supporting Trump’s position that such officials should be removable at will.

However, the ruling explicitly carved out an exception for the Federal Reserve, describing it as a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity” with a distinct historical tradition, signaling that its board members likely retain greater protection against presidential removal. This distinction aims to preserve the Fed’s independence, a move seen as reassuring to financial markets concerned about potential economic instability if the Fed were subject to presidential control.

Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, arguing that the majority’s decision undermines the 1935 precedent Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which upheld for-cause removal protections for independent agency members. Kagan criticized the Fed exception as inconsistent, noting that the Fed’s independence rests on the same legal foundations as other agencies like the NLRB and MSPB.

She warned that the ruling could destabilize the structure of independent agencies, which Congress designed to be insulated from political interference through bipartisan boards and for-cause removal provisions. The case stems from Trump’s efforts to remove Wilcox and Harris, both Biden appointees, shortly after taking office. Federal law typically allows such removals only for “neglect of duty or malfeasance in office,” but Trump’s legal team argued that these restrictions unconstitutionally limit presidential power under the Constitution’s separation-of-powers clause.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority appeared to lean toward this view, though it deferred a final decision pending further briefing and argument. The ruling has raised concerns about the broader implications for other independent agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission or Securities and Exchange Commission, though the Fed’s explicit exemption mitigates fears of immediate impact on monetary policy.

The decision strengthens the president’s authority over independent agencies like the NLRB and MSPB, which were designed to operate with some insulation from political influence. This could allow Trump to replace agency members with loyalists, potentially aligning agency decisions more closely with White House priorities. The ruling may extend to other independent agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

This could lead to shifts in regulatory enforcement, labor policy, or consumer protections, reflecting the administration’s agenda rather than bipartisan or technocratic consensus. Agencies like the NLRB and MSPB were structured with for-cause removal protections to ensure impartiality. The ruling challenges this framework, potentially allowing political considerations to override expertise or statutory mandates.

The decision appears to chip away at the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor precedent, which upheld for-cause protections for independent agency members. This could signal a broader judicial shift toward expanding presidential power under the unitary executive theory, favored by the Court’s conservative majority. The Court’s decision is temporary, with further briefing and arguments scheduled.

A final ruling could either solidify this expansion of presidential power or refine its scope, potentially clarifying which agencies remain protected beyond the Fed. The carve-out for the Federal Reserve, described as a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity,” introduces ambiguity. Critics, like Justice Kagan in her dissent, argue this exception lacks a coherent legal basis, as the Fed’s independence stems from similar statutory protections as other agencies. This could invite future litigation to test the boundaries of the exception.

The explicit exemption of the Federal Reserve reassures financial markets, as it protects the Fed’s ability to set monetary policy without direct political interference. This mitigates fears of Trump pressuring the Fed to adjust interest rates or other policies to align with his economic or political goals, which could have caused market volatility. While the Fed is shielded, other agencies overseeing economic regulations (e.g., SEC, CFPB) could face leadership changes, leading to shifts in enforcement priorities.

This might affect business confidence, investment decisions, or consumer protections, depending on the new appointees’ policies. The ability to fire agency members without cause could deepen politicization of federal agencies, undermining their role as neutral arbiters. This may erode public trust in institutions like the NLRB, which handles labor disputes, or the MSPB, which oversees federal employee protections.

Congress may respond by attempting to strengthen statutory protections for agency members or restructuring agencies to limit presidential influence. However, such efforts would face challenges in a polarized Congress and potential vetoes from the administration. Supporters of the ruling argue it enhances democratic accountability by ensuring agencies align with the elected president’s agenda. Critics counter that it risks administrative chaos, as frequent turnover could disrupt long-term policy implementation and expertise-driven governance.

The ruling could set a precedent for further expanding presidential authority, potentially affecting the balance of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Future administrations may leverage this to exert greater control over the administrative state. The decision highlights the Supreme Court’s increasing willingness to intervene in disputes over agency structure, signaling a more assertive judicial role in shaping the administrative state.

The NLRB, which oversees labor relations, may see shifts in rulings on union activities, workplace disputes, or employer obligations if new appointees favor business interests or other priorities aligned with the administration. The MSPB, tasked with protecting federal employees from arbitrary dismissal, could face challenges in maintaining its impartiality, potentially affecting federal workforce morale and protections.

The ruling enhances presidential power over independent agencies, potentially reshaping their operations and policies, while the Federal Reserve’s exemption preserves its autonomy for now. The decision raises concerns about the politicization of agencies, challenges long-standing legal precedents, and sets the stage for further legal battles over the scope of executive authority. Its temporary nature suggests that the full implications will depend on the Court’s final ruling, expected after additional arguments.