DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1233

Boeing to Resume Jet Deliveries to China as Trump’s 90-Day Truce Softens Trade Standoff

0

Boeing will resume aircraft deliveries to China next month, marking a breakthrough in the icy trade relationship between Washington and Beijing.

The move comes after months of stalled transactions that left the American aerospace giant shut out of its second-largest market. The restart also follows President Donald Trump’s announcement of a 90-day truce in the U.S.-China trade conflict earlier this month — a key development that appears to have paved the way for the return of Boeing jets to Chinese tarmacs.

CEO Kelly Ortberg confirmed the update on Thursday during a presentation at the Bernstein investor conference, saying China had now given the green light to resume deliveries after previously halting them amid heightened trade tensions.

“China has now indicated … they’re going to take deliveries,” Ortberg said. “The first deliveries will be next month.”

The renewed flow of Boeing jets into China highlights what could be a significant shift in U.S.-China commercial relations — one catalyzed by President Trump’s unexpected trade truce announcement on May 5. The 90-day pause in new tariffs and trade hostilities was framed by Trump as a window to “allow our teams to work on a more comprehensive agreement.”

The truce marked a rare cooling of rhetoric in a trade war that has spanned tariffs on billions of dollars worth of goods, export restrictions, and a near halt in cross-border industrial cooperation. For Boeing, which is often seen as a proxy for broader U.S. manufacturing and export health, the resumption is an early sign that the truce is already having commercial consequences.

Boeing has long depended on China’s booming aviation sector, fueled by a growing middle class and rapid domestic airport expansion, to drive long-term sales growth. But the company’s deliveries to Chinese airlines have slowed to a trickle in recent years, weighed down by regulatory uncertainty, pandemic disruptions, and a wider geopolitical chill.

Ortberg declined to comment on whether the resumed deliveries came with additional conditions or concessions but acknowledged that the development was “encouraging for everyone watching the U.S.-China dynamic.”

Boeing’s Strategic Stakes in China

China is not just a major buyer of Boeing aircraft — it is a critical linchpin in the company’s global business. The country is expected to account for nearly 20% of all global aircraft demand over the next two decades, according to Boeing’s own forecasts. Missing out on Chinese contracts leaves Boeing exposed to European rival Airbus, which has capitalized on the opening to deepen its footprint in the country.

Thursday’s announcement provides a shot in the arm to Boeing’s embattled commercial division, which has been trying to recover from a series of crises — including the two fatal 737 Max crashes and the more recent midair blowout of a door panel on an Alaska Airlines Max 9 jet. Those incidents invited waves of regulatory scrutiny and production restrictions, including a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cap limiting output to 38 Max jets per month.

However, Ortberg said Boeing is aiming to ramp up production to 42 planes per month by midyear and will assess increasing that number to 47 by the end of 2025. The company is also targeting certification for its Max 7 and Max 10 models by year-end, which would restore its full narrow-body lineup for the first time in years.

Even with the resumed deliveries, Boeing continues to face tariff pressures. Ortberg noted that the company is still paying duties on some imported aircraft components, particularly from Japan and Italy, used in the production of wide-body Dreamliner jets. Those jets are primarily assembled in South Carolina.

He, however, pointed out that most of those duties can be recouped once the aircraft are exported.

“The only duties that we would have to cover would be the duties for a delivery, say, to a U.S. airline,” he said, downplaying any lasting financial impact for international orders.

He added that the current trade environment, while volatile, is unlikely to be permanent.

“I personally don’t think these [tariffs] will be permanent in the long term,” Ortberg said, expressing cautious optimism about a thaw in U.S. trade relations with its key partners.

Ortberg’s leadership, which began last August, has won cautious praise from major airline CEOs, who had grown increasingly frustrated with Boeing’s delayed deliveries during a period of surging post-pandemic travel demand. United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby, speaking on CNBC Thursday, said he believed Boeing “has turned the corner.”

“We over-ordered aircraft believing the supply chain would be challenged,” Kirby said, noting that global production remains under strain even as demand returns.

Airlines have welcomed the prospect of more predictable Boeing deliveries, especially as summer travel season approaches and capacity constraints loom.

Turning a Corner or Temporary Relief?

While the resumed deliveries to China are a clear win for Boeing, questions remain about whether this shift is a permanent reordering of the U.S.-China trade balance — or just a temporary reprieve under Trump’s 90-day truce.

China’s willingness to re-engage in commercial aviation may indicate a strategic pivot to secure essential industrial partnerships while avoiding further economic fallout. For Trump, allowing Boeing to restart deliveries gives his administration leverage to claim a trade win — even as structural issues in U.S.-China relations remain unresolved.

In the meantime, Boeing is capitalizing on the opportunity, using the breakthrough to reset its narrative. The company still faces a long road to recovery, burdened by regulatory hurdles, production constraints, and the lingering reputational scars of its past missteps.

Trump Media’s $2.5B Bitcoin Treasury Deal Is A High-Stakes Bet

0

Trump Media & Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social, announced on May 27, 2025, a $2.5 billion deal to create a Bitcoin treasury, one of the largest by a public company. The funds will be raised through a private placement with approximately 50 institutional investors, involving $1.5 billion in common stock and $1 billion in 0% convertible senior secured notes, priced at a 35% premium.

The deal, expected to close around May 29, 2025, will boost the company’s liquid assets to over $3 billion, alongside existing cash and investments of $759 million from Q1 2025.  CEO Devin Nunes described Bitcoin as an “apex instrument of financial freedom,” stating the investment aims to protect against financial institution discrimination and create synergies for subscription payments and utility tokens across Truth Social, Truth+, and Truth.Fi platforms.

Crypto.com and Anchorage Digital will provide custody for the Bitcoin holdings. The move aligns with a broader trend of companies like MicroStrategy adopting Bitcoin as a treasury asset and reflects Trump’s pro-crypto stance, including his push for a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve. However, Trump Media’s stock fell 10-12% following the announcement, despite Bitcoin trading near its all-time high of around $112,000.

The $2.5 billion Bitcoin treasury deal by Trump Media & Technology Group carries significant implications, both for the company and the broader financial and political landscape. The deal significantly boosts Trump Media’s liquid assets to over $3 billion, providing substantial financial flexibility. This could fund expansion of Truth Social, Truth+, and Truth.Fi, potentially enhancing their competitiveness in social media, streaming, and financial services.

By allocating a large portion of its treasury to Bitcoin, Trump Media is betting on the cryptocurrency’s long-term value as a hedge against inflation and fiat currency devaluation. This aligns with strategies adopted by companies like MicroStrategy, which has seen its stock soar due to its Bitcoin holdings. Bitcoin’s volatility (trading near $112,000 but with historical swings) introduces risk. A price crash could impair the company’s financial position, while a continued rally could amplify returns. The 10-12% stock drop post-announcement suggests investor skepticism about the move’s immediate benefits.

Using Crypto.com and Anchorage Digital for custody and planning synergies with subscription payments and utility tokens positions Trump Media as a crypto-friendly entity, potentially attracting a younger, tech-savvy user base. The deal reflects Donald Trump’s recent pro-crypto stance, including his advocacy for a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve and policies to make the U.S. a “Bitcoin mining powerhouse.” This could appeal to his political base and crypto enthusiasts, reinforcing Truth Social’s role as a platform for his supporters.

CEO Devin Nunes’ framing of Bitcoin as an “apex instrument of financial freedom” ties into broader themes of resisting centralized financial control and “debanking” risks, resonating with populist and libertarian sentiments. As one of the largest Bitcoin treasury deals by a public company, this move could inspire other firms to follow suit, further legitimizing cryptocurrency as a corporate asset class.

Integrating Bitcoin into Truth Social’s ecosystem (e.g., via Truth.Fi) could pioneer new models for decentralized finance (DeFi) within social platforms, though execution risks remain high given the company’s limited track record in fintech. Supporters of Bitcoin and decentralized finance see this as a bold move to embrace a future where cryptocurrencies challenge traditional banking systems. Critics, including traditional investors, view it as reckless due to Bitcoin’s volatility and regulatory uncertainties. The stock’s 10-12% drop reflects this skepticism among some shareholders. Retail investors, particularly those aligned with Trump’s base or crypto communities, may view this as a visionary step.

Institutional investors, wary of Bitcoin’s risks and Trump Media’s governance issues (given its association with a polarizing figure), may remain cautious, contributing to the stock’s decline. The deal reinforces Trump Media’s alignment with Trump’s political brand, appealing to his base who see Bitcoin as a tool for economic sovereignty. Opponents may view it as a publicity stunt or a risky financial maneuver tied to Trump’s polarizing persona, deepening partisan divides in perceptions of the company.

Libertarians and crypto advocates may praise the move as a stand against centralized financial control, while proponents of regulation may argue it invites scrutiny from agencies like the SEC, especially given Trump’s history of regulatory battles. The crypto community, active on platforms like X may celebrate this as a mainstream endorsement of Bitcoin, boosting sentiment. Skeptics, including those who see crypto as speculative or environmentally harmful (due to mining’s energy use), may criticize the move as irresponsible.

The deal may solidify Truth Social’s niche as a platform for Trump-aligned, crypto-friendly users, but it risks alienating mainstream users who prefer platforms like X or Meta’s offerings, which have not yet embraced crypto at this scale. Trump Media’s Bitcoin treasury deal is a high-stakes bet that could reshape its financial and strategic trajectory while amplifying its ideological alignment with Trump’s pro-crypto stance.

It strengthens the company’s position in the crypto ecosystem but introduces significant risks due to Bitcoin’s volatility and the company’s polarizing brand. The move deepens divides between crypto advocates and skeptics, Trump supporters and detractors, and decentralized finance proponents and traditional financial institutions. Its success will hinge on Bitcoin’s performance, regulatory developments, and Trump Media’s ability to execute its crypto-integrated vision for Truth Social and beyond.

Musk Criticizes Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” in Rare Break with the President, Says It Undermines DOGE’s Work

0

In a rare and pointed criticism of President Donald Trump, Elon Musk has slammed the recently passed Republican spending bill, calling it a setback for efforts to reduce wasteful government expenditure.

The criticism, which aired in a preview of an upcoming interview on CBS Sunday Morning, marks one of Musk’s most direct and public rebukes of the man he has long backed—both ideologically and politically—even when Trump’s policies ran contrary to Musk’s business interests.

“I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,” Musk said, referring to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the federal cost-cutting agency he headed until recently.

The bill in question—the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”—is projected by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to raise the federal budget deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next ten years. That’s a sharp reversal from DOGE’s stated aim of fiscal prudence.

Since its creation in January 2025, DOGE has claimed to have saved $170 billion in taxpayer money by slashing bureaucratic redundancies and eliminating overlapping federal programs, including a controversial gutting of the U.S. Agency for International Development and job cuts affecting some 275,000 federal employees, according to data from consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

Trump had boasted of the bill as a landmark legislative win, calling it “big and beautiful.” But Musk, in a dig at that framing, retorted, “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don’t know if it can be both.”

This stark divergence in rhetoric has sparked speculation of a growing schism between the billionaire industrialist and the Republican leader, especially as Musk announces the end of his role at the White House.

For years, Musk has been seen as a cheerleader for Trump, praising his deregulatory stance and frequently appearing at White House events. He continued to offer public support even when the Trump administration pursued policies that threatened Musk’s core businesses—particularly the electric vehicle sector, which faced headwinds from Trump’s fossil fuel-heavy energy agenda and the rollback of federal EV subsidies.

Trump’s support for oil drilling and traditional automakers has consistently undermined the clean energy transition championed by Tesla and other Musk ventures. Yet Musk, always calculating, maintained cordial relations with Trump, securing influence in key policy discussions and later accepting a high-profile advisory role as DOGE chief—a position that allowed him to shape federal spending but also put him directly in the political spotlight.

Now, Musk’s comments suggest a shift, with the SpaceX and Tesla CEO signaling that he is stepping back from his Washington role.

“It was clear that DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,” Musk told The Washington Post in a separate interview published Tuesday. “The federal bureaucracy is much worse than I realized.”

His withdrawal comes just as Trump’s bill heads to the Senate, where it faces stiff opposition—not only from Democrats but also from Republican fiscal conservatives. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a former presidential hopeful and one-time Trump rival, has blasted House Republicans for failing to codify DOGE’s proposed spending cuts, calling it “a betrayal of the voters.”

The timing of Musk’s criticism is significant. Trump is known for his zero-tolerance approach to dissent, particularly from allies. His history of falling out with former aides, executives, and party loyalists is well-documented. From former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and one-time strategist Steve Bannon, Trump has often publicly castigated former allies after a perceived betrayal.

That history raises questions about whether Musk’s comments could escalate into a full-blown feud. Already, reports suggest tensions have been simmering behind the scenes.

Meanwhile, markets appeared to respond positively to Musk’s pivot. Tesla stock edged higher following the release of the CBS interview clip, buoyed by investor optimism that Musk would now be refocusing on the company after months of distraction from political affairs. His companies—including Tesla, X (formerly Twitter), and SpaceX—have faced mounting challenges amid regulatory pressure and competition, making his return to the helm a welcome development for shareholders.

However, the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” continues to divide Congress—and possibly one of its most high-profile corporate allies. If Musk’s past loyalty can no longer buffer him from Trump’s retaliation, the political fallout could reshape the calculus for other business leaders who’ve walked the tightrope of MAGA politics.

Tekedia Capital Portfolio, Vetsark, Wins Best Seed Startup at 2025 AfricArena Lagos Fintech, Mobility & Logistics Summit

0

Tekedia Capital congratulates our portfolio company, Vetsark, for being named Best Seed Startup at 2025 AfricArena Lagos Fintech, Mobility & Logistics Summit. Vetsark funds more poultry farmers in Nigeria than any bank! Yes, it is a neonbank for poultry farmers. It gives more than money, it provides most things any poultry farmer needs to thrive.

Last week, I congratulated another of our portfolio, Kuraway, for winning the 2025 Launchpad competition organized by Founders Connect. Kuraway anchors intra-African trade with its technologies and solutions, making it easier for farmers, SMEs, etc to scale their operations across Africa.

We’re Tekedia Capital and we’re investing to build the next Africa through entrepreneurial capitalism.

Implications of Circle’s $57M USDC Freeze in the LIBRA Token Scandal

0

Circle, the issuer of USD Coin (USDC), froze approximately $57.65 million in USDC held in two Solana-based wallets linked to the LIBRA memecoin scandal. The freeze was executed following a temporary restraining order issued by a federal court in the Southern District of New York, prompted by Burwick Law, which is representing hundreds of LIBRA investors in a class-action lawsuit filed in March 2025.

The lawsuit targets Kelsier Ventures and its co-founders—Gideon, Thomas, and Hayden Davis—along with others like Meteora and KIP Protocol, alleging they orchestrated a pump-and-dump scheme. The LIBRA token, promoted by Argentine President Javier Milei, surged to a $4 billion market cap in February 2025 before crashing over 90%, leading to accusations of market manipulation and insider trading. A hearing is scheduled for June 9, 2025, to determine if the funds will remain frozen.

There’s debate over whether the freeze was also influenced by an Argentine investigation, with plaintiff Martin Romeo claiming involvement, though Burwick Law attributes it solely to the U.S. court order. The freeze, prompted by Burwick Law’s class-action lawsuit and a U.S. federal court order, signals growing judicial willingness to intervene in crypto markets, especially in cases of alleged fraud like the LIBRA pump-and-dump.

This could set a precedent for holding crypto issuers, promoters, and platforms accountable, potentially increasing regulatory scrutiny on memecoins and decentralized finance (DeFi) projects. The action may bolster investor confidence by showing that legal recourse is possible in crypto scams, where recovery of funds is often difficult. However, it also highlights the risks of unregulated tokens, potentially deterring retail investors from speculative assets like memecoins.

Circle’s compliance with the court order demonstrates the centralized control stablecoin issuers wield, which could spark debate about the balance between regulatory compliance and the ethos of decentralization. It may push users toward fully decentralized alternatives or raise questions about stablecoin vulnerabilities to legal interventions. The freeze affects wallets on Solana, implicating platforms like Meteora and KIP Protocol named in the lawsuit.

This could lead to reputational damage and reduced trust in Solana-based DeFi ecosystems. It may also pressure exchanges and protocols to enhance due diligence to avoid similar scandals. The involvement of Argentine President Javier Milei and claims of an Argentine investigation add geopolitical complexity. If Argentina’s government is pursuing parallel actions, it could complicate cross-border legal efforts, especially given crypto’s global nature and varying jurisdictional regulations.

Circle’s ability to freeze $57M in USDC underscores the centralized control over stablecoins, clashing with the decentralized ideals of many crypto advocates. Critics may argue this undermines the promise of financial sovereignty, while supporters of the freeze see it as necessary to combat fraud. The lawsuit alleges insider trading and market manipulation by Kelsier Ventures and affiliates, pitting retail investors—who suffered massive losses after LIBRA’s 90% crash—against well-connected insiders who allegedly profited.

This fuels distrust in memecoin projects often driven by hype and influencer endorsements. The U.S. court’s swift action contrasts with slower or less defined regulatory responses in other jurisdictions, like Argentina. This divide could lead to a fragmented global crypto regulatory landscape, where outcomes depend heavily on where legal action is pursued.

On platforms like X, sentiment is split. Some users praise the freeze as justice for defrauded investors, while others view it as overreach, arguing it punishes the broader crypto ecosystem and stifles innovation. Posts on X also reflect skepticism about Milei’s role, with some calling it political posturing, while others defend his libertarian stance. The upcoming June 9, 2025, hearing will be critical in determining whether the freeze holds, potentially shaping the trajectory of these divides and influencing future crypto litigation and regulation.