The Trump administration scored a temporary legal reprieve on Thursday after a federal appeals court agreed to pause a lower court ruling that had struck down much of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff regime.

The move preserves for now—the administration’s authority to impose tariffs under emergency powers, just as legal and economic battles over the trade measures intensify.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a brief order granting the administration’s request to stay a May 28 judgment by the U.S. Court of International Trade. That lower court had ruled that key elements of Trump’s trade policy, including the so-called “Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders,” exceeded the authority granted to the president under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The orders targeted imports from multiple U.S. trading partners and were part of Trump’s broader effort to reset America’s global trade relationships.

“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the trade court said in a stinging rebuke on Wednesday, siding with five small business owners who challenged the administration’s authority.

The Trump administration responded swiftly, warning the appeals court that it would seek “emergency relief” from the U.S. Supreme Court as early as Friday if the lower court’s ruling was not put on hold. The Federal Circuit’s temporary stay prevents that escalation for now, allowing time for the court to fully consider the case.

“The trade court’s judgment is temporarily stayed until further notice while this court considers the motions papers,” the appeals court wrote in its one-paragraph order.

Legal Challenge to Executive Power

The plaintiffs in the case—a group of small, owner-operated import businesses—had argued that Trump’s use of IEEPA to justify wide-ranging tariffs lacked legal basis. Their lead attorney, Jeffrey Schwab, who serves as Senior Counsel and Interim Director of Litigation at the Liberty Justice Center, told Business Insider the court’s initial ruling was a much-needed check on executive overreach.

“I think the court understood that the administration’s argument—that it had essentially unilateral authority to impose whatever tariffs it wanted on any country, at any rate, at any time—under IEEPA went too far,” Schwab said. “So we’re really happy the court ruled the way it did, and I think we will make the same arguments before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.”

Schwab added that the lower court’s ruling acknowledged the real limits on presidential power, even under emergency laws originally designed for foreign policy crises, not economic re-engineering.

Economic and Political Stakes

The legal battle is unfolding against the backdrop of growing unease over the tariffs’ impact on the U.S. economy. Earlier, the Commerce Department reported that the economy shrank by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2025, the first contraction in three years. The drop was largely driven by a surge in imports, as U.S. companies scrambled to stock up before the tariffs took full effect, and by declines in consumer and federal government spending.

The temporary stay granted by the appeals court now leaves the business community and economic forecasters with uncertainty. While the ruling allows the administration to maintain its tariffs in the near term, it also signals that a final judgment on their legality may still be months away.

If the tariffs are eventually struck down again, it could offer much-needed relief to U.S. importers, manufacturers, and consumers burdened by rising prices. Conversely, if the court upholds Trump’s use of emergency powers under IEEPA, it could cement a dramatic expansion of presidential authority over trade policy.

The appeals court did not provide a timeline for its decision on the administration’s motion. If it eventually sides with the lower court, the case could quickly advance to the U.S. Supreme Court—where the broader question of how much power the president has to reshape the U.S. economy through emergency declarations could be tested in full.

Until then, the tariffs remain in place, prolonging a period of legal, political, and economic uncertainty that continues to shape both America’s trade posture and its broader economic trajectory.

The African Development Bank (AfDB) Group is rolling out a bold $6 billion investment strategy to transform Africa’s fragile healthcare systems and reduce the continent’s reliance on imported drugs.

The initiative, unveiled at the 2025 AfDB Annual Meetings in Abidjan, marks one of the most ambitious continent-wide health interventions in recent memory—divided into two $3 billion programmes targeting infrastructure and local pharmaceutical manufacturing.

AfDB President Dr. Akinwumi Adesina, while presenting his 10-year scorecard, emphasized that the investment was already underway, describing it as a critical step toward ensuring Africa can both deliver and produce healthcare solutions at scale.

“Today, the African Development Bank Group is implementing a $3 billion programme for quality health infrastructure and a $3 billion programme for the development of local pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity in Africa,” Adesina announced.

Central to this vision is the newly established African Pharmaceutical Technology Foundation, an institution designed to break Africa’s historical exclusion from proprietary pharmaceutical technologies. The foundation will help African countries gain access to intellectual property rights and safeguard essential manufacturing know-how for medicines and vaccines.

Adesina’s remarks came as the Bank marked what he called “a decade of delivery,” particularly in agriculture, food security, and energy access—three areas where the AfDB says it has either mitigated or outright reversed looming crises.

The Bank’s Feed Africa strategy, launched in response to growing food insecurity and exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, reportedly helped 104 million Africans achieve food security. The Bank said its interventions also gave 13 million farmers access to improved agricultural technologies across the continent.

When the war in Ukraine triggered fears of a food crisis due to blocked exports of wheat, maize, and oilseeds, the AfDB moved swiftly with a $1.5 billion emergency food production facility. According to Adesina, the facility exceeded expectations.

He said in just two years, our support allowed 14 million farmers across 30 countries to have access to improved seeds and fertilizers. This led to the production of 44 million tons of food—116% above the target—worth $17.3 billion.

Ethiopia’s Wheat Revolution and a $72 Billion Food Pledge

One standout example is Ethiopia, which expanded its heat-tolerant wheat-producing areas from just 5,000 hectares in 2018 to more than 650,000 hectares by 2023. The result: self-sufficiency in wheat within four years—a feat that was once seen as far-fetched in a region traditionally reliant on imports.

The momentum gained from such successes was evident at the Feed Africa Summit in Dakar, where over 30 African leaders signed the Food and Agriculture Delivery Compacts. The summit mobilized a staggering $72 billion in global pledges to back national food security agendas, which were later endorsed by the African Union.

Energy Access Push Gains Steam

Buoyed by gains in agriculture, the AfDB is now turning its attention to another foundational issue—energy. In partnership with the World Bank, the Bank launched Mission 300, an ambitious drive to connect 300 million people to electricity by 2030.

This culminated in the Africa Energy Summit in Dar es Salaam, co-chaired by Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan, where more than 48 African countries endorsed the Dar es Salaam Declaration on Energy Access.

“Leaders at the summit unanimously endorsed the Dar es Salaam Declaration on Energy Access, with the full support of the African Union,’’ Adesina said.

The Declaration reflects a rare continent-wide consensus to accelerate energy delivery through a combination of national policy shifts, regional electricity grid interconnections, and increased investment in renewables and transmission infrastructure. The Bank reported that $55 billion has already been mobilized to support these efforts.

A Coordinated Future

Adesina’s report card paints a picture of an institution not merely reacting to crises but proactively reshaping the African development narrative—from health and food to energy. The Bank is banking on high-level coordination and massive financial commitments to drive systemic changes across sectors.

With the launch of the African Pharmaceutical Technology Foundation, a major step has been taken to change how the continent responds to health emergencies—ending dependence on imported vaccines and treatments that became painfully evident during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The broader investment push underlines a coordinated, long-haul approach by the AfDB to ensure that Africa’s economic growth is not only resilient but also anchored in self-reliance and innovation.