DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 140

Risevest Achieves Regulatory Milestone with Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Fund Manager Licence

0

Risevest, a digital investment platform that helps individuals build long-term wealth by giving them access to global investment opportunities, has secured a Fund & Portfolio Manager licence from the Nigeria’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

The new licence obtained through its subsidiary, RV Fund Management Limited brings Risevest’s operations under the capital market’s regulatory framework.

Announcing this milestone, the company’s founder and CEO Eke Urum said,

“This approval reflects months of rigorous review and engagement. We’re grateful to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the critical work they do in safeguarding Nigeria’s financial system and maintaining standards that protect investors. Strong regulation builds strong markets, and strong markets build lasting wealth”.

Risevest Fund & Portfolio Manager licence marks a big win for the fintech after it faced scrutiny from SEC, advising Nigerians not to invest in the platform.

Recall that in January 2025, The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a strong warning to Nigerians against investing in Risevest and several other platforms, citing unauthorization to operate in the country’s capital market.

It was observed that SEC’s warning occurred amid intensified adverts by Risevest on radios, billboards, and social media, encouraging Nigerians to invest on the platform.

At the time, Risevest said its Nigerian investment activities were safeguarded through a trusteeship arrangement with Meristem Trustees Limited, an SEC-licensed trustee.

The company now joins a growing list of other SEC-licenced fintechs operating in Nigeria, including Bamboo and Trove, which acquired an SEC-licenced broker-dealer in January. “It has always been our goal to operate at the highest level of global compliance,” Urum noted.

Founded in 2019 by Eke Urum, Bosun Olanrewaju, and Tony Odiba, Risevest presents itself as a digital wealth manager and investment platform tailored especially for Nigerians and other Africans who want exposure to global assets without the complexities of direct trading on foreign exchanges.

In an era where access to international financial markets has traditionally been limited for many Africans, Risevest has emerged as a compelling fintech solution that aims to democratize investment opportunities and help users build long-term wealth beyond local borders

At its core, Risevest isn’t a typical brokerage where users pick and trade individual securities themselves. Instead, it functions as a managed investment service, curating portfolios of assets and deploying users’ funds on their behalf based on selected plans and goals.

In addition to Nigerian regulation, Risevest is registered in Delaware, USA, and partners with SEC-licensed entities to hold and manage client assets, adding layers of compliance and transparency.

By bridging the gap between Nigerian investors and global markets, the fintech has carved out a niche as a gateway to diversified, dollar-based investing. Its managed portfolios, low barriers to entry, and mobile-first experience make it an attractive option for those looking to grow their financial future beyond local opportunities.

The company’s mission is to connect users to the best wealth creating opportunities in the world, with a goal to help them create wealth and achieve their financial goals.

Outlook

Risevest’s newly secured regulatory status is expected to enhance investor confidence, expand institutional partnerships, and support product innovation within Nigeria’s evolving digital investment landscape.

As regulatory clarity improves across the fintech sector, the platform is well positioned to deepen its role in advancing financial inclusion and global market participation for African investors.

Looking ahead, the company’s strengthened compliance framework could enable broader service offerings, increased capital market integration, and accelerated adoption among retail investors seeking structured pathways to long-term wealth creation.

Peak XV Returns $7bn to Investors, Targets AI and Fintech in Next Capital Deployment

0

Peak XV says it has returned more than $7 billion to investors and backed 35 IPOs, as it positions new capital toward AI, fintech, and consumer startups amid deepening U.S.–India tech ties.


Peak XV Partners has returned more than $7 billion in cash to investors since inception and backed 35 companies that have gone public, according to managing partner Shailendra Singh.

The development underscores the firm’s track record as it prepares to deploy fresh capital across Asia’s startup ecosystem.

According to TechCrunch, Singh declined to provide a breakdown of distributions since the firm’s high-profile split from Sequoia Capital, which formally separated the India and Southeast Asia operations into an independent entity. However, in September 2024, TechCrunch reported that Peak XV had returned roughly $1.2 billion to investors within that year alone.

The returns figure comes at a time when venture capital firms globally are under pressure to demonstrate liquidity amid a prolonged slowdown in IPO markets and exit activity. By highlighting cumulative cash distributions and public listings, Peak XV appears intent on reinforcing investor confidence ahead of further fundraising and capital deployment.

Fund Discipline After Sequoia Split

Ahead of the current raise, Peak XV’s prior flagship fund closed at $2.85 billion in late 2021, when it was still operating under the Sequoia brand umbrella. That fund size was subsequently reduced to approximately $2.4 billion. Singh described the reduction as part of a “disciplined approach to capital,” reflecting a recalibration after the exuberant valuations of the 2021 venture boom gave way to tighter liquidity and investor scrutiny.

The earlier pool also included Peak XV’s India growth strategy. Singh said the firm does not plan to raise a new dedicated growth fund until more of that dry powder has been deployed. The approach suggests a focus on pacing investments carefully, preserving flexibility, and avoiding capital overhang at a time when late-stage financing remains selective.

The disciplined resizing of the fund contrasts with the expansionary posture many venture firms adopted during the peak of the funding cycle. Industry observers note that by trimming commitments and pacing deployments, Peak XV may be attempting to protect returns and manage risk in a more volatile macroeconomic environment.

AI, Fintech, and Consumer Focus

Looking ahead, Singh expects the new capital to flow primarily into artificial intelligence, fintech, and consumer technology startups. The firm has already made more than 80 investments in AI-focused companies, positioning itself as an early and active backer of the generative AI wave sweeping global markets.

AI investments span infrastructure tools, model development, enterprise applications, and sector-specific solutions. Venture firms globally have intensified their exposure to AI startups, viewing the technology as a horizontal enabler capable of reshaping software, financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing.

Fintech remains another core focus, particularly in India and Southeast Asia, where digital payments, embedded finance, and credit access continue to expand. Consumer startups, especially those leveraging digital distribution and AI-driven personalization, are also seen as high-growth opportunities in markets with rising internet penetration and mobile-first adoption.

Singh added that deep tech — encompassing areas such as advanced hardware, semiconductors, space technology, and scientific computing — is emerging as an additional opportunity set. While deep tech typically involves longer gestation periods and higher capital intensity, venture firms increasingly view it as a strategic frontier aligned with national industrial ambitions.

U.S.–India Corridor Gains Importance

Singh highlighted the growing importance of U.S.–India ties, noting that more founders in the region are building products for global markets rather than purely domestic audiences. The cross-border technology corridor has strengthened as Indian startups expand into the United States and global investors deepen exposure to India’s innovation ecosystem.

This dynamic is particularly visible in AI and enterprise software, where Indian-founded companies often target international customers from inception. Access to U.S. capital markets, global enterprise clients, and research partnerships has become a critical component of scaling.

For Peak XV, the positioning reflects a broader shift in India’s startup ecosystem — from a largely domestic growth story to a globally integrated innovation hub. As geopolitical tensions reshape supply chains and technology partnerships, India’s role as an alternative manufacturing base and software development powerhouse has gained strategic relevance.

Exit Environment and Liquidity

The claim of $7 billion in cumulative cash returns is notable against the backdrop of subdued exit markets. Global IPO activity has remained uneven, with investors demanding clearer profitability pathways and stronger governance standards. That 35 portfolio companies have reached public markets suggests a degree of maturation within Peak XV’s portfolio.

Still, the venture landscape remains bifurcated. While AI and high-growth technology startups attract premium valuations, other sectors face funding constraints and down rounds. Peak XV appears to be aligning its deployment strategy with areas where capital remains abundant and exit prospects comparatively stronger by concentrating on AI, fintech, and consumer segments.

As it moves into its next investment cycle, Peak XV’s emphasis on disciplined capital management, selective growth funding, and cross-border expansion denotes a cautious but opportunistic posture. In a venture market defined by both exuberance in AI and restraint elsewhere, the firm is seeking to balance liquidity track record with forward-looking bets on transformative technologies.

South Korean Prosecutors Recovered Approximately 320.88 Bitcoin

5

South Korean prosecutors from the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office recovered approximately 320.88 Bitcoin (BTC)—valued at around $21-21.4 million at the time—after an unknown hacker voluntarily returned the stolen funds.

The Bitcoin was stolen in August 2025 when investigators accidentally entered their wallet recovery seed phrases or sensitive credentials into a phishing website during an ongoing probe. The funds were seized cryptocurrency from a prior raid; linked to a gambling platform investigation.

Prosecutors only noticed the disappearance during a routine check in late 2025 around December/January. On or around February 17, 2026, the hacker transferred the full amount (320.8+ BTC) back to an official wallet controlled by the authorities. The funds were then moved to a secure wallet at a domestic cryptocurrency exchange for safekeeping.

Authorities quickly tracked the stolen wallet’s activity and coordinated with centralized exchanges to freeze or block transactions linked to those funds. This made it extremely difficult or impossible for the hacker to liquidate or move the Bitcoin without detection, reportedly pressuring them to return it rather than risk permanent loss or further tracing.

No arrests have been made, and the hacker’s identity remains unknown. Prosecutors continue their investigation, but the full recovery is being hailed as an unusual and positive outcome in a crypto theft case.

This incident highlights ongoing challenges with secure handling of seized crypto assets by law enforcement, but also shows how blockchain transparency and rapid exchange cooperation can limit a thief’s options.

The return of 320.88 BTC ($21–21.4 million) by an unidentified hacker to South Korean prosecutors is an exceptionally rare event in cryptocurrency theft history. Most stolen crypto is laundered, mixed, or spent rather than voluntarily returned, making this case stand out with several key implications across security, law enforcement, regulation, and the broader crypto ecosystem.

The primary reason cited for the return is that prosecutors quickly coordinated with domestic and international centralized exchanges to freeze transactions linked to the stolen wallet addresses. This made it nearly impossible for the hacker to cash out or launder the funds without triggering alerts, KYC flags, or permanent blacklisting.

Large-scale thefts are becoming harder to profit from. Criminals face a stark choice: hold unusable (“tainted”) assets indefinitely or return them to avoid total loss. This shifts the economics of crypto crime toward lower expected returns, potentially deterring future opportunistic attacks especially non-state actors.

The original theft stemmed from investigators accidentally entering sensitive credentials (seed phrases or recovery info) into a phishing site during an ongoing probe—classic social engineering, not a sophisticated exploit. This follows other recent South Korean incidents, like separate police losses of seized BTC from “secure” wallets.

Even government/law enforcement agencies handling seized crypto remain highly vulnerable to basic phishing and operational security (OpSec) failures. It underscores the urgent need for: Multi-party computation (MPC) wallets. Hardware security modules (HSMs). Strict air-gapped processes. Mandatory phishing-resistant training and verification protocols.

Crypto’s irreversibility cuts both ways—once compromised, recovery is rare without external pressure like this case. No arrests have occurred, and the hacker’s identity is still unknown—yet the full amount was recovered.

This contrasts with typical outcomes where funds are lost forever or recovered only after lengthy blockchain analysis and legal pressure. It shows that proactive freezing/blocking can force voluntary surrender in some scenarios, offering a blueprint for other jurisdictions.

However, it also highlights limitations: without identifying the perpetrator, deterrence remains incomplete, and similar attacks could recur if the root cause (poor handling procedures) isn’t fixed. The funds never hit open markets (they moved directly back to authorities ? secure exchange wallet), so no selling pressure or volatility spike occurred.

Reinforces the narrative that improved tracing, freezing mechanisms, and institutional adoption of analytics tools like Chainalysis, Elliptic are squeezing cybercriminals. In a year with record-high thefts often linked to state actors like North Korea’s Lazarus Group stealing billions, this small but complete recovery is a counter-example that shows defensive progress is possible.

The case arrives amid heightened scrutiny of crypto custody practices, following incidents like major exchange errors and other police wallet compromises. It may accelerate calls for stricter guidelines on how South Korean authorities and exchanges handle seized digital assets. Expect renewed focus on: Standardized custody protocols, independent audits and possibly new legislation to prevent similar lapses

It also fuels ongoing debates about balancing crypto’s pseudonymity with the ability of authorities/exchanges to intervene in illicit flows. While embarrassing for the prosecutors, the outcome is a net win: full recovery of public funds, zero market disruption, and a demonstration that coordinated, rapid response can sometimes turn theft into restitution.

It doesn’t eliminate crypto crime risks, but it narrows the window for profitable exploitation—especially for smaller, non-state hackers. The investigation continues, so more details or an eventual arrest could emerge.

Nvidia Close to Finalizing a $30B Equity Investment in OpenAI 

0

NVIDIA is close to finalizing a $30 billion equity investment in OpenAI, which effectively replaces or scales back from a previously announced larger commitment involving up to $100 billion.

Background on the Original Deal

In September 2025, NVIDIA and OpenAI announced a strategic partnership; framed as a memorandum of understanding or letter of intent to deploy at least 10 gigawatts of NVIDIA-powered AI infrastructure involving millions of GPUs, starting with the Vera Rubin platform in late 2026.

As part of this, NVIDIA committed to invest up to $100 billion progressively to support OpenAI’s purchases and deployment of its chips in data centers. This was tied to milestones, with an initial tranche planned once definitive agreements were reached.

However, that multiyear investment framework proved more complex and took longer than expected to finalize, and it appears to have stalled or been abandoned in its original form.

The New Arrangement

NVIDIA is now shifting to a direct $30 billion equity stake in OpenAI (no milestones or deployment contingencies attached). This forms part of OpenAI’s massive ongoing funding round, which aims to raise more than $100 billion overall and values the company at around $730 billion pre-money or up to ~$830 billion in some reports, post-money estimates vary.

OpenAI plans to reinvest much of the new capital into NVIDIA hardware anyway, so the partnership for GPU supply remains strong, but the structure changes from a conditional infrastructure investment to straight equity ownership.

This move allows NVIDIA led by Jensen Huang to gain ownership in a key customer, while reducing the capital commitment and risk compared to the original $100 billion plan. The shift was first prominently reported by the Financial Times.

NVIDIA has declined to comment directly, but sources describe it as a strategic pivot toward taking a stakeholder position rather than just an “arms dealer” supplying chips. This reflects the intense capital needs of frontier AI development—OpenAI’s valuation and fundraising scale are staggering—and ongoing close ties between the two companies despite the scaled-back investment vehicle.

The shift from NVIDIA’s originally announced up to $100 billion multi-year infrastructure investment commitment to a streamlined $30 billion direct equity stake in OpenAI carries several significant implications across strategy, finance, market dynamics, and the broader AI ecosystem.

The original $100B plan involved conditional, milestone-tied funding for massive data center builds. This exposed NVIDIA to execution risks like delays, cost overruns, power constraints, and regulatory hurdles in physical infrastructure.

The new $30B equity investment is a straightforward cash-for-shares deal with no such contingencies, reducing balance-sheet strain and direct operational exposure while still securing a meaningful ownership position in a top customer. NVIDIA gains equity in one of the highest-valued private AI companies ~$730B pre-money / up to ~$830B post-money in the ongoing round, potentially benefiting from OpenAI’s future growth, valuation appreciation, or eventual liquidity events.

At the same time, OpenAI plans to reinvest much of the fresh capital into NVIDIA hardware anyway—maintaining strong GPU demand and reinforcing NVIDIA’s “arms dealer + stakeholder” role in AI. Bullish long-term signal for investors: Analysts view this as strategically positive for NVIDIA stock, trimming risk while locking in a gigantic customer relationship.

It addresses earlier market concerns from January 2026 reports of the deal being “on ice” that had pressured AI/tech stocks. Short-term volatility is possible, but the pivot underscores confidence in sustained AI capex without overcommitting capital.

The $30B from NVIDIA forms a key part of a blockbuster fundraising round targeting > $100B total, providing runway for frontier model training, compute scaling, talent, and operations. Unlike the milestone-dependent original structure, this equity comes without deployment hurdles, accelerating OpenAI’s roadmap under Sam Altman.

OpenAI remains a “gigantic customer” for NVIDIA GPUs (potentially millions more units), ensuring access to cutting-edge hardware amid competition from AMD, custom chips from hyperscalers, or in-house efforts. At ~$730-830B, this round cements OpenAI’s status as a mega-cap private entity, signaling investor belief in its path to AGI-level capabilities despite enormous cash burn.

The deal exemplifies tightening ties among AI leaders—chip suppliers (NVIDIA), model developers (OpenAI), cloud providers (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon), and investors (SoftBank, others). This creates a more integrated (some say “circular”) financing loop: investors fund OpenAI ? OpenAI buys NVIDIA chips ? NVIDIA profits and reinvests ? repeat.

Critics highlight bubble risks if growth expectations falter or if returns don’t materialize. Even the scaled-back version shows frontier AI requires staggering funding. OpenAI’s round potentially >$100B and ongoing chip purchases underscore that infrastructure spend isn’t slowing—it’s evolving in structure for efficiency.

The pivot eases earlier overhangs that weighed on AI stocks. It may stabilize or boost sentiment around NVIDIA and the sector, while highlighting how megadeals are being restructured amid complexity. This isn’t a retreat from the AI boom—it’s a pragmatic recalibration.

NVIDIA secures strategic ownership and demand with less risk; OpenAI gets faster, cleaner capital to fuel its ambitions; and the ecosystem demonstrates resilience in adapting massive commitments to real-world execution challenges. The partnership remains rock-solid, just in a more shareholder-friendly form.

CME Group to Launch 24/7 Trading for Regulated Crypto Futures and Options 

0

CME Group, the world’s leading derivatives marketplace officially confirmed it will launch 24/7 trading for its regulated cryptocurrency futures and options, starting May 29, 2026 pending final regulatory review and approval.

Trading will occur continuously on the CME Globex platform. It begins at 4:00 p.m. CT (Central Time) on Friday, May 29 — equivalent to 5:00 p.m. ET or 10:00 p.m. UTC, depending on daylight saving adjustments. There will be at least a two-hour weekly maintenance period over the weekend to allow for system upkeep.

Weekend and holiday trades from Friday evening through Sunday evening will carry the trade date of the following business day, with clearing, settlement, and regulatory reporting handled accordingly on that next business day.

This move aligns CME’s crypto derivatives more closely with the always-on nature of spot cryptocurrency markets like Bitcoin and Ethereum trading on exchanges that never close. Currently, CME’s crypto products including Bitcoin, Ether, and newer ones like Solana, XRP, Cardano, Chainlink, and Stellar have more limited hours, typically around 23 hours per day with daily breaks.

The decision comes amid strong institutional demand: CME reported record volumes in its crypto suite, including $3 trillion in notional volume across 2025, showing growing interest in regulated tools for hedging and exposure to digital assets. This is covered directly in CME’s official press release and echoed across major crypto/finance outlets.

If approved without issues, it could further bridge traditional finance (TradFi) and crypto by giving institutions more flexible, round-the-clock risk management options. The CME Group’s decision to launch 24/7 trading for its regulated cryptocurrency futures and options starting May 29, 2026 represents a significant evolution in bridging traditional finance (TradFi) with the always-on crypto ecosystem.

This builds on record-breaking activity: $3 trillion in notional volume across 2025 and strong 2026 momentum; average daily volume up 46% year-over-year to ~407,200 contracts, with open interest also rising. Institutions can now react to news, events, or price moves at any time including weekends and holidays, eliminating overnight/weekend risk buildup that previously existed due to limited CME hours ~23 hours/day with breaks.

Reduced basis risk — Better alignment between CME derivatives and 24/7 spot crypto markets on exchanges like Binance or Coinbase minimizes discrepancies and improves hedging efficiency. This caters to surging demand from banks, asset managers, hedge funds, and corporates.

Experts view it as a structural shift toward treating crypto as a mature asset class with sophisticated, regulated tools—further integrating it into portfolios. Round-the-clock access on a major regulated platform like CME Globex should attract more participants, tightening spreads and increasing depth, especially in futures/options for Bitcoin, Ether, Solana, XRP, and others.

More efficient price discovery — Continuous trading reduces gaps from weekend spot moves not reflected in derivatives until Monday, leading to smoother convergence. Potential for reduced volatility in some scenarios — Better real-time risk management could dampen extreme swings, though high-frequency trading (HFT) and algorithmic activity might introduce new short-term volatility.

The infamous Bitcoin “CME gap” (price discrepancies from weekend spot moves vs. closed futures) effectively ends post-launch, as trading becomes continuous. This removes a predictable pattern some traders exploited or feared. Stronger institutional participation often stabilizes prices long-term and signals maturity, potentially boosting confidence and inflows via ETFs or direct exposure.

Mixed views on control — Some critics argue it enables greater Wall Street influence via cash-settled contracts allowing “paper” shorts without owning underlying assets, potentially leading to more manipulation or suppression tactics seen in commodities like gold/silver.

Others see it as validation that crypto’s nonstop model is winning out, with TradFi adapting rather than resisting. Signal of crypto maturation — Amid record volumes and new listings like Cardano, Chainlink, Stellar futures, this reinforces regulated derivatives as a gateway for mainstream capital.

Precedent for other markets — It parallels discussions around 24/7 stock trading on Wall Street, showing crypto leading the push toward always-on global finance. Early commentary ranges from bullish (“Wall Street copying crypto”) to cautious (“institutional capture”), but no immediate massive price surge noted—focus remains on long-term structural benefits.

This is widely seen as bullish for long-term adoption and legitimacy, especially among institutions seeking reliable, CFTC-regulated tools in a volatile space. It doesn’t change crypto’s decentralized core but further embeds it within global financial infrastructure. If volumes continue climbing post-launch, expect even tighter integration between spot and derivatives markets.