DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 15

Coinbase Completes Solana DEX Integration As Coinbase Releases Post-Quantum Roadmap

0

Coinbase has fully rolled out its integration with the Solana blockchain, enabling users to trade millions of Solana-based tokens directly within the Coinbase app via its built-in decentralized exchange (DEX) functionality.

This doesn’t require official centralized listings on Coinbase’s exchange—instead, it leverages Solana’s leading DEX aggregator, Jupiter, to handle routing and execution across various Solana DEXs for seamless swaps. Tokens become tradable almost immediately after launching on Solana (or Base), with no extra setup needed for projects.

The integration expands access to a massive number of tokens often cited in the millions and taps into Solana’s high-speed, low-cost ecosystem. It’s live for users in supported regions like the US excluding New York in some reports and Brazil, with phased global rollout.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong highlighted the completion reaching “100%”, emphasizing faster trading, broader token access, and improved user experience. This move positions Coinbase more as an “everything app” for crypto, bridging custodial services with on-chain DeFi trading and boosting Solana’s visibility among mainstream users.

Coinbase Releases Post-Quantum Roadmap

Coinbase has outlined and is actively advancing a comprehensive post-quantum security roadmap to prepare for potential threats from quantum computing, which could eventually break current cryptographic algorithms used in blockchains.

A major recent step includes establishing an independent Advisory Board on Quantum Computing and Blockchain, featuring experts from academia and industry like affiliations with Stanford and UT Austin. The board will: Assess quantum risks to blockchain systems.

Publish position papers and security recommendations. Support real-time responses to quantum advances. The first position paper on quantum risk assessment and a resilience roadmap is expected early in 2026.

Broader elements of the roadmap include: Immediate product enhancements, such as updates to Bitcoin address handling to improve quantum resistance. Long-term cryptographic research, focusing on adopting post-quantum signature schemes e.g., lattice-based like ML-DSA.

Ongoing efforts to mitigate risks to assets like Bitcoin without hype-driven panic. This proactive stance addresses growing concerns in the crypto space about quantum threats, aiming to future-proof user funds and infrastructure.

Coinbase has also released related research insights on the quantum threat to Bitcoin and mitigation strategies. ML-DSA (Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm) is the standardized name for what was originally known as CRYSTALS-Dilithium.

It is a post-quantum digital signature scheme selected and finalized by NIST in FIPS 204. It provides strong security against both classical and quantum attacks, based on the hardness of lattice problems — specifically, the Module Learning With Errors (MLWE) problem and a variant called SelfTargetMSIS (a nonstandard Module Short Integer Solution problem).

ML-DSA operates over the polynomial ring Rq=Zq[X]/(X256+1)R_q = \mathbb{Z}_q[X] / (X^{256} + 1)R_q = \mathbb{Z}_q[X] / (X^{256} + 1), where q=8380417q = 8380417q = 8380417 (a prime), and uses the Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) for efficient polynomial multiplication.

All coefficients are integers modulo ( q ), and the scheme employs rejection sampling, hint-based compression, and pseudorandom expansion from seeds via SHAKE-256 XOF. Parameter SetsML-DSA defines three parameter sets, each targeting different NIST security strength categories roughly corresponding to classical security bits and quantum resistance.

These parameters balance security, key/signature sizes, and performance (higher parameters increase sizes but provide more security margin). Signatures are larger than classical schemes like ECDSA (64–72 bytes) or Ed25519 (64 bytes), but signing and verification are efficient (often comparable or faster in optimized implementations, especially with AVX2).

Signing (Sign); Uses Fiat-Shamir with aborts (rejection sampling) for zero-knowledge:Derive message hash ? = H(H(pk) || M). Derive per-signature randomness ?” from K, randomness, ?. Loop (rejection sampling): Sample masking y ? [-??+1, ??]^? from ?”. Compute w = A y ? decompose to high bits w?. Hash ? || Encode(w?) ? challenge polynomial c (sparse, exactly ? ±1 coeffs via SampleInBall). Compute response z = y + c s?. Check bounds: ?z?_? < ?? – ?, low bits of w – c s? within bounds, hint h = MakeHint(…) has ? ? 1’s. If any fail ? retry with new ?. Signature ? = Encode(Encode(c) || z mod ±q || h).

Provable security in the quantum random oracle model (EUF-CMA / SUF-CMA). Hedged signing using fresh randomness is recommended to resist side-channels; deterministic mode exists but is riskier.

ML-DSA is designed as a direct drop-in replacement for ECDSA/EdDSA/RSA signatures in protocols needing quantum resistance, though larger sizes require protocol adjustments (e.g., in TLS, certificates). For the full formal spec, algorithms, and proofs, refer to NIST FIPS 204.

EU–India Seal ‘Mother of All Deals’ as Landmark Trade Pact Cuts Tariffs on Over 90% of Goods

0

India and the European Union have concluded a sweeping free trade agreement that will remove or sharply reduce tariffs on more than 90% of goods traded between the two economies, creating what European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described as a free trade zone of nearly two billion people.

The deal, branded “historic” by both sides, comes at a moment of acute global trade tension. New Delhi is under pressure from steep U.S. tariffs on key exports, while the EU is recalibrating its trade relationships amid growing uncertainty in its long-standing economic ties with Washington under President Donald Trump.

Under the agreement, India will lower tariffs on a wide range of European products, including automobiles, machinery, and agricultural goods, while the EU will open its market further to Indian exports such as textiles, apparel, leather goods, marine products, chemicals, plastics, and gems and jewelry. Many of these Indian sectors have been directly hit by recent U.S. tariff hikes of up to 50%, making preferential access to the European market particularly significant.

“We have created a free trade zone of 2 billion people, with both sides set to gain economically,” von der Leyen said, adding that the agreement sends “a signal to the world that rules-based cooperation still delivers great outcomes.”

India’s Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said the deal is expected to come into force in 2026, following ratification processes on both sides.

While India is only the EU’s ninth-largest trading partner—accounting for 2.4% of the bloc’s total goods trade in 2024—the EU is one of India’s most important commercial partners, alongside the U.S. and China. In financial year 2025, bilateral trade in goods between India and the EU reached 11.5 trillion rupees ($136.54 billion), with Indian exports at $75.85 billion and imports at $60.68 billion, according to India’s commerce ministry.

At the heart of the agreement are deep tariff concessions. The European Commission estimates that India will cut tariffs on European goods by around €4 billion ($4.7 billion) annually. More than 90% of EU exports to India—covering automobiles, machinery, chemicals, aircraft, and agri-food products—will face lower duties. Brussels said India has granted the EU tariff reductions that exceed those offered to any of its other trading partners.

One of the most striking elements of the deal is India’s willingness to ease protection in politically sensitive sectors. Tariffs on European cars will be reduced gradually from as high as 110% to 10%, while duties on car parts will be abolished over a period of five to ten years. European automakers with a presence in India include Renault, Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz.

India has also moved to nearly eliminate tariffs of up to 44% on machinery, 22% on chemicals, and 11% on pharmaceuticals. On agriculture, high duties on European exports such as wine, olive oil, spirits, and confectionery will be reduced or removed, giving EU producers preferential access to India’s fast-growing consumer market. At the same time, sensitive European agricultural sectors—beef, chicken meat, rice, and sugar—will remain protected from Indian imports.

Christophe Hansen, the EU’s commissioner for agriculture and food, said European wines, spirits, beers, and olive oil would enjoy preferential access to India under the agreement, calling it a major opportunity for European farmers and food producers.

Markets in India reacted nervously. Shares of major automakers fell on concerns about increased competition from European brands. Maruti Suzuki ended the day 1.5% lower, Hyundai Motor India closed down 3.6%, while Tata Motors and Mahindra & Mahindra fell 1.3% and 4.2%, respectively. Stocks of Indian alcoholic beverage companies also dropped, with Sula Vineyards sliding 4.1% and shares of United Breweries and United Spirits falling by more than 2%.

The Indian government sought to reassure investors, saying consumers would benefit from access to high-tech vehicles and greater competition, while Indian-made automobiles could also gain improved access to the EU market under reciprocal provisions.

But the gains could be substantial for India’s export sectors. Once the agreement takes effect, textiles, apparel, marine products, leather, footwear, chemicals, plastics, sports goods, toys, and gems and jewelry will face zero duties in the EU. These labor-intensive sectors account for about $33 billion in exports and were previously subject to EU tariffs ranging from 4% to 26%.

“This should boost India’s export competitiveness in these sectors, which are currently under strain due to higher U.S. tariffs,” said Sonal Varma, chief economist for India and Asia ex-Japan at Nomura.

The deal also carries major employment implications. Goyal said the agreement could generate six to seven million jobs in India’s textile sector alone, which is the country’s second-largest employer after agriculture. Beyond goods, the pact includes provisions allowing temporary entry and stay for professionals such as business visitors, intra-corporate transferees, contractual service suppliers, and independent professionals.

Analysts say India’s IT services, professional services, and education sectors are particularly well-positioned to benefit from these mobility clauses.

Geopolitically, the agreement is being closely watched in Washington. It is widely seen as a strategic hedge by both New Delhi and Brussels against increasingly unpredictable U.S. trade policy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has already criticized the EU for pushing ahead with the deal, pointing out that Washington imposed 25% tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil, only for Europe to deepen trade ties with New Delhi.

President Trump has yet to comment publicly on the EU–India agreement, but the White House is unlikely to welcome a pact that reduces U.S. leverage over two major economic partners. India’s Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, however, struck a conciliatory tone, saying he expects U.S.–India relations to remain strong and expressing confidence that a bilateral trade deal with Washington would eventually be completed.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has praised the “landmark” agreement, echoing von der Leyen’s description of it as the “mother of all deals.” Both leaders are expected to highlight the pact at an EU–India summit, presenting it as a statement of commitment to open markets and multilateral trade at a time when global commerce is being reshaped by tariffs, geopolitics, and strategic rivalry.

With the ink barely dry, attention is now shifting from celebration to implementation—and to how the United States responds to a deal that signals India and Europe’s determination to diversify trade ties in an increasingly fragmented global economy.

Canada Stated it has No Plans for Free Trade Agreement with China

0

Recent developments involve a limited, sector-specific trade agreement or preliminary deal between Canada and China, and Canada has explicitly stated it has no intention of negotiating a broader free trade pact.

Earlier in January 2026, Canada and China reached a deal that reduces tariffs in specific areas. This includes Canada lowering tariffs on a quota of about 49,000 Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) to around 6% removing a previous 100% surtax, alongside Chinese concessions like reduced tariffs on Canadian canola and visa-free travel for Canadians.

This is not a full free trade agreement (FTA) but a targeted tariff-reduction pact. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose 100% tariffs on all Canadian goods entering the U.S. if Canada proceeds with or makes any significant “deal with China.”

This appears tied to concerns over China gaining indirect access to the U.S. market through Canada, potentially undermining U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods similar to past USMCA/CUSMA tensions.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney stated clearly on January 25-26, 2026, that Canada has “no intention” of pursuing a free trade deal with China. He described the recent agreement as limited and not a broad FTA, emphasizing it’s consistent with existing trade frameworks like the USMCA (formerly NAFTA).

This came directly in response to Trump’s threats, effectively ruling out escalation to a full FTA. Canada isn’t abandoning an existing or imminent full FTA because one wasn’t on the table. They’re clarifying no such pursuit exists, likely to de-escalate U.S. tariff risks.

This reflects ongoing trade tensions in North America, with Trump using tariff leverage to influence allies’ dealings with China.

Canada had imposed a 100% surtax (additional duty) on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs), on top of the standard most-favoured-nation (MFN) tariff rate. This effectively made the total duty around 106.1% or higher in practice, mirroring or aligning with U.S. measures to restrict Chinese EV imports.

New arrangement

Under the preliminary agreement, Canada will allow a limited quota of Chinese EVs to enter at a significantly reduced rate:Annual quota: Up to 49,000 Chinese-made EVs initially some reports note this quota may increase over time, but 49,000 is the starting cap mentioned.

Tariff rate within quota: Reduced to the standard MFN rate of 6.1% essentially removing the 100% surtax for these units. Vehicles exceeding the quota would likely still face the higher tariffs/surtax, though specifics on over-quota treatment aren’t detailed in public announcements.

This change makes select Chinese EVs like models from BYD, NIO, or others like the Lotus Eletre produced in China much more price-competitive in Canada, potentially cutting landed costs by nearly half in some cases due to the tariff slash.

The EV provision is part of a broader, limited trade reset that includes reciprocal concessions from China, such as: Lowering tariffs on Canadian canola seed to a combined rate of approximately 15% by March 1, 2026 down from previous retaliatory rates around 84% or higher.

Expected visa-free travel for Canadian citizens to China. This is not a comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA) but a targeted, sector-specific deal focused on EVs, agri-food like canola, energy, and people-to-people ties.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has reiterated that Canada has no intention of pursuing a full FTA with China, especially amid U.S. President Trump’s threats of 100% tariffs on all Canadian goods if deeper ties proceed.

The deal aims to reset strained Canada-China relations stemming from past disputes over tariffs, Huawei, and more while staying within existing frameworks like the USMCA to minimize U.S. backlash. Implementation details like exact quota allocation, eligible models, or timelines beyond the initial cap may evolve through further negotiations.

Market Pauses on SOL and SHIB While ZKP Pushes 190M Tokens Into Circulation Every 24 Hours

0
zkp

Crypto markets are entering a measured phase where follow-through has been limited, and conviction remains selective. Recent Solana price prediction discussions have cooled as SOL trades near key support after a volatile start to the month. Meanwhilem Shiba Inu price prediction chatter reflects a similar slowdown as SHIB consolidates below recent highs. Instead of sharp moves, price action across large-cap names has compressed.

In this environment, the conversation around the best crypto to buy is shifting. Rather than reacting to intraday candles, some participants are examining how projects structure access, distribution, and participation during quieter market phases.

That change in focus has brought renewed attention to Zero Knowledge Proof (ZKP), which is advancing a daily, on-chain distribution model that contrasts with the current hesitation seen in SOL and SHIB.

Solana Holds Key Ground as Activity Metrics Stay Elevated

Solana’s recent pullback has refocused attention on structural levels rather than momentum. SOL has hovered near the $130 zone, a level many traders now see as pivotal in Solana price prediction models. A hold above this area has historically supported recovery attempts, while a break would likely weaken near-term confidence.

Beyond price, network metrics remain notable. Roughly 70% of the circulating SOL supply is currently locked to support network operations, representing close to $60 billion in value. This has reduced liquid supply and strengthened network security, even as short-term price action remains cautious. Analysts also point to stabilization signals from trend indicators that often precede either consolidation or a directional move.

For now, Solana sits in a wait-and-see phase. While long-term projections remain ambitious, near-term Solana price prediction frameworks emphasize support defense and volume confirmation before any sustained upside can be considered. This pause has left room for alternative narratives to gain traction.

Shiba Inu Trades Defensively as Leverage & Flows Cool

Shiba Inu has also shifted into a more defensive posture following its early-January advance. SHIB is trading near $0.00000793, down from the $0.00001008 peak that marked the top of its recent rally. From a Shiba Inu price prediction perspective, this move has placed the token back below mid-range Fibonacci levels, forcing buyers to defend nearby support.

Derivatives data reflect this caution. Open interest, which previously exceeded $500 million during peak speculation, has contracted sharply to around $88.5 million, indicating that leverage has largely unwound. Spot flow data reinforces this tone, with recent readings showing approximately $609,700 in net outflows, suggesting sellers remain active during rebounds.

Technically, the immediate support band between $0.00000793 and $0.00000759 is now critical. A failure there could expose $0.00000682, while a recovery would require a reclaim of $0.00000806 and sustained acceptance above the $0.00000868–$0.00000875 zone. As with SOL, Shiba Inu price prediction discussions currently favor consolidation over acceleration.

ZKP Pushes 190M Tokens Into Circulation Every 24-Hour Cycle

Zero Knowledge Proof is drawing attention for how participation is structured rather than how the price changes day to day. ZKP operates a daily, on-chain presale auction that releases 190 million ZKP every 24 hours through a proportional contribution model. There are no fixed prices, private allocations, or preferential access, and tokens are claimable immediately after each auction window closes.

Alongside this mechanism, ZKP is running a $5 million USD giveaway, with 10 winners receiving $500,000 worth of ZKP each. Entry requirements emphasize engagement: holding ZKP, following official channels, sharing the giveaway, and referrals. For people looking for the best crypto to buy, this time-bound structure and transparent access have become part of the appeal during a low-momentum market.

ZKP is designed as a Substrate-based Layer 1 supporting both EVM and WASM execution. It uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify off-chain computation on-chain, enabling complex workloads to be validated without exposing underlying data. Dedicated hardware devices known as Proof Pods perform these computations and generate proofs.

Proof Pods earn ZKP only when tasks are validated. Rewards are calculated using the previous day’s auction reference price, creating a consistent and transparent payout framework. A level-based model determines earning capacity, with higher levels generating proportionally higher rewards tied directly to verified work.

Transparency is central to the system. Every task, proof, and ZKP reward is verifiable on-chain. Users can monitor task history, real-time compute metrics, daily uptime, rewards by level, and upgrade impact through a personalized dashboard and device interface. This visibility is increasingly cited by participants comparing ZKP with other options when weighing the best crypto to buy in a cautious market.

Why Attention Is Shifting

The contrast between consolidation in established assets and structured participation models is becoming clearer. Solana and Shiba Inu price prediction narratives both point to patience, not momentum. In parallel, ZKP’s defined timelines, daily distribution, and verifiable mechanics offer a different way to engage.

As markets reassess risk and timing, the debate around the best crypto to buy is broadening beyond short-term charts. Instead of chasing breakouts, some participants are focusing on how projects operate during quieter phases. Whether SOL and SHIB eventually resume trend moves or extend consolidation, ZKP’s 200M-per-day structure has positioned it firmly within that evolving conversation.

Website: https://zkp.com/

Auction: https://auction.zkp.com/

X: https://x.com/ZKPofficial

Telegram: https://t.me/ZKPofficial

EU opens fresh probe into X over Grok AI risks, deepens scrutiny under Digital Services Act

0

The European Commission has launched a new formal investigation into X, escalating regulatory pressure on the Elon Musk-owned platform over the deployment of its artificial intelligence tool Grok and the risks it poses to users in the European Union.

In a statement, the Commission said the new probe will examine whether X properly assessed and mitigated the risks linked to the rollout of Grok’s functionalities on its platform in the EU. Regulators are particularly concerned about the dissemination of illegal content, including manipulated sexually explicit images, some of which could amount to child sexual abuse material.

“These risks seem to have materialized, exposing citizens in the EU to serious harm,” the Commission said, signaling that its concerns are no longer theoretical but grounded in observed outcomes on the platform.

As part of the new proceedings, the Commission will assess whether X has complied with its obligations under the Digital Services Act to diligently identify and mitigate systemic risks. These include the spread of illegal content, negative effects linked to gender-based violence, and serious consequences for users’ physical and mental well-being arising from the deployment of Grok’s features.

The investigation will also examine whether X conducted and submitted an ad hoc risk assessment report to the Commission before deploying Grok functionalities that significantly altered the platform’s overall risk profile, as required under EU law.

In parallel, the Commission said it has expanded its existing investigation, opened in December 2023, into X’s compliance with the DSA’s rules governing recommender systems. That extension will focus on whether X properly assessed and mitigated systemic risks associated with its recommendation algorithms, including the impact of its recently announced switch to a Grok-based recommender system.

If the Commission’s findings confirm its preliminary concerns, X could be found in breach of several provisions of the DSA, including Articles 34 and 35, which set out obligations for very large online platforms to assess and reduce systemic risks, and Article 42, which governs reporting and oversight requirements.

The Commission stressed that the opening of formal proceedings does not prejudge the final outcome, but said the investigation will be treated as a priority.

The probe is being conducted in close coordination with Coimisiún na Meán, Ireland’s media regulator, which serves as the Digital Services Coordinator for X as the platform’s EU country of establishment. Under the DSA, the Irish authority will be formally associated with the investigation, reflecting the EU’s cross-border enforcement framework.

As part of its next steps, the Commission said it will continue gathering evidence, including through additional requests for information, interviews, and inspections. It also signaled that interim measures could be imposed if X fails to make meaningful adjustments to its service during the investigation.

The formal proceedings give the Commission broad enforcement powers. These include the ability to issue a non-compliance decision and impose further fines, or to accept commitments offered by X to address the concerns identified. Once proceedings are opened, national regulators in EU member states are relieved of their own enforcement powers in relation to the suspected infringements, centralizing oversight at the EU level.

Grok, developed by X’s AI arm, has been integrated into the platform in multiple ways since 2024, enabling users to generate text and images and to receive contextual information related to posts. As a designated very large online platform under the DSA, X is subject to the bloc’s strictest obligations, including the duty to assess and mitigate risks related to illegal content and threats to fundamental rights, particularly those affecting minors.

The new investigation builds on a wider enforcement action that has already seen X penalized under the DSA. On 5 December 2025, the Commission adopted a non-compliance decision against the platform, imposing a €120 million fine over deceptive design practices, lack of advertising transparency, and insufficient data access for researchers. The broader December 2023 proceedings also cover X’s notice-and-action mechanisms and its handling of illegal content, including terrorist material.

In September, the Commission sent X a detailed request for information related to Grok, including questions about antisemitic content generated by the Grok account in mid-2025, highlighting growing regulatory unease about the AI tool’s outputs.

European officials have framed the latest move as part of a broader effort to ensure that AI deployment does not come at the expense of fundamental rights.

“Sexual deepfakes of women and children are a violent, unacceptable form of degradation,” said Henna Virkkunen, the Commission’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security, and democracy. “With this investigation, we will determine whether X has met its legal obligations under the DSA, or whether it treated the rights of European citizens — including those of women and children — as collateral damage of its service.”

Under the DSA, individuals who believe they have been harmed by AI-generated content, including non-consensual intimate images or child sexual abuse material, have the right to lodge complaints with their national Digital Services Coordinator. Support services are also available at the national level for victims of such content.

The case is shaping up as one of the EU’s most significant tests yet of how far the bloc is willing to go in enforcing its landmark digital rulebook against AI-driven features on major platforms, and it could set a precedent for how generative AI systems are governed across Europe.