DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 1554

High-Risk and Low-Risk Investments: Which One is Best for You?

0

Investment is a very powerful wealth creation tool but with very different levels of risk associated with different investments. The investor needs to decide whether he or she is prepared to take higher risks for the possibility of higher returns or whether he or she would like a conservative approach with lower risk and safer gains. This article explains the differences between high-risk and low-risk investments, their pros and cons, and how to choose the right approach based on your goals.

If you’re new to investing and want to explore trading strategies, AvaTrade offers a comprehensive guide on how to trade forex. Whether you’re interested in Forex, stocks, or commodities, their platform provides essential tools and insights for beginners.

1. Investing with Risk

What is Investment Risk?

Risk associated with investment is the probability that the value of an asset may change and thus may result in losses. Various risks affect investment performance, such as:

  • Market Risk: The risk that overall market movements will affect the value of an asset.
  • Credit Risk: The risk that a firm or a debtor will not repay a loan or bond.
  • Inflation Risk: The possibility that rising inflation will erode purchasing power and reduce real returns.
  • Liquidity Risk: The difficulty of selling a property with minimal loss of value.

2. High-Risk Investments: Greater Potential, Greater Risk

What Are High-Risk Investments?

High-risk investments carry the possibility of high returns but are also highly volatile with the possibility for substantial losses. They are desirable for individuals who are willing to risk their money for the possibility of increased rewards.

Popular High-Risk Investments

Stocks (Growth Stocks and Small-Cap)

  • Growth-oriented businesses can yield high returns but are also vulnerable to price fluctuations.
  • Small-cap stocks are usually more volatile than established blue-chip companies.

Cryptocurrencies

  • Digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum are gaining popularity as these have high growth potential.
  • They are highly dependent upon regulatory developments and mood within the markets.

Startups and Venture Capital

  • Early-stage investment into new businesses can yield tremendous profits provided the venture prospers.
  • However, the rate of startup failure is high, making this venture risky.

Forex and Commodities Trading

  • Currency and commodity markets are potential sources of instant gains but are highly volatile.
  • Sharp price changes are brought about by economic and geopolitical reasons.

Real Estate Investments in Volatile Markets

  • Some investors treat real estate as a high-risk asset, especially in volatile housing markets.
  • According to a recentLinkedIn article, real estate can outperform stocks in certain economic conditions but requires careful market analysis.

Pros and Cons of High-Risk Investments

  • Higher potential for high returns.

  • Ability to amass wealth quickly.

x Greater risk of losing a lot.

x Active management and deep understanding of the markets are required.

3. Conservative Investments: Stability Rather Than Speed

What Are Low-Risk Investments?

Low-risk investments prioritize capital protection above all else and earn steady but lower returns. They are most suitable for investors who prioritize financial predictability and safety.

Popular Low-Risk Investments

Government Bonds and Treasury Securities

  • Issued by governments, these investments provide reliable returns and are among the safest options.
  • S. Treasury bonds, for example, offer fixed interest payments with minimal risk.
  • As highlighted in a S. Bank report, changes in interest rates significantly affect bond yields, making them a crucial factor for low-risk investors.

Certificates of Deposit (CDs) and Fixed Deposits

  • Banks offer CDs with guaranteed returns over a specified period.
  • While low-risk, they often provide lower yields than other investments.

Dividend-Paying Stocks and Blue-Chip Companies

  • Well-established corporations consistently pay dividends, providing investors with regular income.
  • These stocks are generally more stable than small-cap or growth stocks.

Real Estate (Stable Markets)

  • Property investments in well-developed regions appreciate over time and provide rental income.
  • Real estate is less volatile than stock markets but requires significant capital.

Advantages & Disadvantages of Low-Risk Investments

  • Lower risk, reducing exposure to steep declines.
  • Known returns, making financial planning easier.

x Lower potential for high returns relative to risky assets.

x Risk of value loss through inflation unless returns are higher than rising prices.

4. How to Choose the Right Investment Approach

Evaluate Your Risk Tolerance

  • If you can handle fluctuations in the markets and losses, high-risk investments may be appropriate for your goals.
  • If predictable and steady growth is your goal, low-risk investments are the better choice.

Set Your Financial Objectives

  • Short-term objectives (such as savings for a major expense) typically require low-risk investments.
  • Long-term goals (such as planning for retirement) may involve a mix of high-risk and low-risk assets.

Diversify Your Portfolio

  • A balanced approach with a combination of high-risk and low-risk investments balances overall risk.
  • 70% in stable assets (blue-chip stocks and bonds) and 30% in higher-growth assets (crypto and tech stocks).

Final Thoughts: Balancing Risk and Reward

Both high-risk and low-risk investments find their place within a balanced investment plan. The right mix depends upon your individual financial situation, time horizon, and risk tolerance. New investors may find a balanced approach merging safe, steady-growth investments with a dash of higher-risk opportunities balances the equation while leaving the door open for potential gains. An understanding of how risk operates and making intelligent choices can allow investors to achieve their goals with minimal exposure to unwanted fluctuations.

Robinhood Partners with Kalshi to Launch Prediction Markets

0

Robinhood has recently launched a prediction markets hub in partnership with Kalshi, a regulated exchange under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This new feature allows Robinhood users to trade contracts based on the outcomes of various real-world events, such as sports, politics, and economic indicators. The hub debuted with offerings like contracts on the Federal Reserve’s target interest rate for May and the men’s and women’s NCAA basketball tournaments, aligning with the timing of March Madness.

This move expands Robinhood’s offerings beyond traditional stocks and crypto, tapping into the growing popularity of prediction markets in the U.S. The collaboration with Kalshi, which won a legal battle in 2024 to offer election-related contracts, ensures regulatory compliance while bringing event-driven trading to Robinhood’s roughly 25 million users. Kalshi’s legal battle centers on its fight with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over the right to offer event contracts tied to political outcomes, specifically congressional control contracts that let users bet on which party will control the U.S. House or Senate after an election.

In June 2023, Kalshi, a New York-based prediction market registered as a designated contract market (DCM) under the CFTC, sought approval to list these contracts. The CFTC rejected them in September 2023, arguing that they constituted “gaming” or gambling—activities it believed were unlawful under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and against the public interest. The agency worried that such contracts could undermine election integrity, incentivize manipulation, or blur the line between financial markets and betting.

Kalshi fired back, suing the CFTC in November 2023 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It claimed the CFTC overstepped its authority, calling the decision “arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law” under the Administrative Procedure Act. Kalshi argued that its contracts weren’t gambling but financial instruments tied to economically significant events—elections—that people could use to hedge risks or gain insight into future outcomes. They pointed to examples like businesses hedging against policy shifts or researchers using market data to forecast trends more accurately than polls.

On September 12, 2024, District Court Judge Jia Cobb ruled in Kalshi’s favor, granting summary judgment and vacating the CFTC’s ban. Cobb found that the CFTC misinterpreted “gaming” in the CEA, noting that elections aren’t games or illegal activities but civic processes with major economic impacts. She rejected the CFTC’s public interest concerns as speculative, saying the agency failed to prove concrete harm. The CFTC didn’t back down, appealing to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and seeking an emergency stay to block Kalshi from offering the contracts during the appeal. Initially, the appeals court issued a temporary administrative stay, but on October 2, 2024, it denied the CFTC’s request for a longer stay.

Judge Patricia Millett wrote that the CFTC hadn’t shown it, or the public would suffer “irreparable injury” without the stay, though she called the underlying merits “close and difficult.” This greenlit Kalshi to launch its election contracts ahead of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, and it quickly did so, listing contracts on everything from congressional control to presidential outcomes. The CFTC’s appeal is still pending as of early 2025, with oral arguments heard by the D.C. Circuit on January 17, 2025. Meanwhile, Kalshi has expanded its offerings, and by late 2024, it reportedly saw over $1 billion in election-related trades.

The CFTC continues to argue that these contracts threaten election integrity, while Kalshi counters that they’ve proven valuable—offering clearer signals than polls during the 2024 race, with no evidence of manipulation. This battle’s outcome could reshape prediction markets. A win for Kalshi might open the floodgates for other platforms to offer similar contracts, challenging the CFTC’s regulatory scope. A CFTC victory could tighten restrictions, pushing such markets offshore to unregulated spaces like Polymarket. Beyond federal rules, state regulators could still ban these contracts locally, adding another layer of complexity. For now, Kalshi’s operating, but the fight’s far from over.

Germany Economy Forecast Indicates Minimal Growth in 2025

0

Revised forecasts for the German economy in 2025 indicate minimal growth, with projections significantly downgraded from earlier estimates. The German government now expects GDP to grow by just 0.3%, a sharp reduction from its previous forecast of 1.1%. This aligns with estimates from other economic bodies, reflecting a consensus of stagnation amid ongoing challenges. Similarly, the European Commission predicts a modest 0.7% growth, while other institutes, such as the IfW Kiel and DIW Berlin, forecast near-zero growth or slight contractions, ranging from 0.0% to 0.2%.

These revisions highlight persistent economic headwinds, including subdued domestic and foreign demand, high energy costs, geopolitical uncertainties, and structural issues like labor shortages and bureaucratic inefficiencies. Uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policies, particularly potential tariffs, further dampens the outlook, especially for Germany’s export-driven manufacturing sector. Despite some positive factors, such as rising real wages and expected interest rate cuts, the overall sentiment remains cautious, with recovery not anticipated until 2026, when growth is projected to range between 0.8% and 1.3%.

German consumer spending has been subdued due to high inflation in recent years, which eroded purchasing power. Although inflation is cooling and real wages are rising, consumer confidence remains low, partly due to economic uncertainty and fears of job losses in key industries. High interest rates, while starting to decline, have also dampened investment in housing and other sectors. Germany’s economy is heavily reliant on exports, particularly in manufacturing sectors like automotive, machinery, and chemicals. Weak global demand, especially from key markets like China and the U.S., has hit German exporters hard.

China’s economic slowdown and shifting focus to domestic production have reduced demand for German goods, while potential U.S. tariffs under a new administration could further hurt exports. The loss of cheap Russian natural gas following the Ukraine war has significantly increased energy costs for German industry. While energy prices have stabilized somewhat, they remain higher than pre-crisis levels, squeezing profit margins, especially for energy-intensive industries like chemicals and steel.

Germany’s ambitious push toward renewable energy and decarbonization (the Energiewende) requires massive investments in infrastructure, technology, and workforce training. While necessary for long-term sustainability, these costs are a short-term burden on businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which form the backbone of the German economy (Mittelstand). Germany faces a severe shortage of skilled workers, exacerbated by an aging population and declining birth rates. This demographic challenge limits the economy’s growth potential, particularly in sectors like technology, healthcare, and construction.

Efforts to attract foreign talent are underway but are hindered by bureaucratic hurdles and language barriers. Germany’s economy is weighed down by excessive red tape, slow administrative processes, and a lag in digitalization. Many businesses, especially SMEs, struggle with outdated infrastructure and slow adoption of digital technologies, reducing their competitiveness compared to global peers. German industries, particularly in automotive and manufacturing, face challenges in adapting to global technological shifts, such as the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and automation. Insufficient investment in research and development (R&D) and a risk-averse business culture have slowed innovation.

Germany’s export-driven economy is highly vulnerable to shifts in global trade policies. The potential return of protectionist measures, such as U.S. tariffs under a possible Trump administration, poses a significant risk. Tariffs on German cars and machinery could severely impact exports, given the U.S. is one of Germany’s largest trading partners. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the war in Ukraine, conflicts in the Middle East, and U.S.-China rivalry, create uncertainty for global supply chains and trade flows. This disproportionately affects Germany, which relies on stable global markets for its economic model.

The shift to electric vehicles (EVs) has caught German automakers off-guard, as they face fierce competition from Tesla and Chinese manufacturers. High production costs in Germany, combined with delays in scaling up EV production, have weakened the sector’s global position. Germany’s industrial base, once a global leader, is losing competitiveness due to high costs, supply chain disruptions, and weaker demand. Some companies are relocating production to lower-cost countries, further hollowing out the industrial sector. Although inflation has moderated from its 2022 peak, it remains above the European Central Bank’s (ECB) 2% target.

This limits the ECB’s ability to cut interest rates aggressively, which would otherwise stimulate investment and consumption. Elevated interest rates, implemented to combat inflation, have increased borrowing costs for businesses and households, dampening investment and construction activity. While rate cuts are expected, their pace and impact remain uncertain.

Explosion Rocks Trans-Niger Pipeline Amidst Political Turmoil in Rivers State

0

An explosion has ruptured a section of the Trans-Niger Pipeline (TNP) in Bodo community, Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State, igniting concerns over environmental degradation and potential disruptions to Nigeria’s oil production.

This incident unfolds against a backdrop of escalating political tensions in the state, which analysts warn could exacerbate insecurity and further threaten oil operations.

The explosion occurred late Monday night near the Bodo-Bonny road, a critical infrastructure project currently under construction. Eyewitnesses reported a massive fire outbreak, with thick black smoke and flames engulfing the surrounding mangrove forests. The TNP is a vital conduit for transporting crude oil to the Bonny export terminal in Rivers State, and any disruption to its operations could significantly impact Nigeria’s oil exports.

Environmental groups have long voiced concerns about oil-related activities in the Niger Delta, particularly in areas like Ogoniland, which have suffered extensive pollution from past oil spills. The recent explosion threatens to compound these environmental challenges, affecting local communities that rely on the ecosystem for their livelihoods.

Political Crisis Fuels Insecurity and Threatens Oil Production

The pipeline explosion is believed to have been instigated by the deepening political crisis in Rivers State, marked by a power struggle between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The rift has led to a divided State House of Assembly, with factions loyal to each leader.

Earlier this month, energy economist Kelvin Emmanuel cautioned the federal government that the political turmoil could lead to insecurity affecting oil production. He remarked, “You want to raise crude oil output but you’re watching the state that contributes the most feedstock descend into anarchy that might necessitate a state of emergency. We are just not serious!”

Supreme Court Ruling Intensifies Legislative-Executive Standoff

The crisis escalated following a Supreme Court judgment affirming the legitimacy of 27 members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, who were previously accused of defection by Governor Fubara. The court upheld earlier decisions, stating that these lawmakers did not defect from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC), as alleged. This ruling has intensified the standoff between the legislative and executive branches in the state.

Fubara has accused the Assembly of obstructing his efforts to implement the Supreme Court’s judgment, particularly concerning the presentation of the 2025 Appropriation Bill. The governor claimed that the lawmakers’ actions were hindering governance and development in the state. The lawmakers led by Amaewhule have refused to honor the notice of the governor for the re-presentation of the budget, and have instead, served notices of misconduct to the governor and his deputy.

Accusations of Federal Interference

President Bola Tinubu’s administration has faced allegations of allowing Minister Nyesom Wike to leverage federal influence and the judiciary to destabilize Rivers State.

An 11-member Independent Judicial Accountability Panel, which included three retired justices, criticized the Supreme Court’s handling of the political crisis in Rivers State. On Friday, March 14, 2025, the panel faulted the court’s judgment, suggesting it set a dangerous precedent that could destabilize Nigeria’s legal and political systems.

The escalating crisis has drawn national attention, with political figures like Peter Obi, the 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, urging everyone to sheath their sword. Obi in a statement on Tuesday, emphasized that the people of Rivers State are the real losers in the ongoing political drama and called for an end to the crisis to prevent further harm to the state’s stability and development.

“Looking at the ongoing crisis in Rivers State, we see yet another glaring example of how our democracy and governance is not serving it’s purpose, the welfare of the people of River State. The disagreement is not about improving the measurable indices of development: education, healthcare, or lifting people out of poverty but rather for reasons that do not in any way benefit the people of Rivers State and Nigeria in general,” he said.

“I fully understand the impact of what is happening in Rivers State. The real losers are the people—their welfare and the future of the society their children will live in.

“My respectful appeal to all those involved is to reconsider their positions and reflect on the grace God has bestowed upon them as leaders. They must think about the suffering people of Rivers State and work towards a better future for their children.”

Temu Expands Payment Options With Checkout.com And Verve For Seamless Global Shopping

0

Temu, a global online marketplace with a wide variety of products, has strengthened its partnership with digital payment provider Checkout.com to enhance payment processing and improve customer checkout experiences.

Since its launch in 2022, Temu has relied on Checkout.com for secure payment transactions worldwide. With this expanded collaboration, Checkout.com will now process payments across 30+ markets, supporting major credit cards, digital wallets, and regional payment solutions like Tamara, a buy-now-pay-later option in the Middle East.

Utilizing Checkout.com’s AI-driven payment optimization engine, and intelligent acceptance, Temu aims to streamline transactions and minimize payment failures.

Speaking on the partnership, a Temu spokesperson said,

“We are proud of the reliable and trustworthy experience we provide to our consumers alongside our everyday best offers. Checkout is an important partner supporting our mission to provide quality affordable products with its global reach and expertise, enhancing the digital payments experience for our customers”.

Also commenting,

Brian Sze, General Manager of Checkout.com for the Asia-Pacific region said,

“We are excited to empower Temu’s merchants with Checkout.com’s secure, stable, and convenient payment solutions, allowing them to focus more on their core business while ensuring a seamless checkout experience for consumers on the Temu platform”.

Temu Now Accepts Payment in Nigeria With a Verve Card

In a significant development for Nigerian shoppers, Verve, Africa’s largest domestic payment card brand, has secured a strategic partnership with Temu. This allows Verve cardholders in the country, to make direct Naira payments on both platforms, eliminating foreign exchange hurdles and simplifying cross-border shopping.

Previously, Nigerian consumers could only shop on Temu using Visa, Mastercard, or virtual dollar cards. With Verve now fully integrated, shoppers can seamlessly access affordable products without currency conversion complexities.

Similarly, AliExpress has now adopted Verve payments, further easing online transactions for Nigerian users. Beyond expanding its reach, Verve is advancing payment innovation with contactless technology, enabling faster, more secure transactions across digital and physical channels. With over 70 million Verve cards in circulation, users can now enjoy seamless payments on platforms like Google Play, YouTube Premium, Netflix, Uber, and Amazon Prime.

These strategic moves by Temu, Checkout.com, and Verve reflect a growing commitment to enhancing digital commerce and ensuring secure, borderless, and frictionless payment experiences for consumers worldwide.

Temu’s Growth in Nigeria

Temu officially launched its operations in Nigeria on Wednesday, November 27, 2024, to disrupt the local market with its direct-from-manufacturer model.

Since its launch, the Chinese e-commerce platform has seen strong consumer uptake. A few days after entering the Nigerian market, it became the most downloaded app with more than 500 million downloads on the Android store

Offering a wide range of products from electronics to home goods and sporting equipment, the online marketplace makes it easier than ever for Nigerians to find great deals and upgrade their lifestyles without breaking the bank. Temu’s popularity is part of the explosive growth in Nigerian e-commerce, where industry revenues are projected to climb 7.81% from a year ago to US$7.43 billion in 2025, while user numbers are estimated to rise 15% to 28.6 million by 2029.

Underpinning this popularity is the platform’s ability to offer quality products at affordable prices. It also allows consumers to purchase products directly from manufacturers, eliminating middleman markups and handling costs. This direct connection results in lower prices, closer to wholesale levels.

Beyond consumer benefits, Temu’s entry catalyzes the growth of Nigeria’s e-commerce ecosystem. It brings competition to the market, forcing existing players like Jumia, and Konga, amongst others to innovate, improve their offerings, and enhance customer service.

Notably, Temu’s strategy of leveraging social media and digital marketing to engage with customers also holds promise in Nigeria, where social platforms are integral to daily life. By harnessing the power of social influence and creating engaging content, the platform can effectively build brand loyalty and drive sales.