DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 2

Nigeria Moves to Host Africa’s First EV Manufacturing Plant in Landmark Deal With South Korea Amid Power Gaps

0

The Federal Government has taken a significant step toward positioning Nigeria at the center of Africa’s electric vehicle transition, signing a Memorandum of Understanding with South Korea’s Asia Economic Development Committee (AEDC) to establish what is being described as the continent’s first large-scale electric vehicle manufacturing plant, alongside nationwide charging infrastructure.

But the plan has been greeted with a mix of optimism and caution, as observers warn that the country may not yet have the fundamentals required to sustain a viable EV market.

The agreement with AEDC, executed on January 30, 2026, by the Minister of State for Industry, Senator John Enoh, on behalf of Nigeria, and AEDC Chairman Yoon Suk-hun, is being positioned as a cornerstone of the country’s green industrial strategy.

According to the National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), the project will be implemented in phases, beginning with EV assembly before expanding into full local manufacturing. At peak capacity, the plant is expected to produce up to 300,000 vehicles annually and create about 10,000 direct jobs. Authorities say the initiative aligns with Nigeria’s National Energy Transition Plan and the National Automotive Industry Development Plan, both of which aim to reduce carbon emissions, promote local manufacturing, and reposition Nigeria as a regional automotive hub.

The Director-General of NADDC, Otunba Oluwemimo Joseph Osanipin, said the partnership would accelerate technology transfer, attract investment, and strengthen research, design, and innovation within the automotive ecosystem. He added that Nigeria is steadily building a sustainable framework that supports green energy adoption and global competitiveness.

While the move is widely seen as plausible on paper, analysts point to the country’s persistent electricity crisis as a fundamental constraint. Nigeria’s national grid remains unstable, with frequent collapses and generation levels that struggle to meet basic household and industrial demand. For many, the idea of rolling out large-scale EV charging infrastructure in such an environment appears, at best, premature.

Electric vehicles rely heavily on consistent and affordable electricity, not only for private charging but also for commercial fleets, logistics operators, and public transport systems that policymakers hope will drive early adoption. In Nigeria, where millions of households rely on petrol and diesel generators for daily power needs, critics argue that charging EVs would simply shift emissions and costs from fuel tanks to generators, undermining the environmental and economic rationale of the transition.

Infrastructure gaps extend beyond electricity. Poor road networks, limited grid coverage outside major urban centers, and the absence of a coordinated national charging framework all pose significant hurdles. Even in Lagos and Abuja, where EV pilots and some charging stations exist, coverage remains thin and largely confined to corporate campuses.

There is also the question of affordability. Electric vehicles remain significantly more expensive upfront than conventional internal combustion engine cars, in a country where average incomes are low, and access to consumer credit is limited. Without substantial subsidies, financing schemes, or cost reductions driven by local manufacturing, mass-market adoption is likely to remain elusive in the near term.

Nigeria’s EV ambitions are not new. In April 2021, the Nigerian Institute of Transport Technology in Zaria set up a project team to develop a locally made electric vehicle. In August 2022, the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure signed MOUs with Israeli and Japanese firms to commence EV assembly and manufacturing. Several local companies, including Innoson Vehicle Manufacturing, Jet Motor Company, SAGLEV, Spiro, NEV Motors, and the Electric Motor Vehicle Company, have since introduced electric or hybrid models, mostly targeting fleets and niche urban users.

The Energy Transition Plan, launched in 2022, outlines an ambitious target of a 100% transition to electric vehicles by 2060, with Lagos State aiming for 2050. However, analysts note that these timelines assume massive improvements in power generation, grid stability, and infrastructure investment that have yet to materialize.

International interest in Nigeria’s EV potential is also rising. In May 2025, China announced plans to establish EV factories and other manufacturing ventures in the country, reflecting a broader push to tap Nigeria’s market size and mineral resources. Proponents argue that such investments could help unlock local value addition, particularly if Nigeria develops its lithium and other critical mineral value chains.

While there has been growing interest, many experts caution that manufacturing capacity alone does not create a market. Without reliable electricity, widespread charging infrastructure, and supportive consumer policies, an EV plant risks becoming an export-oriented facility or a symbolic project disconnected from domestic realities.

Against this backdrop, Nigeria’s EV push only underscores its ambitious long-term vision, colliding with short-term structural constraints. Analysts have noted that for projects like this to succeed and become a catalyst for genuine transformation, Nigeria has to quickly fix its infrastructure deficits and the basics that electric mobility depends on.

OPEC+ Maintains March Oil Output Amid Price Volatility and Iran Tensions, Markets Brace for 2026 Supply Shifts

0

OPEC+ on Sunday confirmed that it will hold oil production steady for March, maintaining the freeze imposed for January and February, as Brent crude hovers near six-month highs and geopolitical risks continue to roil global markets.

The decision highlights the producer group’s cautious approach amid a volatile environment, where concerns about a potential U.S. strike on Iran and disruptions in key oil-producing regions collide with expectations of a global supply surplus in 2026.

Brent crude closed near $70 a barrel on Friday, just shy of the six-month peak of $71.89 reached on Thursday. Analysts point to fears that U.S. action against Iran could constrain output from a major OPEC member, pushing prices higher in the near term. At the same time, expectations of a supply surplus next year, combined with seasonal consumption trends, limit the incentive for producers to expand output.

The March freeze affects eight key OPEC+ producers: Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, and Oman. Last year, these countries agreed to raise quotas by approximately 2.9 million barrels per day for April–December 2025, equivalent to roughly 3% of global oil demand. However, they halted further increases for early 2026, citing weaker seasonal demand and a cautious outlook amid lingering economic uncertainties.

Significantly, OPEC+ offered no guidance on output policy beyond March, reflecting strategic ambiguity. Jorge Leon, former OPEC official and now head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad Energy, emphasized the importance of this silence.

“With rising uncertainty around Iran and U.S. tensions, the group is keeping all options firmly on the table,” Leon said.

He added that OPEC+ internal data points to a lower call on crude in the second quarter of 2026, which could constrain any future production hikes.

OPEC+, which comprises the 13-member Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries plus Russia and allied producers, controls about half of global oil output. Its decisions thus have a disproportionate influence on the market, shaping both pricing and investment signals for producers outside the cartel.

Geopolitical Risks and Iran

The geopolitical backdrop remains tense. U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing targeted strikes against Iranian security forces and leadership, following the January capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces. The Trump administration has imposed extensive sanctions on Tehran to limit its oil revenues, a critical source of state funding. While both sides have expressed some willingness to negotiate, Iran has stressed that its defense capabilities are non-negotiable, maintaining an element of uncertainty that supports oil prices.

OPEC+ appears to be factoring these risks into its production calculus. Any disruption in Iranian output, even temporarily, could tighten global supply and support near-term prices, though the group remains wary of overproducing in the face of projected surpluses in 2026.

Oil supply disruptions in Kazakhstan have also played a role in market dynamics. The Tengiz oilfield, one of the country’s largest, has been restarted in stages after experiencing outages earlier in 2026, according to local authorities. Any delays in returning to full capacity could further tighten supplies, at least temporarily, supporting prices.

Compliance with OPEC+ quotas continues to be a focal point. The Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC), which met alongside the producers, reiterated the importance of adherence to output agreements. While it does not set policy, the JMMC monitors compliance and issues recommendations, helping to maintain cohesion among member states. Past challenges with uneven compliance have occasionally undermined market discipline and contributed to price volatility.

The March freeze reflects OPEC+’s broader strategy of cautious flexibility. By keeping output steady, the group preserves the ability to respond to short-term shocks—whether geopolitical disruptions, technical outages, or unexpected shifts in demand—without committing prematurely to long-term increases. Analysts note that the lack of forward guidance is a deliberate measure to avoid signaling excessive supply growth at a time when global demand may soften later in 2026.

Global oil markets are also grappling with mixed signals from macroeconomic factors. Inflationary pressures, high interest rates, and uneven growth in major economies could dampen demand, while strategic stockpiling in countries such as the U.S. has amplified price swings. The interaction of these economic drivers with geopolitical uncertainty has created a backdrop of volatility that market participants are closely monitoring.

The next OPEC+ ministerial meeting is scheduled for March 1, with the JMMC set to convene on April 5. Analysts expect these gatherings to provide more clarity on the group’s stance for the second quarter of 2026, particularly in light of projected supply surpluses and potential geopolitical shocks.

Solving the Equations of Business: Welcome to Tekedia Mini-MBA Edition19

0

Good People, welcome to Tekedia Mini-MBA, Edition 19. We are grateful that you have chosen Tekedia as the place to deepen your business, entrepreneurial, and leadership capabilities. Thank you for trusting us with your learning journey.

If you encounter any challenges along the way, please let us know. Our support team, among the finest in the world of education, operates 24/7 to provide non-academic assistance. For academic matters, use the Comment section on the class board; our Faculty members are always present, engaging, and ready to guide.

Over the next 12 weeks, we will solve the equations of markets across 12 core modules, including strategy, law, marketing, operations, technology, finance, and more, covering over 100 courses. Together, we will examine the simple but powerful logics that govern enterprise:

  • Innovation = Invention + Commercialization
  • Great Company = Awesome Products + Superior Execution
  • Business Momentum = Business Size × Growth Rate
  • …and many more.

At Tekedia, we believe business can be mastered the same way we understand natural philosophy through first principles. That is why we will unravel the mechanics of business systems, studying the physics of markets and the mathematics of business success. This is not about memorizing cases; it is about understanding how value is created, scaled, and defended.

I am honoured to welcome hundreds of learners once again to this 19th edition of Tekedia Mini-MBA, a testament to the durability of our mission. In Igbo wisdom, when a man prepares food and his kinsmen, who also have food at home, come to eat with him, it is a great honour. Your presence here is that honour, and I thank you.

This is the best school with a mission  to discover and make scholars noble, bright and useful. Welcome to Tekedia Institute. And if you are yet to join us, register here.

Ndubuisi Ekekwe
Professor & Lead Faculty
Tekedia Institute

BYD’s Sales Slump Deepens, Exposing the Strains Beneath China’s EV Boom

0

BYD’s January sales dropped by 30.1% from a year earlier, marking the fifth straight month of decline, and exposing the struggle of the Chinese EV giant amid a push to expand its market.

The decline is seen as a revealing snapshot of how China’s electric vehicle champion is being squeezed simultaneously by a cooling domestic market, intensifying competition, and a more uncertain global expansion path.

The company sold 210,051 vehicles worldwide in January, according to a stock exchange filing. Production fell nearly in tandem, down 29.1%, extending a contraction that began in July last year. The parallel slide in both sales and output suggests the slowdown is not simply a demand hiccup but a broader recalibration across BYD’s operations.

At home, the pressure is most visible in BYD’s core plug-in hybrid segment. Plug-in hybrids account for more than half of the company’s total vehicle sales and have long been a key differentiator, appealing to price-sensitive consumers wary of charging infrastructure gaps. Yet sales of these models fell 28.5% in January, deepening a trend after a 7.9% decline in 2025. In response, BYD rolled out upgraded versions of several plug-in hybrid models last month, equipped with longer-range batteries and positioned as better-value options in the affordable segment. The January data shows those upgrades have yet to arrest the slide.

China’s auto market, the largest in the world, is entering a phase of stagnation as the government scales back subsidies for trading in lower-priced vehicles. Those incentives had helped sustain volume growth and price competitiveness, particularly for manufacturers like BYD that built scale around affordability. Their gradual withdrawal is reshaping consumer behavior and forcing automakers into sharper price wars, especially in the mass-market and budget categories.

Competition has also become more unforgiving. Domestic rivals such as Geely and Leapmotor have been aggressive in rolling out new models and cutting prices, narrowing the differentiation that once set BYD apart. The result is margin pressure and slower sales growth across the sector, even as capacity built during the boom years remains high.

Against this backdrop, BYD’s overseas business has become central to its growth narrative. Exports of new energy vehicles reached 100,482 units in January, and international sales growth last year was strong enough to help BYD overtake Tesla as the world’s top EV seller by volume. That overseas surge offset domestic weakness in 2025 and underpinned BYD’s ability to narrowly meet its reduced global sales target of 4.6 million vehicles.

But even the export story is showing signs of caution. BYD has set a target of 1.3 million vehicles in overseas shipments this year, implying a 24% increase from 2025. That figure, however, is below earlier ambitions. Management had told Citi in November that overseas sales could reach as high as 1.6 million units. The absence of an explanation for the downward revision hints at a more sober assessment of global conditions, including rising trade barriers, regulatory scrutiny, and slower-than-expected adoption in some markets.

Geopolitics and trade policy have also come into play. Chinese EV makers face growing resistance in Europe and North America, where governments are increasingly wary of subsidized imports. BYD’s strategy to counter this has been to localize production. Its new EV plant in Hungary is expected to come online this year, adding to existing manufacturing in Brazil and Thailand, with assembly plants planned in Indonesia and Turkey. These facilities are designed to shorten supply chains, reduce tariff exposure, and signal long-term commitment to host markets.

Still, overseas expansion comes with its own risks. Building plants abroad requires heavy upfront investment at a time when cash flows are under pressure, while competition from established automakers and local EV brands remains fierce. Moreover, slowing global growth and tighter consumer spending in many regions could limit the pace at which overseas markets absorb new Chinese entrants.

The January numbers also raise questions about BYD’s near-term outlook. The company has not yet announced a global sales target for 2026, a notable silence for a manufacturer that has historically been confident in projecting aggressive growth goals. Combined with falling production and sustained sales declines, the lack of guidance suggests management is bracing for a more volatile and uncertain year.

More broadly, BYD’s struggles reflect a turning point for China’s EV sector. Years of rapid expansion, generous subsidies, and intense competition created a market defined by scale and speed. That era is giving way to one marked by consolidation, tighter margins, and slower growth. Even market leaders are being forced to adjust expectations, refine product strategies, and rethink how quickly overseas markets can compensate for a maturing domestic base.

The challenge now is execution for BYD. Its global footprint, vertical integration, and battery expertise still give it structural advantages. But sustaining leadership will depend on whether it can stabilize domestic sales, defend margins in a price-sensitive market, and turn its ambitious overseas investments into durable growth engines rather than costly hedges.

January’s data does not signal a collapse, but it does underline a harder truth: the path forward for China’s largest EV maker is becoming more complex, less predictable, and far more contested than during the boom years that propelled it to the top.

Evaluating Alternatives to Boost Finance in Today’s Lending Market

0

Consumer lending in 2026 reflects a more disciplined and mature market. Platforms now compete on structure, transparency, and operational consistency rather than bold claims. Oversight has increased, and that pressure has reshaped how lending products are built and maintained.

Borrowers have adjusted as well. Decision-making now extends beyond speed or convenience and focuses more on how a product performs over time. Let’s take a closer look at how to evaluate alternatives to Boost Finance by examining the core factors that define quality lending products today.

Approval Logic and Risk Alignment

Approval systems in today’s lending market use more data to better match loans with borrower capacity. Lenders evaluate multiple verification signals alongside account behavior rather than depending on a single data point. This leads to more accurate approvals and fewer issues later in the loan term.

As borrowers understand this process, they compare loan options based on structure and repayment clarity, not speed alone. Installment-style products with clear eligibility rules tend to stand out. In this context, borrowers often compare loans like boost finance with similar alternatives to see how predictable the approval and repayment terms are.

Transparency now plays a bigger role in lender selection. Many lenders explain which data points affect approvals and how decisions are made. This allows borrowers to compare options based on process and consistency rather than marketing claims.

Product Design and Structural Clarity

Modern lending products are shaped by structure first, not branding. Clear repayment frameworks, defined timelines, and predictable servicing rules determine how stable a product feels after onboarding. Products that rely on vague language often create confusion once accounts are active.

Many alternatives now emphasize upfront clarity. Terms are written to explain how payments are applied, how account status changes are communicated, and what actions trigger review. This approach aligns with current regulatory expectations around borrower understanding.

Structural clarity also supports consistency. Products built with defined processes tend to handle routine changes smoothly. That reliability matters more than novelty in a market where long-term usability drives satisfaction.

Repayment Flexibility With Defined Rules

Flexibility has become standard, but execution varies widely. Strong products define what flexibility means in practice. They explain when adjustments can be requested, how reviews are handled, and the possible outcomes.

The best alternatives make the workflow explicit. Some platforms support payment date alignment within certain limits, while others permit a one-time schedule change under specific conditions. The key is transparency around approval requirements, any verification involved, and how changes impact future payments and due dates.

Borrowers comparing options should evaluate flexibility as a servicing control. A tightly defined option that is applied consistently is more reliable than an open-ended promise that depends on discretion. Clear, repeatable rules reduce friction during account changes and make ongoing management predictable.

Compliance Focus and Platform Stability

Compliance alignment now plays a direct role in product quality. Clear disclosures make it easier to understand terms, schedules, and servicing rules before anything is finalized. Accurate records matter because they keep balances, due dates, and payment histories consistent across statements and account views.

Regulatory guidance has also pushed lenders to communicate with more precision. Strong platforms document changes, confirm updates in writing, and keep a clear trail of what changed and when. They also run issue handling through defined steps, so corrections and disputes follow a predictable process instead of ad hoc decisions.

Platform stability improves when compliance is built into routine servicing. Lenders that update policies early are less likely to change workflows suddenly when standards shift. That continuity reduces disruption and keeps account management steady over the life of the product.

Servicing Experience Beyond Signup

Onboarding is just the entry point. Servicing is what determines whether a loan stays easy to manage after the first payment. Account visibility, accurate payment tracking, and fast issue resolution shape the real, day-to-day experience.

Top alternatives prioritize servicing as a core feature, offering real-time payment updates, clear transaction histories, and transparent status changes. Support quality also matters because it reveals how well the platform runs, especially when something needs to be corrected.

Servicing should be evaluated with practical signals, not first impressions. Products built for routine account management tend to stay consistent once the loan is active. That usually leads to fewer surprises than products that put most of their effort into the signup flow.

What Distinguishes Strong Alternatives Today

In 2026, lending has become less about finding a “best” option and more about selecting a system that aligns with how someone wants to manage their commitments. The strongest alternatives make trade-offs deliberately, choosing transparent processes over constant exceptions.

That design choice usually signals a platform built to last through market shifts and tighter oversight. Borrowers get the most leverage when they compare products like they would compare operations, not offers. When that mindset changes, the decision gets simpler without getting shallow.