DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 22

Trust Wallet Hacked as Users Lose $7 Million in Security Breach

0

In a major security breach shaking the crypto community, popular non-custodial wallet Trust Walletconfirmed that hackers exploited a critical vulnerability in its browser extension, draining roughly $7 million worth of digital assets from hundreds of users across multiple blockchain networks.

The incident, linked to version 2.68 of the Trust Wallet extension, saw unauthorized transactions and the illicit transfer of funds, prompting urgent warnings for users to disable the compromised version and update to the patched release.

Reports reveal that all victims have one thing in common before the hack, they installed the Trust Wallet browser extension.

In a tweet on X, the company wrote,

“We’ve identified a security incident affecting Trust Wallet Browser Extension version 2.68 only. Users with Browser Extension 2.68 should disable and upgrade to 2.69. Please note: Mobile-only users and all other browser extension versions are not impacted.”

Trust Wallet and its parent ecosystem have pledged to cover losses as users’ funds are SAFU. The team is still investigating how hackers were able to submit a new version.

The incident comes amid a surge in high-profile exploits and phishing campaigns. One of the defining features of 2025 has been the scale of high-profile exploits. While exploits targeted platforms, phishing campaigns targeted people, and in 2025, these attacks became more convincing and dangerous than ever.

Cybercriminals increasingly shifted away from generic scam emails toward highly targeted campaigns aimed at specific victims, including developers, traders, and high-net-worth crypto holders. Wallet-draining phishing links, fake airdrops, and malicious “security update” prompts flooded social media platforms like X, Telegram, and Discord.

Many of these scams tricked users into signing malicious transactions or approving unlimited token allowances, giving attackers direct access to their funds without ever needing private keys. Also, centralized exchanges, once considered safer than decentralized alternatives, became prime targets.

The most notable incident was the massive Bybit hack, which reportedly saw attackers drain over $1 billion worth of Ethereum in a single operation, making it one of the largest crypto thefts ever recorded.

Beyond Bybit, other exchanges and trading platforms also suffered losses ranging from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, often through hot-wallet compromises and supply-chain attacks.

A Chainalysis report revealed that over $3.4 billion has been stolen in 2025, with the February Bybit compromise alone accounting for $1.5 billion of that total.

Stolen fund activity in the crypto ecosystem has long been characterized by outliers, with most hacks remaining relatively small while a handful result in enormous losses. However, Chainalysis notes that 2025 marks a significant escalation in this pattern. For the first time on record, the ratio between the largest single hack and the median loss across all incidents has exceeded the 1,000x threshold.

According to the report, this means that funds stolen in the largest attacks are now more than 1,000 times greater than those lost in a typical hack, surpassing even the extreme disparities observed during the 2021 bull market. These figures are calculated using the U.S. dollar value of assets at the time they were stolen, underscoring the real-time financial impact of these breaches.

Chainalysis further highlights that this widening gap has led to an unprecedented concentration of losses. In 2025, the top three hacks alone account for 69% of all service-related losses, fundamentally reshaping how annual theft totals are distributed. As a result, overall loss figures are increasingly driven by a small number of catastrophic events rather than a broad increase in smaller incidents.

Meanwhile, centralized services are experiencing increasingly large losses due to private key compromises. Despite their institutional resources and professional security teams, these platforms remain vulnerable because of this fundamental security challenge.

North Korea remains a dominant crypto threat actor, despite fewer confirmed incidents. In 2025, North Korean hackers stole at least $2.02 billion in cryptocurrency ($681 million more than in 2024), representing a 51% increase year-over-year.

The persistence of high theft volumes indicates that while some areas of crypto security may be improving, attackers continue to find success across multiple vectors.

Outlook

The Trust Wallet incident and the broader trends observed in 2025 point to a more dangerous and asymmetric security environment for the crypto industry. Losses are becoming increasingly concentrated in a small number of high-impact events, raising systemic risk across the ecosystem.

Looking ahead, wallet providers and exchanges will need to invest more heavily in code integrity, access controls, and internal review processes to prevent hacks.

Foreign-Branded Smartphone Shipments Surge in China, Reclaiming Market Share in November

0

Shipments of foreign branded mobile phones in China more than doubled in November, rising to 6.93 million units, according to government-affiliated data released on Dec. 25 by the China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT).

Reuters calculations based on the CAICT release show the figure represents a 128.4 percent jump from a year earlier, a sharp rebound for overseas brands in a market that has largely been dominated by domestic manufacturers.

Total mobile phone shipments in China reached 30.16 million units in November, up 1.9 percent year on year. Foreign-branded devices therefore accounted for roughly 23 percent of overall shipments during the month, a notable expansion of market share at a time when overall industry growth remains modest. The data point to a late-year resurgence in demand for imported smartphones, even as Chinese brands continue to compete aggressively on pricing, specifications, and distribution.

The CAICT, described in its release as a government-affiliated research institute, identified Apple’s iPhone among the foreign-branded models contributing to the surge. However, the excerpts published did not provide a full brand-by-brand breakdown, nor did they specify which iPhone models were most in demand. The absence of details on sales channels, regions, or price tiers leaves open questions about whether the increase was driven primarily by high-end flagship purchases, promotional activity, or restocking by retailers ahead of year-end shopping.

The rebound stands out against the broader backdrop of China’s smartphone industry, which has faced slowing replacement cycles, cautious consumer spending, and intense competition among local players such as Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo.

In recent quarters, domestic brands have captured the bulk of unit sales by offering a wide range of mid- to low-priced devices, often bundled with incentives through online platforms and telecom operators. A near tripling of foreign-branded shipments year on year suggests that demand for premium imported models strengthened in November, potentially linked to seasonal buying patterns, new product launches earlier in the year, or renewed consumer interest in established global brands.

Market participants are likely to watch closely how this shift affects competitive dynamics. A stronger showing by foreign brands could pressure domestic manufacturers to adjust pricing, increase promotions, or accelerate feature upgrades, particularly in the premium segment where margins are higher but competition is fiercer. It may also influence inventory planning and supply chain decisions heading into early 2026, especially if retailers anticipate sustained demand rather than a one-off seasonal spike.

The data also arrive amid heightened scrutiny of technology supply chains and the broader geopolitical environment shaping the consumer electronics industry.

While the CAICT figures and Reuters calculations have been widely republished, the snapshot nature of the data leaves important gaps for investors, analysts, and competitors trying to gauge momentum by brand or segment.

However, the November numbers offer a clear signal that foreign-branded phones, led in part by iPhone shipments, have regained a meaningful foothold in China’s handset market as the year draws to a close. Whether this marks the start of a more durable shift in consumer preferences or simply a temporary rebound tied to seasonal factors will become clearer as data for the opening months of 2026 emerge.

Tariffs Jolt U.S. Leather Industry, Pushing Bootmakers and Luxury Brands Toward Higher Prices

0

When President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on imports in April, the shock rippled quickly through the U.S. leather industry. At Twisted X, a Texas-based bootmaker known for its Western footwear, the disruption hit with major impact, according to a CNBC report.

Import costs on finished work boots surged almost overnight. Shipments already en route were paused mid-transit. Invoices fluctuated so sharply that staff at the company’s Decatur, Texas headquarters found themselves recalculating margins hour by hour. Management converted a conference room into what executives dubbed a “tariff war room,” a sign of how fast-moving and unpredictable the situation had become.

“A lot of other leather companies had to pause shipments because of the chaos and it felt like prices were going all over the place before you could take account,” Twisted X chief executive Prasad Reddy said. “It was a very uncertain time.”

The turmoil at Twisted X has been mirrored across the leather sector, from small specialty retailers to global fashion houses. With pre-tariff inventories largely exhausted, the products now reaching store shelves are significantly more expensive to produce. Industry analysts say prices at the register are unlikely to retreat anytime soon.

According to projections by the Yale Budget Lab, prices for leather goods are expected to remain nearly 22% higher for at least the next one to two years. The increase is being driven by a mix of inflation, persistent supply chain bottlenecks, and heavy tariff exposure across key sourcing countries, including China, Vietnam, Italy, and India.

“The reason why leather is hit so hard is twofold,” said John Ricco of the Yale Budget Lab. “Some of the highest tariff rates are placed on countries where we import most leather. The second issue is that the U.S. simply imports far more leather and apparel-related products from these trading partners than it produces domestically.”

The pressure is already showing up in corporate earnings. Tapestry, which owns luxury brands including Coach and Kate Spade, told investors in August that tariff-related costs could reach $160 million, warning of stronger-than-expected pressure on profits.

A global supply chain under strain

The modern leather supply chain is deeply globalized. A typical pair of Twisted X boots begins as a raw cowhide from a U.S. ranch. That hide is salted and shipped overseas, often to Asia, to be tanned into leather. For Twisted X, around half of its products are currently tanned in China, down from about 90% in 2017, according to Reddy.

Once tanned, the leather is usually shipped again, often to factories in China, Vietnam, Mexico, or India, where it is cut, stitched, and assembled into finished boots before being sent back to the United States.

That system kept costs low for years. It also left companies highly exposed when tariffs hit.

“When tariffs happened, everything stopped,” said Kerry Brozyna, president of the Leather and Hide Council of America. “They couldn’t take shipments in because if they calculated the tariff into the price, they wouldn’t be able to sell the product.”

The U.S. already runs one of its largest manufacturing trade deficits in leather goods. In 2023, the country imported $1.37 billion worth of leather apparel while exporting just $92.7 million, according to Census Bureau data. China alone accounts for roughly one-third of all leather goods imported into the United States.

“Being so reliant on overseas production methods ended up hurting many people in the industry when they didn’t know exactly what was going to happen,” Reddy said.

He added that Twisted X has been working for years to reduce its exposure to China, a strategy that has become more urgent under the new tariff regime.

Exiting China, however, has not been straightforward. Companies shifting production encountered congestion and capacity limits in Cambodia and Bangladesh, longer lead times in Vietnam, and a new complication in August when a 50% tariff was imposed on many Indian leather exports. By late summer, costs had risen across nearly every stage of production, from hides and tanning to assembly and shipping back to the U.S.

“We saw all our channels to make boots keep getting more expensive until we were able to figure out a good solution,” Reddy said.

Footwear and fashion conglomerates are facing the same reality. Steve Madden said new tariffs weighed heavily on its third-quarter performance. “The quarter was challenging, driven largely by the impact of new tariffs on goods imported into the United States,” chief executive Edward Rosenfeld told analysts in November.

Passing costs to consumers

Many companies initially tried to absorb higher costs, but that buffer is wearing thin. Twisted X said it raised prices by about 1% to 3% this year, a move the company described as relatively modest compared with some competitors.

“We look at it as a success,” said Tricia Mahoney, the company’s chief marketing officer. “Many competitors were looking at bigger increases, but we prioritized our customers and tried to keep prices as stable as possible. Next year could be tough, but we are more prepared than ever.”

At the luxury end of the market, price increases are already visible. Chanel’s Classic Flap bag is now roughly 5% more expensive than it was a year ago after another round of price hikes this spring, according to luxury retail pricing data.

Analysts say the sharper impact is likely still ahead. Ricco expects prices for leather footwear and accessories to rise about 22% over the next year or two, with a longer-term increase of around 7% as higher tariffs, freight costs, and tight supplies of premium hides work their way through the system.

“2026 is probably where rubber meets the road,” Ricco said. “Companies will have to decide whether to pass costs on to consumers, cut jobs or reduce payments to shareholders.”

Fewer cattle, fewer hides

Compounding the tariff shock is a shortage of raw materials. The U.S. cattle herd is at its smallest level since the 1950s, following years of drought, rising feed costs, and herd liquidation. Since hides are an unavoidable byproduct of beef and dairy production, fewer cattle translate directly into fewer hides, even as global demand for high-quality leather remains strong.

“Fewer cattle means the hides that are available are more expensive,” Reddy said, noting the effect on premium boots made with high-grade leather.

Consumers hoping to switch to cheaper synthetic alternatives may find little relief. Many faux-leather and polyurethane materials rely on petrochemical inputs sourced from Asia, which are also subject to new tariffs. Retailers and analysts say synthetic footwear and handbags are already seeing mid- to high-single-digit cost increases.

For an industry already operating on thin margins, the combination of tariffs, supply chain upheaval, and raw material shortages is reshaping pricing and production decisions. While companies like Twisted X have managed to contain increases for now, the leather industry broadly is bracing for a more painful adjustment ahead.

Brazil Forces Apple to Open iOS Ecosystem: Alternative App Stores, External Payments, and New Fees Approved in Landmark Settlement

0
An Apple logo is seen at the entrance of an Apple Store in downtown Brussels, Belgium March 10, 2016. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo

Brazil’s competition authority, the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), has ratified a groundbreaking settlement with Apple that mandates sweeping changes to the App Store’s operations on iOS devices within the country.

The agreement, finalized through a Termo de Compromisso de Cessação on December 23, 2025, concludes a protracted antitrust investigation launched in December 2022 and imposes obligations for third-party app stores, external payment links, alternative in-app payment processors, and a differentiated commission structure—representing one of the most extensive liberalizations of Apple’s platform outside the European Union’s Digital Markets Act framework.

The probe originated from a complaint filed by Latin America’s e-commerce leader MercadoLibre, which accused Apple of abusing its dominant position by enforcing exclusive app distribution through the App Store and mandating its in-app purchase system for digital goods and subscriptions, typically at a 30% commission rate. CADE’s investigation scrutinized practices including the outright ban on sideloading and alternative marketplaces, restrictions preventing developers from directing users to lower-cost external payment options, and policies that stifled competition in Brazil’s burgeoning digital economy, home to over 150 million iPhone users.

In its technical opinion earlier this year, CADE recommended condemnation, finding Apple’s rules created barriers to entry and innovation. Preventive measures imposed in late 2024—requiring Apple to permit external payments—were contested by the company in court but ultimately upheld, paving the way for the negotiated settlement. Key provisions of the agreement, effective for an initial three-year term with potential extensions or revisions, include allowing developers to integrate clickable buttons or links directing users to external websites for transactions, with no commission if only static text informs users of alternatives. Third-party payment processors may operate alongside Apple’s system inside apps, presented on equal footing without preferential treatment. Most significantly, Apple must enable alternative app stores and sideloading in Brazil, though it retains the right to display neutral, objective security warnings limited in scope and free of additional friction or discouraging language.

The fee structure introduces nuanced tiers: standard App Store transactions remain subject to commissions of 10% to 25% depending on developer size and volume, with an additional 5% transaction fee for those using Apple’s payment rails. External redirects via interactive elements incur a 15% fee, while purely informational static text triggers no charge. Third-party marketplaces face a 5% Core Technology Fee to cover platform maintenance and security.

Apple has up to 105 days from the agreement’s binding date—anticipated for early 2026—to roll out technical implementations, likely via an iOS update such as 19.3 or a dedicated Brazil-specific patch. Noncompliance risks fines up to R$150 million, approximately $27.1 million, alongside potential resumption of the full investigation.

Apple responded by emphasizing user protections: “In order to comply with regulatory demands from CADE, Apple is making changes that will impact iOS apps in Brazil. While these changes will open new privacy and security risks to users, we have worked to maintain protections against some threats, including keeping in place important safeguards for younger users.”

The company confirmed no plans to extend these concessions globally. The settlement’s complainant, MercadoLibre, described the outcome as partial progress but vowed continued vigilance. Industry analysts estimate the changes could reduce Apple’s App Store revenue in Brazil—part of its $100 billion-plus global services segment—by 15-25% annually, while empowering local developers in gaming, streaming, and fintech.Brazil, lacking DMA-equivalent legislation, achieved this through pure antitrust enforcement, distinguishing it from reforms in the EU, Japan, and South Korea.

The decision reinforces a global wave of scrutiny on Big Tech gatekeepers, testing Apple’s ability to maintain ecosystem integrity amid mounting pressure to accommodate regional demands without fragmenting its worldwide model. Developers anticipate a more competitive landscape as implementation looms, potentially lowering consumer prices and spurring innovation in Latin America’s largest market.

2025: The Year AI Minted Over 50 New Billionaires Amid Record Funding and Infrastructure Boom

0

Artificial intelligence dominated headlines, investments, and wealth creation in 2025 like no other sector, transforming entrepreneurs into billionaires at an unprecedented pace and solidifying AI’s role in everyday work and life.

According to Forbes, more than 50 new billionaires emerged from the AI ecosystem this year, driven by explosive valuations, massive funding rounds exceeding $200 billion globally, which captured 50% of all venture capital, up 16% from 2024 per Crunchbase, and infrastructure commitments rivaling national budgets. The year kicked off with a shockwave in January when Chinese startup DeepSeek released an open-source large language model trained with dramatically less compute than U.S. counterparts, sending ripples through markets and instantly elevating founder Liang Wenfeng to billionaire status with an estimated net worth of $11.5 billion.

U.S. frontrunner Anthropic, developer of the Claude model family, raised $3.5 billion early in the year at a $61.5 billion valuation, propelling all seven cofounders—including siblings Daniela and Dario Amodei—into the billionaire ranks for the first time. The company went on to secure a total of $16.5 billion in funding across rounds, culminating in a September valuation of $183 billion.

Infrastructure became the year’s defining theme. In January, President Donald Trump announced the $500 billion Stargate data center initiative involving OpenAI, SoftBank, and Oracle—sparking a cascade of commitments from tech giants. Meta, Alphabet, and Microsoft each pledged upwards of $65 billion toward AI compute facilities, fueling a data center construction frenzy that minted over a dozen new billionaires among suppliers and enablers.

Semiconductor networking firm Astera Labs saw its cofounders enter billionaire territory amid surging demand for high-bandwidth interconnects. Data center real estate player Fermi and Korean manufacturers ISU Petasys (chips) and Sanil Electric (transformers) similarly benefited from hyperscaler buildouts. Cloud provider CoreWeave, backed by Nvidia, achieved multibillion-dollar status, enriching its founders through explosive growth in GPU cloud services.

The talent and data wars intensified. In June, Meta acquired a 49% stake in data labeling leader Scale AI for over $14 billion, valuing the company at approximately $29 billion. The deal appointed 28-year-old CEO Alexandr Wang—already a billionaire since 2022—as Meta’s chief AI officer, while briefly making cofounder Lucy Guo (31, departed 2018 but retained equity) the world’s youngest self-made female billionaire at $1.4 billion.

Rivals filled the vacuum: Surge AI founder Edwin Chen reached an estimated $18 billion net worth via his 75% stake in the company, which hit a $24 billion valuation on $1.2 billion in 2024 revenue. Data labeling startup Mercor soared to $10 billion in October after a $250 million round, turning its three 22-year-old cofounders into the youngest self-made billionaires ever, each worth around $2.2 billion.

Multimodal AI captured imaginations in September with OpenAI’s Sora 2 launch, flooding social media with hyper-realistic generated videos and images. Billions flowed into image, video, and audio startups, notably ElevenLabs, whose AI voice synthesis platform raised $100 million at a $6.6 billion valuation in October, minting billionaires out of cofounders Mati Staniszewski and Piotr Dabkowski.

Workplace adoption accelerated dramatically: Gallup surveys showed weekly AI usage doubling from 11% in 2023 to 23% in 2025, with even higher penetration among developers. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella—himself newly minted a billionaire through stock performance—revealed up to 30% of the company’s code was AI-generated. Coding tool Cursor from Anysphere reached a $29 billion valuation in November, creating four new billionaire cofounders.

Companies heavily leveraging AI, including video game developer Paper Games, translation software firm TransPerfect, and Chinese robotics maker Orbbec, propelled their founders into the billionaire ranks. As AI permeates industries from software to manufacturing, 2025’s wealth creation wave, fueled by unprecedented capital concentration and technological breakthroughs, marks the sector’s transition from hype to economic powerhouse. It has reshaped global billionaire lists and is expected to set the stage for even greater transformations ahead.