Which general studies course would you recommend for all students besides the current ones in Nigerian universities? We suggest “Prompt Engineering Techniques”. You can go with “AI Prompting Essentials” or Prompting Techniques & Methods to overcome Nigerian Society of Engineers’s reservation of the word “engineering” in non-engineering programs. Let me explain why we think that way.

In most universities in Nigeria, there are courses which fall under the umbrella of General Studies (GST) and in most universities they include Use of English, Logic and Philosophy (Humanities), Polity and Economy of Nigeria, etc, understanding that many universities call them different names. Largely, these courses are required early year courses irrespective of the program the student is enrolled to undertake.

But over the last two years, we have noted that a student’s ability to ask the right questions to available technologies, including AI, is even more important than the student knowing the answer. Simply, we need to educate and train students with basic foundational means to ask the right questions and get the right answers from the machines and computing systems of the future. In that AI future, understanding the prompting technique and methodology will be useful. And I think it is as basic as the requirement of the Use of English which enables us to communicate with humans. But here, we need to communicate with machines; feel free to call it evolved Use of English for AI!

“Prompt engineering” in AI refers to the practice of carefully crafting specific instructions, called “prompts,” to guide a generative AI model to produce accurate and relevant responses by providing the right context and information for the desired task, essentially maximizing the model’s capabilities through well-designed input phrasing. This course will equip students with the right prompting skills for foundation, LLMs and GenAI levels of AI. I think every great school should make it a GST course.

In the next Tekedia Mini-MBA which begins on Feb 10, Tekedia Institute is introducing Prompting Essentials to provide the basis for our Learners to progress on this, focusing on the business management and leadership aspect; nothing technical as we’re a business school. We will demonstrate with ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini how to win the communication of the future.

Comment on Feed

Comment: But prompting is quite easy. I don’t think that you will have enough to fill a semester coursework

My Response: In Use of English, you need two semesters to learn how to communicate with humans after spending all the time in secondary school learning English. Then, the Use of Languages for Machines (yes, that is what that AI prompting is about), you think it is not a full semester course. Provided the course is not about “define prompt engineering”, “name the 3 people who gave a speech about prompt engineering you kno”, list “3 types of prompt workers in Chicago” … you get the idea of our normal Nigerian way of teaching, a semester may not even be enough.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has acknowledged that the company underestimated TikTok’s meteoric rise, misjudging it as a mere video platform rather than a social media phenomenon.

Speaking at an internal all-hands meeting, a recording obtained by Business Insider, Zuckerberg admitted that Meta’s slow response to TikTok stemmed from a flawed assumption that the app was more like YouTube than a true social network.

“When I look back on TikTok, I think part of the reason why we were slow to it is because we didn’t think TikTok was social,” Zuckerberg said. “We looked at it and we thought, ‘Oh, this is like, a little more like YouTube.'”

His remarks offer a rare glimpse into how the tech giant miscalculated one of the biggest shifts in social media history, allowing TikTok to surge ahead as Meta scrambled to catch up.

Zuckerberg explained that Meta’s traditional view of social interaction—centered around friends sharing content and commenting on posts—caused the company to initially misunderstand TikTok’s power. While Meta focused on feeds and direct engagement, TikTok thrived on algorithmic content discovery, with users engaging not just through public comments but also by sharing videos in private messages.

“Because we were too dismissive up front, it wasn’t just about people commenting in the feed,” Zuckerberg said. “It was about people seeing stuff in their feed and then sharing it into message threads.”

He pointed out that the majority of social interaction on Meta’s platforms—WhatsApp, Messenger, and Instagram Direct—now happens through private messaging rather than public posts. TikTok’s ability to generate viral content that users instinctively shared in private channels gave it a competitive edge that Meta failed to recognize early on.

Meta’s Strategy to Regain Users from TikTok

Having lost the initial battle, Meta is now aggressively trying to claw back its influence, not only by improving Reels on Instagram and Facebook but also by betting heavily on its new social media platform, Threads.

In an effort to wrestle creators and users away from TikTok, Meta has reportedly offered some influencers as much as $30,000 to join Threads and create content. The company hopes that by incentivizing top creators to post on Threads, it can build momentum for the platform and offer an alternative to both TikTok and Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter).

This move is reminiscent of past strategies by social media giants, where companies poured millions into content creator programs to boost user engagement. Meta is hoping that if it can get big influencers to consistently post and bring their audiences along, Threads could grow into a legitimate competitor in the social media space.

The Uncertain Future of TikTok, Meta’s Possible Advantage

Beyond offering financial incentives to influencers, Meta is also keeping a close eye on TikTok’s uncertain future in the U.S. The short-form video platform is facing increasing scrutiny from regulators over its ties to China.

President Trump signed an executive order giving ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, 75 days to either divest from TikTok or face a ban in the U.S. The Biden administration has also expressed concerns over TikTok’s data privacy practices, adding to the regulatory uncertainty.

“We don’t have control of what’s going to happen to TikTok,” Zuckerberg said. “We have a lot of competitors, but they’re an important one. So, who’s gonna own TikTok at the end of the year? What’s gonna happen? I mean, that’s a pretty big deal, something that’s a card that we get to turn over.”

If TikTok is forced to sell its U.S. operations or is banned outright, Meta could benefit significantly, as many of TikTok’s displaced users and creators might turn to Instagram Reels and Threads as alternatives.

Avoiding the Same Mistakes with AI

Zuckerberg used the discussion about TikTok to issue a broader warning to employees: Meta must ensure it does not take “too narrow of a view” when it comes to emerging trends, particularly artificial intelligence.

He outlined a vision for AI-powered features across Facebook and Instagram, predicting that interactive AI agents and more immersive AI-generated content experiences will soon become central to the platform.

“I think the next trend here is there’re going to be things that either AI can produce, that we can just put in there… I think this year we’re gonna have stuff where it’s like, okay, you have an AI agent, and you can just start talking to it,” he said.

Zuckerberg dismissed concerns that Meta’s aggressive push into AI could divert attention from its core social media business, arguing that as a large company, it must be able to juggle multiple priorities.

“If we can’t build Facebook and [the] next platform at the same time, then, like, eventually game over,” he stated, making it clear that Meta cannot afford another miscalculation like the one it made with TikTok.1

Meta’s AI investments are already transforming its platforms, with AI-driven recommendations playing a growing role in user feeds. The company is also experimenting with AI chatbots and digital assistants designed to enhance user engagement.

But as Zuckerberg’s comments suggest, the challenge for Meta is not just about developing AI technology, it’s about ensuring that it fully understands and capitalizes on the next big shift in social media before it is too late.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg found himself in an ironic predicament last week when remarks he made during an internal meeting about his frustration over company leaks were, once again, leaked to the press.

According to a report by 404 Media, Zuckerberg expressed his exasperation over the continuous stream of confidential company information reaching the public, stating, “We try to be really open, and then everything I say leaks. It sucks.”

The leaked footage reportedly captures Zuckerberg addressing employees during an “all-hands” meeting on Thursday, where he lamented that he had to be increasingly cautious about what he says internally. His words, however, did not stay internal for long. Within hours, 404 Media had obtained and published details from the meeting, exposing the CEO’s grievances about the very problem he was discussing.

Meta has long struggled with internal leaks, a problem that has worsened in recent months as tensions rise within the company. The latest leak comes at a particularly sensitive time for Zuckerberg, who has been navigating efforts to rebuild Meta’s relationship with former U.S. President Donald Trump. The company recently agreed to pay a $25 million settlement following a lawsuit filed by Trump, who had been suspended from Meta’s platforms after the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

Zuckerberg’s efforts to mend ties with Trump have reportedly sparked internal debates, further fueling leaks from disgruntled employees. Some staffers see the shift as a pragmatic business decision, while others view it as a betrayal of Meta’s previous stance on political misinformation and election integrity.

In response to the persistent leaks, Meta’s leadership has escalated its crackdown on employees caught sharing internal information with the press. Chief Information Security Officer Guy Rosen issued a stern warning following the latest breach, making it clear that Meta would not tolerate leaks.

“We take leaks seriously and will take action,” Rosen wrote in an internal memo, which was also leaked to the media. “When information is stolen or leaked, there are repercussions beyond the immediate security impact. Our teams become demoralized, and we all waste time that is better spent working on our products and toward our goals and mission.”

Rosen also confirmed that Meta had recently fired several employees for leaking confidential company information.

“We recently terminated relationships with employees who leaked confidential company information inappropriately and exfiltrated sensitive documents,” he stated.

The company is reportedly increasing surveillance and security measures to curb future leaks, though its effectiveness remains to be seen.

Zuckerberg Adapts Meta’s Meetings

Zuckerberg, frustrated by the continuous leaks, revealed that Meta has made changes to its internal communications, particularly during the company’s “all-hands” meetings. The Q&A section, once a hallmark of Meta’s internal transparency, has been modified to limit potential leak points.

“I want to be able to talk about stuff openly,” Zuckerberg said in the leaked meeting audio. “But I am also trying to, like, well, we’re trying to build stuff and create value in the world, not destroy value by talking about stuff that inevitably leaks.”

The persistence of leaks despite these adjustments raises questions about employee trust in Meta’s leadership. The company’s efforts to tighten its grip on internal communication may further alienate workers, particularly as concerns about workplace culture, political affiliations, and content moderation policies continue to simmer.

Leaks: A Global Tech Trend

Meta’s struggle with leaks is part of a broader trend of internal dissent within major tech companies. Employees at Silicon Valley giants like Google, Amazon, and Apple have increasingly spoken out—sometimes anonymously—against company policies, executive decisions, and ethical concerns.

For Meta, the issue is compounded by the company’s turbulent past with content moderation, political controversies, and its shifting corporate strategy. The firm’s decision to reinstate Trump on its platforms, coupled with its legal settlement, has only deepened the ideological divide among its workforce.

Additionally, Meta has been dealing with mounting criticism over its workplace policies, including recent employee protests over the removal of tampons from men’s restrooms—a seemingly minor issue that nonetheless ignited debates over inclusivity and company culture.

As Meta moves forward, it faces a fundamental dilemma: How does it maintain internal transparency while preventing damaging leaks? Zuckerberg has long championed an open internal culture, but his frustration suggests that the reality is proving unsustainable.

For now, Meta’s response appears to be increased surveillance, stricter policies, and swift terminations for leakers. But whether these measures will stop employees from speaking out—or simply drive them to find more discreet ways to leak—remains uncertain.

One thing is clear: The irony of Zuckerberg’s complaints about leaks being immediately leaked underscores just how difficult it will be for Meta to regain control of its internal communications. The battle between company secrecy and employee dissent is far from over.