DD
MM
YYYY

CATEGORIES

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

CATEGORIES

PAGES

Home Blog Page 248

Bitcoin Could Crash to $50,000 – Standard Chartered Issues Warning

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

Major investment bank Standard Chartered has delivered one of the more sobering near-term outlooks for the cryptocurrency market in recent months.

In a recent commentary shared by reporter Bloomberg, Geoff Kendrick, the bank’s Head of Digital Assets Research, now anticipates Bitcoin sliding to around $50,000 and Ethereum (ETH) dropping toward $1,400 in the coming months

This prediction represents roughly 26% further downside for BTC and 29% for ETH from mid-February 2026 levels where BTC hovered near $67,000 and ETH near $1,950–$2,000.

The global thought leader on digital assets attributed the potential downturn to a softening U.S. economy, declining holdings in digital asset ETFs, and delayed expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts until at least June, all of which continue to weigh on crypto markets.

The bearish short-term call comes amid persistent ETF outflows (nearing $8 billion in cumulative redemptions in some reports), softening U.S. economic signals, and the continued delay of meaningful Federal Reserve rate cuts (now not expected until potentially June or later).

After a brief period of optimism that saw Bitcoin price stabilize trading above $72,000, after falling as low as $59,847 earlier this month, the world’s largest cryptocurrency has resumed its downward trajectory, reflecting a sharp shift in investor sentiment.

Bitcoin is down 23% year-to-date and approximately 40% off its late-2025 peak. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has fallen into single digits (Extreme Fear territory). Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF flows remain net negative in recent weeks, with daily outflows occasionally exceeding $400 million.

With Bitcoin consolidating between the $66,000 and $67,000 zone, several analysts note that Bitcoin’s recent price structure reflects a market still dominated by distribution pressure rather than sustained demand recovery.

Standard Chartered has now revised its end-of-2026 price targets downward for the second time since late 2025. The bank has reduced it Bitcoin price projection ti $100,000 (previously $150,000; originally $300,000 in earlier 2025 forecasts. Also, its price for Ethereum was reduced to $4,000, previously $7,500.

Similar cuts were applied to several altcoins:

– Solana (SOL) ? $135 (from $250)

– BNB ? $1,050 (from $1,755)

– Avalanche (AVAX) ? $18 (from $100)

– XRP ? $2.80 (from $8.00 in some prior views)

Despite the cuts, the bank insists its long-term constructive view remains intact. It continues to project Bitcoin reaching $500,000, Ethereum $40,000, and Solana $2,000 by the end of 2030.

Kendrick highlighted several reinforcing factors for near-term weakness:

1. ETF investor behavior — Many recent buyers are sitting on unrealized losses and appear more inclined to reduce exposure than to “buy the dip.”

2. Macro headwinds — U.S. economic softening and delayed monetary easing remove a key tailwind that crypto had enjoyed in previous cycles.

3. Deleveraging underway — Open interest has declined, and the current correction — while painful — is described as more “orderly” than the chaotic crashes of 2018 or 2022.

Once a bottom is established around the projected levels, Kendrick expects a recovery phase through the second half of 2026, eventually carrying major assets toward the revised year-end targets.

While some traders view the $50,000 region as strong historical support (previous cycle highs and institutional cost-basis zones), others warn that capitulation selling could briefly overshoot if ETF redemptions accelerate or if broader equity markets weaken further.

Outlook

Standard Chartered’s latest note is a clear reminder that  even in a maturing asset class crypto remains highly sensitive to macro liquidity conditions and institutional flows. Whether Bitcoin holds above $50,000 or tests lower will likely depend on the pace of ETF selling and any surprise shifts in Fed rhetoric over the next 1–3 months.

The bank’s outlook comes at a time when Bitcoin has been navigating heightened volatility, with investors weighing institutional inflows against tightening financial conditions and global economic uncertainty.

Russia Considering a Return to Using USD for International Settlements 

By
Paul Ugbede Godwin
-
0

Russia is considering a return to using the US dollar in international settlements as part of a proposed wide-ranging economic partnership with the United States under President Donald Trump’s administration.

This stems from an internal Kremlin memo reviewed and reported by Bloomberg. The document outlines several areas of potential US-Russia economic alignment, potentially tied to a broader deal that could include ending or resolving aspects of the Ukraine conflict.

Russia’s proposed return to the dollar settlement system, which could extend to energy transactions; a major reversal of Moscow’s multi-year push toward de-dollarization and alternatives like the ruble, yuan, or BRICS mechanisms.

Joint ventures in oil, LNG, and offshore/hard-to-recover reserves, allowing US firms to recover prior losses. Cooperation on critical raw materials like lithium, copper, nickel, platinum. Long-term aviation contracts and potential US involvement in Russian manufacturing.

Preferential access for US companies to the Russian consumer market. Collaboration on nuclear energy including AI-related ventures. Joint promotion of fossil fuels over low-emission policies seen as favoring China and Europe.

The memo argues that re-embracing the dollar would help Russia expand its foreign exchange market, reduce balance-of-payments volatility, and stabilize its economy—benefits that would require lifting Western sanctions and restoring access to dollar-based systems like SWIFT.

This represents a dramatic policy shift for Russia, which has aggressively pursued de-dollarization since 2022 sanctions like shifting trade with China and others to national currencies, building BRICS alternatives. A pivot back could slow global de-dollarization momentum, reinforce the dollar’s dominance, and impact markets; recent reports noted sharp drops in gold and silver prices on the news, as it undercuts narratives around dollar alternatives and inflation hedges.

However, this is still at the proposal stage—an internal pitch, not a finalized agreement. It would depend on major concessions (sanctions relief, Ukraine-related deals), and reactions vary: Some view it as tactical leverage or bargaining in US-Russia talks.

Others note Russia’s deepening ties with China make a full pivot unlikely without significant incentives. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has commented that the dollar remains attractive if not “weaponized,” but Russia hasn’t formally abandoned alternatives.

BRICS de-dollarization efforts remain a key ongoing initiative among the bloc’s members (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, plus expanded partners like Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, UAE, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia), aimed at reducing reliance on the US dollar in international trade, reserves, and payments.

This is driven by concerns over US sanctions, dollar “weaponization,” geopolitical tensions, and the desire for greater financial sovereignty in a multipolar world. De-dollarization has made tangible but gradual progress, particularly in intra-BRICS trade: Local currency settlements now account for 60-67% of BRICS trade overall, with even higher figures in specific bilateral pairs.

BRICS nations are actively reducing dollar reserves down from ~58.2% in 2024 to ~56.92% in early 2026 across the group.
Central banks especially in BRICS+ have accelerated gold purchases, breaching the 5,000-tonne milestone in annual global buying in recent years, with gold increasingly viewed as a neutral reserve asset to hedge against dollar exposure.

Russia, China, and India conduct much of their energy and commodity trade without dollars, and similar patterns exist with Brazil and others. However, progress is uneven and faces challenges: No unified BRICS currency exists yet (a common one remains a “distant dream” per analysts).

Efforts focus on practical alternatives like linking national central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) — e.g., India’s digital rupee, China’s digital yuan, Russia’s digital ruble — for interoperable cross-border payments. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has proposed formally linking BRICS CBDCs to simplify trade and tourism, potentially on the agenda for the 2026 BRICS Summit (hosted by India).

Projects like BRICS Bridge (a blockchain-based payment system), mBridge (for CBDC settlements), and experimental “BRICS Unit” (a settlement unit backed ~40% by gold and 60% by member currencies) are in pilot or early stages. The New Development Bank (NDB) has ramped up loans in local currencies.

Impact of Recent Russia-US Developments

The February 2026 Bloomberg-reported Kremlin memo proposing Russia’s return to dollar settlements including for energy in a potential Trump-era deal has sparked debate. This could include sanctions relief, SWIFT access, and US involvement in Russian energy/minerals.

It represents a potential tactical shift for Russia to diversify away from over-reliance on China/yuan and stabilize its economy.
Analysts note it would slow de-dollarization momentum but not end it — China, India, and others continue pushing alternatives independently. Over 60% of BRICS trade is already in local currencies; a Russian pivot might stall broader bloc unity but wouldn’t reverse existing bilateral non-dollar flows.

Market reactions reflect short-term narrative shifts, but structural trends like gold hoarding and CBDC links persist. Some view Russia’s proposal as leverage in US talks possibly tied to Ukraine resolution rather than a full abandonment of BRICS.

The dollar remains dominant globally still ~58-60% of reserves, per various metrics, bolstered by network effects, deep markets, and lack of viable full alternatives. De-dollarization is more about diversification and risk reduction than outright replacement — a gradual “multipolar” shift rather than collapse.

Challenges include coordination hurdles, convertible currency limits, political risks and internal BRICS differences. 2026 could be pivotal with India’s BRICS presidency and summit focusing on payment interoperability, but experts see no imminent “BRICS currency shock.”

BRICS efforts are accelerating in targeted areas (local currencies, gold, digital systems) but remain incremental and resilient to setbacks like potential Russian realignment. The process is chipping away at dollar hegemony without fully dismantling it yet.

Tekedia Mini-MBA Live Zoom Lectures Begin

By
Ndubuisi Ekekwe
-
0

We will begin the live Zoom component of Tekedia Mini-MBA tomorrow. I will discuss the mission of firms and why innovation is indispensable to achieving whatever organizations set out to accomplish. Companies must continuously innovate to improve how they combine and recombine the factors of production to create products and services that solve market frictions.

Innovation is not an abstract ideal; it is an operational discipline. We will unpack the components of that process and how they work together to drive real outcomes.

What is symphonic innovation? It is innovation that is not domain-specific, but is anchored on a unified and harmonious approach in the deployment of technology and business components to accelerate productivity gains and cushion competitiveness. With Symphonic Innovation, you do not deploy and launch for blockchain, for example, only to be tripped by AI; you launch with a mindset that these technologies and business components are like extended musical compositions which must be carefully organized to make the orchestra an unforgettable experience.

How do you make business an orchestra like experience? You solve equations of markets. Together, we will solve them over 12 weeks.

Great Company = Awesome Products + Superior Execution

Innovation = Invention + Commercialization.

Sat, Feb 14 | 7pm-8.30pm WAT | Innovation, Growth and the Mission of Firms – Ndubuisi Ekekwe | Zoom link

Welcome.

Russia Blocks WhatsApp Nationwide, Adding to Mounting Global Regulatory Pressure

By
Samuel Nwite
-
0

Russia’s full block of WhatsApp intensifies pressure on Meta’s messaging business at a time when the company is also facing heightened antitrust scrutiny in Europe.

Russia has completely blocked WhatsApp, the messaging platform owned by Meta Platforms, in what the Kremlin described as a response to the company’s failure to comply with domestic law.

The decision removes the country’s most widely used messenger from the Russian internet and deepens Meta’s regulatory challenges abroad, particularly in Europe.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed the move on Thursday.

“Due to Meta’s unwillingness to comply with Russian law, such a decision was indeed taken and implemented,” Peskov told reporters.

He urged Russians to switch to MAX, a state-backed messaging service, calling it “an accessible alternative, a developing messenger, a national messenger, and it is available on the market for citizens as an alternative.”

WhatsApp said the decision would undermine secure communications.

“Trying to isolate over 100 million users from private and secure communication is a backwards step and can only lead to less safety for people in Russia,” the company said in a statement.

The ban follows months of escalating restrictions imposed by Roskomnadzor, Russia’s state communications watchdog. In August, authorities began restricting WhatsApp and other foreign messaging platforms, disabling voice calls after accusing them of failing to share information with law enforcement in cases related to fraud and terrorism.

In December, Roskomnadzor announced further measures to gradually limit the service, accusing WhatsApp of continuing to violate Russian law and of being used “to organize and carry out terrorist acts on the territory of the country, to recruit their perpetrators and to commit fraud and other crimes.”

Russian courts have previously fined WhatsApp for failing to remove prohibited content. Authorities have also demanded that the company establish a local representative office in Russia, a legal requirement imposed on foreign technology firms operating in the country.

Meta itself has already been designated an extremist organization in Russia, following earlier bans on Facebook and Instagram.

The technical mechanism behind the latest block appears to involve removing WhatsApp-related domain names from Russia’s national domain registry, preventing devices inside the country from resolving the app’s IP addresses. Access is now largely limited to users employing virtual private networks, which are themselves subject to increasing regulatory constraints.

Sovereign Internet Strategy and Domestic Alternatives

The move aligns with Russia’s broader push to construct what officials describe as a “sovereign” communications infrastructure. The policy seeks to ensure that foreign-owned digital platforms either comply with Russian legislation or withdraw from the market.

Authorities have promoted MAX, a state-backed messenger that integrates government services into its platform. Critics argue the app could facilitate state surveillance. Russian officials reject that characterization, saying the service is intended to improve convenience and centralize access to public services.

In Moscow, the reaction to the ban was mixed. Activists briefly locked the doors of Roskomnadzor’s offices with a bicycle chain and displayed a poster reading, “Give us an unregulated internet – Russia without Roskomnadzor.” Some residents described the move as a violation of consumer choice, while others said alternative messaging platforms would suffice.

The elimination of WhatsApp, however, removes a central communications channel for millions of users, businesses, and cross-border contacts.

Broader Regulatory Headwinds in Europe

The Russian block comes at a sensitive moment for WhatsApp and Meta more broadly in Europe, where regulators have intensified scrutiny under competition and digital market rules.

WhatsApp, which has integrated messaging infrastructure across Meta’s platforms, is operating in a regulatory environment shaped by the European Union’s Digital Markets Act (DMA). Under the DMA, large online platforms designated as “gatekeepers” must comply with interoperability, data use, and competition requirements. The European Commission has examined how Meta structures data sharing and integration between WhatsApp and other services within its ecosystem.

European competition authorities have also scrutinized how Meta leverages its scale across messaging, social networking, and digital advertising markets. The latest is the inquiry into Meta’s policy, restricting the use of third-party AI on WhatsApp. Antitrust regulators are increasingly focused on whether dominant platforms restrict rivals’ access to user data or lock in users through ecosystem integration.

WhatsApp is not only a consumer communications tool for Meta, but a strategic asset in payments, business messaging, and cross-platform integration. Restrictions in large markets limit growth opportunities and complicate compliance strategies.

Kiyosaki Makes Bold Claim: Why He’d Pick Bitcoin Over Gold Every Time

By
Ojukwu Emmanuel
-
0

As the global markets battle with economic uncertainty, prominent investor Robert Kiyoski is doubling down on digital assets.

The Rich Dad Poor Dad author has boldly declared that he prefers Bitcoin to gold, calling it the superior store of value in today’s evolving financial landscape.

In a post on X, he wrote,

“I am often asked: Which is a better investment? Gold or Bitcoin. Obviously I would say both for diversification of assets and add silver. Yet if I had to choose only one asset I would choose Bitcoin. Why? Because gold is in theory infinite.  When the price of gold rises more gold miners, which I am will dig more more.

“Bitcoin, by design is limited to 21 million, a number which we are near now. That means by design no more Bitcoin can be added after 21 million are mined. Brilliant.  That means the price of Bitcoin should only go up. Glad I bought my Bitcoin early.   I am still actively mining for gold and drilling for oil.”

While gold has long been seen as a safe haven, Kiyosaki believes Bitcoin represents the next generation of wealth preservation. He framed his reasoning around one key principle, absolute scarcity.

The logic is straightforward and echoes a classic Bitcoin maximalist talking point. Gold’s supply can and historically does expand when prices rise high enough to justify more mining, exploration, and technological improvements in extraction.

Bitcoin’s protocol, by contrast, enforces a strict 21 million coin cap, no exceptions, no upgrades to inflate supply, no central authority that can change the rules.

Kiyosaki, who remains active in gold mining and oil drilling, acknowledges gold’s enduring appeal and real-world utility. Yet he highlights Bitcoin’s engineered hardness as the decisive edge in a world of endless money printing.

His post reignited the long-running gold vs Bitcoin debate. Bitcoin supporters lauded the endorsement from a prominent (and occasionally controversial) financial educator.

Meanwhile Gold advocates pushed back strongly on his argument. Common criticisms included:

– Gold has thousands of years of proven monetary history, industrial uses (electronics, jewelry, dentistry), and central-bank demand.

– Bitcoin’s value depends almost entirely on continued belief and network effects—it’s “speculative” compared to gold’s tangible fallback demand.

– Scarcity alone doesn’t guarantee price appreciation (many scarce things aren’t valuable).

– Bitcoin has experienced brutal drawdowns (70–90%+ multiple times), while gold tends to hold steadier during crises.

Kiyosaki’s statement comes in a period where Bitcoin is currently on a downward price trajectory, despite starting the year on a positive note.  After a brief period of optimism that saw prices stabilize trading above $72,000, the world’s largest cryptocurrency recent sharp decline, reflects a  shift in investor sentiment.

Reports reveal that Bitcoin has posted $2.3 billion in realized losses in what an analyst says is one of the largest capitulation events in history, rivaling its crash in 2021. Several other analysts note that BTC’s recent price structure reflects a market still dominated by distribution pressure rather than sustained demand recovery.

Recent market indicators now suggest that fear is once again dominating trader psychology, raising concerns about whether this pullback is a temporary correction or the start of a deeper slide.

Gold on the other hand hovered near $5,050 early Wednesday, comfortably above the psychological $5,000 line, as traders hit pause ahead of key US labor data. The metal is steady, though still roughly $550 below its recent peak near $5,600. After violent swings in recent weeks, bullion appears to be digesting gains rather than chasing fresh highs.

Kiyosaki has repeatedly urged buying gold, silver, and Bitcoin during dips, paused accumulation at certain price levels, and occasionally sold portions due to taxes moves. With ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty persistent inflation concerns, massive sovereign debt levels, and questions around fiat stability Kiyosaki’s voice remains influential.

His pivot toward emphasizing Bitcoin’s superiority in scarcity terms reflects a broader narrative shift among some traditional finance figures who see digital gold as the harder, more portable, and more censorship-resistant evolution of the yellow metal.

However, diversification remains his baseline advice, as he urges traders to hold both gold and silver plus Bitcoin. But if push came to shove and only one asset could stay in his portfolio, he’d bet on Bitcoin.

1...247248249...8,444Page 248 of 8,444

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy

© Tekedia. All rights reserved.

Term & Privacy