The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) has revealed that Nigeria’s inflation rate climbed to 34.6% in November 2024, up from 33.8% in October.

This increase reflects the relentless rise in the cost of goods and services, marking another month of worsening economic conditions under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration.

On a year-on-year basis, inflation was 6.4 percentage points higher than the 28.2% recorded in November 2023. While the month-on-month inflation rate of 2.638% in November showed a marginal slowdown compared to 2.640% in October, the cost of living continues to skyrocket, leaving millions of Nigerians struggling to make ends meet.

Food inflation, in particular, remains a major driver of the overall increase. At 39.93% in November, food prices have surged by 7 percentage points compared to the same period last year, disproportionately affecting low-income households who spend a significant portion of their income on food.

Staples like yam, maize, and rice—critical components of the Nigerian diet—have become unaffordable for millions. The average annual food inflation rate for the 12 months ending November 2024 was 38.67%, up from 27.09% in 2023, highlighting the worsening trend.

Regionally, states like Bauchi (46.21%), Kebbi (42.41%), and Anambra (40.48%) recorded the highest food inflation rates, indicating severe price volatility in northern and southeastern Nigeria. Meanwhile, states such as Delta (26.47%), Benue (28.98%), and Katsina (29.57%) reported the lowest rates but remained well above sustainable levels.

Impact on Nigerians

The rising inflation has placed unbearable pressure on ordinary Nigerians, eroding their purchasing power and pushing millions into deeper financial distress. For many, basic necessities like food, transportation, and healthcare have become luxuries. The situation has sparked widespread discontent, with citizens lamenting the inability of the government to address the root causes of the crisis.

The World Bank has painted an even bleaker picture of Nigeria’s economic future. In its 2023 forecast, the institution warned that inflation, combined with stagnant economic growth, could push an additional 7.1 million Nigerians into extreme poverty in 2025. This would bring the total number of Nigerians living on less than $2.15 a day to about 100 million. A new assessment has found that a staggering 33 million people will face acute food insecurity in Nigeria in 2025, with the number of people facing emergency levels of need projected to almost double.

Tinubu’s Fiscal Policies Under Scrutiny

The continuous rise in inflation calls into question the effectiveness of Tinubu’s fiscal policies, which were expected to stabilize the economy following the controversial fuel subsidy removal mid-last year. Tinubu’s administration had touted the subsidy removal as a necessary step to free up funds for critical infrastructure and social investment programs.

However, the resulting economic shocks, compounded by the depreciation of the naira and structural inefficiencies, have left the masses worse off.

Measures by the government to shore up the economy, including implementing a floating exchange rate and attempting to attract foreign investment, have yet to yield tangible results for the average Nigerian. Instead, they have fueled inflation and deepened economic inequality.

The removal of the fuel subsidy, which was intended to save the government billions of naira annually, has ironically led to skyrocketing transportation costs and triggered a domino effect on the prices of goods and services. Similarly, the devaluation of the naira has made imports more expensive, driving up production costs for businesses that rely on foreign raw materials.

Economic experts have criticized the government’s inability to complement these policy moves with robust social safety nets or initiatives to support local production.

With inflation spiraling out of control and poverty levels rising, economists are calling for targeted interventions to reduce inflationary pressures, such as improving agricultural productivity, reducing transportation costs, and introducing direct cash transfers to vulnerable households.

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has maintained a tight monetary policy to curb inflation, but critics argue that high interest rates are stifling economic growth and further squeezing struggling businesses. There is a growing consensus that fiscal policy must work hand-in-hand with monetary measures to address the underlying structural issues driving inflation.

SpaceX has filed a petition to hold an election on incorporating its Boca Chica-based Starbase launch facility as a city, marking a bold move that blends corporate ambition with civic control.

The letter, addressed to local officials in Cameron County, Texas, outlines SpaceX’s vision of establishing South Texas as “a gateway to Mars,” reinforcing CEO Elon Musk’s long-term goals for space exploration and deeper involvement in shaping local governance.

Since 2014, Starbase has been a hub for SpaceX’s rocket production and testing, playing host to several high-profile projects. Most recently, the site saw the groundbreaking test of the Starship spacecraft, where SpaceX employed its innovative “mechazilla” robotic arms to catch the rocket booster, a significant milestone in the pursuit of reusable spacecraft technology.

SpaceX General Manager Kathryn Lueders, in the letter, emphasized the scale of operations at Starbase, noting that thousands of employees work at the facility, with several hundred residing on-site. If the petition for incorporation succeeds, Starbase would gain municipal status, granting SpaceX enhanced autonomy and streamlining its regulatory processes in the area.

Elon Musk announced via his social media platform X that Starbase would also serve as the company’s new headquarters, signaling a strategic pivot for SpaceX as it strengthens its roots in Texas.

Musk’s Strategic Shift Toward Red States

The move to turn Starbase into a city is part of other decisions that reflect Musk’s evolving political and business alignment. Over the past several years, Musk has increasingly distanced himself from traditionally liberal “blue states” like California, opting instead to ground his operations in conservative-leaning “red states” such as Texas.

In July 2024, Musk announced plans to relocate the headquarters of SpaceX and X (formerly Twitter) from California to Texas. This decision followed a series of public clashes with California regulators and policies. Musk, who has become increasingly vocal about his discontent with progressive regulations, cited a California law that prohibits schools from mandating teacher disclosure of a student’s changes in name, pronouns, or gender identity to their parents as a prime example of what he views as overreach.

By contrast, Texas’s business-friendly environment and less stringent regulatory framework have been appealing to Musk. The state has not only accommodated his ventures but has also emerged as a key battleground for his ideological leanings, which have aligned more closely with conservative values in recent years.

Musk’s political and economic disputes with California escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic when Tesla’s Fremont factory faced operational restrictions due to state-mandated lockdowns. He threatened to move Tesla’s operations to Texas or Nevada in protest, eventually following through by relocating Tesla’s headquarters to Austin in 2021.

The billionaire also clashed with the California Coastal Commission over the expansion of SpaceX’s launch activities, filing a lawsuit after the commission criticized his political views and denied his request for additional launches.

This exodus of Musk’s ventures from California, once considered a bastion for innovation and tech, underscores his broader pivot toward states where conservative ideals around limited government intervention align with his business priorities.

Starbase: A New Frontier or Corporate Takeover?

If Starbase becomes a city, it will raise questions about the implications of a private company effectively controlling a municipality. While incorporation would streamline SpaceX’s ability to conduct launches and expand its infrastructure, many argue it could lead to governance issues, conflicts of interest, and diminished oversight.

Environmental groups have already raised concerns about the impact of SpaceX’s activities on the local ecosystem, particularly in the wildlife-rich Boca Chica area. Turning Starbase into a city could further compound these tensions, as SpaceX would likely prioritize its operational goals over broader community or environmental considerations.

However, many believe the push to incorporate Starbase reflects Musk’s larger strategy of consolidating control over his ventures’ operational environments. In Texas, a state that champions low taxes and minimal regulation, Musk has found fertile ground to expand his enterprises and reframe his public persona.

As Musk increasingly positions himself as a conservative-leaning figure—regularly criticizing progressive policies and embracing free speech absolutism on X—the decision to root his ventures in Texas appears as much about politics as business. Establishing Starbase as a city would further cement this ideological and operational shift.

However, the fate of Starbase’s incorporation will depend on the outcome of the proposed election and the willingness of Cameron County officials to support Musk’s vision. If successful, Starbase could serve as a model, or a cautionary tale, for how private companies shape governance in the 21st century.

For Musk, this move represents more than just another milestone in his quest to colonize Mars. Many believe it’s a strategic effort to create an operational utopia that aligns with his personal and business philosophies. Whether this vision can coexist with the interests of local communities and regulatory frameworks remains to be seen.

The AI concerns of the world: “Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt has issued a grave warning about the rapid pace of artificial intelligence (AI) development, urging humanity to tackle the potential risks before it’s too late. With systems on the verge of self-improvement and independent decision-making, Schmidt suggests that society may soon face the dilemma of pulling the plug on machines that could operate autonomously—and possibly resist human intervention.”

This is what Africa should be concerned about MOST: an AI age where Africa has no presence in the production phase. African leaders must not fall on this armageddonic alarm because we saw how Germany, etc re-started coal plants when they could not get cheap energy from Russia, after the invasion of Ukraine. They did ot return to the stone age despite the crusade of climate warming.

(I believe in global warming and advocate for everyone to stop its menace. But I do not want our leaders to mindlessly follow the global messaging against our strategic national and continental interests because those global crusaders are not doing enough)

Sure, we must be concerned about the dangers of AI, but for Africa, that is not the main danger right now; the real issue is that we could be participants at the consumerism side, just to consume, with no production participation. In other words, let our alarms focus on the fact that we do not have enough electricity in Nigeria and broad Africa to even power laptops in the age where Americans are creating these new species of machines.

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: Ndubuisi Ekekwe, you’ve made some interesting points. how can we balance technology advances with energy needs?

My Response: In secondary school, my geography teacher, Mazi Oji, on introducing us to Human Geography explained the Kardashev scale which largely equated phases of human civilization with energy mining and usage. Ideally, you cannot advance on tech without energy because energy is civilization. So, your question should not happen because no serious country SHOULD be limited by energy.

AI Will Soon Be Deciding What They Want to Do, Society Must Consider “Unplugging It” – Eric Schmidt