DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 26

A Married Couple Playing Secret Agent in their Own Living Room over 2,323 BTC

0

In 2023, businessman Ping Fai Yuen held 2,323 Bitcoin in a Trezor hardware wallet, a “cold wallet” offline for security, protected by a PIN and a 24-word recovery seed phrase. This amount was worth roughly $60 million then; as of March 2026, it’s valued at around $170–180 million depending on exact BTC price fluctuations.

Yuen alleges that his estranged wife, Fun Yung Li, and possibly her sister Lai Yung Li, installed secret CCTV cameras in their family home in an upscale Brighton neighborhood. These cameras reportedly captured him entering or revealing his seed phrase and passwords while he accessed or managed the wallet.

The wife allegedly used this footage to obtain the recovery phrase, access the wallet, and transfer the entire 2,323 BTC across multiple addresses now spread across 71 blockchain addresses. No movements have occurred since December 21, 2023, according to tracking. Yuen’s daughter reportedly warned him in July 2023 that his wife was targeting the Bitcoin amid their divorce discussions.

In response, he installed audio recording equipment in the home as a countermeasure. Recordings allegedly captured discussions about the CCTV setup and the hidden passwords and seed phrase. After discovering the theft, Yuen confronted his wife, leading to an altercation where he was charged with and later pleaded guilty to assault in 2024. Police searches of the wife’s property reportedly found hardware wallets and recovery seeds.

The situation escalated into mutual surveillance: the husband recording to gather evidence of the theft, the wife (allegedly) recording to steal the assets. It’s been colorfully described online as “a married couple playing secret agent in their own living room” over this fortune.

Yuen is suing his wife and sister-in-law to recover the Bitcoin. The High Court recently heard arguments in the case, which remains ongoing and unresolved. The stolen funds’ movement across many addresses complicates tracing and recovery under traditional legal frameworks for digital assets.

This story highlights classic crypto security risks: even air-gapped hardware wallets are vulnerable if the seed phrase is compromised via physical surveillance (“wrench attack” variant in a domestic setting). It also shows how divorces increasingly involve hidden or disputed crypto holdings.

A wrench attack (also called a $5 wrench attack or rubber-hose cryptanalysis) in the context of cryptocurrency refers to a type of theft that uses physical force, violence, threats, intimidation, or coercion to force a victim to hand over access to their crypto holdings.

Unlike traditional hacking attempts that try to crack encryption, steal private keys digitally, or exploit software vulnerabilities, a wrench attack bypasses all of that high-tech security by targeting the human element — the person who knows the password, PIN, seed phrase, or recovery words.

The name comes from a famous satirical XKCD webcomic from around 2009–2013, often dated to xkcd #538. In the comic, security experts discuss elaborate encryption schemes, but one character bluntly points out: instead of brute-forcing a strong key, just threaten the victim with a cheap $5 wrench until they reveal the password.

This dark humor highlights a fundamental truth in security: no amount of cryptographic strength protects you if someone can physically compel you to unlock your wallet. Attackers identify wealthy crypto holders through social media flexing (posting gains, luxury lifestyles), blockchain analysis (public wallet activity), news stories, or leaks.

Crypto’s key advantages for attackers: funds are borderless, instantly transferable, irreversible, and hard to trace once moved — making it ideal for quick cash-outs. These attacks have reportedly increased in recent years with 2025 noted as a “record year” in some reports, including dozens to over 70 documented cases globally, as crypto wealth grows more visible and mainstream.

In cases like the married couple scenario with hidden cameras capturing a seed phrase in a domestic dispute, it shows a non-violent variant — surveillance to obtain credentials without direct physical confrontation, but still exploiting the same human and physical vulnerability. True wrench attacks often involve overt violence or threats.

Crypto security experts including maintainers of public incident trackers recommend strategies like: Never publicly reveal or hint at large holdings. Use multi-signature wallets requiring multiple approvals and keys. Employ dead-man switches, time-locks, or sham wallets with small amounts to mislead attackers.

In short, wrench attacks remind us that in crypto, the weakest link is often not the code — it’s the person holding the keys. Strong encryption is great, but it can’t stop a determined attacker with a wrench or worse.

US Spot Bitcoin ETFs Record $767M in Net Inflows 

0

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $767 million in net inflows over the past week marking the first five consecutive days of positive inflows in 2026 and the third straight week of net positive flows.

This streak reversed earlier volatility and outflows seen in parts of the year, signaling renewed institutional demand despite ongoing market chop. The strongest single day was Tuesday, with around $251 million in inflows. Friday wrapped the week with about $180–187 million more.

No outflows were reported across the 12 Bitcoin ETFs on the final day, with all showing positive or neutral activity. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) led the pack, capturing roughly $601 million; a dominant share of the total, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC and others like VanEck.

Total net assets under management for spot Bitcoin ETFs now sit around $91–97 billion, with cumulative inflows since launch exceeding $56 billion. This institutional buying helped push Bitcoin’s price toward the $73,000–$75,000 range in recent sessions, though some analysts note a lag between flows and immediate price action—possibly due to broader macro factors like geopolitical tensions, derivatives positioning, or profit-taking.

The inflows contrast with earlier 2026 periods of hesitation, reinforcing Bitcoin’s appeal as a portfolio hedge or “digital gold” amid uncertainty. Ether ETFs added around $161 million last week, while some altcoin products  saw minor outflows. Overall, the data points to sustained conviction from traditional finance players, even if retail sentiment remains cautious.

If the trend holds, it could support further stabilization or upside, especially with corporate accumulators like Strategy formerly MicroStrategy also adding aggressively to their Bitcoin treasuries. Markets remain dynamic.

BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has established clear dominance in the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market since its launch in January 2024. IBIT consistently captures the largest share of inflows, assets under management (AUM), and trading activity among the roughly 12 competing spot Bitcoin ETFs.

IBIT holds around $55–62 billion in assets making it the largest spot Bitcoin ETF by a wide margin. For comparison, the next closest often Fidelity’s FBTC sits in the $10–20 billion range, while the total market for spot Bitcoin ETFs hovers near $90–97 billion.

In recent weeks, IBIT has absorbed a disproportionate share of net inflows. For the week of March 9–13; the $767M total inflows referenced earlier, BlackRock’s IBIT took roughly $600–601 million — about 78–80% of the week’s total. On standout days:March 4: ~$307 million (66% of daily total).

This pattern has held since launch, with IBIT often claiming 60–80%+ of weekly or monthly inflows. IBIT has grown to command over half and sometimes 70–75% of trading volume and net inflows in the category, far outpacing rivals like Fidelity (FBTC), ARK 21Shares (ARKB), Bitwise (BITB), and others.

Several structural and firm-specific advantages explain this lead: As the world’s largest asset manager, BlackRock has deep relationships with pensions, endowments, family offices, wealth managers, and advisors. When these entities allocate to Bitcoin, they default to the most trusted, familiar name — iShares and BlackRock — to minimize friction and perceived risk.

Distribution Power

BlackRock’s vast network including platforms, advisors, and brokerages makes IBIT easily accessible in portfolios. Many institutional allocators and financial advisors prefer routing new crypto exposure through established channels they already use for equities, bonds, etc.

IBIT’s expense ratio is among the lowest around 0.12–0.25%, and it offers superior liquidity for large trades, reducing slippage and execution costs — critical for big institutional orders. The “iShares” label carries credibility in traditional finance. Many investors view BlackRock’s involvement as validation of Bitcoin’s legitimacy, especially compared to smaller or crypto-native issuers.

This has driven massive inflows from both new-to-crypto institutions and long-term accumulators. While Grayscale’s GBTC had an early head start (pre-ETF conversion), high fees and outflows hurt it. IBIT quickly overtook it as the go-to vehicle for regulated, spot Bitcoin exposure, becoming one of the fastest-growing ETFs ever.

IBIT’s dominance isn’t just about size — it’s a reflection of BlackRock’s unmatched infrastructure, trust, and ability to channel traditional finance capital into Bitcoin. This concentration has made IBIT the “cleanest” institutional proxy for BTC exposure, often driving the majority of ETF-related buying pressure that supports price stabilization or rallies.

Google Turns to Chinese Suppliers for AI Data Center Cooling as Infrastructure Bottlenecks Deepen

0

Alphabet’s Google is in discussions with Chinese firms, including Envicool, over the procurement of liquid cooling systems for its rapidly expanding artificial intelligence data centers, according to people familiar with the matter quoted by Reuters.

The talks follow a recent visit to China by a procurement team from Google’s Taiwan operations, which confirms the intensifying global competition for critical infrastructure components needed to support high-performance AI computing.

Liquid cooling — which circulates fluids around servers to dissipate heat — has become essential as next-generation AI workloads, driven by high-density processors, generate significantly more heat than traditional air-cooling systems can manage.

While global attention has largely focused on shortages of advanced semiconductors, particularly those produced by companies such as Nvidia, the latest developments point to a broader supply chain strain. The surge in AI infrastructure investment is now creating bottlenecks in less visible but equally critical components — including cooling systems, optical interconnects, and power management equipment.

Sources said Google’s outreach to Chinese suppliers underlines the tightening availability of liquid cooling components, as hyperscale cloud providers race to build data centers capable of supporting increasingly complex AI models. The shift signals that the constraint in AI expansion is no longer limited to chips but extends to the entire physical architecture required to run those systems.

The discussions also point to the expanding role of Chinese manufacturers in global data center supply chains, even as geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing continue to shape technology flows. Chinese firms have steadily gained ground in segments such as thermal management, benefiting from large-scale domestic demand driven by China’s own data center buildout.

Alongside Envicool, companies such as Lingyi iTech and Feilong Auto Components have emerged as key suppliers of cooling components, while Lenovo plays a role in server manufacturing. In parallel, Chinese firms are also strengthening their position in adjacent segments of AI infrastructure. Optical component manufacturers such as Innolight and Eoptolink are benefiting from demand for high-speed data transmission, while printed circuit board makers like Victory Giant Technology count major global technology companies among their clients.

Demand for liquid cooling systems is expected to expand rapidly as AI adoption accelerates. According to industry estimates cited by JPMorgan, the global market for AI server liquid cooling systems is projected to exceed $17 billion in 2026, up from $8.9 billion the previous year — effectively doubling within a short period.

The growth is being driven by both cloud providers and companies deploying custom AI chips, as well as by the increasing power density of next-generation processors.

Envicool, founded in 2005 and now valued at roughly $14 billion, has been a major beneficiary of this trend. The company reported a 40% surge in revenue during the first nine months of the year, reflecting strong demand for its cooling solutions. At a recent industry event, the company showcased a coolant distribution unit (CDU) — a core component that channels cooling fluid to server racks — developed to meet Google’s specifications.

Analysts at Goldman Sachs say Envicool is preparing for potential orders from Google involving its fifth-generation CDU systems, while also expanding manufacturing capacity in Guangdong province and scaling operations in Thailand and the United States.

But the liquid cooling sector remains highly fragmented, with multiple suppliers producing different components such as pumps, heat exchangers, distribution units, and control systems.

This fragmentation creates both flexibility and vulnerability in the supply chain. On one hand, large buyers like Google can diversify sourcing across regions. On the other, it increases coordination complexity and exposes data center construction timelines to delays if any single component becomes scarce.

Industry executives say that as AI systems scale, thermal management is becoming as strategically important as compute performance itself. Without effective cooling, high-performance chips cannot operate at full capacity, limiting the efficiency of multi-billion-dollar data center investments.

Taiwan Remains A Critical Link In Supply Chain

Google’s Taiwan-based procurement team reflects the island’s continued central role in global technology supply chains. Companies such as Foxconn, Auras Technology, and Delta Electronics are key suppliers of thermal and power management systems for AI infrastructure across Asia.

Taiwan’s deep expertise in electronics manufacturing makes it a critical intermediary between U.S. technology firms and Asian component suppliers.

However, the engagement with Chinese suppliers comes at a time of heightened U.S.-China technology tensions, particularly around advanced semiconductors and AI systems.

Washington has imposed export controls restricting the sale of high-end chips to Chinese companies, while also encouraging domestic manufacturing of critical technologies.

However, the latest developments suggest that even as the U.S. seeks to reduce dependence on China in strategic technologies, American companies remain reliant on Chinese manufacturers for key components deeper in the supply chain.

This creates a complex dynamic where competition and interdependence coexist — particularly in areas such as thermal management, where Chinese firms have developed cost and scale advantages.

Google’s move highlights how the global race to build AI infrastructure is expanding beyond software and semiconductors into the physical systems that support computing at scale. As companies deploy increasingly powerful AI models, the demands on data centers — from energy consumption to heat dissipation — are rising sharply.

This is reshaping the economics of AI, with infrastructure costs becoming a central factor in determining how quickly and widely AI technologies can be deployed.

For companies like Google, securing reliable access to components such as liquid cooling systems is becoming critical to maintaining competitiveness in the AI race. The developments suggest that the next phase of the AI boom will depend as much on algorithms as on the ability of companies to build — and sustain — the vast physical infrastructure required to run them.

Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) Holding Its March Meetings Around 17-18, 2026

0

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is holding its March 2026 meeting this week, on March 17-18, 2026. The rate decision along with the policy statement will be released on Wednesday, March 18, 2026, at 2:00 PM ET (18:00 GMT), followed by Chair Jerome Powell’s press conference at 2:30 PM ET.

This is one of the FOMC’s eight scheduled meetings for the year, and it’s marked with a Summary of Economic Projections, which often provides key insights into the committee’s views on future rates. The federal funds rate target range is currently 3.50%–3.75%, where it has been held steady since the January 2026 meeting after some cuts in late 2025.

Markets and analysts overwhelmingly expect the Fed to hold rates unchanged at this meeting: CME FedWatch Tool and similar indicators show a very high probability around 92–97% or higher in recent reports of no change. Only a tiny chance under 3–8% in various sources of a cut, and even less for a hike.

Factors influencing this include persistent inflation above the 2% target; core measures around 2.4–2.8%, labor market resilience, geopolitical uncertainties like oil price impacts from conflicts, and broader economic data. The focus will be on: Any shifts in the dot plot for projected 2026 and beyond rate cuts.

Powell’s tone in the press conference—hawkish (cautious on cuts) or dovish (more open to easing later). Updated economic projections on growth, inflation, and unemployment. This could influence markets, including stocks, bonds, the USD, and assets like crypto, depending on whether the messaging signals cuts later in 2026 (possibly summer or later) or a more prolonged pause.

The official FOMC calendar confirms this schedule on the Federal Reserve’s website. The FOMC rate decision is widely expected to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50%–3.75%. Market pricing via the CME FedWatch Tool shows a near-certain probability around 94–99.9% in recent updates of no change, with only a tiny chance of a 25 bps cut.

Crypto markets, particularly Bitcoin (BTC) and major altcoins like Ethereum (ETH), XRP, and others, remain highly sensitive to this event due to its influence on global liquidity, risk appetite, USD strength, and forward guidance on rates. The decision itself is “priced in,” so the real driver will be the updated Summary of Economic Projections (SEP/dot plot) and Powell’s tone.

Historical patterns are bearish for crypto around FOMC announcements: BTC dropped after 7 of 8 meetings in 2025 even on actual cuts, and fell ~7.3% in 48 hours after the January 2026 hold from ~$90k to ~$83k. A “sell the news” reaction is common, even on expected outcomes, due to profit-taking or uncertainty.

BTC around $73,000–$74,000 recent surge to over $74k wiped out shorts, ETH around $2,200–$2,300. Expect short-term volatility, with potential downside pressure toward BTC $68k–$70k if messaging stays hawkish; fewer 2026 cuts projected due to sticky inflation, oil/geopolitical factors like Middle East tensions pushing energy prices higher.

Dovish Surprise (Bullish for Crypto)

If the dot plot signals more cuts in 2026 shifting to 2+ expected cuts or Powell sounds open to easing later in the year; acknowledging slower growth or room despite inflation, risk assets rally. BTC could push toward $75k–$80k+ quickly, with altcoins outperforming; ETH potentially testing higher resistance, XRP gaining on macro tailwinds.

Institutional ETF inflows could accelerate, supporting a relief rally. Fewer projected cuts, stronger emphasis on inflation persistence; core measures still above 2%, oil volatility, or cautious tone amid Fed leadership transition uncertainty (Powell’s term ends May 2026, potential shifts).

This could trigger selling in risk assets, with BTC revisiting $68k–$70k or lower in 48–72 hours, and broader altcoin weakness. Crypto has shown some positive decoupling from equities recently potentially positioning it as a hedge amid macro uncertainty. However, FOMC events often override that temporarily due to liquidity sensitivity.

Volatility is expected to spike around the 2:00 PM ET release and press conference—many traders advise waiting for the post-announcement candle to close before major positioning. Other factors like upcoming regulatory clarity or token unlocks could amplify moves, but the Fed statement is the dominant catalyst this week.

The event leans toward short-term downside risk or chop for crypto unless forward guidance surprises to the dovish side.

Tekedia Capital Invests in GRU Space, Building Moon Hotel

0

Good People, Tekedia Capital is excited to announce our investment in GRU Space, a promising startup to give the world the first Moon factory. Their patent-pending system transforms Moon dust into durable bricks and deploys inflatable habitats directly on the lunar surface.

This breakthrough could begin laying the groundwork for lunar infrastructure, from research bases to future space hotels. We have the price list for the Moon Hotel.

At Tekedia Capital, we invest in Founders building the world’s greatest modern companies. Visit Tekedia Capital to learn more https://capital.tekedia.com/course/fee/