DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 283

Tesla Reports Strong Deliveries And Energy Deployments in Q3 2025, Despite Profit Decline Amid Rising R&D Costs

0

In the third quarter (Q3) of 2025, Tesla achieved record global vehicle deliveries and energy storage deployments across the residential, industrial, and utility sectors, underscoring the company’s operational strength and continued global expansion.

The strong performance translated into record revenue and free cash flow generation, despite a drop in profitability due to increased research and development spending.

Tesla reported a 12% year-over-year (YoY) increase in total revenue to $28.1 billion, exceeding analyst estimates of $26.37 billion. However, earnings per share came in at 50 cents adjusted, slightly below the expected 54 cents. Automotive revenue climbed 6% YoY to $21.2 billion, up from $20 billion a year earlier, while total revenue rose from $25.18 billion in the same period last year.

Net income, however, fell 37% to $1.37 billion, or 39 cents per share, compared with $2.17 billion or 62 cents per share a year earlier. The company attributed the decline to lower electric vehicle (EV) prices and a 50% rise in operating expenses, driven by investments in artificial intelligence (AI) and other R&D initiatives.

Tesla’s operating income dropped 40% YoY to $1.6 billion, resulting in a 5.8% operating margin. The company noted that year-over-year performance was influenced by increased vehicle deliveries, growth in energy generation and storage, expansion in services and other categories, offset by lower regulatory credit revenue and a one-time full self-driving (FSD) revenue recognition in Q3 2024 related to the Cybertruck and other advanced features.

Despite the profit squeeze, Tesla expanded its vehicle lineup in October with the Model 3 Standard and Model Y Standard, each offering over 300 miles of range and starting at $36,990 and $39,990, respectively. These new models aim to make Tesla vehicles more accessible following the expiration of the EV tax credit in the United States.

The company also launched the Model Y Performance, which accelerates from 0–60 mph in 3.3 seconds, and introduced leasing options for certified pre-owned Model 3s and Model Ys. In China, the EV giant launched the Model YL in China, a longer wheelbase version of the Model Y with 6 seats and 3 rows, expanding its product portfolio in this critical market.

Notably, Tesla achieved record deliveries in South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Singapore and began deliveries of the Model Y in India. South Korea is now its third largest market behind only the U.S. and China, serving as validation of

the company’s competitive positioning in a robust EV market.

In the energy sector, Tesla unveiled the Megapack 3 and Megablock, next-generation battery products designed to simplify large-scale installations by reducing deployment costs and time. The company expects these innovations to strengthen its position in the renewable energy market.

Tesla emphasized that its scale, cost efficiency, and AI advancements position it to adapt to changing market conditions better than competitors. The company’s focus remains on scaling core hardware and maximizing deliveries and deployments, with each Tesla product designed to deliver increasing value through AI-driven services such as Autobidder and virtual power plant optimization.

Looking ahead, Tesla reaffirmed its commitment to integrating AI across its automotive and energy portfolios, driving toward what it calls a “future of sustainable abundance,” as outlined in its Master Plan Part IV.

With record Q3 deliveries and continued innovation across both vehicles and energy products, Tesla remains a leader in pushing the boundaries of technology, sustainability, and AI-driven mobility.

Nigeria Launches Federal Treasury Receipt (FTR) to Curb Leakages and Boost Fiscal Transparency

0

Nigeria has launched the Federal Treasury Receipt (FTR), a major digital reform initiative designed to plug revenue leakages, strengthen accountability, and improve transparency in public finance management.

According to the Ministry of Finance, the system creates a single, standardized, and digitally verifiable proof of all payments made into federal accounts. It ensures that every government-issued receipt corresponds directly with actual funds received by the Treasury — a mechanism officials say will help close long-standing loopholes in revenue collection.

The ministry described the FTR as “a significant step toward tightening public financial controls,” adding that it is part of a broader reform agenda to strengthen fiscal discipline and ensure real-time tracking of government revenues.

A Unified System for Fiscal Oversight

The FTR rollout coincides with the introduction of the Central Billing System (CBS), which standardizes pricing and billing for all government services. Both systems are integrated into a larger digital architecture known as the Revenue Optimization and Assurance Platform (RevOp) — an end-to-end ecosystem that went live on August 1, 2025.

The Finance Ministry explained that RevOp provides real-time visibility into inflows from ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs), enabling automated reconciliation and settlement between the Treasury and the various revenue-generating institutions.

In an official statement, the ministry said the combined system is built “to ensure every naira due to the Federation is captured, reconciled, and accounted for.”

Officials believe that, once fully operational, the platform will give Nigeria one of the most integrated public finance systems in Africa — a development they say will not only curb corruption but also raise the efficiency of non-oil revenue management.

Addressing Nigeria’s Chronic Revenue Gaps

If the system performs as intended, analysts say the FTR–CBS–RevOp ecosystem could reshape Nigeria’s fiscal trajectory.

Digital receipts will create clearer audit trails and help identify discrepancies between reported and actual collections. Transparent verification of payments could also encourage voluntary tax compliance, a critical factor in raising Nigeria’s low tax-to-GDP ratio, which currently averages below 10% — one of the lowest in the world.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its 2025 Article IV consultation, again emphasized the need for Nigeria to expand its tax base, improve collection efficiency, and strengthen digital oversight of revenues. The IMF has long argued that without a wider and more transparent revenue net, Nigeria’s fiscal space will remain too constrained to meet development goals.

The introduction of the FTR system, therefore, aligns closely with those recommendations. By automating verification and integrating all billing under one platform, the reform targets the weak links that have historically enabled manipulation and misreporting of payments at various collection points.

Over time, reduced leakages could free up significant funds for infrastructure, education, and healthcare — areas repeatedly starved of adequate budgetary support. Stronger non-oil revenue collection, in turn, would help reduce Nigeria’s dependence on crude exports, which still account for most of its foreign exchange earnings despite years of diversification pledges.

Learning from Earlier Reforms

The Treasury Single Account (TSA), introduced in 2015, was Nigeria’s first major attempt to consolidate federal revenues into a single account under the Central Bank. While the TSA helped enhance visibility of government balances, it did not address the full revenue chain, particularly the verification of receipts and standardization of service pricing.

Subsequent tax reforms and non-oil revenue initiatives brought modest improvements, but persistent challenges — including manual leakages, weak digital integration, and poor inter-agency coordination — continued to undermine progress.

The new digital suite represents a more comprehensive approach. By combining billing, receipts, and reconciliation within a unified ecosystem, it aims to create an end-to-end fiscal data trail, enabling both transparency and accountability.

This comes amid broader fiscal restructuring efforts. In August 2025, the government directed the Revenue Mobilization, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) to review the revenue-sharing formula, a move that signals renewed efforts to not only enhance collections but also improve the equity of distribution among the three tiers of government.

Pilot Phase and Implementation Roadmap

The Ministry of Finance said it has already commenced a 30-day pilot phase across ten federal agencies to test the system’s compliance and operational readiness.

This pilot will assess the capacity of the existing ICT infrastructure to support real-time, nationwide data capture and reconciliation. Upon successful evaluation, the government plans to launch full-scale implementation, bringing all MDAs under the FTR framework.

The rollout also coincides with preparations for the formal takeoff of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) in January 2026. The NRS is expected to consolidate revenue administration under a single authority, streamlining oversight and enforcement currently fragmented across multiple agencies.

Officials have described the two reforms — the FTR system and the creation of the NRS — as mutually reinforcing, both designed to simplify revenue collection, eliminate duplication, and create a transparent, traceable process from payment initiation to treasury confirmation.

Key Challenges Ahead

Despite its promise, experts warn that institutional resistance and technological limitations could impede the system’s effectiveness.

Many MDAs, accustomed to legacy systems and discretionary control over certain revenue streams, may resist full integration into the centralized digital network. Ensuring compliance across hundreds of agencies will therefore test the government’s political will.

There are also concerns about infrastructure readiness. The success of the FTR depends on real-time connectivity, secure data management, and interoperability between the Treasury, the Central Bank, and the MDAs’ financial systems. Any lag or inconsistency could undermine the accuracy of reconciliation and erode trust in the platform.

The Finance Ministry has, however, expressed confidence that these issues will be addressed through continuous system upgrades, stakeholder training, and phased adoption supported by the Office of the Accountant-General and the Ministry of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy.

US Sanctions Russian Oil Companies

0

The United States imposed sanctions on Russia’s two largest oil producers, Rosneft and Lukoil, marking the first such action against Russia in President Donald Trump’s second term.

These measures, announced by the US Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), aim to pressure Moscow into agreeing to an immediate ceasefire in its ongoing war against Ukraine, which began in February 2022.

The sanctions were enacted under Executive Order 14024, targeting entities operating in Russia’s energy sector. The move follows the abrupt cancellation of a planned summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Budapest, Hungary, which Trump described as not “feeling right.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized that the sanctions address “Putin’s refusal to end this senseless war,” noting that the targeted companies fund the Kremlin’s “war machine.”

The US has urged allies to join these efforts, with a wind-down period for existing transactions until November 21, 2025. Rosneft state-controlled, led by Putin’s ally Igor Sechin and Lukoil. Nearly three dozen subsidiaries are also affected.

Freezing of all US-based assets owned by these companies. Prohibition on US persons individuals and entities conducting business with them. Threats of secondary sanctions on foreign financial institutions that facilitate transactions involving Rosneft or Lukoil oil sales. Such banks risk losing access to US markets and the dollar-based financial system.

Oil and gas account for about 25% of Russia’s federal budget. Rosneft and Lukoil together produce around 3.1–3.7 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil and gas condensate, representing nearly half of Russia’s crude exports and about 3.3% of global oil output.

Vertically integrated; 49% stake in India’s Nayara refinery 400,000 bpd, reliant on Russian crude; projects in Central Asia, Africa, Latin America. Major exporter to India, China; earned ~$13.28 billion in profit.

Exploration/production/refining; supplies to Hungary, Slovakia, Turkey’s STAR refinery; refineries in Bulgaria (190,000 bpd) and Romania; retail networks in Europe. Key supplier to Europe and Asia; international downstream projects.

Brent crude surged 4.7–5% to $65.53 per barrel, a two-week high, due to fears of reduced Russian supply. This echoes a 1.6% rise after the UK’s similar sanctions last week. The MOEX Russia Index dropped 3.6% to 2,546, its lowest in over a week.

Chinese state oil majors suspended seaborne Russian oil purchases. India’s refiners are reviewing contracts and poised to sharply cut imports—potentially to zero—to avoid secondary sanctions, amid US tariffs of up to 50% on Indian goods as retaliation for past Russian oil buys. This could remove a major buyer for Russia’s discounted crude.

Sanctioned Rosneft and Lukoil last week, warning of global fuel disruptions. EU: Adopted its 19th sanctions package, banning Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports from January 2027. Rosneft is already sanctioned, but Lukoil has exemptions for buyers like Hungary and Slovakia.

Unlike the Biden administration, which delayed sanctioning these firms to avoid inflating energy costs, Trump’s approach combines diplomacy with economic leverage. Trump has expressed hope that the sanctions “won’t be on for long” if peace talks resume, while imposing tariffs on non-compliant allies like India.

Experts view this as a “significant escalation,” potentially constricting Russia’s revenue but risking higher global energy prices. A former Treasury official noted that secondary bank sanctions could be the most effective, as they deter third-party enablers.

However, some analysts doubt immediate impact on Putin without broader targeting of banks or key buyers like China. The sanctions could degrade Russia’s war funding by limiting exports to major markets, forcing discounted sales or rerouting via “shadow fleets.”

Ukraine hailed it as “great news,” while Russia warned of supply disruptions. With nuclear drills underway in Moscow and US restrictions eased on Ukraine’s long-range missiles, tensions remain high. Further US actions are possible if no ceasefire emerges, potentially including asset seizures to aid Ukraine’s defense.

Transparent Leadership & Trusted Audits: Why BlockDAG Is the Best Crypto to Buy This October

0

Crypto has had its share of hidden teams and short-lived promises, leaving many cautious about where to place their trust. BlockDAG (BDAG) has set a different example, opting for transparency, accountability, and verified performance. Led by CEO Antony Turner, supported by Dr. Maurice Herlihy, and backed by CertiK and Halborn audits, the project combines visibility, expertise, and security into one credible framework.

Having raised nearly $430 million in its presale and priced at $0.0015 for a limited time, BlockDAG isn’t a faceless venture; it’s a public, accountable ecosystem that’s setting new standards for openness in crypto. The project’s upcoming Binance AMA on Friday, October 24, at 3 PM UTC will give the global community direct access to insider updates, new roadmap details, and developments ahead of Keynote 4: The Launch Note and GENESIS DAY. With BDAG still available in Batch 31 and the TGE code offering extra benefits before the dashboard upgrade and price jump, the countdown is officially on.

Why Transparency Matters More Than Ever

Anonymous founders and disappearing projects have shaken confidence in crypto. BlockDAG’s decision to maintain a public, fully accountable team has changed that narrative. Antony Turner, a seasoned executive known for his work at Spirit Blockchain and SwissOne Capital, gives the project visible, responsible leadership. This clarity allows buyers to see the people driving progress rather than faceless profiles.

Transparency doesn’t just inspire confidence, it builds stability. It allows supporters to evaluate decisions, technology, and partnerships based on evidence, not speculation. In an environment where credibility is rare, BlockDAG’s open leadership structure offers a foundation that makes participation feel secure and informed. This clear, accountable framework is what makes BDAG one of the best cryptos to buy now for those seeking long-term reliability in a volatile market.

The Value of Real Expertise

Leadership is crucial, but expertise turns ideas into lasting systems. BlockDAG’s advisory board includes Dr. Maurice Herlihy, a world-renowned computer scientist and recipient of the Gödel and Dijkstra Prizes, often considered the highest honors in computing. His involvement ensures that BDAG’s architecture is built on academically validated design principles, not untested concepts.

Dr. Herlihy’s experience in distributed computing directly strengthens BlockDAG’s hybrid architecture, which merges Proof-of-Work security with DAG scalability. This ensures the network isn’t only efficient but also structurally sound, ready for real adoption. When credible research meets capable execution, projects transition from hype to substance. That’s why BlockDAG continues to be viewed as one of the best cryptos to buy now, bridging theory with practice.

How CertiK and Halborn Validated BlockDAG’s Security

For most crypto projects, claims of safety are marketing slogans. BlockDAG has taken the extra step by completing full audits from CertiK and Halborn, two leading blockchain security firms trusted by global institutions. These audits examine the project’s codebase, network structure, and smart contract layers to detect vulnerabilities before public release.

Passing both reviews confirms that BlockDAG’s technical foundation is sound and ready for real-world application. It shows that the project values verifiable proof over speculation, which is key to earning lasting trust. This commitment to transparency and audit-backed quality assurance has drawn attention from both individual users and large-scale backers. It’s this proactive approach to security that reinforces why BlockDAG is seen as the best crypto to buy now, a project built to perform and endure.

How Credibility Becomes Value

In crypto, short-term hype fades quickly, but genuine credibility builds value that lasts. BlockDAG’s success formula, visible leadership, world-class advisory, and independent audits, creates a feedback loop of trust and adoption. This structure attracts not only casual participants but also larger entities that value proven governance and compliant frameworks.

The BDAG coin, currently available at $0.0015, provides access to one of the few ecosystems that combine institutional-level trust with technological performance. This mix of transparency, verified systems, and community backing has created lasting traction, pushing BlockDAG far beyond typical presale expectations. It’s a demonstration that trust and growth can coexist, making BDAG a leading choice for those looking for the best crypto to buy now before the final presale window closes.

Final Overview

For years, the biggest question in crypto has been simple: who can you trust? BlockDAG answers that question through proof, not promises. With Antony Turner’s public leadership, Dr. Herlihy’s advisory guidance, and audits by CertiK and Halborn, the project has built its credibility from the ground up.

As its presale crosses $430 million and the Binance AMA approaches, BlockDAG continues to deliver on every front: security, visibility, and scalability. The TGE code offers a last entry at $0.0015, providing access before the dashboard upgrade and price rise. In a market full of uncertainty, BlockDAG has made reliability measurable. That’s why it’s consistently recognized as the best crypto to buy now, combining trust, technology, and timing into one complete package.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

 

China Reclaims Position as Germany’s Top Trading Partner as U.S. Tariffs Bite

0

China has overtaken the United States to become Germany’s largest trading partner once again, underscoring how renewed U.S. tariffs and shifting global supply dynamics are reshaping the economic relationship between Europe’s biggest economy and its top export markets.

Preliminary data from Germany’s statistics office showed that total trade between Germany and China reached €163.4 billion ($190.7 billion) from January to August 2025, narrowly surpassing €162.8 billion in trade with the United States. The figures, calculated by Reuters, reveal how rising protectionism under President Donald Trump’s second administration has reversed last year’s trend, when the U.S. temporarily displaced China after eight years of Chinese dominance in German trade.

The latest shift comes despite Berlin’s stated efforts to reduce its economic dependence on Beijing amid political frictions and concerns about unfair trade practices. The data, however, suggest that Germany’s diversification efforts have run into the hard realities of global demand and industrial interdependence.

Tariffs Take a Toll on German Exports

U.S. tariffs have played a central role in the latest reversal. German exports to the United States fell 7.4% in the first eight months of 2025 to €99.6 billion, a sharp decline that worsened as the year progressed. In August alone, exports to the U.S. dropped 23.5% year-on-year, signaling that the impact of trade barriers is accelerating.

“There is no question that U.S. tariff and trade policy is an important reason for the decline in sales,” said Dirk Jandura, president of the BGA foreign trade association.

Jandura explained that U.S. demand for Germany’s signature export products—automobiles, machinery, and chemical goods—has weakened significantly. These categories, long pillars of German industry, are among those hit hardest by new American tariffs targeting vehicles and industrial components.

The Trump administration’s latest trade measures, introduced earlier this year, were aimed at narrowing the U.S. trade deficit and protecting domestic manufacturers. But for Germany, which relies on the U.S. as its second-largest export destination, the measures have cut deep.

Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, said that the combination of tariffs and a stronger euro had dealt a double blow to German exporters.

“With the ongoing tariff threat and the stronger euro, German exports to the U.S. are unlikely to rebound any time soon,” he said.

Germany’s export-driven economy is particularly sensitive to global policy shifts. Automakers such as Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz have large production bases in the United States but still depend heavily on transatlantic trade flows. Machinery and equipment manufacturers—another key sector—also face headwinds as American companies source more domestically to avoid import penalties.

While exports to the United States fell, Germany’s trade relationship with China followed a more complex pattern. Exports to China dropped even more steeply than those to the U.S.—down 13.5% year-on-year to €54.7 billion in the first eight months of 2025. However, this was more than offset by a surge in imports from China, which rose 8.3% to €108.8 billion.

This import boom pushed the overall trade balance in China’s favor and reestablished Beijing as Berlin’s top trading partner, continuing a trend of structural dependence that German policymakers have struggled to unwind.

“The renewed import boom from China is worrying,” said Brzeski, noting that “data shows that these imports come at dumping prices.”

Economists have linked the surge in Chinese imports to aggressive pricing in key sectors such as electric vehicles, solar technology, and consumer electronics. These low-cost goods have gained significant market share in Europe, challenging local producers and raising fears of deindustrialization in Germany’s manufacturing heartland.

Brzeski warned that such trends “not only increased German dependence on China but could add to stress in key industries where China has become a major rival.”

The concerns echo similar warnings from European Union officials, who have launched investigations into alleged Chinese dumping practices in the electric vehicle market. The European Commission has accused Chinese automakers of benefiting from heavy state subsidies that allow them to undercut European competitors, a charge Beijing has denied.

For Germany, which remains the EU’s largest importer of Chinese goods, these developments present a policy dilemma. Berlin has been vocal about the need for “de-risking” from China—a term Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government uses to describe reducing economic exposure without outright decoupling. Yet, as the new data show, German industry continues to rely heavily on Chinese components and intermediate goods.

Repercussions for Berlin

The return of China as Germany’s top trading partner points to how geopolitical and economic forces are pulling Berlin in opposing directions. On the one hand, the government has urged companies to diversify supply chains and reduce dependence on authoritarian regimes. On the other hand, the structural integration of the two economies—especially in automotive and machinery sectors—makes any sudden decoupling costly and complex.

The imbalance between imports and exports also raises questions about competitiveness. Germany’s exports to China have been declining amid slowing Chinese growth and increased local competition. Meanwhile, Chinese companies have deepened their footprint in Europe, expanding exports in high-value segments such as green energy and advanced manufacturing.

Economist Salomon Fiedler of Berenberg Bank said the shifts highlight Germany’s growing vulnerability to external shocks.

“In the absence of economic dynamism at home, some in Germany may now be troubled by any shifts on world markets,” he observed.

Fiedler’s remarks point to a broader malaise in the German economy, which has been stagnating under weak domestic investment, rising energy costs, and subdued consumer demand. The latest trade figures thus expose not just a change in trading partners but a structural imbalance that could constrain Germany’s growth for years.

A Shifting Global Trade Order

The developments also mirror a wider reordering of global trade ties in 2025. As Washington doubles down on tariffs and industrial policy, and Beijing continues to expand its export dominance, Europe finds itself navigating between two rival powers.

For Germany, once the undisputed export powerhouse of Europe, the growing trade friction with the United States and rising dependence on China represent a narrowing strategic corridor. The country’s export sector—long the engine of its prosperity—now faces mounting pressure to adapt to a multipolar world defined by protectionism, currency fluctuations, and technological rivalry.

Germany’s trade policy is expected to be a central issue in upcoming EU economic strategy discussions. Analysts say Berlin’s challenge will be to strike a balance between safeguarding its industrial base and aligning with broader Western efforts to limit reliance on Chinese supply chains.

As Brzeski warned, the data show that “the renewed import boom from China” could deepen Germany’s vulnerabilities if unchecked. At the same time, with U.S. tariffs showing no sign of easing, the country’s traditional export model appears to be under its greatest strain in years.

What began as a statistical shift in trade tables now reflects a deeper structural reality: Germany’s economic compass, long anchored between Washington and Beijing, is once again swinging toward China — even as the political winds in Berlin blow the other way.