DD
MM
YYYY

PAGES

DD
MM
YYYY

spot_img

PAGES

Home Blog Page 294

Oil Prices Rebound from Five-month Lows As Trump-Xi Meeting Offers Hope

0

Oil prices rebounded on Tuesday, rising modestly from the previous session’s five-month lows, as investors reassessed expectations of an impending glut and sought clarity on the trade dispute between the United States and China — the world’s two largest oil consumers.

Brent crude futures gained 31 cents, or 0.5%, to close at $61.32 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures for November delivery — which expired at Tuesday’s settlement — advanced 30 cents, or 0.5%, to $57.82 a barrel. Both benchmarks had tumbled to their lowest levels since early May on Monday amid record U.S. production levels and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies’ decision to maintain their planned supply hikes, raising expectations of an oversupplied market.

Analysts quoted by Reuters said that relatively low U.S. crude and distillate fuel inventories provided some support to prices.

Low inventories are “helping counter some of the pressure on oil benchmarks,” Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodities analyst at SEB, said.

The market has also been reacting to shifting geopolitical signals. The U.S.-China trade dispute — which has weighed heavily on global growth expectations — remains a key factor influencing oil demand outlooks. Still, both Washington and Beijing have recently signaled a willingness to ease tensions.

U.S. President Donald Trump, who is scheduled to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in South Korea next week, said Monday he expects to reach a fair trade deal with his counterpart. The president struck a more optimistic tone after months of tariff escalations that have dampened trade and industrial activity worldwide.

Analysts Divided Over Market Direction

Despite Tuesday’s gains, traders remain cautious. The structure of both Brent and WTI futures curves has started to shift into a contango — a market condition where prices for near-term delivery are lower than for later months. This typically indicates that immediate supply is abundant, while demand is softening.

The degree of that contango, however, remains a subject of debate. The International Energy Agency (IEA) earlier this month projected that a surplus next year could steepen the futures curve into a “super contango,” reflecting significant oversupply. But that scenario has not yet materialized, according to UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo.

“While supply concerns have increased in recent weeks again, we believe the oil market is oversupplied but not in a glut,” Staunovo wrote in a client note. “We expect oil prices to stabilize around current levels,” he added, cautioning that renewed trade tensions could still pressure prices downward.

A preliminary Reuters poll released Monday suggested that U.S. crude stockpiles likely rose last week — a sign that domestic output, which has reached record levels above 13 million barrels per day, continues to outpace refinery demand.

“The reality of stock builds appears to be finally here, and prices should head lower to put a deeper contango in the market,” said Scott Shelton, energy specialist at TP ICAP Group.

Adding a modest floor to prices, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that the U.S. Department of Energy plans to purchase 1 million barrels of crude oil for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). The planned acquisition marks the latest step in Washington’s effort to rebuild emergency inventories that were drawn down last year.

The Trade Tensions Factor

The outcome of next week’s meeting between Trump and Xi in South Korea could set the tone for oil markets heading into November. Analysts say a cooperative outcome could provide short-term relief to energy prices, while further escalation could deepen global demand concerns.

The U.S.-China trade rift has already slowed industrial activity across Asia and Europe. Economists estimate that trade-related uncertainty has shaved nearly half a percentage point off global GDP growth this year. With oil demand closely tied to manufacturing and transport activity, even marginal changes in trade outlooks could have outsized effects on prices.

While China has remained the world’s largest oil importer, its refiners have started to moderate purchases amid slower domestic demand and increased export restrictions on refined products. Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to flood global markets with shale oil, keeping downward pressure on global benchmarks.

Still, the combination of supply restraint by some OPEC members and ongoing geopolitical risks — including tensions in the Middle East and disruptions in Russian crude flows due to sanctions — could provide intermittent support to prices in the months ahead.

For now, the market remains in a balancing act between optimism over potential trade resolution and concerns of a global supply overhang.

The oil market is expected to remain range-bound until there’s clearer evidence of either a stronger economic recovery or significant supply cuts.

Brent and WTI futures have both lost roughly 12% from their mid-summer highs, and analysts expect continued volatility through the fourth quarter as the U.S. election campaign intensifies and global economic forecasts remain uncertain.

With inventories rising and refinery margins under pressure, traders and analysts alike agree that any durable rebound in prices will depend less on immediate supply shifts and more on whether global growth and energy consumption can regain momentum heading into 2026.

ISS Urges Shareholders to Reject CoreWeave’s $9bn Bid for Core Scientific as Investors Signal Preference for Independence

0

A leading proxy advisory firm, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), has urged investors to vote against artificial intelligence infrastructure company CoreWeave’s proposed $9 billion all-stock acquisition of data center operator Core Scientific, saying the latter has achieved “considerable success as a standalone company.”

The recommendation, released Monday, sets the stage for a contentious shareholder vote scheduled for October 30 that could decide whether one of the most high-profile mergers in the AI computing infrastructure space proceeds or collapses. ISS said Core Scientific’s strong recovery and operational momentum since emerging from bankruptcy in January 2023 make a continued independent path appealing for shareholders.

Core Scientific has achieved considerable success as a standalone company and could continue to operate independently. ISS believes that the fixed exchange ratio structure exposes shareholders to potential downside risk as CoreWeave’s stock price fluctuates.

When the deal was first announced in early July, CoreWeave, which offers Nvidia-powered cloud computing infrastructure for AI workloads, proposed to acquire Core Scientific in an all-stock transaction with an implied value of $20.40 per share. At the time, the bid valued Core Scientific around $9 billion, but since then, CoreWeave’s shares have fallen, reducing the effective value of the offer.

Investor skepticism began surfacing almost immediately after the July announcement. Two Seas Capital, one of Core Scientific’s largest shareholders, publicly declared its opposition, arguing that the sale process was flawed and the offer “materially undervalued” the company. It said the fixed share ratio left Core Scientific’s shareholders “vulnerable to fluctuations in CoreWeave’s stock price.”

“We see no reason why Core Scientific shareholders should accept such an underwhelming deal,” Two Seas Capital wrote in a letter to investors on Friday. “Based on recent trading data, we see little evidence that they will.”

Core Scientific’s shares fell nearly 18% on the day the deal was announced but have since rebounded sharply, closing at $18.81 on Monday and rising more than 5% in post-market trading after ISS released its opposition. The rally reflects growing investor confidence that Core Scientific may be worth more on its own than as part of CoreWeave.

CoreWeave’s chief executive, Michael Intrator, expressed disappointment with ISS’s recommendation but stood firm on the offer’s terms, signaling the company would not sweeten its bid despite market pushback.

“We think that the bid that we put out there for [Core Scientific] is a fair representation of the relative value of the two companies as an all-stock deal,” Intrator told CNBC on Tuesday. “We are going to just kind of proceed as we have, in the event that the transaction does not go through. It is a nice to have, not a need to have for us.”

He added, “Everything has a value, and the number we put out is the value we’re willing to pay for them under all circumstances.”

Intrator’s comments underscore CoreWeave’s attempt to project confidence amid uncertainty about the vote outcome. His characterization of the merger as a “nice to have” rather than a necessity contrasts sharply with the market’s interpretation of CoreWeave’s broader expansion drive in the AI infrastructure sector.

CoreWeave has been on an aggressive acquisition spree this year, seeking to deepen its footprint in the AI computing ecosystem. The company has acquired or pursued several AI-related firms, including OpenPipe, Weights & Biases, and Monolith, as it aims to expand its software and hardware integration capabilities.

“We’ve been in acquisitive mode as we continue to build and extend the functionality of our company,” Intrator said.

The New Jersey-based firm, backed by investors such as Magnetar Capital and Nvidia, has rapidly grown into one of the largest providers of AI computing power to hyperscalers, including Microsoft. Its infrastructure runs on Nvidia’s high-end graphics processing units (GPUs), which are in high demand for training large language models and other generative AI applications.

The proposed acquisition of Core Scientific, a Texas-based Bitcoin miner that repurposed much of its infrastructure for high-performance computing, was intended to bolster CoreWeave’s data center footprint and energy management capabilities. The merger, if approved, would create one of the largest vertically integrated AI infrastructure networks in the United States.

Core Scientific’s trajectory since its bankruptcy exit last year has been marked by steady improvement. The company expanded its hosting business, cut debt, and improved cash flow amid a broader recovery in digital asset prices and demand for computing power. That turnaround has become a central argument for opponents of the deal who believe Core Scientific can unlock higher shareholder value independently, especially as AI-related workloads surge.

The ISS recommendation carries considerable weight in influencing institutional votes. Proxy firms like ISS and Glass Lewis often help shape the outcomes of corporate mergers and acquisitions, especially when institutional shareholders are divided or undecided.

While CoreWeave argues that combining with Core Scientific would create operational synergies and cost efficiencies, critics contend that the offer undervalues Core Scientific’s potential. The market’s reaction appears to support that view: Core Scientific’s stock has consistently traded below the implied bid price but has shown resilience, suggesting investors are positioning for the deal’s rejection.

CoreWeave’s unwillingness to raise its offer also signals confidence in its standalone growth trajectory, driven by booming demand for AI compute infrastructure. The company has raised billions of dollars in funding in 2024 and expanded data center capacity to meet surging demand from AI model developers and cloud providers.

Still, the ISS report’s timing could significantly sway sentiment before the October 30 vote. Should shareholders reject the acquisition, Core Scientific would continue independently, while CoreWeave would maintain its strategy of scaling through smaller, targeted acquisitions.

However, the market appears to be betting against a merger for now. Core Scientific’s shares have outperformed since the deal’s announcement, while CoreWeave’s stock has drifted lower — a divergence that reflects investors’ contrasting assessments of value and leverage in the AI infrastructure race.

Greenlane Holdings Announces $110M Raise for BERA Treasury Strategy

0

Nasdaq-listed Greenlane Holdings Inc. (ticker: GNLN), a distributor of premium smoking accessories and lifestyle products, revealed a $110 million private investment in public equity (PIPE) transaction.

The funds will establish a dedicated cryptocurrency treasury focused on BERA, the native token of the Berachain blockchain. This marks the first institutional treasury strategy backed by the Berachain Foundation, positioning Greenlane as one of the largest publicly traded holders of BERA.

The raise involves the sale of Class A common stock and/or pre-funded warrants at $3.84 per share and $3.83 per pre-funded warrant. Approximately $50 million will come in cash, with the remaining $60 million in BERA tokens.

Net proceeds will fund open-market purchases and over-the-counter (OTC) transactions to acquire BERA, making it Greenlane’s primary treasury reserve asset. This strategy aims to generate returns while enhancing BERA’s liquidity, governance participation, and ecosystem stability.

Polychain Capital is leading the placement, with participation from Blockchain.com, Kraken Ventures, North Rock Digital, CitizenX, dao5, and the Berachain Foundation. Aegis Capital Corp. acted as the exclusive placement agent.

The deal is expected to close around October 23, 2025. Greenlane’s stock will continue trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under GNLN. Ben Isenberg joins as Chief Investment Officer to lead the Berachain Treasury Strategy.

Bruce Linton former CEO of Canopy Growth appointed as Board Chairman. Billy Levy joins as Director. Isenberg highlighted BERA’s unique yield model, powered by Berachain’s Proof-of-Liquidity consensus mechanism, which derives staking rewards from network revenues rather than traditional Proof-of-Stake inflation.

He noted untapped institutional growth potential for Berachain, a Layer 1 blockchain known for its strong brand in crypto communities.

Jonathan Ip, General Counsel of the Berachain Foundation, described the move as a “key step in Berachain’s broader engagement with capital markets and institutional participants,” praising the team’s expertise in traditional finance, crypto, and retail.

GNLN shares surged 30-45% in premarket and intraday trading following the news, reflecting investor enthusiasm for Greenlane’s pivot into digital assets as a hedge against macroeconomic uncertainty.

BERA’s price rose about 8% on October 20, trading around $1.6-$1.8 support levels, with analysts eyeing resistance at $2-$4 and potential upside to $8-$10 if institutional adoption accelerates. This comes amid broader trends of altcoins like ETH, SOL, XRP, and BNB gaining traction in corporate treasuries.

Greenlane’s strategy echoes moves by companies like MicroStrategy and Tesla with Bitcoin, but focuses on an emerging DeFi ecosystem. Berachain, which raised $150 million from investors including Brevan Howard and Framework Ventures, uses Proof-of-Liquidity to incentivize liquidity provision.

Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) Mechanism

Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) is a consensus mechanism developed by the Berachain blockchain, designed to incentivize liquidity provision while securing the network.

Unlike traditional Proof-of-Stake (PoS) or Proof-of-Work (PoW), PoL aligns network security with decentralized finance (DeFi) activity by rewarding users for providing liquidity to the ecosystem.

PoL encourages participants to lock up or stake assets like BERA, Berachain’s native token in liquidity pools or other DeFi protocols on the Berachain network. This liquidity supports the ecosystem’s decentralized applications (dApps) while contributing to network security and governance.

Instead of relying solely on staking for block validation, PoL ties rewards to the economic activity generated by liquidity provision. User deposit assets (e.g., BERA or other tokens) into Berachain’s liquidity pools, such as those in its native decentralized exchange (DEX) or other DeFi protocols.

These pools facilitate trading, lending, or other financial activities, ensuring the ecosystem has sufficient liquidity for dApps to function efficiently. Berachain uses a Proof-of-Stake-based consensus, but validators are selected and rewarded based on their contribution to liquidity pools, not just staked tokens.

The more liquidity a participant provides (e.g., through BERA or paired assets), the higher their influence in the network’s validation process. Rewards are derived from network revenues, such as transaction fees, trading fees from the DEX, or other protocol-generated income, rather than inflationary token minting common in traditional PoS.

Participants earn yields based on the amount and duration of liquidity provided, creating a sustainable incentive model that aligns with DeFi activity. For example, Greenlane’s treasury strategy leverages PoL to generate returns on its BERA holdings by staking them in these pools, as noted by Chief Investment Officer Ben Isenberg.

Liquidity providers and validators can participate in Berachain’s governance, influencing protocol upgrades or fee structures. This aligns with Greenlane’s goal to enhance BERA’s ecosystem stability through active governance participation.

Unlike PoS systems that often dilute token value through inflation, PoL rewards come from real economic activity, making it more sustainable. PoL bridges DeFi and blockchain security, ensuring validators have a stake in the ecosystem’s success.

By incentivizing liquidity, PoL supports Berachain’s Layer 1 scalability, enabling high-throughput DeFi applications. Greenlane Holdings’ $110M raise to build a BERA treasury leverages PoL to generate returns on its holdings.

By staking BERA in liquidity pools, Greenlane can earn yields from Berachain’s network revenues while supporting the ecosystem’s liquidity and governance. This strategy positions Greenlane to benefit from BERA’s growth as an altcoin, especially as institutional interest in DeFi rises.

A portion of these fees is distributed to Greenlane as a reward, proportional to their liquidity contribution. Simultaneously, their stake helps secure the network, earning additional governance rights or validator rewards.

PoL’s focus on liquidity-driven rewards makes Berachain attractive for institutional players like Greenlane, as it offers a hedge against inflation and aligns with DeFi’s growth.

Greenlane plans quarterly transparency reports on holdings, performance, and governance to build trust. This development signals growing Wall Street interest in altcoin treasuries, potentially paving the way for more public firms to integrate tokens like BERA.

MrBeast Files Trademark for Crypto Exchange Platform

0

YouTube superstar Jimmy Donaldson better known as MrBeast has filed a U.S. trademark application for MrBeast Financial, signaling plans for a downloadable app that could include cryptocurrency exchange services, payment processing, and more.

The filing was submitted on October 13, 2025, by his company Beast Holdings, LLC, and is currently awaiting assignment to a USPTO examiner. This would be the 53rd trademark in his portfolio if approved, joining brands like MrBeast Burger and Feastables.

The application outlines a comprehensive fintech platform, potentially blending entertainment with finance for MrBeast’s massive audience over 446 million YouTube subscribers.

This move aligns with MrBeast’s prior crypto involvement, dating back to at least 2021. He’s invested in crypto startups, bought high-profile NFTs including at least eight CryptoPunks, and wallets linked to him have traded influencer-shilled tokens for reported profits of $13 million.

Recent reports also suggest his company Beast Industries previously pitched investors on crypto-linked products like credit cards and personal loans. Launching a real crypto exchange isn’t straightforward. If MrBeast Financial proceeds, Beast Holdings would need: Registration as a Money Services Business (MSB) with FinCEN.

State-level money transmitter licenses. Approvals from the SEC or CFTC, depending on the platform’s structure (e.g., handling securities or derivatives). Based on USPTO timelines, initial examination could happen by mid-2026, with final approval or rejection by late 2026.

Note that many companies file trademarks defensively to protect brand names, so this doesn’t guarantee a launch—though speculation is high given MrBeast’s track record of turning viral ideas into billion-dollar ventures.

Speculation that it might rival influencer-led banks, with one user noting: “From YouTube to burgers to crypto exchanges—millions of fans could enter crypto overnight.”

MrBeast’s Involvement with CryptoPunks NFTs

Jimmy Donaldson, aka MrBeast, dipped into the NFT world early, particularly with CryptoPunks—the iconic 10,000-piece Ethereum collection launched in 2017 by Larva Labs.

He’s best known for buying and later selling a batch during the 2020-2021 bull run, turning a tidy profit. However, as of October 2025, there’s no evidence he holds any CryptoPunks in his publicly tracked wallets.

MrBeast’s primary Ethereum wallet linked to his identity via public disclosures begins activity, initially focused on DeFi staking. Buys multiple CryptoPunks at low prices: individual costs ranged from ~$1,400 to $4,850 roughly 4-12 ETH at the time. At least 4-6 acquired here, per on-chain traces.

Announces owning 8 CryptoPunks in a Logan Paul podcast. Total holdings exceed a dozen when including prior buys. Floor price surges amid celeb hype (e.g., from celebs like Snoop Dogg and Eminem jumping in). He credits Gary Vee’s group call (with Logan Paul and 33 others) for the tip-off.

Highest sale is CryptoPunk #7200 for 120 ETH ~$389,500 USD at the time, bought for $2,166—netting over $387,000 profit (178x return). Other sales follow, with total profits from initial four Punks alone exceeding $1 million. Confirms selling all 8 publicly revealed Punks and likely the rest, making 20-30x returns overall. Shifts focus to other NFTs like VeeFriends (Gary Vee’s project).

On-chain analysis shows no CryptoPunks in his known wallets (e.g., 0x… addresses tied to Beast Holdings). Recent activity leans toward token investments (e.g., $ASTER) and his upcoming MrBeast Financial crypto exchange plans.

From the documented CryptoPunks sales, MrBeast pocketed millions—part of a broader $20M+ crypto profit tally across NFTs and tokens including Ethernity Chain and others. His strategy was buy-low during early hype, sell-high amid the 2021 boom.

His reveal contributed to CryptoPunks’ floor price pump—from ~$20K in early 2021 to peaks over $100K. Critics (e.g., on-chain investigators) have called it “insider trading lite” due to the celeb echo chamber, but no formal issues arose.

With his October 2025 trademark for MrBeast Financial including crypto exchange services, he’s circling back to crypto—but NFTs like Punks aren’t mentioned. His portfolio now favors BTC $1.5M+ HODL from 2021 and utility tokens over collectibles.

If MrBeast ever flips back into Punks unlikely given his business pivot, it’d make waves—his 446M+ YouTube subs could drive massive liquidity. Overall, this filing positions MrBeast as a potential disruptor in influencer fintech, but success hinges on navigating regulations and execution.

Tinubu Urges Judiciary to Master Blockchain as Nigeria Softens Stance on Cryptocurrency

0

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has called on Nigeria’s judiciary to deepen its understanding of blockchain technology, cryptocurrency, and other emerging digital systems, signaling what analysts see as a clear shift from the country’s previous hardline stance on crypto under the former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) leadership.

Speaking at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)–National Judicial Institute (NJI) Workshop for Justices and Judges in Abuja, Tinubu said the sophistication of modern financial crimes requires new judicial tools and digital competence. He urged judicial officers to adapt quickly to the realities of a technology-driven financial world.

Represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima, Tinubu stated that Nigeria’s justice system must evolve to handle the complex financial offenses now being committed through digital currencies and blockchain-based platforms.

“How does one do justice in a cryptocurrency fraud case except one is grounded in such matters?” the President asked.

“Learning and relearning is no longer a buzz phrase but an essential undertaking for continued relevance in this digital age,” he said in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Communications, Stanley Nkwocha.

Tinubu’s comments mark a notable shift in tone for Nigeria’s policy direction on cryptocurrency. Until recently, authorities maintained a tough stance against crypto assets, citing their use in money laundering, terrorism financing, and capital flight.

Under former CBN Governor Godwin Emefiele, the apex bank in February 2021 issued a circular directing all financial institutions to close accounts dealing in or facilitating cryptocurrency transactions. Banks were also prohibited from engaging with crypto exchanges, a move that effectively froze digital currency activities within the formal financial system.

The CBN defended the decision as a measure to protect the financial system from illicit flows, arguing that cryptocurrencies lacked intrinsic value and operated in an unregulated environment. However, the move drew heavy criticism from fintech innovators, investors, and international observers, who said it stifled innovation and isolated Nigeria from the global digital finance ecosystem.

Despite the restrictions, Nigeria quickly emerged as one of the world’s most active peer-to-peer crypto markets. Platforms like Binance saw rising activity from Nigerian users, indicating that digital currency adoption was growing beyond the reach of traditional regulation.

Analysts say Tinubu’s recent admonition to the judiciary represents a recognition of this new reality — that cryptocurrency is no longer a fringe activity, but an integral part of global finance requiring judicial literacy, regulatory clarity, and institutional adaptation.

In his address, Tinubu also warned judicial officers to uphold integrity and independence, stressing that compromise within the justice system undermines national morality.

“The moral foundation of our nation rests squarely on the integrity of its judicial system. We draw our moral distinction as a people from the judiciary, and we owe it the reverence and autonomy to remain the last sanctuary of our collective conscience,” he stated.

He assured that his administration remains committed to enhancing judges’ welfare and protecting judicial autonomy, citing recent remuneration reviews and reforms to strengthen institutional independence.

According to Tinubu, justice delivery in the digital era must be technologically driven, ethically upright, and swift enough to restore public confidence in the rule of law.

Tinubu also noted that many Nigerians are frustrated by prolonged corruption cases involving high-profile defendants, while smaller cybercrime cases are resolved with speed.

“The theme of this year’s workshop—Enhancing Justice in the Fight Against Economic and Financial Crimes—comes at a time when many Nigerians are angered by delayed adjudication in serious corruption cases,” he said.

He urged the judiciary to embrace continuous digital learning, warning that new financial crimes exploit gaps in digital literacy.

“Your vantage position on the Bench does not insulate you from the consequences of corruption,” the President warned. “There are no special roads, hospitals, or communities for judges. A Nigeria free of corruption is possible if we all commit to doing what is right.”

Broader government recognition of digital risks

Tinubu’s comments come amid renewed government interest in understanding and regulating Nigeria’s expanding digital economy. Earlier this month, Speaker of the House of Representatives Abbas Tajudeen inaugurated an ad hoc committee to assess the economic, regulatory, and security implications of cryptocurrency adoption and Point-of-Sale (POS) operations.

Speaking in Abuja, Tajudeen said the committee was formed in response to “growing concerns over fraud, cybercrime, and consumer exploitation in the digital finance space.”

The development follows ongoing efforts by the CBN and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to design a coherent regulatory framework for digital assets — one that balances innovation with investor protection.

Analysts say Tinubu’s call to the judiciary completes a triangular shift in Nigeria’s institutional approach to crypto — from prohibition under Emefiele, to cautious re-engagement under the SEC, and now to digital literacy and judicial readiness under Tinubu’s administration.