The Federal Reserve of the United States reduced its primary interest rate by 25 basis points on October 29, 2025, lowering the target range to 3.75%-4.00%. It also announced that quantitative tightening (QT) will be terminated on December 1.
The majority of market observers expected it to mark the end of the downturn and the beginning of a new bullish phase for risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
However, instead of a sharp rally or a total collapse, the cryptocurrency markets only moved slightly, as reflected in the crypto heatmap. What made Bitcoin and Ethereum so comparatively restrained?
The market’s advanced pricing: the “no surprise” effect
One of the main reasons is that the Federal Reserve’s cut was anticipated by market participants. Analysts, traders, and automated trading systems had already factored the 25-basis-point rate cut into their calculations through futures curves, forward rates, and risk asset valuations.
In fact, Bitcoin price fell by about 2.5% after the announcement, which was a cautious reaction rather than a wave of liquidations. The mild decline suggests that most of the policy shift had already been priced into investors’ sentiment.
Rate cuts and the end of quantitative tightening (QT) typically result in increased liquidity in the financial market, which reduces returns on safe assets and diverts capital towards high-risk areas.
By that logic, crypto should benefit the most, as it is often viewed as an “on-risk” asset class. In fact, some analysts argue that by quitting QT, the Fed is releasing liquidity that would otherwise be locked in the banking system, potentially directing the flows towards crypto, DeFi, or even tech start-ups.
Yet this liquidity boost unfolds gradually and does not directly convert into aggressive short-term bids. Often, market participants wait for confirmation before allocating capital.
The Constraint of Speech — The Tone of Powell is Important
The Fed’s verbal signals are as important as the figures. Chairman Jerome Powell’s remarks revealed disagreements within the committee concerning the future interest rate cuts and signaled caution about inflation risks.
That uncertainty lessened the enthusiasm: the cut happened, however the route remained unclear. In crypto trading, where sentiment and forward guidance are predominant factors, such a stance can even suppress the potential upside.
Crypto traders were cautious with their interpretation of Powell’s words. If investors thought that further cuts were not guaranteed, they would refrain from making bullish bets.
Crypto markets are increasingly relying on their own fundamentals — such as on-chain metrics, adoption, and network usage — rather than relying solely on pure macroeconomic factors. This allows crypto markets to behave somewhat independently of traditional macroeconomic shocks, especially when these shocks are anticipated.
Several studies of past interest rate cuts suggest that the relationship between rates and crypto returns, although historically negative, is not far from perfect. During this cycle, the response has been muted in more mature markets, with prices changing substantially only when regulatory, technological, or institutional catalysts prevail over resistance.
Even in favorable macroeconomic environments, traders may prefer to take profits rather than open new positions until the announcements are made. This type of profit-taking could slow the pace of rapid price movements.
Moreover, capital-flow restraints in the crypto market — including exchange liquidity, stablecoin supply, and capital controls — slow reactions in both speed and magnitude.
In short, limited price movement is a result of several overlapping forces: the announcement was anticipated, liquidity effects are slow, the Fed’s communication was cautious, crypto now reacts less to macroeconomic factors alone, and traders remained circumspect.
